WILL IT EVER BE POSSIBLE for the musical composer to fix his art product by his own unaided efforts in an objectively independent, unalterable form, just as the painter produces his painting? In the present state of the art, the transmission of a musical work is dependent largely upon recurring reproduction or recreation of a composition, very often by executants other than the composer. Virtuoso soloists, ensemble players, orchestra players, choral singers are needed by the composer of music (so far as he is not himself the performer). The painter needs no such aids. The painter with the aid of pigments, the sculptor with a more or less plastic material, embodies his ideas in objective form, which needs only the action of light to transmit a sense impression to the beholder. Can the musician ever be provided with an analogous method of carrying his sound conceptions to the ears of auditors? Modern electrical technique seems to hold out a promise of some such process. The sound film and the loud speaker are at any rate able to reproduce by purely mechanical means a very complicated acoustic product always in the same way and with the same sense impression for the hearer. If the musician could be enabled to manipulate his sound effects as the painter handles his pigments, if he could mix his tones and overtones, his tone-colors and tone-shadings in infinite variety without the aid of the artificial sound producers which we now call musical instruments, and if finally he could fix the resulting complicated sound curve upon a lasting medium like the sound film, capable of being acoustically reproduced at will with the aid of electric apparatus, he will have reached the autonomy and independence of the painter. He will have been brought into direct contact with his hearer as the painter is with his beholder. The turning on of the electric current will do for the musical work of art what the
Read full abstract