Nab-paclitaxel In Patients Research Articles

Abstract CT135: A phase 1b study of palbociclib + nab-paclitaxel in patients (pts) with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC)

Abstract Palbociclib (P), an oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, has shown antitumor activity in preclinical PDAC models. In Avatar PDAC models, P+ nab-paclitaxel (A) was more effective than either agent alone and similar to P+A+gemcitabine. This study assessed safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), preliminary efficacy, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of P+A in pts with advanced PDAC. Pts with metastatic PDAC, Karnofsky performance status ≥70 and adequate organ function were eligible. In the dose escalation phase, P was administered orally once daily at doses ranging from 75-125 mg/d for 21 of every 28 days (3/1 schedule). A was administered intravenously at 100-125 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. Additional cohorts were P 75 mg (3/1 schedule or continuously) with A (100- and 125-mg dose, biweekly). The prespecified efficacy target was 12-month survival probability >65% at MTD. In total, 76 pts (median age 61 years [range 39-75], 45% female) received a median of 4 treatment cycles (range 1-21); 44 (57.9%) pts had liver disease and 61 (80.3%) had prior treatment for advanced disease. Four dose-limiting toxicities were observed: grade 3 mucositis (1), grade 4 neutropenia (2), and febrile neutropenia (1). Grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 67 (88.2%) pts; events reported for ≥5% of pts were neutropenia (61.8%), leukopenia (26.3%), anemia (22.4%), asthenia (9.2%), lymphopenia (7.9%), and peripheral neuropathy (5.3%). PK demonstrated no significant drug-drug interactions. MTD was P 100 mg (3/1 schedule) and A 125 mg (days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days). Objective response rate and disease control rate in the 23 pts treated at MTD were 13% and 65.2%, respectively. In these pts, median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and survival probability at 12 months were 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.5-9.7), 12.1 months (95% CI: 6.4-14.8), and 50% (95% CI: 29.9%-67.2%), respectively. Thirty of 57 analyzed pts (52.6%) had an on-treatment maximum Ca 19-9 reduction >50% from baseline. In paired skin punch biopsies (26 pts at any dose level, including 13 pts at MTD), pRb decreased during P dosing, increased above baseline during the week off P, and decreased again following P dosing, demonstrating PD modulation of Rb phosphorylation. CDKN2A, RAS, and TP53 mutations were analyzed in plasma DNA; clinical outcome of pts without alterations detected (n=58, 26, and 28, respectively) was superior to those with alterations detected (n=12, 44, and 42 pts, respectively). In conclusion, P+A was tolerated, with side effects as expected based on single agent profiles, and no significant PK interactions. MTD was P 100 mg (3/1 schedule) + A 125 mg (days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days). PD observations were consistent with CDK4/6 inhibition. The combination regimen did not meet the prespecified efficacy threshold.Pfizer (NCT02501902) Citation Format: Manuel Hidalgo, Rocio Garcia Carbonero, Kian-Huat Lim, Wells Messersmith, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Erkut Borazanci, Andrew Lowy, Laura Medina Rodriguez, Daniel Laheru, Xin Huang, Meggan Tammaro, Jean-François Martini, Arthur Kudla, Kenneth Kern, Teresa Macarulla. A phase 1b study of palbociclib + nab-paclitaxel in patients (pts) with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT135.

Комбинация гемцитабина и наб-паклитаксела у больных местнораспространенным и генерализованным раком поджелудочной железы

Комбинация гемцитабина и наб-паклитаксела у больных местнораспространенным и генерализованным раком поджелудочной железы

A phase III trial of capivasertib and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (CAPItello290).

TPS1109 Background: Therapeutic options for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are limited to sequential chemotherapy, although recent advances with novel agents have been made for specific subgroups (PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors and PARP inhibitors in patients with germline BRCA mutations). The PI3K/AKT/PTEN signaling pathway is often activated in TNBC, mainly through activating mutations in PIK3CA or AKT1 and/or inactivating alterations in PTEN. The phase II PAKT study (NCT02423603) demonstrated that addition of the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib to first-line paclitaxel resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced TNBC, especially in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (Schmid et al, 2019). This phase III trial (NCT03997123) will further evaluate the efficacy and safety of capivasertib in combination with paclitaxel in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC in an unselected population and will also explore potential predictive markers of sensitivity to the combination of paclitaxel and capivasertib. Methods: Eligible patients for this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial must have metastatic TNBC or locally advanced disease not amenable to resection with curative intent. Patients must be candidates for single-agent taxane therapy and have received no prior systemic therapy for locally advanced inoperable or metastatic disease. Prior chemotherapy in the (neo)adjuvant setting must be completed ≥12 months prior to enrollment. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15) with either capivasertib 400 mg twice daily or placebo (days 2–5, 9–12 and 16–19) every 28 days, until objective radiologic disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, unacceptable toxicity or death. Stratification factors will be prior adjuvant chemotherapy, visceral versus non-visceral disease, and geographic region. Post-randomization central testing of tumor tissue (collected prior to enrollment) will be carried out to identify predictive markers of sensitivity to treatment. The primary endpoints of this study are PFS and OS. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, time to second progression or death, objective response rate, duration of response, and clinical benefit rate. Enrollment for this study started in May 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03997123 .

A single-arm, open-label, phase I study of CPI-613 (Devimistat) in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

4635 Background: Glycolic and mitochondrial metabolism are aberrant in pancreatic cancer and translate into chemoresistance. Inhibition of glutamine metabolism can potentially synergize with therapies that increase intracellular reactive oxygen species, such as nab-paclitaxel. CPI- 613 is a novel antimitochondrial agent developed by Rafael Pharmaceuticals that showed promising clinical activity in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer. Preclinical data suggested possible synergy of CPI-613 with nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Single arm, open-label, phase I study of CPI-613 with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer to determine MTD, safety, and preliminary efficacy of CPI-613 in combination with chemotherapy. Key eligibility criteria included: histologically documented and measurable locally-advanced or metastatic, PDAC. ECOG performance status 0-2; and first line systemic treatment. CPI-613 was infused intravenously with a starting dose of 500 mg/m2 followed by modified dose nab-paclitaxel (100mg/m2) and gemcitabine ( 800 mg/m2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The the primary endpoint, the MTD of CPI-613 was determined by a two-stage, dose-escalation schema, with 6-month treatment duration for patients exhibiting treatment response. Secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events, complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Results: From February 2018 to 2020, 26 patients were screened, (23 metastatic and 3 locally advanced), 22 patients enrolled and 18 patients underwent a restaging scan. As of the time of submission 3 patients are still on active treatment. Patient demographics were: median age of 65, ECOG was 0-1, The MTD of CPI- 613 was determined to be 1500 mg/m2. The dose limiting toxicities were not achieved. Overall the treatment was well tolerated with toxicities mainly related to chemotherapy; most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic toxicity and neuropathy. 1 patient achieved CR, 9 PR, 8 stable disease and 1 progressive disease for an objective response rate of 50% with a CR rate of 5.5%. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that CPI 613 can be safely administered with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel at doses up to 1,500 m/g2. Efficacy data suggest synergy with chemotherapy. Further clinical studies of CPI-613 efficacy in pancreatic cancer are in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT03435289 .

ABREAST: a prospective, real-world study on the effect of nab-paclitaxel treatment on clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. However, real-world evidence on effectiveness remains limited. The primary objective of this multicenter prospective study was to assess the overall response rate (ORR) of patients with MBC treated with nab-paclitaxel. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life, assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) instrument. Eligible patients (N = 150; 36% with de novo MBC presentation) with a median age of 64.5years were enrolled (86% were ER+, 33.3% (50/150) were ≥ 70years of age and 53% were treated in the third or later line of treatment). A median of 6 cycles were administered but 26% of patients required dose reduction due to toxicity. The ORR was 26.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.6-33.7], the median PFS was 6.2months (95% CI 5.2-7.3), and the median OS 21.1months (95% CI 17.2-not estimable). There was no statistical significant difference in the median PFS of patients < and ≥ 70years of age. The patients' baseline FACT-B total score remained unchanged. The serious and non-serious adverse event incidence rates were 13% and 48%, respectively. This prospective study provides further evidence on quality of life, efficacy, and safety of nab-paclitaxel in patients with MBC and sheds more light in special subpopulations such as the elderly and those treated beyond the second line.

BRD4 inhibition suppresses PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on the surface of tumour cells can cause tumour immune evasion. Benefits of combining anti-PD-L1 therapy with nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have been reported. However, some patients cannot tolerate the immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) caused by antibody-based immunotherapy. BRD4 is a member of the bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) family. BRD4 inhibition has shown antitumour effects in many tumours, but its role in TNBC has not been definitively concluded. In particular, the immune regulation of BRD4 in TNBC has been rarely studied. In this study, we used JQ1, a BET inhibitor, and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting BRD4 to explore the influence of BRD4 on PD-L1 expression in TNBC. The results indicated that BRD4 inhibition suppressed PD-L1 expression and the PD-L1 upregulation induced by interferon-γ (IFN-γ). In the in vivo experiments, we found that JQ1 not only reduced the PD-L1 expression level but also changed the proportions of T lymphocyte subsets in the spleens of tumour-bearing mice, which helped to relieve immunosuppression. Briefly, our study reveals that BRD4 regulates PD-L1 expression and may provide a potential method for blocking the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immune checkpoint in TNBC.

Abstract A76: Efficacy of immunotherapy agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in phase I clinical trials

Abstract Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) agents have demonstrated exceptional clinical benefit in patients with many tumor types, including melanoma and lung cancer. The PD-L1 inhibitor, atezolizumab, was recently FDA approved in combination with nab-paclitaxel for patients with PD-L1 positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors demonstrate modest efficacy in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of IO agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in phase I clinical trials. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using a database of patients with metastatic breast cancer who received treatment with IO agents in phase I/Ib clinical trials at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus from January 1, 2012 to July 1, 2018. Abstracted data included patient demographics, baseline characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Results: 208 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated in phase I/Ib clinical trials; 43 were treated with an IO agent. The average age was 53 years old and 55.8% had hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, 39.5% TNBC, and 4.6% HER2-positive disease. On average, patients received two prior lines of chemotherapy (range 0-7) in the metastatic setting. 31/43 patients (72.1%) received single agent or combination IO, and 12/43 (27.9%) received IO + chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months in all patients. 9/43 (21%) of patients remained on study &amp;gt; 6 months and had a median PFS of 8.6 months. Patients remaining on study &amp;gt; 6 months were more likely to be treated with IO + chemotherapy compared to patients with a PFS &amp;lt; 6 months (77.8% v. 14.7%, p=0.0007). There was no difference in sites of metastasis, prior lines of chemotherapy, breast cancer subtype, absolute lymphocyte count, or LDH between patients with a PFS &amp;gt; 6 months compared to &amp;lt; 6 months. Conclusions: A subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in phase I clinical trials at our center with an IO agent had derived prolonged clinical benefit. The benefit was not limited to patients with TNBC and was associated with receipt of chemotherapy in combination with IO. Predictors of response to immunotherapy in breast cancer beyond PD-L1 expression remain uncharacterized, and further research is needed to identify these factors. Citation Format: Jodi A. Kagihara, Jennifer A. Weiss, Andrew Nicklawsky, Dexiang Gao, Virginia F. Borges, Peter Kabos, Antonio Jimeno, Jennifer R. Diamond. Efficacy of immunotherapy agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in phase I clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2019 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A76.

Atezolizumab for the treatment of breast cancer

ABSTRACTIntroduction: In March 2019, atezolizumab became the first immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive a breast cancer-specific approval. Based on a significant improvement in progression-free survival as well as a 10-month improvement in overall survival (on interim analysis) seen in the IMpassion 130 trial, the combination of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel was approved for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Areas covered: This article reviews current data and ongoing research on atezolizumab for the treatment of breast cancer. Results of atezolizumab monotherapy trials in the context of other early immune checkpoint blockade trials in breast cancer are discussed as well as data from combination clinical trials with chemotherapy in both early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. We focus on the safety and efficacy analyses from the phase III IMpassion trial that led to FDA and EMA approval of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients whose tumor tested positive for PD-L1 by the Ventana SP142 companion diagnostic immunohistochemical assay.Expert opinion: The FDA and EMA approvals of atezolizumab mark an important advance for treatment of metastatic TNBC. However, ongoing investigations need to define better biomarkers of response, determine resistance mechanisms, and identify strategies to increase response rates.

Abstract P2-15-04: Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized, optimal dose finding, phase II study of triweekly nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (the ABROAD study)

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has superior efficacy compared to conventional paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is more frequent with nab-PTX. In a single arm phase 2 trial (CA002-0LD), low dose nab-PTX (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (q3w) resulted in a good objective response rate (39.5%) without CIPN of grade 3 or higher. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate the optimal dose of nab-PTX by comparing a low dose (LD) and a medium dose (MD) to the standard dose (SD). Here, we evaluate the patients-reported outcomes (PROs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the ABROAD study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three different doses of q3w nab-PTX (SD: 260 mg/m2 vs. MD: 220 mg/m2 vs. LD: 180 mg/m2) were administered in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Grade 3/4 neuropathy rates with the three doses were estimated by logistic regression. The optimal dose was selected by 2-step selection. First, if the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was &amp;lt;0.75 or &amp;gt;1.33, the inferior dose was dropped. Then, a dose with an estimated incidence of grade 3/4 neurotoxicity &amp;gt;10% was also dropped. PROs and HRQoL were assessed as secondary endpoints at baseline, and during the 2nd, 4th and 6th courses of protocol treatment using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-Taxane), Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ), Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS) and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D). The primary outcome for PROs and HRQoL was the FACT-Taxane trial outcome index (TOI), and inter-group comparison was performed using a mixed effect model for repeated measures (MMRM). This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID C000012429). RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were randomly assigned to SD (n=47), MD (n=46) or LD (n=48) nab-PTX. PFS analysis showed that LD nab-PTX at 180 mg/m2/3 weeks was the optimal dose with good clinical efficacy and tolerability for patients with MBC (reported by Hara at ASCO2019). Longitudinal analysis (MMRM) showed that the difference from the baseline FACT-Taxane TOI score at MD and LD were significantly better than that at SD (MD vs. SD p&amp;lt;0.001, LD vs. SD p&amp;lt;0.001). Differences from baseline for the FACT-Taxane total score, physical well-being sub-score, and emotional well-being sub-score at MD and LD were also better than at SD. The difference from baseline for the CFS score at LD was better than that at SD (p=0.013) and those for EQ-5D utility scores at MD and LD were better than that at SD (MD vs. SD p=0.011, LD vs. SD p&amp;lt;0.001). There were no significant differences for the PNQ. CONCLUSION: Our results show that low dose nab-PTX at 180 mg/m2/3 weeks could be an optimal dose for PFS and from the perspectives of PROs and HRQoL. Citation Format: Hiroaki Kato, Fumikata Hara, Masahiro Kitada, Masato Takahashi, Yuichiro Kikawa Yuichiro Kikawa, Eiko Sakata, Yoichi Naito, Yoshie Hasegawa, Tsuyoshi Saito, Tsutomu Iwasa, Junji Tsurutani, Naruto Taira, Tsutomu Takashima, Kosuke Kashiwabara, Tomohiko Aihara Tomohiko Aihara, Hirofumi Mukai. Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized, optimal dose finding, phase II study of triweekly nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (the ABROAD study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-15-04.

Abstract OT2-08-02: Capivasertib and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: A phase III trial (CAPItello-290)

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) generally has an aggressive clinical course, including distant metastases and increased likelihood of death within 5 years of diagnosis compared with non-TNBCs. Therapeutic options for metastatic TNBC patients are limited to sequential chemotherapy, although recent advances with novel agents have been made for specific subgroups (PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors and PARP inhibitors in germline BRCA-mutant patients). However, improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) derived from immune-oncology and PARP inhibitors are still insufficient in terms of informing patient selection and overall magnitude of benefit. Developing novel treatments in both early and advanced TNBC settings remains a significant unmet need in the management of advanced breast cancer. The PI3K/AKT/PTEN signaling pathway is often activated in TNBC, mainly through activating mutations in PIK3CA or AKT1 and/or inactivating alterations in PTEN. The Phase II PAKT study (NCT02423603) demonstrated that addition of the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib to first-line paclitaxel resulted in significantly longer PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced TNBC, especially in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (Schmid, 2018). The Phase III trial we report (NCT03997123) will further evaluate the efficacy and safety of capivasertib in combination with paclitaxel in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC in an unselected population and will also explore potential predictive markers of sensitivity to the combination of paclitaxel and capivasertib. Methods: Eligible patients for this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial must have metastatic TNBC or locally advanced disease not amenable to resection with curative intent. Patients must be candidates for single-agent taxane therapy and have received no prior systemic therapy for locally advanced inoperable or metastatic disease. Prior chemotherapy in the (neo)adjuvant setting must be completed ≥12 months prior to enrollment. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15) with either capivasertib 400 mg twice daily or placebo (days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19) every 28 days until objective radiologic disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Stratification factors will be prior adjuvant chemotherapy, visceral vs non-visceral disease, and geographic region. Post-randomization central testing of tumor tissue (collected prior to enrollment) will be carried out to identify predictive markers of sensitivity to treatment. The primary endpoints of this study are PFS and OS. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, time to second progression or death, objective response rate, duration of response, and clinical benefit rate. Enrollment for this study opened in May 2019. Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Javier Cortes, Mark Robson, Hiroji Iwata, Roberto Hegg, Sunil Verma, Marina Nechaeva, Binghe Xu, Vincent Haddad, Esteban Rodrigo Imedio, Gaia Schiavon, Andrew Foxley, Yeon Hee Park. Capivasertib and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: A phase III trial (CAPItello-290) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-08-02.

A phase II trial of pharmacological ascorbate, gemcitabine, and nabpaclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

TPS791 Background: FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel are both frontline chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic pancreas cancer. For most who cannot tolerate the triplet, the latter doublet is the preferred option. Through previous work by our group, pharmacologic ascorbate is known to synergize with gemcitabine; preliminary in vitro data from our group suggests a similar synergistic response with paclitaxel. Though ascorbate has been utilized in cancer therapy, few robust trials have investigated intravenous delivery of ascorbate to deliver plasma concentrations that are cytotoxic to tumor cells. Our prior studies have demonstrated ascorbate induces oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer cells; this cytotoxicity appears to be greater in tumor vs. normal cells. We hypothesize that production of hydrogen peroxide mediates the increased susceptibility of pancreatic cancer cells to ascorbate-induced metabolic oxidative stress, resulting in improved treatment outcomes, which has led to the development of the clinical trial (NCT02905578). Methods: All participants receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 weekly) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on cycle days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Participants are randomized to ± pharmacologic ascorbate (75-gram infusion 3x weekly) in addition to chemotherapy. Study therapy continues until tumor progression. The primary objective is to determine overall survival in patients when treated with combination gemcitabine, nab-Paclitaxel and high-dose ascorbic acid compared to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer. Secondary objectives include determining objective response rate as well as progression free survival using RECIST 1.1 criteria employing a blinded reviewer for RECIST measurements. The study opened to accrual in 2018 with a goal of enrolling 65 participants. Oversight.Study is conducted under IND 105715 (J. Cullen, sponsor). The University of Iowa Biomedical IRB (IRB-01) serves as the IRB of record. Clinical trial information: NCT02905578.

A phase II trial of low-dose nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously treated or recurrent advanced gastric cancer (OGSG1302).

350 Background: Paclitaxel is a key drug in second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC) and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is also widely used in Japan. A previous phase II trial in Japan showed the effectiveness of nab-PTX (260 mg/m2) administered every 3 weeks (q3w) in patients with AGC with a response rate (RR) of 27.8%; however, toxicity was major concern with grade ≥3 neutropenia (49.1%) and peripheral neuropathy (23.6%). To solve this problem, we investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose q3w nab-PTX regimen in AGC. Methods: Eligibility requirements included: aged ≥20 years, HER2-negative, histologically confirmed, unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma, one or more prior chemotherapy containing fluoropyrimidine regimens, presence of measurable lesion(s) according to RECIST ver. 1.1, ECOG PS of 0–2, and adequate organ function. Nab-PTX was administered at a dose of 220 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RR. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events, relative dose intensity and proportion of patients who received subsequent chemotherapy. Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled from 10 institutions in Japan. Of the 32 patients treated with protocol therapy, RR (CR, PR) was 3.1% (95% CI, 0–16.2%), which was not reached the protocol-specified threshold (p = 0.966). DCR (CR, PR, SD) was 37.5% (95% CI, 21.1–56.3%), median OS and PFS were 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.4–14.2) and 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.1). Relative dose intensity was 97.8% (215 mg/m2). 62.5% of patients received subsequent chemotherapy. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (38%), anemia (13%), fatigue (19%), anorexia (16%), and peripheral neuropathy (13%). Conclusions: Low-dose regimen of q3w nab-PTX was slightly less toxic, although it did not demonstrate the same effect as the original regimen in response rate. Therefore, it is not recommended for AGC in second or later line setting. Clinical trial information: UMIN 000012701.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus nab-paclitaxel for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Background:Immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is now the standard first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, limited evidence exists to show the efficacy of immunotherapy plus taxanes for patients who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.Methods:The immunotherapy naïve patients with metastatic NSCLC who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or combined with nab-paclitaxel after prior platinum-based chemotherapy from 2015 to 2018 in PLA General Hospital were identified. The progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety were assessed.Results:Of 57 patients, 40 were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and 17 were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus nab-paclitaxel. With a median OS follow-up of 16.3 months, the nab-paclitaxel group showed significantly longer OS compared with the immune monotherapy group (median, 28.6 months versus 15.9 months, log-rank p = 0.020). When adjusted by covariates in COX proportional regression model, both the treatment group [p = 0.009, hazard ratio (HR) 0.361; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.168–0.773] and performance status (p = 0.003, HR 0.372; 95% CI 0.192–0.721) demonstrated independent association with the longer OS from combination therapy. In addition, ORR was 23.5% (4/17) in the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) plus nab-paclitaxel group versus 13.5% (5/37) in immune monotherapy group (p = 0.439), with a DCR of 88.2% (15/17) and 59.5% (22/37) (p = 0.034), respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events was 23.5% (4/17) in the combination group and 2.5% (1/40) in the immune monotherapy group.Conclusion:PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus nab-paclitaxel resulted in significantly longer OS and higher response versus ICI single agent in metastatic NSCLC patients who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings need to be further explored by prospective studies.

Phase 2 study of vismodegib, a hedgehog inhibitor, combined with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BackgroundThe Hedgehog (Hh) signalling pathway is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Preclinical studies have shown that Hh inhibitors reduce pancreatic cancer stem cells (pCSC), stroma and Hh signalling.MethodsPatients with previously untreated metastatic PDA were treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Vismodegib was added starting on the second cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as compared with historical controls. Tumour biopsies to assess pCSC, stroma and Hh signalling were obtained before treatment and after cycle 1 (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) or after cycle 2 (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel plus vismodegib).ResultsSeventy-one patients were enrolled. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 5.42 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.37–6.97) and 9.79 months (95% CI: 7.85–10.97), respectively. Of the 67 patients evaluable for response, 27 (40%) had a response: 26 (38.8%) partial responses and 1 complete response. In the tumour samples, there were no significant changes in ALDH + pCSC following treatment.ConclusionsAdding vismodegib to chemotherapy did not improve efficacy as compared with historical rates observed with chemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study does not support the further evaluation of Hh inhibitors in this patient population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01088815.

Abstract PR07: Phase I/II study of mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin LMB-100 with nab-paclitaxel for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Abstract Purpose: LMB-100 recombinant immunotoxin (iTox) consists of a mesothelin-binding Fab for targeting and a modified Pseudomonas exotoxin A payload. Preclinical studies showed that combining taxanes with iTox results in synergistic antitumor activity. The primary objectives of this phase I/II study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LMB-100 when given with nanoalbumin bound (nab)-paclitaxel to participants with previously treated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to assess the objective response rate. Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 20) received fixed-dose nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8) with LMB-100 (65 or 100 mcg/kg on Days 1, 3, and 5) in 21-day cycles. Treatment was limited to 2-3 cycles by protocol. Safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and relationship of activity to tumor mesothelin expression were assessed. Results: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Grade 3 myalgia was observed in 2 of 5 patients treated with 100 mcg/kg. DLT of Grade 3 edema from capillary leak syndrome (CLS) was observed in 1 of 6 patients at MTD of 65 mcg/kg. Severe toxicities of Grade 4 left ventricular dysfunction and hypotension from CLS were observed in 1 patient in the phase II expansion, resulting in study closure. LMB-100 anti-drug antibody formation limited LMB-100 exposure in 5 of 13 patients during cycle 2. Seven of 17 patients with evaluable CA19-9 experienced &amp;gt;50% decrease of this tumor marker, and one patient developed a partial response. Response was associated with higher tumor mesothelin expression and Cycle 2 LMB-100 exposure. Conclusions: The combination caused serious toxicity. Despite some observed clinical activity, further testing of this combination will not be pursued. This abstract is also being presented as Poster B01. Citation Format: Christine C. Alewine, Mehwish Ahmad, Cody J. Peer, Zishuo Hu, Min-jung Lee, Akiro Yuno, Jessica Kindrick, Anish Thomas, Seth Steinberg, Jane B. Trepel, William D. Figg, Raffit Hassan, Ira Pastan. Phase I/II study of mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin LMB-100 with nab-paclitaxel for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Science and Clinical Care; 2019 Sept 6-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PR07.

359P - Reproducibility and concordance of 4 clinically developed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

359P - Reproducibility and concordance of 4 clinically developed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

P2.01-95 Updated Data of KRSG 1302 Study: Nedaplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer

P2.01-95 Updated Data of KRSG 1302 Study: Nedaplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer

708P - A phase I/Ib, multi-center trial of ARQ-761 (Beta-Lapachone) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

BackgroundARQ761 (β-lapachone) is a hydroquinone analog that exploits the unique elevation of NQO1 found in 90% of pancreatic cancer cells and causes tumor-specific cell death by eliciting a futile redox cycle generating high levels of reactive oxygen species and ultimately PARP1 hyperactivation-dependent cell death. ARQ761 induces cell death which is: (i) not dependent on p53 status; (ii) not dependent on cell cycle status; (iii) not affected by known oncogenic driver or carrier mutations; and (iv) not affected by loss of caspases. We demonstrated that ARQ761 has synergistic antitumor activity with chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer preclinical models. MethodsThis was a single arm phase-1b clinical trial of ARQ-761 plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for patients with pancreatic cancer. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ARQ 761 in combination with chemotherapy. Secondary objectives were to assess clinical activity, safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamic effects. Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma not treated with prior gemcitabine with adequate hematologic, renal and liver function and good performance status were enrolled. Dose levels are described in the table. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess for NQO1 expression. ResultsFifteen patients were evaluable for safety, 67% were male, 53% had received prior chemotherapy and 96% tested positive for NQO1 expression. The most common treatment related toxicities were anemia and fatigue. The following dose limiting toxicities were observed (dose level 1: neutropenia, anemia, dose level -1 fatigue). The maximum tolerated dose of ARQ761/gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is 156/800/100mg/m2. Tumour response was stable disease in 53% Pharmacodynamic analysis was performed on post treatment biopsies. ConclusionsWe report results of a phase 1b clinical trial of the novel NQO1 bioactivatable compound, ARQ761, in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Treatment related toxicities were observed which were noted in preclinical models and managed with routine dose adjustment. Clinical trial identificationNCT02514031. Legal entity responsible for the studyUT Southwestern Medical Center. FundingPancreatic Cancer Action Network, Rising Tide, Gateway, Arqule Pharmaceuticals. DisclosureM.S. Beg: Research grant / Funding (institution): Arqule; Advisory / Consultancy: Array; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Boston Biomedical; Advisory / Consultancy: Guardant; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech. D. Boothman: Research grant / Funding (institution): Arqule; Advisory / Consultancy: Toray global; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: systems oncology. Y. Arriaga: Full / Part-time employment: IBM. A. Sanjeeviaiah: Advisory / Consultancy, 1500$: Guardant health. B. Schwartz: Full / Part-time employment: Arqule. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

695P - Phase I/II study of LDE225 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

BackgroundIn pancreatic cancer desmoplasia is a central feature of the tumour microenvironment. Growing evidence suggests that by targeting both tumour cells and tumour stoma, treatment efficacy is increased. LDE225 is a pharmacological Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor and is thought to specifically target tumour stroma. We investigated the combined use of LDE225 and chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. MethodsThis was a multi-center, dose finding, phase I/II study for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. In part I of the study, we established the maximum tolerated dose of LDE225 to be 200mg once daily co-administered with gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 and nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4 week cycle (ESMO 2017). The objective of the phase II part was to evaluate efficacy and safety of the treatment combination and assess tumour cellularity and vascularity with diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Tumour response evaluation was performed using CT scan. Here we report on the phase II part of the study. ResultsIn the phase II part we included 25 patients. Most patients had WHO performance status of 0-1 (92%) and 60% were male. All patients received prior chemotherapy. Patients were treated with a median number of two cycles (IQR 1.5-5.0). Four therapy related grade 4 adverse events (AE) were observed: sepsis (2), neutropenia (2), and one grade 5 (sepsis). Most common grade 3 therapy related AEs were neutropenia (37%) and diarrhea (14.8%). Patients discontinued treatment because of progressive disease (20), bacterial infection (1), sepsis (1) and diminished quality of life (1). 2 patients are still alive. In 19 patients target lesion response was evaluable, 2 patients had partial response (10%), stable disease was seen in 10 patients (53%) and 7 patients had progressive disease (37%). The median overall survival was 6 months (IQR 3.0-8.5). Tumour vascularity and cellularity is currently being analyzed in 25 patients. ConclusionsThis study shows that LDE225 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is well-tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and has promising efficacy. Clinical trial identificationNCT02358161. Legal entity responsible for the studyJ.W. Wilmink. FundingNovartis, Celgene and Sunpharma. DisclosureH.W.M. van Laarhoven: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lily; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Philips. H.W. Wilmink: Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Shire. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

EP1.01-04 Phase I/II Trial of Biweekly Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: NJLCG1402

EP1.01-04 Phase I/II Trial of Biweekly Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: NJLCG1402