Past earthquakes have revealed that damage to sheet-pile walls under saturated conditions is closely linked to excess pore water pressure buildup in the surrounding soil. Nonlinear effective stress analysis (ESA) is commonly employed to assess the seismic performance of sheet-pile walls in liquefiable soils, incorporating constitutive models for liquefaction simulation. However, ESA results are sensitive to uncertainties in input parameters, model calibration, and modeling techniques. Dynamic centrifuge tests conducted in the Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Project (LEAP) offer valuable insights into important response mechanisms and validate ESA. Seven centrifuge tests on a cantilevered sheet-pile wall model showed that liquefaction did not occur in the backfill near the wall due to net seaward wall displacement but did occur farther away. In addition, the mechanism of wall displacement was mainly due to the shear deformation of the softened backfill, with the displacement magnitude depending on the relative density of soil, peak ground acceleration of base motion, and wall displacement during gravity loading. Nonlinear ESA was performed for three centrifuge tests using FLAC2D and the PM4Sand constitutive model for soil. Gravity analysis captured static wall displacement and initial stress distribution in the soil. Two calibrations of the PM4Sand model were pursued at the element level: C1 calibration for liquefaction strength and C2 calibration for liquefaction strength and the post-liquefaction shear strain accumulation rate. System-level simulations showed similar liquefaction behavior as observed in the tests for both calibrations. However, the C2 calibration provided closer predictions of wall displacements, while the C1 calibration (default for PM4Sand) resulted in larger and more conservative displacements. Overall, the PM4Sand model performed well with minimal calibration, making it suitable for nonlinear ESA of sheet-pile walls.