ABMT has been proposed as a salvage treatment of resistant/refractory HD. HDS using Cy 7g/m2 for debulking and PBPC mobilization followed by MTX 8g/m2 and then VP-16 2g/m2 before ABMT, described by Milan group, seems to be effective in these patients. We report the results obtained using this procedure in 31 patients with HD who failed conventional therapy or relapsed within 24 months of conventional chemo +/−radiotherapy. Patients were treated with HDS followed by ABMT receiving BEAM (BCNU, Etoposide, Ara-C and Melphalan) as conditioning regimen. The median age was 25 years (12–61), 20 male (64,5%) and 11 female (35,5%). The histology at diagnosis showed: 19 (61,3%) nodular sclerosis; 9 (29%) mixed cellularity; 2 (6,5%) lymphocyte-depleted and 1 (3,2%) lymphocyte-rich HD. Bulky disease was presented in 15/31 (49%) patients and 6/31 (20%) had bone marrow infiltration. The Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were 49% (n = 31) and 60% (n = 15), respectively, in 1825 days. The OS was 62% for patients with 0–1 prognostic factors at diagnosis and a shorter OS was observed in patients with more than 2 prognostic factors (P = 0.004). Bulky disease, histology type and bone marrow involvement did not correlate with poor outcome. Fifteen patients died, 8/15 due to progressive disease (53%), 5/15 due to toxicity after the HDS (33%) and 2/15 due to toxicity after ABMT (13%). Status presens for alive patients after a median time of 783 days (range 50–1929) from transplant is: CR 11 (35,5%), partial response 2 (6,5%) and 4 in progressive disease (12,9%). We conclude that HDS followed by ABMT is an effective salvage regimen for patients with resistant/refractory Hodgkin’s disease and probably induces a long and stable CR mainly in chemosensitive patients. Patients presenting >2 prognostic factors at diagnosis presented worst outcome.
Read full abstract