In this paper we give a sufficient condition for the exact controllability of the following model of the suspension bridge equation proposed by Lazer and McKenna in [A.C. Lazer, P.J. McKenna, Large-amplitude periodic oscillations in suspension bridges: Some new connections with nonlinear analysis, SIAM Rev. 32 (1990) 537–578]: { w t t + c w t + d w x x x x + k w + = p ( t , x ) + u ( t , x ) + f ( t , w , u ( t , x ) ) , 0 < x < 1 , w ( t , 0 ) = w ( t , 1 ) = w x x ( t , 0 ) = w x x ( t , 1 ) = 0 , t ∈ R , where t ⩾ 0 , d > 0 , c > 0 , k > 0 , the distributed control u ∈ L 2 ( 0 , t 1 ; L 2 ( 0 , 1 ) ) , p : R × [ 0 , 1 ] → R is continuous and bounded, and the non-linear term f : [ 0 , t 1 ] × R × R → R is a continuous function on t and globally Lipschitz in the other variables, i.e., there exists a constant l > 0 such that for all x 1 , x 2 , u 1 , u 2 ∈ R we have ‖ f ( t , x 2 , u 2 ) − f ( t , x 1 , u 1 ) ‖ ⩽ l { ‖ x 2 − x 1 ‖ + ‖ u 2 − u 1 ‖ } , t ∈ [ 0 , t 1 ] . To this end, we prove that the linear part of the system is exactly controllable on [ 0 , t 1 ] . Then, we prove that the non-linear system is exactly controllable on [ 0 , t 1 ] for t 1 small enough. That is to say, the controllability of the linear system is preserved under the non-linear perturbation − k w + + p ( t , x ) + f ( t , w , u ( t , x ) ) .
Read full abstract