Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Articles

Phase 1b/2, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion trial of tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab with and without oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2+ gastrointestinal cancers (trial in progress).

TPS376 Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2) gene amplification or protein overexpression (HER2+) occurs in many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers; thus, there is interest in evaluating HER2-targeted therapies in these tumor types. Tucatinib (TUC) is a highly selective HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor with minimal EGFR inhibition, approved in multiple regions for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. In patient-derived xenograft models of HER2+ tumors (including esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers), TUC + trastuzumab showed superior anti-tumor activity compared with either agent alone (Kulukian 2020). In the MOUNTAINEER study, TUC + trastuzumab in HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) resulted in an objective response rate of 52% and a median duration of response of 10.4 months (interim results, Strickler 2019). The SGNTUC-024 study (NCT04430738) will evaluate TUC + trastuzumab with and without oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic GI cancers. Methods: SGNTUC-024 is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion phase 1b/2 trial. Phase 1b assesses the safety and tolerability of TUC + trastuzumab + either FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) with or without pembrolizumab. One chemotherapy-free cohort is planned (TUC + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab). The initial phase 1b cohort enrolled patients with gastric, esophageal, and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas; cholangiocarcinoma; gallbladder carcinoma; and CRC to receive TUC (150 mg oral [PO] twice daily [BID]) + trastuzumab + FOLFOX. Subsequent phase 1b cohorts will receive TUC (300 mg PO BID) + trastuzumab + either FOLFOX or CAPOX. Once the recommended dose for use with oxaliplatin is identified, cohorts enrolling patients with gastric, esophageal, and GEJ adenocarcinomas will open with patients receiving TUC (300 mg PO BID) + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab with or without either FOLFOX or CAPOX. Phase 2 will expand the assessment of safety and efficacy and enroll 2 cohorts: patients with gastric, esophageal, and GEJ adenocarcinomas (to receive TUC + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab + either FOLFOX or CAPOX, Cohort A) and patients with CRC (to receive TUC + trastuzumab + FOLFOX, Cohort B). Safety and efficacy will be summarized with descriptive statistics. Patients that receive chemotherapy must be eligible for an oxaliplatin-based regimen as standard of care. Patients with irradiated or resected central nervous system (CNS) lesions may enroll, and patients with known active CNS lesions may be eligible for phase 2. The phase 1b portion of the trial is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT04430738.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for gastrointestinal cancers with SWI/SNF complex genetic alterations.

346 Background: SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex is encoded by multi-gene families that are recurrently mutated in cancer. Previous studies reported that tumors harboring SWI/SNF complex genetic alterations (GA) are sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the clinical significance of SWI/SNF complex GA in patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GICs) is unclear. Methods: We reviewed patients with metastatic GICs who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and received ICIs at our institution between July 2014–June 2021. SWI/SNF complex GA were defined as ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, PBRM1, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1 alterations. Results: Of 292 patients receiving CGP, 136 patients received ICIs, of which 10 (7.4%) had SWI/SNF GA, including 8 ARID1A (5.9%), 1 ARID2 (0.7%) and 2 SMARCA4 (1.5%) alterations. The subjects included 50 esophageal cancers, 84 gastric cancers, and 2 small intestine cancers. The patients with SWI/SNF complex GA had significantly higher proportions of microsatellite instability-high ( p = 0.004) and lower proportions of esophageal cancer ( p = 0.002), compared with patients without SWI/SNF complex GA. During the median follow-up time of 7.5 months (M), the median overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and progression-free survival (PFS) in all patients was 13.2 M ([95% confidence interval [CI] 7.7-21.8 M), 2.2 M (95%CI, 1.8-2.5 M), and 2.3 M (95%CI, 1.9-2.8 M), respectively. The patients with SWI/SNF complex GA had better OS (median, not reached vs 10.3 M; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.86]; p = 0.019) than those without SWI/SNF complex GA. The patients with SWI/SNF complex GA tended to have longer TTF (median, 4.7 M vs 2.1 M; HR, 0.67 [95%CI 0.38–1.17]; p = 0.16) and PFS (median, 5.4 M vs 2.2 M; HR, 0.70 [95%CI 0.39–1.27], p = 0.24) than those without SWI/SNF GA. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in all patients was 13.2% (95%CI, 8.0-20.1) and 40.4% (95%CI, 32.1-49.2), respectively. The ORR and DCR of patients with SWI/SNF complex GA tended to be higher than those without SWI/SNF complex GA (ORR, 30.0% vs 11.9%; p = 0.13: DCR, 70.0% vs 38.1%; p = 0.09), with 1 complete response and 2 partial responses in the patients with SWI/SNF complex GA. Conclusions: The patients with GICs who had SWI/SNF complex GA were more likely to benefit from ICI therapy, suggesting that novel ICI-containing chemotherapies targeting SWI/SNF complex GA are needed for GICs.[Table: see text]

A phase I study of pharmacokinetic (PK)-driven sequential dosing of rucaparib (RUB) with irinotecan liposome (nal-IRI) and fluorouracil (5FU) in metastatic gastrointestinal (mGI) and pancreas (PANC) cancers.

563 Background: RUB is an oral PARP1,2,3 inhibitor that demonstrated efficacy in patients (pts) with ovarian and prostate cancers harboring deleterious BRCA mutations. RUB exerts synergistic anti-tumor effect with IRI preclinically though the combination has overlapping toxicities. We previously published on the population PK of nal-IRI (Adiwijaya, Ma et al, Clin Pharm Ther 2017). We conducted a phase I study to evaluate a novel sequential dosing of RUB with nal-IRI/5FU in mGI cancer pts. Methods: Eligible pts had incurable mGI cancer previously received > 1 line of therapy (rx), ECOG PS 0-1, had RECIST measurable disease, adequate organ reserves and not received IRI for metastatic disease. Previous PARPi rx was excluded. The endpoints included dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile. The dose escalation utilized the 3+3 design. RUB was given oral bid on Day 4 to 13 and 18 to 27 with nal-IRI i.v. and 5FU i.v. 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hr on Day 1 and 15, every 28 day. Planned dose levels were RUB 400 mg/nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 (DL1), 400 mg/70 mg/m2 (DL2) and 600 mg/70 mg/m2 (DL3). Adverse events (AEs) were scored per CTCAE v4.03. Molecular profile was evaluated by CLIA-certified NGS testing. Results: Eighteen pts including 11 colorectal (CRC), 6 PANC, 1 gastroesophageal (GE) were enrolled and 12 were evaluable for DLTs. DL2 was not tolerable (DLT: G3 diarrhea, nausea and vomiting) and DL2A was added (RUB 600 mg/nal-IRI 50 mg/m2). DL2A enrolled 6 pts with no DLT and was determined as the MTD. Of DLT-evaluable pts, G3 and worse treatment-related AEs from all cycles were diarrhea (33%), fatigue (25%), leukopenia (25%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (8%) and nausea (8%). Four of 12 response evaluable pts had partial response: 2 CRC (1 had ATM mut), 1 PANC ( ATM mut), 1 GE ( BRCA2 mut) whilst 3 responders previously had platinum (PLA). Five pts had stable disease beyond 16 weeks (range 18.9 to 100.7 weeks), and all had prior PLA. Conclusions: The study successfully determined the MTD of RUB in combination with nal-IRI and 5FU. Encouraging efficacy was observed in PLA-treated mGI cancers including responses in those harboring ATM and BRCA alterations. The study is proceeding to evaluate the efficacy of the combination in metastatic pancreas cancer pts with and without BRCA1/2 or PALB2 alterations. Clinical trial information: NCT03337087.

GOBLET: A phase 1/2 multiple-indication biomarker, safety, and efficacy study in advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal cancers exploring treatment combinations with pelareorep and atezolizumab.

TPS216 Background: Checkpoint blockade therapy only benefits a small subset of GI cancer patients (approximately 4%) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, which are characterized as immunologically ‘hot’ (Bonneville et al., 2017). Most GI cancers, however, have microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors, which have an immunologically “cold” phenotype with fewer genetic mutations, reduced immune cell infiltration, and downregulated immune checkpoint proteins. These attributes make MSS tumors resistant to conventional immunotherapy including checkpoint blockade therapy (Ooki et al., 2021). Pelareorep is a naturally occurring, non-genetically modified reovirus. Upon intravenous administration, pelareorep selectively kills tumor cells and promotes several immunologic effects that prime tumors to respond to checkpoint blockade. These include the stimulation of tumor-directed innate and adaptive immune responses, increased T cell infiltration, expansion of new T cell clones, and increased PD-L1 expression in tumors (Samson et al., 2018, Manso et al. 2021 AACR). Given its expected synergy with checkpoint blockade, as well as its encouraging efficacy in prior GI cancer studies (Mahalingam et al. 2020), the GOBLET study is designed to evaluate pelareorep plus atezolizumab in multiple GI cancer indications. Methods: GOBLET is an open-label, non-randomized, multiple-cohort, phase 1/2 study in patients with advanced or metastatic GI cancers. This study employs a Simon two-stage design. Stage 1 comprises four treatment groups: Cohort 1 – First-line pancreatic cancer treated with pelareorep plus atezolizumab and chemotherapy (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) (N = 12); Cohort 2 – First-line MSI-H colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with pelareorep plus atezolizumab (N = 19); Cohort 3 – Third-line CRC treated with pelareorep plus atezolizumab and chemotherapy (trifluridine/tipiracil) (N = 14); and Cohort 4 – Second-line or later squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated with pelareorep plus atezolizumab (N = 10). The first 3-6 patients enrolled into the chemotherapy-containing cohorts (Cohorts 1 and 3) comprise a safety run-in that must be successfully concluded prior to enrolling additional patients into these cohorts. The primary objectives are safety and efficacy based on objective response rate (ORR) at week 16. Any cohort showing a promising ORR in Stage 1, based on pre-specified criteria, may be advanced to Stage 2 and enroll additional patients. Clinical trial information: 2020-003996-16.

Prolonged Survival in Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer and the Significance of the Modulation of the Activity of Cells of the Tumor Microenvironment

Prolonged Survival in Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer and the Significance of the Modulation of the Activity of Cells of the Tumor Microenvironment

Redefine Hyperprogressive Disease During Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.

ObjectiveEmerging evidence showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) lead to hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in a small proportion of patients. There is no well-recognized standard for the evaluation of HPD. Comprehensive exploration of HPD definition system in gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI is lacking to date.MethodsA total of 126 patients with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI monotherapy were analyzed. Seven definitions of HPD were defined with tumor growth kinetics (TGK) or tumor growth rate (TGR) by including new lesions or not, and with different cutoffs. Incidence and performance of different criteria were compared. Clinicopathologic characteristics and baseline genomic variations associated with HPD were also explored.ResultsTumor growth kinetics ratio of more than two fold that incorporated new lesions into calculation of HPD outperformed other definitions by successfully stratifying 14 patients (11.1%) with both accelerated disease progression (median PFS, 1.62 versus 1.93 months; hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.98 to 3.48; P = 0.059) and worse overall survival (median OS, 3.97 versus 10.23 months; hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.78; P = 0.021). Baseline genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA, including SMARCA2, MSH6, APC signaling pathway, and Wnt signaling pathway, might be associated with the risk of HPD.ConclusionIncorporating new lesions emerging during the treatment was shown to be reliable for the assessment of TGK. TGK serves as a more convenient way to reflect tumor growth acceleration compared with TGR. Genomic alterations were suggested to be associated with the occurrence of HPD.

Germline HLA-B evolutionary divergence influences the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in gastrointestinal cancer

BackgroundThe human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) genotype has been linked with differential immune responses to infectious disease and cancer. However, the clinical relevance of germline HLA-mediated immunity in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer remains elusive.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the genomic profiling data from 84 metastatic GI cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) recruited from Peking University Cancer Hospital (PUCH). A publicly available dataset from the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center (MSK GI cohort) was employed as the validation cohort. For the PUCH cohort, we performed HLA genotyping by whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis on the peripheral blood samples from all patients. Tumor tissues from 76 patients were subjected to WES analysis and immune oncology-related RNA profiling. We studied the associations of two parameters of germline HLA as heterozygosity and evolutionary divergence (HED, a quantifiable measure of HLA-I evolution) with the clinical outcomes of patients in both cohorts.ResultsOur data showed that neither HLA heterozygosity nor HED at the HLA-A/HLA-C locus correlated with the overall survival (OS) in the PUCH cohort. Interestingly, in both the PUCH and MSK GI cohorts, patients with high HLA-B HED showed a better OS compared with low HLA-B HED subgroup. Of note, a combinatorial biomarker of HLA-B HED and tumor mutational burden (TMB) may better stratify potential responders. Furthermore, patients with high HLA-B HED were characterized with a decreased prevalence of multiple driver gene mutations and an immune-inflamed phenotype.ConclusionsOur results unveil how HLA-B evolutionary divergence influences the ICB response in patients with GI cancers, supporting its potential utility as a combinatorial biomarker together with TMB for patient stratification in the future.

402 Pegasus GI, a platform study of SAR444245 (THOR-707, a pegylated recombinant non-alpha IL2) with anti-cancer agents of participants with advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal cancer

BackgroundSAR444245 (THOR-707) is a recombinant human IL-2 molecule that includes a PEG moiety irreversibly bound to a novel amino acid via click chemistry to block the alpha-binding domain while retaining near-native affinity for the beta/gamma subunits. In animal models, SAR444245 showed anti-tumor benefits, but with no severe side effects, both as single agent and when combined with anti-PD1 comparing with historical data from aldesleukin. Preclinical study demonstrated SAR444245 enhances ADCC function of cetuximab. The HAMMER trial, which is the FIH study, shows preliminary encouraging clinical results: initial efficacy and safety profile with SAR444245 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab or with cetuximab support a non-alpha preferential activity, validating preclinical models. The Pegasus GI Ph 2 study will evaluate the clinical benefit of SAR444245 in combination with pembrolizumab or cetuximab for the treatment of participants with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal cancer [esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), gastric cancer (GC) or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ), Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal cancer (CRC)]MethodsPegasus GI will enroll approximately 280 patients in 7 separate cohorts concurrently (4 cohorts) or sequentially (3 cohorts). In cohort A, 2–3 line (L) ESCC participants who have progressed after checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based therapy will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab. In cohorts B1, B2 & B3 participants with GC and GEJ cancers will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab. Cohort B1 & B2 will enroll 1–3L CPI-naïve patients. Cohort B3 will enroll 2-4L patients post CPI-based therapy). In cohort C, 2–3L HCC participants who have progressed after CPI-based therapy will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab. In cohorts D1 and D2, 3–6L CRC participants will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab (any RAS) or SAR444245 + cetuximab (RAS-wild type)SAR444245 is administered IV at a dose of 24 ug/kg Q3W until disease progression or completion of 35 cycles. Pembrolizumab is administered as per label, Q3W for up to 35 cycles. Cetuximab is administered per label, QW until PD.The study primary objective is to determine the antitumor activity of SAR444245 in combination with other anticancer therapies. Secondary objectives are to assess safety profile, other indicators of antitumor activity, the pharmacokinetic profile and immunogenicity of SAR444245. The study will be conducted in the US, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, South Korea and ChinaAcknowledgementsThe Pegasus GI study is sponsored by SanofiEthics ApprovalAll applicable ECs are obtainedConsentAll participant consents are obtained

Changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and tumor markers (TMs) to predict treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.

154 Background: PROs assessing quality of life (QOL) and symptoms at a single timepoint frequently correlate with clinical outcomes in patients with cancer, yet efforts to understand how longitudinal changes in PROs can predict for treatment outcomes are lacking. In practice, oncologists often use changes in serum TMs (CEA and CA19-9) to monitor patients with GI cancer, and thus we sought to examine associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response and survival outcomes among patients with advanced GI cancer. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with metastatic GI cancer prior to initiating chemotherapy at Massachusetts General Hospital from 5/2019-12/2020. At baseline (start of treatment) and 1-month later, we collected PROs (QOL [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General {FACT-G}], physical symptoms [Edmonton Symptom Assessment System {ESAS}], and psychological symptoms [Patient Health Questionnaire-4 {PHQ-4}]) and TMs. We used regression models to examine associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response (clinical benefit [defined as decreased or stable tumor burden] or progressive disease at the time of first scan) and survival outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]), adjusted for baseline values of each respective variable. Results: We enrolled 159 of 191 patients approached (83.2% enrollment); 134 had 1-month follow-up data (median age = 64 years [range: 28 to 84 years], 64.2% male, 46.3% pancreaticobiliary cancer). For treatment response, 63.4% had clinical benefit and 36.6% had progressive disease at the time of first scan (mean time to first scan = 2.01 months). Changes in PROs (ESAS-Total: OR = 0.97, p = 0.022; ESAS-Physical: OR = 0.96, p = 0.027; PHQ-4 depression: OR = 0.67, p = 0.014; FACT-G: OR = 1.07, p = 0.001), but not TMs (CEA: OR = 1.00, p = 0.836 and CA19-9: OR = 1.00, p = 0.796), were associated with clinical benefit at the time of first scan. Changes in ESAS-Total (HR = 1.03, p = 0.004), ESAS-Physical (HR = 1.03, p = 0.021), PHQ-4 depression (HR = 1.22, p = 0.042), FACT-G (HR = 0.97, p = 0.003), and CEA (HR = 1.00, p = 0.001) were predictors of PFS. Changes in ESAS-Total (HR = 1.03, p = 0.006) and ESAS-Physical (HR = 1.04, p = 0.015) were predictors of OS, but 1-month changes in TMs (CEA: HR = 1.00, p = 0.377 and CA19-9: HR = 1.00, p = 0.367) did not significantly predict for OS. Conclusions: We found that 1-month changes in PROs can predict for treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with advanced GI cancers. Notably, 1-month changes in CEA only correlated with PFS, while changes in CA19-9 did not significantly predict treatment response or survival outcomes. These findings highlight the potential for early changes in PROs to predict treatment outcomes while underscoring the need to monitor and address PROs in patients with advanced cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04776837.

Association of PIK3CA, PTCH1, FGF6, and NRAS mutations with venous thromboembolism in advanced lung and gastrointestinal cancer.

e15087 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) and non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common and increases morbidity and mortality. In advanced GI and NSCLC, molecular subtyping has increased use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). The association between tumor mutation profile and VTE risk remains undetermined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive GI/NSCLC patients from 2014-2019 with NGS and follow‐up at Brown Cancer Center. The NGS platform detected substitutions, indels, copy number alterations and select rearrangements in 324 genes. Patients with thrombophilia, anticoagulation use or >1 malignancy were excluded. VTE was defined as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or visceral vein thrombosis within 6 months prior to diagnosis or any time after. For statistical analysis SAS 9.5 was used with significance at alpha=0.05. Multinomial logistic regression was performed, in which the log odds of VTE was modeled as a linear combination of the genes. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for VTE were generated. Results: A total of 364 patients were reviewed; after exclusions 326 patients were included comprising Stage III/IV NSCLC (58%), metastatic colorectal (33%) and other metastatic GI cancers - gastric, duodenal, esophageal, pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma (9%). Approximately half (53%) were males with mean age of 59.1 yrs and 76.4% current/former smokers. There was a low level of microsatellite instability (0.9%). VTE occurred in 75 patients (23%) during a mean follow‐up of 24.5 months. Only 1 patient had surgery within 90 days prior to VTE. Of 248 genes mutated in the VTE group, 9 were more prevalent compared to those without VTE (Table). Statistical analysis showed PIK3CA, PTCH1, FGF6, and NRAS mutations significantly increased odds of VTE, with PIK3CA the most prevalent of these (Table). Conclusions: Patients with PIK3CA, PTCH1, FGF6 and NRAS mutations had significantly higher VTE risk. These tumor mutations and associated pathways may provide novel insight into risk stratification, prevention and targeted treatment of VTE in cancer. [Table: see text]

Changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and tumor markers (TMs) to predict treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.

6560 Background: PROs assessing quality of life (QOL) and symptoms at a single timepoint frequently correlate with clinical outcomes in patients with cancer, yet efforts to understand how longitudinal changes in PROs can predict for treatment outcomes are lacking. In practice, oncologists often use changes in serum TMs (CEA and CA19-9) to monitor patients with GI cancer, and thus we sought to examine associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response and survival outcomes among patients with advanced GI cancer. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with metastatic GI cancer prior to initiating chemotherapy at Massachusetts General Hospital from 5/2019-12/2020. At baseline (start of treatment) and 1-month later, we collected PROs (QOL [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General {FACT-G}], physical symptoms [Edmonton Symptom Assessment System {ESAS}], and psychological symptoms [Patient Health Questionnaire-4 {PHQ-4}]) and TMs. We used regression models to examine associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response (clinical benefit [defined as decreased or stable tumor burden] or progressive disease at the time of first scan) and survival outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]), adjusted for baseline values of each respective variable. Results: We enrolled 159 of 191 patients approached (83.2% enrollment); 134 had 1-month follow-up data (median age = 64 years [range: 28 to 84 years], 64.2% male, 46.3% pancreaticobiliary cancer). For treatment response, 63.4% had clinical benefit and 36.6% had progressive disease at the time of first scan (mean time to first scan = 2.01 months). Changes in PROs (ESAS-Total: OR = 0.97, p = 0.022; ESAS-Physical: OR = 0.96, p = 0.027; PHQ-4 depression: OR = 0.67, p = 0.014; FACT-G: OR = 1.07, p = 0.001), but not TMs (CEA: OR = 1.00, p = 0.836 and CA19-9: OR = 1.00, p = 0.796), were associated with clinical benefit at the time of first scan. Changes in ESAS-Total (HR = 1.03, p = 0.004), ESAS-Physical (HR = 1.03, p = 0.021), PHQ-4 depression (HR = 1.22, p = 0.042), FACT-G (HR = 0.97, p = 0.003), and CEA (HR = 1.00, p = 0.001) were predictors of PFS. Changes in ESAS-Total (HR = 1.03, p = 0.006) and ESAS-Physical (HR = 1.04, p = 0.015) were predictors of OS, but 1-month changes in TMs (CEA: HR = 1.00, p = 0.377 and CA19-9: HR = 1.00, p = 0.367) did not significantly predict for OS. Conclusions: We found that 1-month changes in PROs can predict for treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with advanced GI cancers. Notably, 1-month changes in CEA only correlated with PFS, while changes in CA19-9 did not significantly predict treatment response or survival outcomes. These findings highlight the potential for early changes in PROs to predict treatment outcomes while underscoring the need to monitor and address PROs in patients with advanced cancer.

Tissue tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a biomarker of efficacy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic gastrointestinal (mGI) cancers.

e14559 Background: While TMB is very dependent on methodology, tissue TMB-H (≥10 mutations/megabase) may predict benefit with ICIs. Pembrolizumab received tissue-agnostic approval for TMB-H unresectable cancers in 2020, but little is known about TMB as a predictive biomarker in mGI cancers. We hypothesized that tissue TMB will correlate with efficacy of ICIs in mGI cancers. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified patients with mGI cancers who received an anti-PD-(L)1 drug and had known TMB at a single academic center from 2012 to 2020. The association of TMB with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Fisher’s exact and Log-rank tests. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to adjust for microsatellite status. Significance was prespecified at 0.05. Results: 83 patients were identified and included. The most common cancer types were colorectal adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 29), esophageal/gastric AC (n = 21) and SCC (n = 4), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 11), anal SCC (n = 7), and pancreas AC (n = 7). Average age was 61, average number of lines of prior systemic therapy for advanced disease was 1.3 (range 0-4), and 37% of patients were treated on a clinical study. All patients received an anti-PD-(L)1 drug; 6%, 2%, and 36% also received ipilimumab, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and other combinations, respectively. Among those with esophageal/gastric cancer, 76% had known PD-L1 CPS (84% ≥1, 63% ≥5, 42% ≥10). TMB was primarily determined by Foundation One CDx (87%). TMB ranged from 0 to 54; n = 22 (27%) were TMB-H (of these, n = 10 were microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)), and n = 61 were TMB-L ( < 10 mutations/megabase; of these, n = 2 were MSI-H). The prevalence of TMB-H and microsatellite stable (MSS) was 14.4%. TMB-L, compared to TMB-H, was associated with inferior ORR (3.5% vs 55.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.045; p < 0.001) and PFS (median 12.7 vs 29.3 weeks; hazard ratio (HR) 2.70; p = 0.001), but not OS (HR 1.20; p = 0.60). In patients with MSS disease, TMB-L, compared to TMB-H, was associated with inferior ORR (OR 0.13; p = 0.04) but not PFS (HR 1.76; p = 0.07) or OS (HR 0.89; p = 0.79). In subgroup analyses, ORR was not significantly associated to tumor type in all or MSS patients. TMB as a continuous variable, in patients with MSS disease, was positively correlated with ORR (p = 0.02) and PFS (p = 0.04), but not OS (p = 0.59). Among all patients, PFS and OS data is immature (median follow-up 13 and 31 weeks). Conclusions: In a single center retrospective study of patients with mGI cancers treated with ICIs, TMB-H was associated with improved ORR and PFS compared to TMB-L. In patients with MSS disease, ORR remained significant. PFS and OS data are immature. TMB as a biomarker of efficacy with ICIs in mGI cancers warrants further study to guide clinical use.

Germline HLA-B evolutionary divergence to influence efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in gastrointestinal cancer.

e16101 Background: To date, although a number of biomarker-related investigations have focused on the intrinsic properties of tumor cells and immune microenvironment, how germline genetics influences efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) immunotherapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is scarcely understood. Methods: Our investigation enrolled 94 metastatic GI cancer patients treated with ICIs recruited from Peking University Cancer Hospital (PUCH) between August 1, 2015, and May 24, 2019. A publicly available dataset from the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center (MSK GI cohort) was used for validation. For the PUCH cohort, we performed HLA genotyping by whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis on the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) from all 94 patients. Tumor tissues from 86 patients were subjected to WES analysis and immune oncology-related RNA profiling. Results: We assessed the clinic relevance of germline HLA heterozygosity and evolutionary divergence (HED, a quantifiable measure of HLA-I evolution) to immunotherapy in patients with advanced GI cancers from the PUCH cohort. Our data showed that neither HLA heterozygosity nor mean HED correlated with the overall survival (OS) in the PUCH cohort. However, patients with high HLA-B HED showed a better OS and durable clinic benefit (DCB) rate compared with the lower subgroup (p < 0.05 for all comparison). The prognostic value of HLA-B HED was consistently validated in the MSK GI cohort (N = 84). Notably, a combinatorial biomarker based on HLA-B HED and tumor mutation burden (TMB) could better stratify potential responders (86 patients with tumor samples). Survival analysis performed on the PUCH and MSK GI cancer datasets further demonstrated the potential joint utility of HLA-B HED and TMB for prognosis stratification. Moreover, HLA-B HED high subgroup was characterized with a lower prevalence of TP53 mutation and enrichment of multiple immune related pathways, indicating an immune-inflamed phenotype of this subgroup. Conclusions: Taken together, our data create an intriguing argument for the germline HLA-B sequence divergence and TMB as complementary biomarkers in guiding patient selection for GI cancer immunotherapy. Further investigation revealed a potential HLA-B restricted mutational pattern of TP53, and can be indicative of tumor immune microenvironment in GI cancer.

Chemotherapy use in end-of-life digestive cancer patients: a retrospective AGEO observational study

BackgroundThe use of chemotherapy (CT) near the end-of-life (EOL) is an important issue in oncology since it could degrade quality of life. CT near EOL is still poorly studied, with no dedicated study in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients. AimTo analyze in GI cancer patients the factors associated with the use of CT within 3- and 1-month before patients’ death. Methods and participantsAll consecutive patients who died from a GI cancer in 10 French tertiary care hospitals during 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Clinical, demographical and biological data were collected and compared between patients receiving or not CT within 3- and 1-month before death. Variables associated with overall survival (OS) was also determined using of univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox model. ResultsFour hundred and thirty-seven patients with a metastatic GI cancer were included in this study. Among them, 293 pts (67.0%) received CT within 3-months before death, and 121 pts (27.7%) received CT within 1-month before death. Patients receiving CT within 3-months before death were significantly younger (median age: 65.5 vs 72.8 years, p < 0.0001), with a better PS (PS 0 or 1: 53.9 vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) and a higher albumin level (median: 32.8 vs 31.0 g/L, p = 0.048). Similar results were found for CT within 1 month before death. Palliative care team intervention was less frequent in patients who received CT in their last month of life (39.7% vs 51.3%, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, median OS from diagnosis was shorter in the group receiving CT within 1-month before death (HR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.48–0.74]). ConclusionIn GI-cancer patients, CT is administered within 3- and 1-month before death, in two and one third of patients, respectively. Patients receiving CT within 1-month before death, had more aggressive disease with poor OS. Palliative care team intervention was associated with less administration of CT in the last month of life. These results highlight the need to better anticipate the time to stop CT treatment in the end-of-life and the importance of an active collaboration between oncology and palliative care teams.

Chemotherapy After Diagnosis of Malignant Bowel Obstruction is Associated with Superior Survival for Medicare Patients with Advanced Malignancy

BackgroundAlthough malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) often is a terminal event, systemic therapies are advocated for select patients to extend survival. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy after MBO and to determine whether chemotherapy after MBO is associated with survival.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study investigated patients 65 years of age or older with metastatic gastrointestinal, gynecologic, or genitourinary cancers who were hospitalized with MBO from 2008 to 2012 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Fine and Gray models were used to identify factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy accounting for the competing risk of death. Cox models identified factors associated with overall survival.ResultsOf the 2983 MBO patients, 39% (n = 1169) were treated with chemotherapy after MBO. No differences in receipt of chemotherapy between the surgical and medical patients were found in the univariable analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–1.07; p = 0.47) or multivariable analysis (SHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00–1.26; p = 0.06). Older age, African American race, medical comorbidities, non-colorectal and non-ovarian cancer diagnoses, sepsis, ascites, and intensive care unit stays were inversely associated with receipt of chemotherapy after MBO (p < 0.05). Chemotherapy with surgery was associated with longer survival than surgery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.97; 95% CI, 2.65–3.34; p < 0.01) or medical management without chemotherapy (aHR, 4.56; 95% CI, 4.04–5.14; p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses of biologically diverse cancers (colorectal, pancreatic, and ovarian) showed similar results, with greater survival related to chemotherapy (p < 0.05).ConclusionsChemotherapy plays an integral role in maximizing oncologic outcome for select patients with MBO. The data from this study are critical to optimizing multimodality care for these complex patients.

Inhibition of BAMBI reduces the viability and motility of colon cancer via activating TGF-β/Smad pathway in vitro and in vivo.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6811.].

The impact of immunotherapy education on GI cancers.

479 Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a heterogeneous group of cancers with varying underlying pathophysiology and distinct treatment paradigms. Immunotherapy (IO) is unique in each of the subtypes and biomarkers utility varies. With the expansion of IO in each cancer subtypes, education remains essential to optimize patient outcomes through integration of the latest evidence-based data at point of care. Through the partnership between Medscape Oncology and the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, 2 educational activities were designed to increase the knowledge and competence of oncologists surrounding the role of IO in patients with advanced GI cancers. Methods: The 2 educational activities included a text based online activity with 3 chapters focused on gastroesophageal cancers, colorectal cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and a 30-minute online, video discussion with 3 faculty and synchronized slides on HCC. Educational effectiveness was assessed with repeated paired pre/post assessment where learners served as their own controls. A chi-square test was used to identify statistical significance in proportion of correct responses. The first activity launched 11/27/2019 and the second activity launched on 5/8/20. Data were collected and reported through 8/25/2020. Results: A total of 8433 learners, including 1543 oncologists, participated from 11/2019 through 8/2020. Participation in education resulted in significant relative improvements among oncologist learners on IO in GI cancers in (n = 641): 110%: role or eligibility of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (p &lt; .001) 38%: clinical trial data of ICIs (p &lt; .001) Subsequent education on unresectable HCC demonstrated a significant relative improvement in both knowledge and competence for oncologist learners (n = 902): 19%: regarding clinical trial data in unresectable HCC (p = .073) 19%; competence identifying role of ICIs in unresectable HCC (p &lt; .05) 59%: competence managing irAEs in unresectable HCC (p &lt; .001). Conclusions: These 2 online CME-certified educational activities resulted in statistically significant gains in oncologist knowledge surrounding the use of IO in advanced GI cancers Follow-up education on HCC demonstrated the value and benefit of multi-modal and sequential activities on improving competence among oncologists caring for patients with unresectable HCC There remains a need for continuous education as more oncologists utilize IO in their practice while the understanding and availability of clinical data continues to expand and evolve in the varying GI cancer subtypes. More than 50% of learners continued to demonstrate a need in understanding the clinical trial data or role of IO in metastatic GI cancers with more than 40% of the learners demonstrating continued need on clinical trial data or role of IO in HCC specifically.

Feasibility of using a computerized food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess dietary patterns in patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

465 Background: Identification of poor dietary patterns is important for the optimal management of patients with metastatic GI malignancies who suffer from high rates of malnutrition and sarcopenia which are associated with increased rates of treatment-related toxicity and worsened survival. Dietary records or recall methods and FFQs are available but have high patient burden and are seldom utilized in oncology settings outside of formal nutritional consultations. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of conducting serial assessments of dietary patterns using a novel computerized FFQ technology. Methods: Assessments of diet using the computerized FFQ, nutritional status (NUTRISCORE), QOL and anorexia/cachexia burden (FAACT), anxiety/depression (HADS) and taste burden were done at the time of initiation of first-line chemotherapy (baseline) and 3 months later. The FFQ was done independently either at home on personal computer after visit or via iPad in infusion room. Dietary quality was defined by the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI) score, which was automatically calculated by the computerized FFQ software. Feasibility was defined as at least 70% of patients completing baseline and 3-month assessments. Spearman’s correlations were used to determine associations between measures. Results: 29 patients with advanced (metastatic or unresectable) GI cancers were enrolled and 23 completed the baseline FFQ (8 colorectal, 5 pancreas, 5 gastroesophageal, 5 other). Median age was 58 (20-78) with M:F ratio of 10:13. The overall completion rate of baseline and 3-month assessments was 81.8%, meeting the pre-defined feasibility criteria. The mean baseline HEI score was 65 (range 38-88). Of patients who completed both baseline and 3-month assessments, the mean HEI score remained stable at 58 with changes in specific HEI components including a 20% decline in the seafood and plant protein score and a 13% decline in the whole grain score and small improvements in other areas (e.g. empty calories, dairy). There were no significant correlations between baseline HEI score and other assessments. Conclusions: It is feasible to use a computerized FFQ to assess for longitudinal changes in eating patterns and dietary quality in patients with advanced GI cancers, particularly when patients can complete the assessments during chemotherapy infusions. Preliminary findings also suggest that the FFQ can be helpful for highlighting areas in which diet quality could be improved. Additional analysis of other computerized FFQ data (e.g. macro/micronutrient consumption) is ongoing.

Being Present 2.0: Online Mindfulness-Based Program for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients and Caregivers.

PurposeA metastatic cancer diagnosis is associated with high levels of distress in patients and caregivers, which may be alleviated by mindfulness interventions. Research on scalable, tailored, online mindfulness training programs is needed. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered 8-week mindfulness-based intervention, Being Present 2.0 (BP2.0).MethodsWe performed a single-arm feasibility study of BP2.0 among patients with any metastatic gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy, with or without an informal caregiver. Participants were instructed to practice mindfulness using pre-recorded guided meditations 5 times per week using a study-specific website and to attend a weekly live, interactive virtual meeting facilitated by a trained instructor. The web-based platform enabled direct measurement of adherence.ResultsThe study enrolled 46 of 74 (62%) patients contacted, together with 23 caregivers (69 participants total), from May to October 2018. Median patient age was 52 (range 20-70 years), 39% were male, 67% non-Hispanic white, 65% had colorectal cancer, and 78% lived outside of San Francisco. The top reasons cited for participation were to reduce stress/anxiety and learn how to meditate. Mean baseline National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN DT) scores were 4.7 (patients) and 5.8 (caregivers). The study discontinuation rate was 20% (eight patients and six caregivers). Among the remaining 55 participants, 43 (78%) listened to at least one audio recording and/or attended at least one virtual meeting, although adherence data was incomplete. The retention rate was 71%, with 39 participants completing at least one follow-up assessment. In post-intervention qualitative interviews, 88% of respondents reported a positive experience. Compared to baseline, participants reported significantly reduced post-intervention NCCN DT scores (mean 3.1; P = .012).ConclusionThe BP2.0 online mindfulness-based program is feasible and acceptable for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer and caregivers. These results will guide plans for a follow-up efficacy study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03528863.

Testicular Metastasis as an Initial Manifestation of Gastrointestinal Cancer

Metastatic small bowel tumors in the testes are uncommon often indicating an advanced stage of sickness with poor prognosis. The route of spread to the scrotal level has not yet been defined. The most of these tumors are diagnosed at autopsy or orchiectomy for metastatic carcinoma. The diagnosis is mainly based on histological and immunohistochemical data. In this paper, we report the case of a 36-year-old patient with a spermatic torsion secondary to a testis metastasis from an adenocarcinoma of the small intestine confirmed histologically, occurring as first clinical manifestation that was taken care in the medical oncology department of CHU Hassan II in Fes. The aim of the subject is to highlight this rare metastatic localization of gastrointestinal cancer; how to approach the diagnosis and distinguish between primary testicular cancer and testicular metastasis; by describing the different clinical, radiological and anatomopathological aspects of metastatic gastrointestinal cancer to the testis.