Abstract Background There is a clinical need in heart failure diagnostics to have a non-invasive measure of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. Echocardiographic parameters may be used to differentiate between normal and elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure, but do not provide a quantitative estimate of the filling pressure. Purpose To establish a non-invasive method for estimating LV filling pressure and construction of the LV diastolic pressure curve. Methods Retrospective study in 100 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Ground truth filling pressure (i.e. LV pre-atrial contraction pressure, which is shown to approximate mean left atrial pressure) was measured by LV micromanometer-tipped catheters. Non-invasive filling pressure was estimated as the sum of minimum LV pressure (minPLV) and the maximum early-diastolic atrio-ventricular pressure difference (∆PA-V), as shown in Figure 1. MinPLV was estimated by a regression model trained in 81 patients, which included an estimate of the time constant of τ (Figure 1) and echocardiographic and demographic parameters. ∆PA-V was computed by a simplified Navier-Stokes momentum conservation equation. Accuracy of filling pressure estimate was evaluated in a test cohort of 19 patients. Results The strongest predictor of minPLV was τ (R=0.71) followed by LA reservoir strain (R=0.65), LV systolic pressure (R=0.23) and body mass index (R=0.37), all of them independent predictors. There was good agreement between estimated and measured τ (Bias -0.0069s and limits of agreement <0.0195s). When combining estimated τ and the three other predictors in a regression model, there was good agreement between estimated and measured minPLV: Bias -0.5 mmHg, limits of agreement <1.9 mmHg (±2SD). Estimated LV filling pressure also showed good agreement with measured values: Bias 0.0 mmHg, limits of agreement <3.1 mmHg, shown in Figure 2. The diastolic pressure curve was estimated with good accuracy (diastolic meanPLV had bias and limits of agreement were respectively 0.2 and <3.2mmHg). Conclusions The proposed non-invasive method estimated LV filling pressure with good accuracy in a population with coronary artery disease. The method also allowed approximation of the LV diastolic pressure curve. The method needs validation in larger populations and in other phenotypes. Method to calculate LV filling pressure LV filling pressure (pre-A) agreement
Read full abstract