IN 1668, ANTOINE von Leeuwenhoek improved the crude microscopes that were being produced in Europe to better study small biological objects (Madigan et al. 1997). Although von Leeuwenhoek's microscope revolutionized biology-giving credence to, among other things, the theory of the cell-the microscope's potential escaped the attention of most ornithologists. Since the late 19th and 20th centuries, a small group of researchers have used microscopes to study feathers (for historical reviews, see Fox 1976, Prum 1999); but it was only recently that a consideration of feathers (and the organisms that live on them) has been united with traditional studies of colors and structures on a macroscopic level. The result is a new appreciation of the importance of the bacterial flora of feathers and their potential to serve as a selective force that can affect the colors of feathers. Microbes were isolated from feathers more than 40 years ago (e.g. Gierl0ff et al. 1961; Pugh and Evans 1970a, b), but feather bacteria went largely unstudied until Burtt and Ichida (1999) isolated feather-degrading Bacillus spp. from the feathers of several species. Shawkey et al. (2003a) subsequently cultured 13 distinct isolates from the feathers of House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). More comprehensive surveys, using both culture-based and cultureindependent methods (see Amann et al. 1995 for a review of those methods and their importance in detecting microbial diversity), have revealed even greater microbial diversity on feathers (M. D. Shawkey et al. unpubl. data). Although it is now clear that feathers are capable of harboring a diverse microflora, the ecological role(s) of that microflora remain largely a mystery. Goldstein et al. (2004) improves our understanding of these roles. Using standard microbiological methods, they demonstrate that feather-degrading bacteria degrade unmelanized white feathers more quickly and completely than melanized black