Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in subjects >75 years of age, a healthcare problem that will increase as the population continues to age. In the United States, the predicted population >75 years of age will exceed 50 million by the year 2038. Epidemiological studies have shown that the prevalence of mitral regurgitation (MR) also increases progressively with age; thus, MR is a common and growing problem in the elderly.1 The most frequently encountered types of MR in the elderly are degenerative mitral valve disease, which results from primary floppy, myxomatous valves with prolapsing or flail leaflets and calcified mitral annulus, and ischemic MR (IMR), now that rheumatic mitral valve disease has declined and endocarditis remains comparatively rare. Article p 265 Although there are American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the optimal management of a broad spectrum of patients with severe MR,2 attention has not focused specifically on the elderly, in whom the condition predominates. In addition, operative mortality is increased in the elderly by major comorbidities that include coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and renal insufficiency. Furthermore, little is known regarding the difference in life expectancy and risk of adverse events in elderly patients with severe MR undergoing successful mitral valve surgery versus those who decline or are denied surgical intervention. A delicate balance must be struck in optimally managing elderly patients with severe MR that not only favors symptomatic benefit over perioperative risk of an adverse clinical outcome, but also improves long-term outcome with regard to morbidity and mortality. Over the past 2 decades, surgical strategies in the treatment of MR have changed from routine mitral valve replacement to mitral valve repair. Because the surgeons’ understanding of normal mitral valve functional anatomy has improved, largely because of …
Read full abstract