Sir: In a recent issue of the Companion, Masand and colleagues1 report a retrospective analysis of 36 outpatients with bipolar or schizoaffective disorder in which risperidone and olanzapine were comparable in efficacy and safety, but treatment costs were lower for risperidone-treated patients. Although the acquisition costs of risperidone are lower than those of olanzapine, when other factors are taken into account, the costs of the 2 agents do not differ appreciably. As the authors point out in their article, atypical antipsychotics are becoming commonly prescribed agents in primary care settings. At the same time, primary care providers are assuming the responsibility of managing bipolar disorders. It is sometimes tempting to categorize newer antipsychotic agents into one class for the management of these conditions. However, at the moment there is considerably more evidence supporting the use of olanzapine in bipolar illness than for any other atypical antipsychotic agent, and much more than the “preliminary” evidence to which the authors allude. On the strength of 2 placebo-controlled studies that tested its efficacy as monotherapy for acute mania in 139 and 115 patients, respectively,2,3 olanzapine is currently the only atypical antipsychotic that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this indication. The strength of these data is one reason olanzapine is more prominent than other atypical antipsychotics in recently published treatment guidelines.4,5 Although a well-controlled study recently demonstrated that risperidone in combination with lithium or divalproex was efficacious as an adjunctive agent for the treatment of mania,6 no clinical trial demonstrating risperidone's efficacy as a monotherapeutic agent has ever been reported. Three head-to-head monotherapy studies7–9 of olanzapine versus FDA-approved mood stabilizers have been conducted in acute mania, with a total of 398 randomized patients. In one study, olanzapine was superior to divalproex in the primary and several secondary outcome measures at 3 weeks7 and at 47 weeks,8 and in the second study, these 2 agents had comparable efficacy at 3 weeks.9 In the third study, the efficacy of olanzapine was similar to lithium on all reported outcome measures.10 Direct comparisons of this sort between other atypical antipsychotics and established mood stabilizers for the treatment of mania are not yet available. Treatment of mania is only one aspect of the comprehensive management of bipolar disorder. Treatment of bipolar depression and long-term prevention of acute mood episodes are important goals, and in these areas olanzapine's efficacy is more firmly established than any other atypical antipsychotic agent. In the only placebo-controlled study of an atypical antipsychotic in bipolar depression, the efficacy of olanzapine statistically separated from placebo after 1 week of treatment, and this effect was sustained throughout the 8 weeks of double-blind treatment.11 Finally, 2 studies12,13 evaluating long-term efficacy have been reported. Open-label therapy with olanzapine was continued for up to 1 year in 113 patients who entered one placebo-controlled registration study.12 In this study, patients demonstrated improvement in mania and depressive symptoms; 88% ultimately achieved protocol-defined remission of symptoms, with only a 25% rate of subsequent relapse. In the second longer-term study, blinded placebo-controlled olanzapine added to lithium or divalproex in 99 patients was much more effective in preventing both depressive and manic relapses than either mood stabilizer alone over a period of 18 months.13 Two other 1-year studies of olanzapine, one versus placebo and the other versus lithium, will be completed this year. In summary, among atypical antipsychotic agents, olanzapine has the most supportive data for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Therefore, it is premature to place these agents into a single category. In addition to acquisition costs, which favor risperidone, available clinical trial data on olanzapine should be considered in treatment choice.
Read full abstract