We believe that Lidicker's (1988) paper on the enigma of microtine cycles, based on a plenary address presented at the 1987 annual meeting of the American Society of Mammalogists, needs response because it contains several unclear points and conclusions of uncertain validity. Lidicker (1988) argued that the enigma of microtine cycles will not be solved by a single-factor approach. He reiterated his earlier claim that a multi-factorial perspective (MFP) is absolutely essential if we are going to understand microtine demography (Lidicker, 1988:226). In contrast, we believe that the multifactorial perspective in its present form is difficult to comprehend; our objective is to address in detail difficulties with it. If these difficulties can be overcome, the multifactorial perspective may be acceptable to more researchers in the field. Three major aspects in Lidicker's (1988) presentation of the multifactorial perspective that could lead to confusion are imprecise terminology, misinterpretation of empirical results, and philosophy of science. Imprecise terminology.-One of the greatest potential sources of confusion in science is imprecise terminology. Presaturation dispersal and dispersal sinks are two terms used by Lidicker (1988) that need to be clarified. The best way to eliminate confusion is to define these terms operationally. Lidicker (1988) asserted that presaturation dispersal is one of eight major components in the multifactorial perspective having a role in the density-regulation machinery of California voles (Microtus californicus). Unfortunately, Lidicker (1975, 1978, 1988) has not defined presaturation dispersal operationally. Certainly, the general characteristics of these animals could not be relied upon because Lidicker (1975:106) defined them so broadly as ... in relatively good condition, and may include any sex and age group including pregnant females. Another approach would be to use the density of the resident population as an indicator of presaturation dispersal. Animals emigrating from the resident population at carrying capacity would be saturation dispersers, whereas animals emigrating before the resident population reaches carrying capacity would be presaturation dispersers. However, numbers of voles and abundances of resources vary over time, thus, it is impossible to measure the carrying capacity. If the operationality of presaturation dispersal is dependent on the operationality of carrying capacity, it behooves Lidicker to suggest how carrying capacity in fluctuating populations of voles is measured. On the positive side, Lidicker's (1975) concept of presaturation dispersal brought attention to the fact that animals may leave a population before food, space, and mates become limiting. Interestingly, Krebs et al. (1973) recognized the effect of dispersal during phases of increasing density on the population dynamics of voles in fenced enclosures (fence effect), but their observations were not widely appreciated at the time. A solution to the problem is to use the rate of population instead of carrying capacity in distinguishing between the two types of dispersal. Presaturation dispersal would occur when population-growth rates are positive, whereas saturation dispersal occurs when population-growth rates are zero or negative. At least the rates of the population can be measured. Lidicker (1988:229) stated the growth rate of a local population is affected strongly by the availability of a dispersal sink (Lidicker, 1975, 1980). Peak densities occur when sinks are filled and dispersal becomes frustrated. These statements are confusing because of Lidicker's ambiguous definition of dispersal sink. Lidicker (1975:117) defined dispersal sink as some empty or unfilled suitable habitat, or perhaps marginal or even unsuitable habitat in which at least short-term survival is possible. If all spatially accessible unsaturated habitats are dispersal sinks, it may be impossible to find a habitat that is not a dispersal sink. Furthermore, if dispersal sinks are unsuitable or marginal habitats where dispersers presumedly suffer high mortality rates, it is difficult to understand how the sinks will become saturated and frustrate dispersal in
Read full abstract