Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries Research Articles

Returning a Division I Hurdler to Sport After Multiple Knee Ligament Injuries

An 18-year-old male hurdler reported to preparticipation physicals, with a history of anterior cruciate ligament, lateral collateral ligament, and posterior cruciate ligament sprain; medial meniscocapsular sprain; and biceps femoris tendon avulsion. The patient received full clearance from his surgeon, despite functional deficits. Rehabilitation and return-to-play decision making included analysis of patient-reported outcome scores and tests of symmetry and neuromuscular control. After graduated intervention and multiple batteries of assessments, the patient was allowed to return to full participation. The nature of this sport and the time between surgery and the intervention made thorough evaluation of function and graduated progression a necessity.

Stress Radiographs for Ligamentous Knee Injuries

Stress radiographs can provide an objective, quantifiable assessment of ligamentous knee injury. Commonly utilized techniques include varus, valgus, and posterior stress radiographs and can be used to augment findings on physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Both invitro and invivo studies have demonstrated reliability and validity of stress radiographs for diagnosing isolated and multiple ligament knee injuries. Varus stress radiographs are clinician applied at 20° flexion to detect injuries to the fibular collateral ligament and posterolateral corner. Valgus stress radiographs are clinician applied at 20° flexion to detect injuries to the medial collateral ligament or posteromedial corner. To evaluate the posterior cruciate ligament, posterior kneeling stress radiographs are obtained with the patient kneeling at 90° flexion on a firm platform. Bilateral radiographs are obtained and the side-to-side difference is compared to established criteria for injury severity. Stress radiographs support accurate diagnosis of complex knee injuries and also provide an objective measure of knee stability following ligament reconstruction. These imaging techniques can be performed in an ambulatory clinic setting with minimal additional equipment, and are thereby cost-effective, efficient, and support clinical decision-making in the treatment of complex knee injuries.

Sex differences in the knee orthopaedic injury patterns among recreational alpine skiers

BackgroundAlthough studies have reported the sex differences in injury patterns among recreational skiers, the findings are still conflicting. This study aims to analyse the sex differences of orthopaedic knee injuries that occurred during alpine skiing.MethodsA total of 306 recreational alpine skiers (125 females and 181 males) who sustained knee surgeries between June 2016 and December 2018 participated in this study. Age, height, weight, and physical activity level of the patients were recorded. The orthopaedic knee injury patterns were analysed based on the diagnosis given by the physicians.ResultsMale skiers (17.13%) had a higher proportion of multiple knee ligament injuries than females (6.40%). The combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament injury were the most common injury types in both females and males, with ACL injury being more prevalent for females (79.20%) than that in males (56.35%). The proportion of female skiers (17.6%) with vigorous-intensity activity level was significantly lower than that of males (30.9%). Female skiers had lower body height, body weight, and body mass index than male skiers (P < 0.001).ConclusionsACL injury is the most common orthopaedic injury among both female and male knee-injured recreational skiers. The proportion of females with an ACL injury is higher than that of males, but the proportion of multiple knee ligament injuries is lower than that of males. More male recreational skiers have vigorous-intensity activity level habits in daily life than females.

Acute primary repair of extraarticular ligaments and staged surgery in multiple ligament knee injuries

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of acute primary repair of extraarticular ligaments with staged surgery for acute knee dislocations (KDs) and multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs).Materials and methodsBetween January 2005 and May 2018, 61 consecutive patients diagnosed with MLKI or KD were referred to or visited our institution. Of these, 31 patients who underwent acute repair of extraarticular ligaments within 3 weeks of injury were included in this study. These patients were retrospectively classified into two groups: those who underwent only primary repair (repair group) and those who underwent staged reconstructive surgery (staged group). Follow-up examination included range of motion (ROM), knee joint stability (Lachman test, posterior drawer test, and varus and valgus stress test), Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS).ResultsTwelve of the 31 patients did not need or desire further surgery and were included in the repair group. No significant difference was observed in demographic data between the repair and staged groups. Although staged surgery decreased positive posterior drawer test results, no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding ROM, other knee joint stability tests, Lysholm scores, Tegner scale, or KOOS.ConclusionsIn this series, all patients returned to their activities of daily living and preinjury occupation levels. Acute primary repair of extraarticular ligaments provides essential knee stability without varus/valgus instability and may reduce the need for subsequent cruciate ligament reconstruction.Level of evidenceLevel IV, retrospective observational study.

Surgical Treatment of Combined ACL PCL Medial Side Injuries

The multiple ligament knee injury involving the medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate ligament is typically the result of a high-energy trauma or knee dislocation event. Optimal treatment strategies are debated, specifically in regard to timing of surgery, reconstruction/repair techniques, and postoperative protocols. This review details the stepwise treatment of these complex patients from diagnosis to postoperative rehabilitation and summarizes the current literature.

The outcomes of one-stage treatment for multiple knee ligament injuries combined with extensor apparatus rupture

BackgroundMultiple knee ligament injuries combined with extensor apparatus rupture are serious and complex knee injuries that are rare in clinical practice. The management is extremely challenging and controversial.The aim of this study is to describe a patient collective with multiple knee ligament injuries combined with extensor apparatus injuries in detail and to report the mid-term outcomes of a one-stage surgical treatment regarding subjective outcome scores, complications, knee instability, and ROM.MethodsEleven of 425 patients with multiple knee ligament injuries combined with extensor apparatus injuries admitted to our hospital were reviewed from July 2008 to May 2017. All patients underwent one-stage repair and reconstruction of multiple knee ligaments and extensor apparatus. The Lysholm knee score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score were adopted to evaluate the surgical effect preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Clinical data, including range of motion and knee stability, were also recorded at the final follow-up.ResultsTen patients were followed up with a mean time of 40 (range, 24–60) months. At the last follow-up, 8 patients had joint flexion range of motion greater than or equal to120 degrees, 2 patients had joint flexion range of motion of 100–120 degrees, and 1 patient had active knee extension limitation of 5 degrees. Stress radiographs showed that the mean differences in posterior displacement were reduced from 10.8 ± 3.0 mm preoperatively to 2.0 ± 2.5 mm at the last follow-up. There were significant improvements in stress radiographs from pre- to postoperative states for all patients with multiple knee ligament injuries. The Lysholm score ranged from 85 to 96, with a mean of 92.1 (compared with 33 before surgery, P < 0.05). The final IKDC scores were A in 2 patients (20%), B in 7 (70%), and C in 1 (10%). Nine of the 10 patients (90%) returned to their former activity level.ConclusionMultiple knee ligament injuries combined with extensor apparatus rupture are rare. Single-stage management of the repair and reconstruction of multiple knee ligaments and extensor apparatus with proper rehabilitation is an effective and reliable procedure to restore knee stability and function.Level of evidenceLevel IV, therapeutic case series.

Rehabilitation Concepts for Multiple Knee Ligament Injuries

Rehabilitation Concepts for Multiple Knee Ligament Injuries

Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries: Does the Knee Dislocation Classification Predict the Type of Surgical Management?

This study aims to evaluate relationships among multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI) patterns as classified according to the knee dislocation (KD) classification and the types of surgical management pursued. We hypothesized that the KD classification would not be predictive of the types of surgical management, and that categorizing injuries according to additional injury features such as structure, chronicity, grade, and topographic location would be predictive of the types of surgical management. This is a Retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at a level I trauma center with a 150-mile coverage radius. Query of our billing database was performed using combinations of 43 billing codes (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] 9, ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology) to identify patients from 2011 to 2015 who underwent operative management for MLKIs. There were operative or nonoperative treatment for individual ligamentous injuries, repair, or reconstruction of individual ligamentous injuries, and staging or nonstaging or nonstaging of each surgical procedure. The main outcome was the nature and timing of clinical management for specific ligamentous injury patterns. In total, 287 patients were included in this study; there were 199 males (69.3%), the mean age was 30.2 years (SD: 14.0), and the mean BMI was 28.8 kg/m2 (SD: 7.4). There were 212 injuries (73.9%) categorized as either KD-I or KD-V. The KD classification alone was not predictive of surgery timing, staging, or any type of intervention for any injured ligament (p > 0.05). Recategorization of injury patterns according to structure, chronicity, grade, and location revealed the following: partial non-ACL injuries were more frequently repaired primarily (p < 0.001), distal medial-sided injuries were more frequently treated operatively than proximal medial-sided injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 24.7; p <0.0001), and staging was more frequent for combined PCL-lateral injuries (OR = 1.3; p = 0.003) and nonavulsive fractures (OR = 1.2; p = 0.0009). The KD classification in isolation was not predictive of any surgical management strategy. Surgical management was predictable when specifying the grade and topographic location of each ligamentous injury. This is a Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Varus mechanism is associated with high incidence of popliteal artery lesions in multiligament knee injuries.

This study aims to identify multiple ligament knee injury patterns that possess a high-risk of vascular lesion. We retrospectively compared torn ligament patterns and the presence of vascular lesions confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography from 122 consecutive patients with diagnoses of multiple ligament knee injury made at the emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients were not eligible if they had an ipsilateral lower extremity lesion (dislocations or fractures at another level), initial evaluation at another hospital, or follow-up for less than 12months. The primary outcomes were the comparison between the imaging findings of torn structures patterns and the presence of a vascular lesion. We identified 48 eligible patients (50 knees) with multiligamentary knee lesions, of whom eight had popliteal artery damage, yielding an incidence of 16%. Our clinical examination detected six of these patients that were classified, according to the Schenck system, as KD-IIIL (6 knees) and KD-IIIM (2 knees). The odds of having a popliteal artery injury is 4.69 to 1 with a KD-IIIL injury that with any other type of injury on that classification (95% CI 0.960-22.98). This data suggests that varus forces causing enough energy to produce a KD-IIIL lesion possess a higher popliteal artery injury risk, making recommendable a thorough examination of the vascular integrity when diagnosing a KD-IIIL lesion.

Erratum: Obesity Is Associated with Significant Morbidity after Multiligament Knee Surgery.

The objective was to report the effect of obesity, utilizing a body mass index (BMI) threshold of 35 kg/m2, on outcomes and complications of multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI). It was hypothesized that obese patients would have longer intraoperative times and hospital length of stay, greater estimated blood loss, and higher rates of wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement (ID p = 0.0001) and higher rates of concomitant lateral meniscus injury (48.0 vs. 25.3%; p = 0.04). Among patients undergoing single-staged surgery, obese patients had significantly longer duration of surgery (219.8 vs. 178.6 minutes; p = 0.02) and more wound infections requiring ID p = 0.03). In contrast, nonobese patients had higher rates of arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or arthrolysis (25.3 vs. 0%; p = 0.003). Obese patients undergoing surgery of an MLKI have longer operative times, greater rates of wound infection requiring I&D, and lower rates of arthrofibrosis. Surgeons may consider these results when counseling patients on their postoperative course and risk for complications. Future research might focus on strategies to reduce complication rates in obese patients with MLKI. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Medial-Sided Injuries in the Multiple Ligament Knee Injury.

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are complex and challenging to treat. The posteromedial corner (PMC) structures are commonly torn in MLKI. A thorough and systematic evaluation is imperative to avoid a missed diagnosis and for planning treatment. With several structures injured, the treatment method (operative vs. nonoperative, repair vs. reconstruction), availability of allografts, timing of surgery, and rehabilitation are some of the factors that have to be considered in the decision-making. Persistent valgus instability because of untreated or not healed medial collateral ligament (MCL) tears will increase graft forces on the cruciate ligament grafts, thus increasing the risk of reconstruction graft failure. In recent years, there has been a growing body of literature on the anatomy and biomechanics of the medial structures that has aided in the development of biomechanically and clinically validated anatomic PMC reconstructions. Despite good healing potential of the MCL, in MLKI, surgical treatment is recommended for grade III PMC injuries to aid early rehabilitation and reduce the risk of surgical failure. Several studies have reported satisfactory outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI involving the medial side. Early functional rehabilitation is imperative to reduce the risk of arthrofibrosis.

ACL Reconstruction in the Multiple Ligament Injured Knee

Multiple ligament knee injuries are complex and can result from sports injuries or high energy trauma. The proper diagnosis and treatment of multiple ligament knee injuries are essential, and careful evaluation and planning are required to achieve successful outcomes. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the multiple ligament injured knee is complicated by several factors, necessitating additional technical considerations. Patient selection, surgical timing, graft selection, and surgical technique require consideration specific to the ACL component of these injuries. We present a summary of the current knowledge with respect to the treatment of ACL injuries in the context of the multiple ligament injured knee.

Performance of PROMIS Computer Adaptive Testing As Compared With Established Instruments for Multiple-Ligament Knee Injuries.

Background:The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing (CAT) is a patient-reported outcome metric that has been validated for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, ACL reconstructions, and meniscal injuries. Thus far, the system has not been validated for multiligament knee injuries. The Multiligament Quality of Life (MLQOL) questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument for this population that can serve as a gold standard for validation of the newer PROMIS.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to further validate the PROMIS CAT for multiligament knee reconstruction. We hypothesized that the PROMIS CAT modules would correlate with the Lysholm knee score (Lysholm), Tegner activity scale (Tegner), and MLQOL for postoperative multiligamentous knee injury patients and that the PROMIS CAT would use fewer question items than the Lysholm, Tegner, and MLQOL while still avoiding floor and ceiling effects.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods:A total of 30 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were retrospectively identified and agreed to participate (87% male; mean ± SD age, 36.3 ± 13.5 years). Consenting patients were administered the Lysholm, Tegner, MLQOL, and PROMIS CAT for Physical Function, Mobility, and Pain Interference. Spearman correlations were used to test agreement across survey instruments. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed for all instruments.Results:PROMIS Pain Interference had excellent correlation with MLQOL Activity Limitations (r = 0.71, P < .0001). Excellent-good correlations were detected between PROMIS Physical Function and MLQOL Activity Limitations (r = –0.63, P = .0002) and PROMIS Mobility and MLQOL Activity Limitations (r = –0.62, P < .0002). Good correlations were found between the Lysholm and the PROMIS Physical Function and PROMIS Mobility (for each, r = 0.50, P = .005). Additional correlations were present with other subsections. There were no floor or ceiling effects for the PROMIS CAT instrument in any category.Conclusion:The PROMIS CAT correlates well with existing outcome measures for multiligament knee injury patients without floor or ceiling effects. The PROMIS CAT is a concise adjunct to the validated injury-specific outcome tool for multiligament knee injury. Surgeons should consider implementing the PROMIS CAT because of its broad validity, including ACL injuries, meniscal tears, and now multiligament knee injuries.

Single-Stage Multiple-Ligament Knee Reconstructions for Sports-Related Injuries: Outcomes in 194 Patients

Background: Outcomes after sports-related multiple-ligament knee reconstructions are limited. Purpose: To evaluate outcomes after single-stage surgical treatment of sports-related multiple-ligament knee injuries and to compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–based and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)–based multiple-ligament knee reconstructions. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Skeletally mature patients with at least 2 major knee ligaments torn during a sporting activity that required surgery with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up were included. The Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Clinical data, including range of motion and knee stability, were also recorded at final follow-up. Results: A total of 276 patients with multiple-ligament knee injuries incurred during sport participation from 2010 to 2016 were identified. Of the 276 patients, 194 (70.5%) had complete follow-up at a mean 3.5 years (range, 2-8 years). There was a significant improvement in all outcome scores as compared with the preoperative scores (P < .001 for all scores). The median (first and third quartiles) Tegner activity score improved from 1 (0, 2) preoperatively to 6 (4, 7) postoperatively. Significant improvements were from 41 (22, 57) to 90 (78, 95) and 44 (24, 60) to 3 (1, 8) for median Lysholm and WOMAC scores, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative outcome scores between patients treated in the acute and chronic phases. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between PCL- and ACL-based multiple-ligament knee injuries. Eighteen (9.3%) patients developed arthrofibrosis requiring reintervention surgery. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that single-stage anatomic-based knee ligament reconstructions with immediate postoperative rehabilitation in the setting of sports-related multiligament injuries yielded significantly improved outcomes irrespective of the ligament injury pattern. In addition, there was no difference in outcomes between ACL- and PCL-based injuries in the setting of sports-related multiligament injuries.

Obesity Is Associated with Significant Morbidity after Multiligament Knee Surgery.

The objective was to report the effect of obesity, utilizing a body mass index (BMI) threshold of 35 kg/m2, on outcomes and complications of multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI). It was hypothesized that obese patients would have longer intraoperative times and hospital length of stay, greater estimated blood loss, and higher rates of wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement (I&D) and revision ligament surgery. A retrospective review was performed on 143 individuals who underwent surgery for an MLKI between 2011 and 2018 at a single academic center. Patients were included if there was a plan for potential surgical repair/reconstruction of two or more ligaments. Patients with prior surgery to the affected knee or intra-articular fracture requiring reduction and fixation were excluded. Comparisons between obese and nonobese patients were made using two-sample t-test and either chi-square or Fisher's exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Of 108 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 83 had BMI < 35 kg/m2 and 25 had BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Obese patients sustained higher rates of MLKI due to ultralow velocity mechanisms (28.0 vs. 1.2%; p = 0.0001) and higher rates of concomitant lateral meniscus injury (48.0 vs. 25.3%; p = 0.04). Among patients undergoing single-staged surgery, obese patients had significantly longer duration of surgery (219.8 vs. 178.6 minutes; p = 0.02) and more wound infections requiring I&D (20.0 vs. 4.8%; p = 0.03). In contrast, nonobese patients had higher rates of arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or arthrolysis (25.3 vs. 0%; p = 0.003). Obese patients undergoing surgery of an MLKI have longer operative times, greater rates of wound infection requiring I&D, and lower rates of arthrofibrosis. Surgeons may consider these results when counseling patients on their postoperative course and risk for complications. Future research might focus on strategies to reduce complication rates in obese patients with MLKI. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Knee Dislocation and Multiple Ligament Injuries of the Knee.

The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of the progress in treatment of knee dislocations and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-based multiple ligament knee injuries over the past 25 years. The perspectives of where we were 25 years ago, where we are today, and where we will be in the future will be explored.

Comparison of Management of Multiple Knee Ligaments Injury: A Clinical Study

Background: Multiple ligament knee injuries (MLKI) are usually the result of knee dislocations following either high energy motor vehicle accidents or low velocity sport injuries. Hence; we planned the present study to assess and compare two different management protocols for treating patients with multiple knee ligament injuries. Methods: The present study involved comparison of two different methods of management of multiple knee ligament injuries. A total of 20 patients with multiple ligament injured knee were included in the present study. All the patients were broadly divided into two study groups as follows: Group 1: Included patients who were treated with one-stage process .i.e. all ruptured ligaments were repaired or reconstructed at a single stage of operation. Group 2: Included patients who were treated with staged processes .i.e. the entire surgical procedure was carried out in multiple stages Complete follow-up details of all the subjects were obtained. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score during follow-up was used for assessment of results. Results: Mean age of the subjects of group 1 and group 2 was 39.5 years and 36.4 years respectively. While comparing the sports and knee symptoms of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score during follow-up, significant results were obtained.Conclusion: Surgical treatment protocol is reliable mode of treatment for treating multiple ligament injury patients.

Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries.

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-based multiple ligament injury, or dislocated knee, is often part of a multisystem injury complex that not only includes the knee ligaments, but may also include blood vessels, skin, nerves, fractures, and other organ system trauma. These factors must be considered in the scope of treating this complex knee injury. These complex knee ligament injuries can result in significant functional instability for the affected individual. This article will discuss multiple ligament knee injuries evaluation, treatment, and special considerations in the pediatric and adolescent population.

Surgical Management of the Multiple-Ligament Knee Injury

The management of multiligament knee injury is a complex process starting with the adequate identification of the injury. A detailed physical and radiographic examination with a thorough understanding of knee anatomy is crucial to assess all damaged structures: anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, posteromedial corner including the medial collateral ligament, and posterolateral corner including the lateral collateral ligament. Several surgical techniques have been developed throughout the years to adequately address these ligament insufficiencies. In this surgical technique description, we describe a reproducible method for the assessment and surgical management of a knee dislocation (KDIV) injury. Our approach includes using anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstructions with modified Bosworth technique for medial-side injuries and a combination of Müller popliteal bypass and Larson figure-of-8 techniques for posterolateral corner injuries. The orders of surgical steps is described concisely, and technical controversies such as graft choice, tunnel positioning, and sequence of graft fixation are discussed in detail.

Current Concepts and Controversies in Rehabilitation After Surgery for Multiple Ligament Knee Injury.

The purpose of this manuscript is twofold: (1) to review the literature related to rehabilitation after surgery for multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI) and after isolated surgery for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), posterolateral corner (PLC), and medial side of the knee and (2) to present a hierarchy of anatomic structures needing the most protection to guide rehabilitation. MLKIs continue to be a rare but devastating injury. Recent evidence indicates that clinicians may be providing too much protection from early weight bearing and range of motion, but an accelerated approach has not been rigorously tested. Consideration of the nature and quality of surgical procedures (repair and reconstruction) can help clinicians determine the structures needing the most protection during the rehabilitation period. The biomechanical literature and prior clinical experience can aid clinicians to better structure rehabilitation after surgery for MLKI and improve clinical outcome for patients.