Groundwater (GW) plays a crucial role in coastal aquifers and arid regions, serving as a lifeline for communities by providing a reliable and resilient water source, making its monitoring essential for sustainable water management. This study aimed at modeling GW via regionalization of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data based on two methods. The first method directly regionalized the GRACE data for modeling GW via in situ measurements, including the lake level, precipitation, temperature, observed GW and Penman-Monteith-Leuning (PML) evapotranspiration data. The second method included two stages, in the first stage, the GRACE data were downscaled via the Famine Early Warning Systems Network Land Data Assimilation System (FLDAS) data which contains satellite based precipitation, temperature, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent data. In the second stage, the downscaled GRACE was bias corrected to provide regionalized data. Artificial intelligence models consist of shallow networks (Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), Adaptive neuro fuzzy (ANFIS), Support Vector Machine (SVR)), the ensemble of shallow networks and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) deep learning method were employed in the modeling process and the observed GW level data were targeted for the regionalization. The Link CluE clustering ensemble method was implemented to cluster the piezometers of the aquifer to separate different GW patterns in the area. The proposed methodology was examined over the Miandoab plain, one of the sub-basins of the Lake Urmia, located in Northwest Iran. The modeling results demonstrated that the first method could exhibit superior performance with the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of up to 17% higher than the second method. Thus, using in situ observed data for downscaling proved to be more accurate than relying on the data based on the satellite imagery. The results indicated that the ensemble of shallow networks could lead to more precise results than using the deep and shallow learning models, individually, where the NSE for the ensemble of shallow networks was up to 50% higher compared to the LSTM model.
Read full abstract