Mutation-specific Testing Research Articles

PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS FOR HUNTINGTON’S DISEASE - CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Background: Huntington’s disease is a rare, neurodegenerative, autosomal dominant disorder with adult onset caused by an expansion of 36 or more CAG trinucleotide repeats in the HTT gene. In Brazil and in some other countries, carriers of HTT’s expanded allele of submitted to in vitro fertilization procedure can investigate embryos genetically to identify the ones that have inherited the expanded allele and the ones that inherited only the normal size alleles. In some instances, an individual has a positive familial history for the disease and do not want to know his/her personal carrier status but is willing to conceive children without the disease. Objective: to demonstrate the reproductive possibilities available to patients with Huntington disease through a case report and literature review. Methods: Here, we discussed the application and viability of the genetic screening techniques, based on a non-disclosure case of Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT). Results: a couple submitted to a non-disclosure test for Huntington disease was submitted to IVF, embryo biopsy and genetic analysis of the samples due to a familial history of the condition. Chromosome and mutation specific tests were applied, and one embryo was selected for uterine transfer. The couple was not informed why the other embryos were discharged. Conclusion: Although many ethical and practical aspects are involved in this decision, a non-disclosure PGT can be offered as an option for these couples, besides sperm, egg or embryo adoption, or child adoption.

A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo‐Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations

The aim of this study was to assess attitudes toward ovarian cancer risk management options for BRCA mutation carriers in healthy Italian women, and to identify predictors of the preference for risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) over surveillance. One hundred eighty-one women aged 30-45 completed a questionnaire about preferences, knowledge, risk perception, and socio-demographic information. Participants were randomly presented with a pamphlet about BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-specific testing, consequences of testing and preventive options for carriers, and they were stratified by having children or not and by age group. Surveillance was the preferred option (64.6%), followed by RRSO (24.3%). Although RRSO is the only effective strategy available to BRCA carriers, most healthy women faced for the first time with this option may not consider it as their preferred choice. Predictors associated with a higher likelihood to prefer surgery over surveillance were: knowing that life expectancy is longer with surgery, perceived comprehension of the consequences of testing, previous knowledge about BRCA testing, anticipated worry about developing cancer, and feelings of risk. Childbearing intentions and the effect of childbearing intentions on choice were associated with a lower preference for surgery. Further research is needed to confirm the role of the factors identified in this study in order to promote informed decision-making about RRSO.

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is an established alternative to pre-natal diagnosis, and involves selecting pre-implantation embryos from a cohort generated by assisted reproduction technology (ART). This selection may be required because of familial monogenic disease (e.g. cystic fibrosis), or because one partner carries a chromosome rearrangement (e.g. a two-way reciprocal translocation). PGD is available for couples who have had previous affected children, and/or in the case of chromosome rearrangements, recurrent miscarriages, or infertility. Oocytes aspirated following ovarian stimulation are fertilized by in vitro immersion in semen (IVF) or by intracytoplasmic injection of an individual spermatozoon (ICSI). Pre-implantation cleavage-stage embryos are biopsied, usually by the removal of a single cell on day 3 post-fertilization, and the biopsied cell is tested to establish the genetic status of the embryo. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on the fixed nuclei of biopsied cells with target-specific DNA probes is the technique of choice to detect chromosome imbalance associated with chromosome rearrangements, and to select female embryos in families with X-linked disease for which there is no mutation-specific test. FISH has also been used to screen embryos for spontaneous chromosome aneuploidy (also known as PGS or PGD-AS) in order to try and improve the efficiency of assisted reproduction; however, the predictive value of this test using the spreading and FISH technique described here is likely to be unacceptably low in most people's hands and it is not recommended for routine clinical use. We describe the selection of suitable probes for single-cell FISH, spreading techniques for blastomere nuclei, and in situ hybridization and signal scoring, applied to PGD in a clinical setting.

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is an established alternative to pre-natal diagnosis, and involves selecting pre-implantation embryos from a cohort generated by assisted reproduction technology (ART). This selection may be required because of familial monogenic disease (e.g. cystic fibrosis), or because one partner carries a chromosome rearrangement (e.g. a two-way reciprocal translocation). PGD is available for couples who have had previous affected children, and/or in the case of chromosome rearrangements, recurrent miscarriages, or infertility. Oocytes aspirated following ovarian stimulation are fertilized by in vitro immersion in semen (IVF) or by intracytoplasmic injection of an individual spermatozoon (ICSI). Pre-implantation cleavage-stage embryos are biopsied, usually by the removal of a single cell on day 3 post-fertilization, and the biopsied cell is tested to establish the genetic status of the embryo. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on the fixed nuclei of biopsied cells with target-specific DNA probes is the technique of choice to detect chromosome imbalance associated with chromosome rearrangements, and to select female embryos in families with X-linked disease for which there is no mutation-specific test. FISH has also been used to screen embryos for spontaneous chromosome aneuploidy (also known as PGS or PGD-AS) in order to try and improve the efficiency of assisted reproduction; however, the predictive value of this test using the spreading and FISH technique described here is likely to be unacceptably low in most people's hands and it is not recommended for routine clinical use. We describe the selection of suitable probes for single-cell FISH, spreading techniques for blastomere nuclei, and in situ hybridization and signal scoring, applied to PGD in a clinical setting.

Proof of principle and first cases using preimplantation genetic haplotyping – a paradigm shift for embryo diagnosis

Preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) proof-of-principle was demonstrated by multiple displacement amplification (MDA) of single buccal cells from a female donor and genotyping using 12 polymorphic markers within the dystrophin gene; the known paternal genotype enabled identification of the paternal haplotype in the MDA products despite 27% allele dropout. MDA amplified DNA from 49 single human blastomeres with 100% success. The MDA products were genotyped using a total of 57 polymorphic markers for chromosomes 1, 7, 13, 18, 21, X and Y; 72% of alleles amplified providing results at 90% of the loci tested. A PGH cycle was carried out for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. One embryo was biopsied: PGH showed a non-carrier female, which was transferred with no resulting pregnancy. A PGH cycle was carried out for cystic fibrosis. Seven embryos were biopsied and PGH allowed the exclusion of 2 affected embryos; a carrier and a non-carrier embryo were transferred resulting in an on-going twin pregnancy. PGH represents a paradigm shift in embryo diagnosis, as one panel of markers can be used for all carriers of the same monogenic disease, bypassing the need for development of mutation-specific tests, and widening the scope and availability of preimplantation genetic testing.

Genetic Testing for Inherited Colon Cancer

The genes associated with each of the inherited syndromes of colon cancer have now been identified, and genetic testing is available for diagnosis. These syndromes include familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, and, possibly, Cowden's syndrome. Clinical genetic testing approaches have been developed for each of these syndromes and are now a part of accepted clinical care. Disease-causing mutations can be found in the majority of families affected with one of the inherited syndromes, and, most importantly, once a mutation is found in an index case of the family, relatives can be tested for the presence or absence of that mutation with near 100% accuracy. Cancer screening and management in syndrome families is then based on the results of genetic testing. For the physician to order and properly interpret genetic tests, a basic understanding of the types of mutations that lead to inherited disease and the methods for detecting them is vital. These issues will be presented. Additional clinical issues somewhat unique to genetic testing include genetic counseling and informed consent for genetic testing, both of which will also be reviewed. Often the most difficult aspect of genetic testing is deciding which patients and families should undergo the testing. Furthermore, this issue is quite specific for each of the syndromes. Thus, following presentation of general principles of selection for genetic testing, a detailed approach for identifying persons who should undergo testing for each of the individual syndromes will be given, together with relevant descriptions of the syndromes. Finally, the ongoing work to discover new and possibly more common but less penetrant colon cancer susceptibility genes that cause common familial colon cancer will be presented.

Canine cystinuria: polymorphism in the canine SLC3A1 gene and identification of a nonsense mutation in cystinuric Newfoundland dogs.

Cystinuria is an inherited renal and intestinal disease characterized by defective amino acid reabsorption and cystine urolithiasis. Different forms of the disease, designated type I and non-type I in cystinuric humans, can be distinguished clinically and biochemically, and have been associated with mutations in the SLC3A1 (rBAT) and SLC7A9 genes, respectively. Type I cystinuria is the most common form and is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait in humans. Cystinuria has been recognized in more than 60 breeds of dogs and a severe form, resembling type I cystinuria, has been characterized in the Newfoundland breed. Here we report the cloning and sequencing of the canine SLC3A1 cDNA and gene, and the identification of a nonsense mutation in exon 2 of the gene in cystinuric Newfoundland dogs. A mutation-specific test was developed for the diagnosis and control of cystinuria in Newfoundland dogs. In cystinuric dogs of six other breeds, either heterozygosity at the SLC3A1 locus or lack of mutations in the coding region of the SLC3A1 gene were observed, indicating that cystinuria is genetically heterogeneous in dogs, as it is in humans. The canine homologue of human type I cystinuria provides the opportunity to use a large animal model to investigate molecular approaches for the treatment of cystinuria and other renal tubular diseases.

Increased risk of breast cancer following irradiation for Hodgkin‚s disease is not a result of ATM germline mutations

Purpose : Long-term survivors of Hodgkin‚s disease who received mantle-field irradiation at a young age have a strongly increased risk of developing breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether this increased risk was substantially greater among women heterozygous for a germline mutation in the ataxia-telangiectasia gene (ATM). Materials and methods : Thirty-two patients were selected who had developed breast cancer at least 10 years following irradiation for Hodgkin‚s disease before the age of 45 years. In these patients, the complete open reading frame of the ATM gene was analysed for the presence of germline mutations using the protein truncation test and two mutation-specific tests, followed by genomic sequencing. Results : No A-T disease causing germline mutations were found in these selected Hodgkin patients. However, several alternative splicing events were detected which might influence protein expression levels. Conclusions : The data suggest that truncating mutations in the ATM gene are not a major component underlying the increased risk of breast cancer following Hodgkin‚s disease.

Various mutation screening techniques in the DNA mismatch repair genes hMSH2 and hMLH1.

Germline alterations in one of five human DNA mismatch repair genes (hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2, and hMSH6) cause hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Mutation analyses of these genes reveal gene carriers with a high risk for colorectal cancer, who benefit from surveillance to prevent disease. Equally important, presymptomatic testing allows nondisposed individuals to discontinue surveillance. We tested different mutation screening methods to optimize mutation detection in hMSH2 and hMLH1. Affected members from a total of 142 unrelated colorectal cancer families were analyzed. Denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), RT-PCR, and the protein truncation test (PTT) were used to screen for mutations on a DNA or RNA basis, respectively. In addition, a mutation-specific test on genomic DNA was used to find the Finnish mutation no. 1, a deletion of hMLH1 exon 16. DGGE identified most of the mutations in the mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2. The RNA-based techniques were used to identify large deletions; however, these were rare in our materials. We describe our compiled results and experience from all our mutation screening studies, as well as unpublished data from our last DGGE screening of 58 patients and RT-PCR and PTT screening of 73 patients.