A phase II trial of low-dose nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously treated or recurrent advanced gastric cancer (OGSG1302).

Abstract

350 Background: Paclitaxel is a key drug in second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC) and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is also widely used in Japan. A previous phase II trial in Japan showed the effectiveness of nab-PTX (260 mg/m2) administered every 3 weeks (q3w) in patients with AGC with a response rate (RR) of 27.8%; however, toxicity was major concern with grade ≥3 neutropenia (49.1%) and peripheral neuropathy (23.6%). To solve this problem, we investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose q3w nab-PTX regimen in AGC. Methods: Eligibility requirements included: aged ≥20 years, HER2-negative, histologically confirmed, unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma, one or more prior chemotherapy containing fluoropyrimidine regimens, presence of measurable lesion(s) according to RECIST ver. 1.1, ECOG PS of 0–2, and adequate organ function. Nab-PTX was administered at a dose of 220 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RR. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events, relative dose intensity and proportion of patients who received subsequent chemotherapy. Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled from 10 institutions in Japan. Of the 32 patients treated with protocol therapy, RR (CR, PR) was 3.1% (95% CI, 0–16.2%), which was not reached the protocol-specified threshold (p = 0.966). DCR (CR, PR, SD) was 37.5% (95% CI, 21.1–56.3%), median OS and PFS were 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.4–14.2) and 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.1). Relative dose intensity was 97.8% (215 mg/m2). 62.5% of patients received subsequent chemotherapy. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (38%), anemia (13%), fatigue (19%), anorexia (16%), and peripheral neuropathy (13%). Conclusions: Low-dose regimen of q3w nab-PTX was slightly less toxic, although it did not demonstrate the same effect as the original regimen in response rate. Therefore, it is not recommended for AGC in second or later line setting. Clinical trial information: UMIN 000012701.