Introduction Objective: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are a key characteristic and known biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our study investigates the potential of NPS as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory score (NPI) to predict progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to AD. In addition, we have analyzed the trajectory of NPS in comparison to global cognitive scores. Introduction NPS are common in MCI and based on prior studies they are a significant risk factor for progression to AD. Working memory and episodic memory are also known to decline with progression of AD. Cognitive tests such as MMSE have been utilized to track patients’ level of cognition and the decline in these cognitive tests is a well-known predictor of dementia. However, how NPI scores relate to cognitive test scores in predicting progression to AD is still unknown. We propose to analyze NPI (total score and sub scores) longitudinally for 6 years and to compare scores between MCI- converters (MCI-C) and MCI- non converters (MCI-NC). We hypothesize that converters may have higher scores compared to non-converters. In addition, we expect that MMSE score should correlate inversely with NPI score. Symptoms associated with progression to AD that are prevalent in our study should match those that are shown in previous studies (depression, delusion, agitation, and apathy.) Methods We selected 150 subjects from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative phase 3 (36 MCI-C and 114 MCI-NC). The only inclusion criteria were that subjects must have NPI scores at two or more time points. Gender, age, and education were matched across all subjects. To measure NPI scores longitudinally, subjects were divided into two groups, MCI-C and MCI-NC. We also grouped subjects according to their NPI scores to measure their cognition using MMSE: healthy (N=55), mild (NPI score= 1-9, N=65), and severe (NPI score= 10 and above, N=30). The NPI total score and MMSE were measured across 6 years and compared at 12-month intervals. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25. Analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare MCI-C and MCI-NC group differences. If the assumption of homogeneity was violated, Brown-Forsythe Test p-value was reported instead. Post-hoc analyses was done by using Gabriel and Dunnett's T3 test. The 12 NPI sub scores were also counted as percentage to analyse the progression of NPS. Results The NPI total scores at all time points for the duration of 6 years were significantly different between MCI-C and MCI-NC (p Conclusions Our study has confirmed previous findings that NPI scores increased with progression of clinical symptoms from MCI to AD in MCI-C relative to MCI-NC. In addition, MMSE scores varied between NPI groups at all time points after baseline. Both of the scores showed a deteriorating trend in their respective scale in MCI-C relative to MCI-NC. This research was funded by Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer's Association; Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health ( www.fnih.org ). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California.