Multi-Agent Path Finding Problem Research Articles

Graph-Based Multi-Robot Path Finding and Planning

Purpose of Review Planning collision-free paths for multiple robots is important for real-world multi-robot systems and has been studied as an optimization problem on graphs, called Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF). This review surveys different categories of classic and state-of-the-art MAPF algorithms and different research attempts to tackle the challenges of generalizing MAPF techniques to real-world scenarios. Recent Findings Solving MAPF problems optimally is computationally challenging. Recent advances have resulted in MAPF algorithms that can compute collision-free paths for hundreds of robots and thousands of navigation tasks in seconds of runtime. Many variants of MAPF have been formalized to adapt MAPF techniques to different real-world requirements, such as considerations of robot kinematics, online optimization for real-time systems, and the integration of task assignment and path planning. Summary Algorithmic techniques for MAPF problems have addressed important aspects of several multi-robot applications, including automated warehouse fulfillment and sortation, automated train scheduling, and navigation of non-holonomic robots and quadcopters. This showcases their potential for real-world applications of large-scale multi-robot systems.

Branch-and-cut-and-price for multi-agent path finding

The Multi-Agent Path Finding problem aims to find a set of collision-free paths that minimizes the total cost of all paths. The problem is extensively studied in artificial intelligence due to its relevance to robotics, video games and logistics applications, but is seldom considered in the mathematical optimization community. This paper tackles the problem using a branch-and-cut-and-price algorithm that incorporates a shortest path pricing problem for finding paths for every agent independently and thirteen classes of constraints for resolving different types of conflicts. Experimental results show that this mathematical approach solves 2402 of 4430 instances compared to 2039 and 1939 by the state-of-the-art solvers Lazy CBS and CBSH2-RTC published in artificial intelligence venues.

Migrating Techniques from Search-based Multi-Agent Path Finding Solvers to SAT-based Approach

In the multi-agent path finding problem (MAPF) we are given a set of agents each with respective start and goal positions. The task is to find paths for all agents while avoiding collisions, aiming to minimize a given objective function. Many MAPF solvers were introduced in the past decade for optimizing two specific objective functions: sum-of-costs and makespan. Two prominent categories of solvers can be distinguished: search-based solvers and compilation-based solvers. Search-based solvers were developed and tested for the sum-of-costs objective, while the most prominent compilation-based solvers that are built around Boolean satisfiability (SAT) were designed for the makespan objective. Very little is known on the performance and relevance of solvers from the compilation-based approach on the sum-of-costs objective. In this paper, we start to close the gap between these cost functions in the compilation-based approach. Our main contribution is a new SAT-based MAPF solver called MDD-SAT, that is directly aimed to optimally solve the MAPF problem under the sum-of-costs objective function. Using both a lower bound on the sum-of-costs and an upper bound on the makespan, MDD-SAT is able to generate a reasonable number of Boolean variables in our SAT encoding. We then further improve the encoding by borrowing ideas from ICTS, a search-based solver. In addition, we show that concepts applicable in search-based solvers like ICTS and ICBS are applicable in the SAT-based approach as well. Specifically, we integrate independence detection, a generic technique for decomposing an MAPF instance into independent subproblems, into our SAT-based approach, and we design a relaxation of our optimal SAT-based solver that results in a bounded suboptimal SAT-based solver. Experimental evaluation on several domains shows that there are many scenarios where our SAT-based methods outperform state-of-the-art sum-of-costs search-based solvers, such as variants of the ICTS and ICBS algorithms.

Multi-agent pathfinding with continuous time

Multi-Agent Pathfinding (MAPF) is the problem of finding paths for multiple agents such that each agent reaches its goal and the agents do not collide. In recent years, variants of MAPF have risen in a wide range of real-world applications such as warehouse management and autonomous vehicles. Optimizing common MAPF objectives, such as minimizing sum-of-costs or makespan, is computationally intractable, but state-of-the-art algorithms are able to solve optimally problems with dozens of agents. However, most MAPF algorithms assume that (1) time is discretized into time steps and (2) the duration of every action is one time step. These simplifying assumptions limit the applicability of MAPF algorithms in real-world applications and raise non-trivial questions such as how to discretize time in an effective manner. We propose two novel MAPF algorithms for finding optimal solutions that do not rely on any time discretization. In particular, our algorithms do not require quantization of wait and move actions' durations, allowing these durations to take any value required to find optimal solutions. The first algorithm we propose, called Continuous-time Conflict-Based Search (CCBS), draws on ideas from Safe Interval Path Planning (SIPP), a single-agent pathfinding algorithm designed to cope with dynamic obstacles, and Conflict-Based Search (CBS), a state-of-the-art search-based MAPF algorithm. SMT-CCBS builds on similar ideas, but is based on a different state-of-the-art MAPF algorithm called SMT-CBS, which applied a SAT Modulo Theory (SMT) problem-solving procedure. CCBS guarantees to return solutions that have minimal sum-of-costs, while SMT-CCBS guarantees to return solutions that have minimal makespan. We implemented CCBS and SMT-CCBS and evaluated them on grid-based MAPF problems and general graphs (roadmaps). The results show that both algorithms can efficiently solve optimally non-trivial MAPF problems.

An Adaptive Agent-Specific Sub-Optimal Bounding Approach for Multi-Agent Path Finding

A Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problem involves multiple agents who want to reach their destinations without obstructing other agents. Although a MAPF problem needs to be solved for many real-world deployments, solving such a problem optimally is NP-hard. Many approaches have been proposed in the literature that offers sub-optimal solutions to this problem. For example, the Enhanced Conflict Based Search (ECBS) algorithm compromises the solution quality up to a constant factor to gain a notable runtime improvement. However, these algorithms use a fixed global sub-optimal bound for all agents, regardless of their preferences. In effect, with the increase in the number of agents, the runtime performance degrades. Against this backdrop, with the intent to further speed up the runtime, we propose an adaptive agent-specific sub-optimal bounding approach, called ASB-ECBS, that can be executed statically or dynamically. Specifically, ASB-ECBS can assign sub-optimal bound considering an individual agent’s requirement. Additionally, we theoretically prove that the solution cost of ASB-ECBS remains within the sub-optimal bound. Finally, our extensive empirical results depict a notable improvement in the runtime by using ASB-ECBS while reducing the search space compared to the state-of-the-art MAPF algorithms.

Parallel Hierarchical Composition Conflict-Based Search for Optimal Multi-Agent Pathfinding

In this letter, we present the following optimal multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) algorithms: Hierarchical Composition Conflict-Based Search, Parallel Hierarchical Composition Conflict-Based Search, and Dynamic Parallel Hierarchical Composition Conflict-Based Search. MAPF is the task of finding an optimal set of valid path plans for a set of agents such that no agents collide with present obstacles or each other. The presented algorithms are an extension of Conflict-Based Search (CBS), where the MAPF problem is solved by composing and merging smaller, more easily manageable subproblems. Using the information from these subproblems, the presented algorithms can more efficiently find an optimal solution. Our three presented algorithms demonstrate improved performance for optimally solving MAPF problems consisting of many agents in crowded areas while examining fewer states when compared with CBS and its variant Improved Conflict-Based Search.

Conflict-Based Search For Optimal Multi-Agent Path Finding

In the multi agent path finding problem (MAPF) paths should be found for several agents, each with a different start and goal position such that agents do not collide. Previous optimal solvers applied global A*-based searches. We present a new search algorithm called Conflict Based Search (CBS). CBS is a two-level algorithm. At the high level, a search is performed on a tree based on conflicts between agents. At the low level, a search is performed only for a single agent at a time. In many cases this reformulation enables CBS to examine fewer states than A* while still maintaining optimality. We analyze CBS and show its benefits and drawbacks. Experimental results on various problems shows a speedup of up to a full order of magnitude over previous approaches.

Flexible and Explainable Solutions for Multi-Agent Path Finding Problems

The multi-agent path finding (MAPF) problem is a combinatorial search problem that aims at finding paths for multiple agents (e.g., robots) in an environment (e.g., an autonomous warehouse) such that no two agents collide with each other, and subject to some constraints on the lengths of paths. The real-world applications of MAPF require flexibility (e.g., solving variations of MAPF) as well as explainability. In this study, both of these challenges are addressed and some flexible and explainable solutions for MAPF and its variants are introduced.

DMAPF: A Decentralized and Distributed Solver for Multi-Agent Path Finding Problem with Obstacles

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is a problem of finding a sequence of movements for agents to reach their assigned location without collision. Centralized algorithms usually give optimal solutions, but have difficulties to scale without employing various techniques - usually with a sacrifice of optimality; but solving MAPF problems with the number of agents greater than a thousand remains a challenge nevertheless. To tackle the scalability issue, we present DMAPF - a decentralized and distributed MAPF solver, which is a continuation of our recently published work, ros-dmapf. We address the issues of ros-dmapf where it (i) only works in maps without obstacles; and (ii) has a low success rate with dense maps. Given a MAPF problem, both ros-dmapf and DMAPF divide the map spatially into subproblems, but the latter further divides each subproblem into disconnected regions called areas. Each subproblem is assigned to a distributed solver, which then individually creates an abstract plan - a sequence of areas that an agent needs to visit - for each agent in it, and interleaves agent migration with movement planning. Answer Set Programming, which is known for its performance in small but complex problems, is used in many parts including problem division, abstract planning, border assignment for the migration, and movement planning. Robot Operating System is used to facilitate communication between the solvers and to enable the opportunity to integrate with robotic systems. DMAPF introduces a new interaction protocol between the solvers, and mechanisms that together result in a higher success rate and better solution quality without sacrificing much of the performance. We implement and experimentally validate DMAPF by comparing it with other state-of-the-art MAPF solvers and the results show that our system achieves better scalability.

Formalisation of Action with Durations in Answer Set Programming

In this paper, I will discuss the work I am currently doing as a Ph.D. student at the University of Potsdam, under the tutoring of T. Schaub. I'm currently looking into action description in ASP. More precisely, my goal is to explore how to represent actions with durations in ASP, in different contexts. Right now, I'm focused on Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), looking at how to represent speeds for different agents and contexts. Before tackling duration, I wanted to explore and compare different representations of action taking in ASP. For this, I started comparing different simple encodings tackling the MAPF problem. Even in simple code, choices and assumptions have been made in their creations. The objective of my work is to present the consequences of those design decisions in terms of performance and knowledge representation. As far as I know, there is no current research on this topic. Besides that, I'm also exploring different ways to represent duration and to solve related problems. I planed to compare them the same way I described before. I also want this to help me find innovative and effective ways to solve problems with duration.

Suboptimal Variants of the Conflict-Based Search Algorithm for the Multi-Agent Pathfinding Problem

The task in the multi-agent path finding problem (MAPF) is to find paths for multiple agents, each with a different start and goal position, such that agents do not collide. A successful optimal MAPF solver is the conflict-based search (CBS) algorithm. CBS is a two level algorithm where special conditions ensure it returns the optimal solution. Solving MAPF optimally is proven to be NP-hard, hence CBS and all other optimal solvers do not scale up. We propose several ways to relax the optimality conditions of CBS trading solution quality for runtime as well as bounded-suboptimal variants, where the returned solution is guaranteed to be within a constant factor from optimal solution cost. Experimental results show the benefits of our new approach; a massive reduction in running time is presented while sacrificing a minor loss in solution quality. Our new algorithms outperform other existing algorithms in most of the cases.

Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarks

The multi-agent pathfinding problem (MAPF) is the fundamental problem of planning paths for multiple agents, where the key constraint is that the agents will be able to follow these paths concurrently without colliding with each other. Applications of MAPF include automated warehouses, autonomous vehicles, and robotics. Research on MAPF has been flourishing in the past couple of years. Different MAPF research papers assume different sets of assumptions, e.g., whether agents can traverse the same road at the same time, and have different objective functions, e.g., minimize makespan or sum of agents' actions costs. These assumptions and objectives are sometimes implicitly assumed or described informally. This makes it difficult for establishing appropriate baselines for comparison in research papers, as well as making it difficult for practitioners to find the papers relevant to their concrete application. This paper aims to fill this gap and facilitate future research and practitioners by providing a unifying terminology for describing the common MAPF assumptions and objectives. In addition, we also provide pointers to two MAPF benchmarks. In particular, we introduce a new grid-based benchmark for MAPF, and demonstrate experimentally that it poses a challenge to contemporary MAPF algorithms.

K-Robust Multi-Agent Path Finding

In the multi-agent path-finding (MAPF) problem a plan is needed to move a set of agents from their initial location to their goals without collisions. In this paper we introduce and study the k-robust MAPF problem, where we seek a plan that is robust to k unexpected delays per agent.

Generalized Target Assignment and Path Finding Using Answer Set Programming

In Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), a team of agents needs to find collision-free paths from their starting locations to their respective targets. Combined Target Assignment and Path Finding (TAPF) extends MAPF by including the problem of assigning targets to agents as a precursor to the MAPF problem. A limitation of both models is their assumption that the number of agents and targets are equal, which is invalid in some applications. We address this limitation by generalizing TAPF to allow for (1) unequal number of agents and tasks; (2) tasks to have deadlines by which they must be completed; (3) ordering of groups of tasks to be completed; and (4) tasks that are composed of a sequence of checkpoints that must be visited in a specific order. Further, we model the problem using answer set programming (ASP) to show that customizing the desired variant of the problem is simple -- one only needs to choose the appropriate combination of ASP rules to enforce it. We also demonstrate experimentally that if problem specific information can be incorporated into the ASP encoding then ASP based methods can be efficient and can scale up to solve practical applications.

Search-Based Optimal Solvers for the Multi-Agent Pathfinding Problem: Summary and Challenges

Multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) is an area of expanding research interest. At the core of this research area, numerous diverse search-based techniques were developed in the past 6 years for optimally solving MAPF under the sum-of-costs objective function. In this paper we survey these techniques, while placing them into the wider context of the MAPF field of research. Finally, we provide analytical and experimental comparisons that show that no algorithm dominates all others in all circumstances. We conclude by listing important future research directions.

Sub-Optimal SAT-Based Approach to Multi-Agent Path-Finding Problem

In multi-agent path finding (MAPF) the task is to find nonconflicting paths for multiple agents. In this paper we focus on finding suboptimal solutions for MAPF for the sum-of-costs variant. Recently, a SAT-based approached was developed to solve this problem and proved beneficial in many cases when compared to other search-based solvers. In this paper, we present SAT-based unbounded- and bounded-suboptimal algorithms and compare them to relevant algorithms. Experimental results show that in many case the SAT-based solver significantly outperforms the search-based solvers.

Modifying Optimal SAT-Based Approach to Multi-Agent Path-Finding Problem to Suboptimal Variants

In multi-agent path finding (MAPF) the task is to find non-conflicting paths for multiple agents. Recently, a SAT-based approach was developed to solve this problem and proved beneficial in many cases when compared to other search-based solvers. In this paper, we introduce SAT-based unbounded- and bounded-suboptimal algorithms and compare them to relevant search-based algorithms.

Meta-Agent Conflict-Based Search For Optimal Multi-Agent Path Finding

The task in the multi-agent path finding problem (MAPF) isto find paths for multiple agents, each with a different startand goal position, such that agents do not collide. It is possibleto solve this problem optimally with algorithms that arebased on the A* algorithm. Recently, we proposed an alternativealgorithm called Conflict-Based Search (CBS) (Sharonet al. 2012), which was shown to outperform the A*-basedalgorithms in some cases. CBS is a two-level algorithm. Atthe high level, a search is performed on a tree based on conflictsbetween agents. At the low level, a search is performedonly for a single agent at a time. While in some cases CBSis very efficient, in other cases it is worse than A*-based algorithms.This paper focuses on the latter case by generalizingCBS to Meta-Agent CBS (MA-CBS). The main idea isto couple groups of agents into meta-agents if the number ofinternal conflicts between them exceeds a given bound. MACBSacts as a framework that can run on top of any completeMAPF solver. We analyze our new approach and provideexperimental results demonstrating that it outperforms basicCBS and other A*-based optimal solvers in many cases.

Finding Bounded Suboptimal Multi-Agent Path Planning Solutions Using Increasing Cost Tree Search (Extended Abstract)

The Increasing Cost Tree Search (ICTS) algorithm is used to produce optimal solutions to the multi-agent path finding problem (MAPF). In this problem, multiple agents are trying to reach their goals without conflicting with each other, while minimizing the total cost of the paths. ICTS has been shown to be very effective in finding optimal solutions. In this paper we consider the problem of finding solutions with bounded suboptimality by changing the order in which ICTS searches its increasing cost tree. With a variety of strategies, we are unable to consistently and significantly reduce the cost of ICTS. Further experimentation suggests why significantly more work is needed to modify ICTS to find suboptimal solutions.

Non-Optimal Multi-Agent Pathfinding is Solved (Since 1984)

Optimal solutions for multi-agent pathfinding problems are often too expensive to compute. For this reason, suboptimal approaches have been widely studied in the literature. Specifically, in recent years a number of efficient suboptimal algorithms that are complete for certain subclasses have been proposed at highly-rated robotics and AI conferences, all mentioning that it is an open problem which subclasses of non-optimal multi-agent pathfinding are tractable. However, it turns out that this problem has already been completely solved in another research community in the 1980s by a constructive proof that provides a polynomial algorithm that is complete for the entire class of problems. In this paper, we would like to bring this earlier related work to the attention of the robotics and AI communities.