Microfiber Release Research Articles

Million Microfiber Releases: Comparing Washable and Disposable Face Masks.

The extensive use of single-use or disposable face masks has raised environmental concerns related to microfiber contamination. In contrast, research on the potential release and ecological impact of microfibers from washable masks (WMs), suggested as an eco-friendly alternative, is currently lacking. Here, we comprehensively investigated the release of microfibers from disposable and WMs of different types in simulated aquatic environments and real-life scenarios, including shaking, disinfection, hand washing, and machine washing. Using a combination of wide-field fluorescence microscopy, He-ion microscopy, and confocal μ-Raman spectroscopy, we revealed that disposable masks (DMs) released microfibers ranging from 18 to 3042 microfiber/piece, whereas WMs released 6.1 × 104-6.7 × 106 microfibers/piece depending on the simulated conditions above. Another noteworthy finding was the observed negative correlation between microfiber release and the proportion of reinforcement (embossing) on the DM surfaces. Microfibers from tested DMs primarily comprised polypropylene (PP), while WMs predominantly released poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and cellulose microfibers. Furthermore, acute toxicological analyses unveiled that PP microfibers (0.01-50 mg/L) from DMs impacted zebrafish larval swimming behavior, while PET microfibers from WMs delayed early-stage zebrafish hatching. This study offers new insights into the source of microfiber contamination and raises concerns about the environmental implications linked to the use of washable face masks.

Scrutinizing the chemical and morphological alterations of microfibers released from household washing machines under varying temperature conditions

AbstractTo fulfill a huge demand that is arising globally due to the skyrocketing population, the textile industry is shifting toward cheaper, sturdier, enduring fabrics. Apparently, innovations are turning out to be banes instead of boons, as they are generating a lot of waste, leading to the destruction of the environment. Microfibers are one such example of an emerging environmental contaminant with several irreversible, health, and ecosystem repercussions. This study deals with the effects of temperature on the generation of microfibrils from washing machines. Three different temperatures ranging from lower to higher were considered. The net weight of microfibers released from higher temperatures was found to be 1132.5 ± 41.3 mg/20 L using gravimetric analysis. The fibers released from the higher temperature, that is, 60°C, were 2.7 and 1.6 times higher than those released from colder temperatures, 30 and 40°C, respectively. The length and diameter of these microfibers were in the microplastic size range. The polyester fiber was found to be released in higher amounts after identification with Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectroscopy. The results of this study can help consumers implement sustainable behavior and regulations to lessen the release of microfibers from washing household textiles.

Unveiling the Microfiber Release Footprint: Guiding Control Strategies in the Textile Production Industry.

Microplastic fibers from textiles have been known to significantly contribute to marine microplastic pollution. However, little is known about the microfiber formation and discharge during textile production. In this study, we have quantified microfiber emissions from one large and representative textile factory during different stages, spanning seven different materials, including cotton, polyester, and blended fabrics, to further guide control strategies. Wet-processing steps released up to 25 times more microfibers than home laundering, with dyeing contributing to 95.0% of the total emissions. Microfiber release could be reduced by using white coloring, a lower dyeing temperature, and a shorter dyeing duration. Thinner, denser yarns increased microfiber pollution, whereas using tightly twisted fibers mitigated release. Globally, wet textile processing potentially produced 6.4 kt of microfibers in 2020, with China, India, and the US as significant contributors. The study underlined the environmental impact of textile production and the need for mitigation strategies, particularly in dyeing processes and fiber choice. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the virgin polyesters and the used ones. Replacing virgin fibers with recycled fibers in polyester fabrics, due to their increasing consumption, might offer another potential solution. The findings highlighted the substantial impact of textile production on microfiber released into the environment, and optimization of material selection, knitting technologies, production processing, and recycled materials could be effective mitigation strategies.

Study on the simultaneous release of microfiber and indigo dye in denim fabric home washing

In recent years, with the increasing global focus on environmental protection, the issue of microfiber release from denim during the washing process has gained attention. In this study, a programmable washing device simulating household drum washing was designed and developed, microfibers and indigo dyes released from denim washing were quantitatively detected, and we have also developed a novel method for estimating the release of microfibers during washing. The effects of washing time, washing temperature, and washing load on microfiber and indigo dye release from denim were explored. The results showed that the effect of washing load on microfiber and indigo dye release was greater than washing temperature and washing time. The research findings indicate that with an increase in washing time (35–95 min) and washing load (100–250 g), the shedding of microfibers and indigo dye significantly increases, reaching peak release levels of 343.6 μg/g fabric and 0.027 mg/L, respectively. However, there is a decreasing trend in the release of microfibers and indigo dye when the washing temperature exceeds 50 °C. Furthermore, our data suggests that an increase in washing load leads to a significant change in the number of microfibers (from 978 items/g fabric to 1997 items/g fabric) and their mass (from 156.87 μg/g fabric to 343.56 μg/g fabric). The influence of washing time, washing temperature, and washing load on microfiber length shows relatively small fluctuations within the range of 600–900 µm. This study provides new ideas and methods for estimating the release of microfiber and indigo dye in denim washing around the world.

Effect of microfibers induced toxicity in marine sedentary polychaete Hydroides elegans: Insight from embryogenesis axis

Presence of surgical face masks in the environment are more than ever before after the COVID-19 pandemic, and it poses a newer threat to aquatic habitats around the world due to microfibers (MFs) and other contaminants that get discharged when these masks deteriorate. The mechanism behind the developmental toxicity of MFs, especially released from surgical masks, on the early life stages of aquatic organisms are not well understood. Toxicity test were developed to examine the effects of MFs released from surgical facemask upon deterioration using the early gametes and early life stages of marine sedentary polychaete Hydroides elegans. For MFs release, cut pieces of face masks were allowed to degrade in seawater for different time points (1 day, 30 days and 120 days) after which the fibers were obtained for further toxicity studies. The gametes of H. elegans were exposed to the MFs (length < 20 μm) separately for 20 min at a concentration of 50 MFs/ml before fertilization. In addition, we also analyzed the experimental samples for heavy metals and organic substances released from face masks. Our findings demonstrated that gametes exposed to MFs affected the percentage of successful development, considerably slowed down the mitotic cell division and significantly postponed the time of larval hatching and also produced an adverse effect during embryogenesis. When the sperm were exposed fertilization rate was decreased drastically, whereas when the eggs were exposed to MFs fertilization was not inhibited but a delay in early embryonic development observed. In addition the release of heavy metals and other volatile organics from the degrading face masks could also contribute to overall toxicity of these materials in environment. Our study thus shows that inappropriately discarded face masks and MFs and other pollutants released from such face masks could pose long-term hazard to coastal ecosystems.

Impact of quantification method on microfiber assessment – A comparative analysis between mass and count based methods

Microfiber from textiles is one of the new anthropogenic pollutants which attracted a wide range of researchers. Domestic laundry, being the most common cause of microfiber release from textiles, is widely studied. Studies exhibit a broad range of quantities of microfibers owing to the distinct quantification methodologies employed due to their convenience and resource availability. Out of several such estimation processes, reporting microfiber quantity in numbers or mass (mg or g) is quite common with respect to the unit area or weight of the textile used. However, results reported by different literature vary significantly. Hence, this study aims to analyze the microfiber release from knitted polyester fabric using count- and mass-based methods. Four different fabrics were used for this study with three different counting processes from literature along with direct weight difference estimation. The results of the direct counting method showed that the average microfiber release of selected fabrics is 13.28–33.16 microfibers per sq.cm, whereas, the direct weight estimation showed an average weight of 0.0664 ± 0.0289 mg/sq.cm. The subsequent conversion showed a release of 887.89 ± 633.49 microfibers/sq.cm of the fabric. Further, the microfiber mass was also estimated using the number of microfiber count and found that a sq.cm of fabric releases up to 0.0010–0.0024 mg of microfibers. While comparing the results, the weight-based estimation showed a significantly higher microfiber release (41.3–42.9 times) than the direct counting method. The deposition of surfactants in detergents, contaminants from the water, atmospheric contaminants, and finishes released from the fabric can be the sources of additional weights noted in the direct mass estimation. As the weight-based method is quite simple and the fastest way to quantify the microfibers, future studies must focus on this area to reduce the error percentage in quantification.

The Comparison of Metal Doped TiO2 Photocatalytic Active Fabrics under Sunlight for Waste Water Treatment Applications

The release of toxic effluents and microfibers during the frequent washings of textiles poses a major threat to the environment. On the one hand, the detrimental effluents from detergents pose a threat to marine biota in peril, and on the other, microplastics have even been found in breastmilk. According to this study, functionalized metal-doped TiO2 nanoparticles can be immobilized to create fabrics that are hygienic and antibacterial. There is a need to reduce the amount of different detergents, surfactants and chemicals used to remove stains. The manufacture of pristine and Cu-, Ag- and Zn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles having trace molar ratios of dopant chosen with a simple sol–gel approach using pad–dry–cure silane coupling agents, firstly with the functionalization and then the immobilization of nanoparticles, was successfully performed on cotton fabric. The as-obtained fabrics were evaluated for their crystallinity, chemical functionalities, surface morphologies and elemental compositions. The photodegradation potentials of unfunctionalized materials were assessed in ambient sunshine against five commercial colors. Within three hours of sunshine exposure, according to color strength analysis and antibactericidal activities, 95–98% of the dye was degraded from the functionalized fabric surface. Additionally, the treated content kept its mechanical and comfort qualities.

Investigation on microfiber release from elastane blended fabrics and its environmental significance

Elastane blended apparel is one of the most preferred items by consumers with fashion interest due to its enhanced comfort and fit. The environmental impact and microfiber release due to elastane usage is often ignored due to its lower percentage in apparel. To address such a gap, this study aimed to quantify and characterize the microfiber release behavior of cotton/elastane knitted fabric. Cotton/Elastane blended knitted fabrics with three different proportions of Cotton/Elastane (98/2, 95/5, and 92/8) were considered for this analysis. Upon laundry and quantification, the results of the study showed that 98/2 Cotton/Elastane fabric released 21.04 ± 12.46 microfibers/sq.cm, whereas, 92/8 Cotton/Elastane fabric released 46.56 ± 6.21 microfibers/sq.cm. An increase in elastane proportion increased the overall emission of microfibers per unit area of fabric. The results also showed a higher contribution of elastane fibers in the total microfibers released. 13.40% of the total fibers released were elastane microfibers in the case of 98/2 Cotton/Elastane fabric, whereas, 92/8 Cotton/Elastane fabric released 19.60% of elastane microfibers. The elastane percentage of the fabric showed a significant positive correlation with total microfiber emission (r = 63%) and elastane microfiber emission (r = 62%). Repeated laundering results showed an overall reduction in microfiber emissions in subsequent washes. However, interestingly, an increase in the wash cycle increased the proportion of elastane microfibers in the total microfibers released. 92/8 Cotton/Elastane fabric released 20% of elastane microfibers in the first wash and the proportion increased to 36% in the 4th wash. In contrast to that, the release of cotton microfibers is noted to decrease with the number of laundry cycles. As far as the length of microfiber is considered, elastane microfibers are shorter than cotton microfibers. The length of elastane microfibers was higher in the initial wash (98/2 Cotton/Elastane fabric - 352.5 μm; 95/5 Cotton/Elastane fabric - 920 μm; 92/8 Cotton/Elastane fabric - 695 μm) and it is reduced with increment in the number of washes with a strong negative correlation of −0.88. A higher proportion of emissions and lower fiber length are the alarming negative impacts of elastane fibers in apparel. Based on this analysis, it is estimated that one square meter of fabric with a lower elastane percentage (2%) can release up to 2.81 × 104 microfibers into the environment at the first wash. The threatening issues of microfibers on aquatic life, particularly in terms of bioaccumulation and biomagnification, are alarming. Elastane blended fabrics should be given special attention because they can make the problem more serious by posing a risk of chemical leachates, such as bisphenols.

Impact of sewing on microfiber release from polyester fabric during laundry

Microfibers released from textile materials are receiving greater attention due to their severe adverse effects on the environment. Although mitigation strategies have been developed for laundering, researchers uphold that it is crucial to start mitigating at the source. In that aspect, this research aims to analyze the cutting and sewing methods of knitted fabrics and their impact on the microfiber release of garments during laundry. The results of the study have confirmed that cutting and sewing methods have a significant impact on the microfiber release of a garment. The analysis of different cutting methods showed that laser and ultrasonic cutting methods reduce the microfiber release up to 20 times compared to the conventional scissor-cut edges. While comparing the different stitch types, the overlock stitch type showed reduced shedding than the other stitch types (flatlock stitch and single needle lockstitch). Our results also showed that the use of more needles increases the microfiber emission among different stitch variations of the same stitch type. For instance, a 45.27 % increase in microfiber emission was reported with the 4-thread overlock stitch (2 needles) than with the 3-thread stitch (1 needle). Regarding seam type, the proposed edge finishing seam (EFb) was effective in reducing 93 % of microfiber release as the edges are completely covered. When the effect of stitch density is considered, in the case of single needle lockstitch and flatlock stitch, the microfiber release is reduced with increased stitch density. However, a different trend was noted in the overlock stitch, which needed detailed exploration in the future. The results confirmed that a proper selection of stitch, stitch density, and seam type would reduce the microfiber release from a garment by up to 64.6 %.

Sunlight-Driven Photocatalytic Active Fabrics through Immobilization of Functionalized Doped Titania Nanoparticles.

Frequent washing of textiles poses a serious hazard to the ecosystem, owing to the discharge of harmful effluents and the release of microfibers. On one side, the harmful effluents from detergents are endangering marine biota, while on the other end, microplastics are observed even in breastfeeding milk. This work proposes the development of sunlight-driven cleaning and antibacterial comfort fabrics by immobilizing functionalized Zn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. The research was implemented to limit the use of various detergents and chemicals for stain removal. A facile sol-gel method has opted for the fabrication of pristine and Zn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles at three different mole percentages of Zn. The nanoparticles were successfully functionalized and immobilized on cotton fabric using silane coupling agents via pad-dry-cure treatment. As-obtained fabrics were characterized by their surface morphologies, availability of chemical functionalities, and crystallinity. The sunlight-assisted degradation potential of as-functionalized fabrics was evaluated against selected pollutants (eight commercial dyes). The 95-98% degradation of dyes from the functionalized fabric surface was achieved within 3 h of sunlight exposure, estimated by color strength analysis with an equivalent exposition of bactericidal activities. The treated fabrics also preserved their comfort and mechanical properties. The radical trapping experiment was performed to confirm the key radicals responsible for dye degradation, and h+ ions were found to be the most influencing species. The reaction pathway followed the first order kinetic model with rate constant values of 0.0087 min-1 and 0.0131 min-1 for MB and MO dyes, respectively.

Impact of vented and condenser tumble dryers on waterborne and airborne microfiber pollution.

Laundering of textiles is a significant source of waterborne microfiber pollution, and solutions are now being sought to mitigate this issue including improvements in clothing technology and integration of filtration systems into washing machines. Vented tumble dryers are a potential source of airborne microfiber pollution, as their built-in lint filtration systems have been found to be inefficient with significant quantities of textile microfibers being released to the external environment through their exhaust air ducts. The present study is the first to evaluate the impact of condenser dryers, finding that they are significant contributors to waterborne microfiber pollution from the lint filter (if users clean this with water), the condenser and the condensed water. Microfiber release from drying of real consumer loads in condenser and vented tumble dryers was compared, finding that real loads release surprisingly high levels of microfibers (total 341.5 ± 126.0 ppm for those dried in a condenser dryer and 256.0 ± 74.2 ppm for those dried in a vented dryer), similar in quantity to microfibers produced during the first highly-shedding drying cycle of a new T-shirt load (total 321.4 ± 11.2 ppm) in a condenser dryer. Vented dryers were found to be significant contributors to waterborne microfiber pollution if consumers clean the lint filter with water in accordance with some published appliance usage instructions, as most (86.1 ± 5.5% for the real consumer loads tested) of the microfibers generated during vented tumble drying were collected on the lint filter. Therefore, tumble dryers are a significant source of waterborne and (for vented dryers) airborne microfiber pollution. While reducing the pore size of tumble dryer lint filters and instructing consumers to dispose of fibers collected on lint filters as municipal solid waste could help reduce the issue, more sophisticated engineering solutions will likely be required to achieve a more comprehensive solution.

Characterization of microfibers originated from the textile screen printing industry

Textile industries are known for their higher levels of environmental impact due to their nature of processes. However, the impact of the textile manufacturing process on emerging microfiber pollution is less explored. This research focuses on analyzing the microfiber release behavior of textile fabrics during the screen printing process. The effluent released in the screen printing process was carefully collected at the point of origin and characterized for microfiber count and length. The analysis revealed a higher amount of microfiber release of 1,394,205.22 ± 426,262.50 microfibers/L of printing effluent. This result was 25 times higher than previous research that analyzed the influent of textile wastewater treatment plants. The lower water usage throughout the cleaning process was noted as the main reason for the higher concentration. Based on the total amount of textile (fabrics) processed, it was noted that the print process releases 23.10 ± 7.06 microfibers/sq.cm of fabric. The majority of identified microfibers were in the length range of 100–500 μm (61.25 %), with an average length of 519.1 μm. The use of adhesives and raw cut edges of the fabric panels were noted as the primary reason for microfiber emission, even in the absence of water. Significantly a higher amount of microfiber release was noted with the lab-scale simulation of the adhesive process. A comparative analysis of microfiber quantity with industry effluent, lab-scale simulation, and household laundry of the same fabric showed that, out of all phases, the lab-scale simulation caused higher fiber release (1156.63 ± 21.74 microfibers per sq.cm of fabric). This shows that the adhesive process during the printing process was the key reason for higher microfiber emissions. When domestic laundry and the adhesive process were compared, domestic laundry showed significantly lesser release (320.31 ± 49 microfibers/sq.cm of fabric). Though various studies have explored the impact of microfiber released from domestic laundry, the results of the current study alarm that the textile printing process is an underestimated source of microfiber release into the environment, which requires greater attention.

Recycling of disposable single-use face masks to mitigate microfiber pollution.

The effectiveness of disposable masks in mitigating the transmission of COVID-19 infection increased the consumption of masks. The cheaper cost and easy accessibility resulted in massive consumption and disposal of non-woven masks. The improper disposal of mask emits microfiber into the environment upon weathering. This research mechanically recycled the disposed-of masks and developed fabric from reclaimed polypropylene (rPP) fibers. Obtained rPP fibers were blended with cotton in different proportions (50/50, 60/40, 70/30 cotton/rPP) to produce rotor-spun yarns and evaluated for their performance. The results of the analysis revealed that the developed blended yarns have enough strength; however, they are inferior to the 100% virgin cotton yarns. Based on its suitability, knitted fabrics were developed from 60/40 cotton/rPP yarn. Along with the physical properties, the microfiber release behavior of the developed fabric was analyzed at its different phases of the lifecycle (wearing, washing, degradation at disposal). The microfiber release was compared with the release characteristics of disposable masks. The results showed that recycled fabrics could release 2.32 microfiber/sq. cm during wearing, 4.91 microfiber/sq. cm in laundry, and 15.50 microfiber/sq. cm at the end-of-life disposal by weathering. In contrast, the mask can release 79.43, 96.07, and 223.66 microfiber/sq. cm, respectively, for use, immediate disposal, and long-term disposal by weathering. Approximately, an 83.17% reduction in the microfiber release was reported when the masks were recycled into fabrics. The compact structure of fabric where the fibers are made into yarn resulted in lesser fiber release. Mechanical recycling of disposable masks is simple, less energy-intensive, less expensive, and can be quickly adopted. However, a 100% elimination of microfiber release was not possible in this method due to the inherent nature of the textiles.

Microfiber mitigation from synthetic textiles - impact of combined surface modification and finishing process.

The use of proper mitigation strategies to control the impact of microfiber pollution is need of the hour requirement. Though several laundry aids were developed to reduce the environmental impact caused by synthetic microfiber, due to the lack of awareness among the public, their effectiveness was limited. Hence, the mitigation measures at the production stage of textile materials can be a proactive solution with greater effectiveness in mitigating the issue at different stages rather than focussing only on domestic laundering. In this aspect, few recent attempts have been made to control the microfiber release from textiles by the surface finishing process. Thus, the current research focused on utilizing the surface modification process and surface finishing process to reduce the microfiber release behavior of knitted polyester fabrics. In this study, polyester knitted fabric (PES) was surface finished with chitosan (PES-Ch), sericin (PES-Se), and polyvinyl alcohol (PES-PVA), and their effectiveness in reducing microfiber shedding during laundry was analyzed. These finishes are applied directly on the polyester fabric and also after surface modification by alkali (Al) and enzyme (En) pre-treatments. The results reported that at the first wash, directly finished samples showed a reduction of 30-40% in microfiber shedding, and the samples finished after alkali pre-treatment showed a significant reduction of 47-84.29% (p < 0.05). Reduction in microfiber release was noted in the order of chitosan finish with alkali pre-treatment (PES-Al-Ch) > chitosan finish (PES-Ch) > sericin finish with alkali pre-treatment (PES-Al-Se) > polyvinyl alcohol finish with alkali pre-treatment (PES-Al-PVA) > polyvinyl alcohol finish (PES-PVA) for both fiber count and mass. In the case of enzyme pre-treatment, no reduction was reported, irrespective of the finishes applied. Repeated wash test results showed that the finishes could withstand and effectively control the microfiber release from the polyester fabric even after 20 washes. The performance of PES-Al-Ch fabric was superior among other modifications up to the fifth wash (with an 83.55% reduction in microfiber release). At extended washes like the 15th and 20th wash, the performance of PES-Al-PVA fabric was found to be better, with 94% and 95% microfiber reduction, respectively.

Characterization of microfibers released from chemically modified polyester fabrics — A step towards mitigation

Synthetic textiles are one of the significant contributors to microfiber pollution, a subclass of microplastics. The impact of microfibers on the environment is irreversible. Several attempts were made to mitigate and control the microfiber release from synthetic textiles by introducing filters and laundry aids in washing machines, whereas some came up with methods to modify the textile materials to release fewer fibers. Studies have related different textile properties with their microfiber release potential. However, moisture properties, one of the essential properties that determine comfort, are not well explored. Hence, this research attempted to mitigate the microfiber release by altering the hydrophilicity of the polyester fabrics through chemical treatment (sodium hydroxide) with the hypothesis that hydrophilicity reduces the microfiber release. Both woven and knitted polyester fabrics were treated with different concentrations of the alkali solution (0.25 M, 0.50 M, 0.75 M, 1.00 M) and evaluated for their microfiber release. Treated fabrics also showed variations in their moisture and physical properties. Woven fabrics showed reduced shedding compared to knitted fabrics due to their compact structure. The results showed that the increase in alkali concentration significantly reduced the microfiber release up to 89.6 % reduction with woven fabric (from 17.37 ± 1.55 fibers/sq.cm to 2.63 ± 0.23 fibers/sq.cm) and a reduction of 68 % was noted for knitted fabric treated with 0.75 M alkali concentration (from 24.38 ± 1.30 fibers/sq.cm to 8.74 ± 1.39 fibers/sq.cm). A higher negative correlation (r = 94 % for woven and 89 % for knitted) was noted between alkali concentration and microfiber release. The alkali treatment significantly reduced the average fiber length from 450 to 230 μm, and 63–93 % of the fibers identified were in size range of 100–500 μm. When the moisture properties of the alkali-treated fabrics are concerned, an increase in moisture properties reduces the microfiber release. Water contact angle and absorbency time positively correlated with microfiber release. However, the study did not show any significant effect of moisture regain percentage and vertical wicking on microfiber shedding. Except for abrasion resistance, the physical properties of alkali-treated fabric did not show any relationship with microfiber release. The study noted the order of factors influencing the microfiber release of polyester fabric as fabric structural parameters (Woven/Knits) > fabric hydrophilicity > fabric physical property.

Release of microfibers from surgical face masks: an undesirable contributor to aquatic pollution

The worldwide usage of surgical face masks (SFM) has increased rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its degradation possibly produces billions of microplastics (MPs) in the environment. To quantify the release of microfibers (MFs), unused SFM were treated with eight different aqueous solutions, each with five replications in two categories, i.e., freshwater (FW) treatments [800 mL FW, 40 mL of 95% alcohol + 800 mL FW, 40 mL of 30% H2O2 + 800 mL FW, and 4 g sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) + 800 mL FW], and saltwater (SW) treatments (800 mL SW, 40 mL of 95% alcohol + 800 mL SW, 40 mL of 30% H2O2 + 800 mL SW, and 4 g SDS + 800 mL SW) at 25 °C for 60 days. The predominant MFs disposed from SFM were transparent and sized between 1.0 to &lt; 0.5 mm. The mean highest amount of MFs observed was 4,911.3 (1-day) and 6,180.24 (30-day) in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) mixed with SW, and 7,269.7 (60-day) in SDS with FW. The greatest number of MFs released per day was 275 (SDS in SW), followed by 193 (SDS in FW). The results indicated that if different kinds of water are mixed with detergent (SDS), it could accelerate the disposal of MP, whereas SW has considerably higher ability to release more MFs in a shorter time period compared to FW. Furthermore, this study implied that the inappropriate dumping of SFM could unfortunately escalate the preexisting MP pollution in the aquatic environment, which could negatively affect the aquatic living beings.

Microfibers: Environmental Problems and Textile Solutions

Microplastics have become a topic of considerable concern and intensive study over the past decade. They have been found everywhere in the oceans, including the deepest trenches and remotest parts of the Arctic. They are ingested by many animals and some are incorporated into tissues. There is considerable effort in studying what effects they have on marine life. It has become clear that when water samples are collected in ways that prevent most long thin particles from escaping through pores of a net, the most abundant type of microplastics found in water and sediments are microfibers (fibers with dimensions less than 5 mm). The major source of these pollutants is synthetic textiles, such as polyester or polyamides, which shed microfibers during their entire life cycle. Microfibers are released during textile manufacturing, everyday activities (e.g., washing, drying, wearing) and final disposal. The complexity of microfiber release mechanisms and of the factors involved make the identification and application of ways to reduce the inputs of microfibers very challenging. A comprehensive approach is strongly needed, taking into account solutions at a number of levels, such as re-engineering textiles to minimize shedding, applying washing machine filters, developing advanced wastewater treatment plants and improving the management of textile wastes. To harmonize and make mandatory the solutions identified, a variety of potential government policies and regulations is also needed.

Effect of surface modification of polyester fabric on microfiber shedding from household laundry

PurposeSynthetic textile materials are noted as one of the major contributors to microfiber pollution through laundry. Though many research works evaluated microfiber pollution, the solutions provided to control microfiber shedding are meager. The existing products collect or filter the microfiber from laundry effluent and restrict the direct leaching. However, no methods were proposed to effectively reduce the shedding from the textile itself.Design/methodology/approachThis research is aimed to analyze the influence of surface modification of polyester knitted textiles by sodium hydroxide, on microfiber shedding. Response surface methodology was adapted to optimize different treatment parameters (alkali concentration, treatment time and temperature).FindingsThe results show that the sodium hydroxide concentration and treatment time had a negative correlation with microfiber shedding reduction. Whereas, treatment temperature had a positive correlation with microfiber shedding reduction. The statistical analysis revealed that 0.4 M concentration, 90°C temperature and 24 min of treatment time was the best process condition for minimum microfiber release. The same was confirmed with a practical experiment and a significant reduction of 80.63% in microfiber shedding after alkali treatment was found.Originality/valueAlkali treatment of different knitted polyester fabrics with various knit structures and mass per square meter showed a significant reduction in microfiber shedding. The repeated laundry performed for 20 washes with surface-modified samples showed a significant reduction in microfiber release at every wash cycle and ensured the longevity of the effect.

Impact of coronavirus pandemic litters on microfiber pollution-effect of personal protective equipment and disposable face masks.

Coronavirus Pandemic is the current biggest challenge against humanity. Apart from the personal health issues and higher mortality by the coronavirus, recent research works have also reported the environmental impacts of the pandemic. The review aims to analyze the current status of face masks and personal protective equipment littering and subsequent environmental impact in terms of microplastic and microfiber pollution. Recent researches in this domain are collected from the leading databases with relevant keywords and critically analyzed. The review results report a multi-fold increment in the usage of personal protective equipment, particularly face masks after the pandemic. Mismanagement of these items leads them to reach the marine environment through a variety of transportation. The results show a significant amount of increment in plastic and pandemic-related littering after the pandemic. The systematic review shows that the use of synthetic fibers in disposable personal protective equipment and masks leads to release of fibers that can add-on to microfiber pollution. The results are also true in the case of reusable masks as the repeated laundry and disinfection methods release a significantly higher amount of microfibers. Only very few studies have addressed the release of microfiber from the mask, and no studies have reported the impact of personal protective equipment. The worldwide mass adaptation and improper disposal of these materials increase the seriousness of the problem multiple folds. These findings suggest the immediate requirement of critical analysis of the pandemic-related littering and microfiber release characteristics. The research also urges the need for the implementation of an environmental management plan as a mitigation strategy around the globe.

Mitigation of microfibers release from disposable masks – An analysis of structural properties

The use of disposable face masks increased rapidly among the general public to control the COVID-19 spread. Eventually, it increased the disposal of masks and their associated impacts on environmental pollution. Hence, this study aims to analyze the impact of nonwoven fabric structural parameters and weathering on the microfiber release characteristics. Spunbond polypropylene nonwoven with four different weights and meltblown nonwoven with two different weights were used in this study to analyze microfiber release at dry, and wet conditions to simulate improper disposal in the environment. Exposure to sunlight significantly increases the microfiber release from 35 to 50% for spunbond fabric and 56–89% for meltblown fabric. Weathering in sunlight structurally affected the tensile properties of the polypropylene fibers due to photodegradation. The study showed that each mask can produce 1.5 × 102 and 3.45 × 101 mg of microfiber/mask respectively in dry and wet states. In the case of structural parameters, a higher GSM (grams per square meter), abrasion resistance, bursting strength, and thickness showed a positive correlation with microfiber release in both fabrics. Significantly a higher microfiber release was reported with meltblown fabric than the spunbond for a given GSM. The presence of finer fibers and more fibers per unit area in meltblown fabric was noted as the main cause. Nonwoven fabric GSM and the number of fibers in a specific area showed a higher influence on microfiber release. Based on the mask consumption reported in the literature, India alone can produce around 4.27 × 102 tons of microfibers/week as an average of dry and wet conditions. The study suggests that the proper selection of physical parameters can significantly reduce the microfiber fiber release at all stages.