Since Ronald W. Shephard introduced homothetic, scalar-valued production functions [4, 41], it has become well-known that a homothetic production function is completely characterized by linear expansion paths and a cost function in which the output variable is separable from the price vector. In this paper we show that the equivalence between linear expansion paths and cost function separability does not hold for a multiple output technology. Therefore, the very notion of homotheticity needs to be refined and separate concepts of homotheticity must be used to characterize linear expansion paths on the one hand, and cost function separability on the other. One of these characterizations was introduced by Fare and Shephard: they defined the class of input mix independent correspondences and showed that a technology possesses linear [input] expansion paths if and only if the correspondence is mix independent ray-homothetic [2, 135]. We will show that in the multiple output case, these correspondences do not necessarily possess cost functions in which the output vector is separable from the price vector. Given the distinction between technologies possessing linear expansion paths and separable cost functions, we introduce the class of correspondences and prove that the cost function is separable if and only if the correspondence is input-homothetic. We then show that input-homothetic correspondences are ray-homothetic-and therefore have linear expansion paths. In addition, we investigate the properties of multiple output technologies and show that homogeneous technologies possess linear expansion paths. However, there is no connection between homogeneous and input-homothetic correspondences. Therefore, the relationships proved in this paper can be represented as follows:
Read full abstract