n a cool late November evening in Bangalore, India, a city held under siege by a 12,500-strong security contingent, Irene Skliva from Greece was crowned Miss World 1996. Since August of 1996, when it was announced that India was to host Miss World Pageant, controversy and debate had surrounded issue. Members of political parties and particular national and local women's organizations, farmers, students, and trade unions from various parts of country demonstrated, wrote petitions, filed public interest litigations in court, and threatened to damage venue of pageant. Opposition to pageant spanned a broad enough spectrum to accommodate an entire range of concerns. For instance, opposition to imperialism, resentment against retreating role of state, high inflation, threatened Indian culture, and an anxiety with foreign all crystallized in response to pageant. Conversely, for state and domestic capital, pageant provided an international opportunity to new, liberalized India to world. The pageant, therefore, was a site at which political protest and anxiety with globalization as well as opportunity to showcase India to world were articulated. It is in this tension between sentiments of proving national worth, on one hand, and protests against pageant, on other, that I examine staging of discourses of gender, nation, sexuality, and place in this article. A month prior to event, in Times of India, a major Englishlanguage newspaper, an advertisement for pageant read the time has come for world to see ... what India is all about, Indian hospitality, Indian culture, Indian beauty, Indian capability.' What is striking about advertisement is statement that real India-its capability
Read full abstract