A perusal of modern texts on pathological anatomy gives us but little information on the subject of the myxosarcoma. A few sentences, or at most a short paragraph, usually suffice for description of this type of neoplasm, and the statements made are often misleading or more than usually vague. Yet during the past century a voluminous literature has been published on, and a vast amount of research devoted to, the myxomatous tumors. Early to attract the attention of pioneers in pathological anatomy, these neoplasms have, through succeeding generations, presented for solution problems which still remain unsolved. The fact that myxomatous or pseudomyxomatous tissue at times appears in many different types of tumor further complicates the study. Maximow makes the definite statement that mucous connective tissue is not present in adult mammals, and continues: “It is found during the development of the embryo in many places of its body, as under the skin, and is a form of the common, loose, irregular connective tissue.” Early investigators made intensive studies of this type of tissue in the gelatinous matrix of the umbilical cord, Wharton's jelly. Frey and others thought that they could demonstrate that the cord is composed of a cellular reservoir with anastomosing tubes on which could condense, in surrounding them, a system of channels, resulting from the condensation of the mucous substance. Thus each cell or branch would occupy the axis of a young connective tissue fiber which would completely enclose it. The interior of these channels would be filled with mucus, containing here and there some embryonic cells, destined later to form fat cells. This conception was valiantly contested by Renaut, who brought evidence to show that the mucin of the cord is not confined in canals or lymphatics, but that it is found in cords or strands of varying size, on which the connective-tissue cells are placed as plaques. He also showed that these connective-tissue cells, fibroblastic in type, did not form a complete sac for the mucin or jelly. It is quite probable that the apparent canalization of Wharton's jelly, and the formation of strands in it, may have been due to the preparation of tissue for microscopic study and did not represent actual conditions found during life. “The intercellular substance [of the cord] is soft, jelly-like, and homogeneous in fresh condition; when fixed, it contains granules and fibrillar precipitates. It gives the reaction for mucin” (Maximow p. 94).
Read full abstract