Metastasis-free Survival Research Articles

Dual-agent immunotherapy for prevention of melanoma brain metastases: A real-world analysis of 8686 patients.

2022 Background: Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are a common endpoint among patients with advanced melanoma and prognosis is poor. Strategies for MBM prevention can prolong life and reduce morbidity. Dual agent immunotherapy (dIT) has been paradigm-changing in management malignant melanoma management. Recent clinical trials have supported the role of dIT for upfront management of small, asymptomatic MBM. Yet, its potential role in extending brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and decreasing MBM incidence overall has not been explored. The objective was to compare MBM incidence, median overall survival (OS), and BMFS in melanoma patients treated with dIT versus single immunotherapy (sIT). Methods: A real-world deidentified database collating clinical information from 92 organizations (TriNetX, Inc.) was queried. Melanoma patients without brain metastases prior to immunotherapy were stratified by treatment (anti-CTLA4 [sIT] and combination anti-CTLA4/ anti-PD1 [dIT]) and propensity-score matched. MBM incidence was measured within 5 years post-IT initiation. A complementary single-institution retrospective cohort study analyzed melanoma patients treated from 2012-2019. Median OS and BMFS were compared via log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. A competing risk analysis was performed to measure the cumulative incidences of MBM and death without MBM. Results: TriNetX identified 8,686 melanoma patients who received immunotherapy (4,585 dIT; 4,101 sIT). MBM incidence was 13.4%, and 19.3%, for the dIT and sIT cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). DIT was associated with a lower likelihood of developing MBM compared to sIT (RR [95%CI], 0.69 [0.62-0.77]). After propensity-score matching on demographics and comorbidities, MBM incidence was similarly 13.3% and 18.5% for the dIT and sIT cohorts, respectively. On single-institution analysis, 130 melanoma patients were included (87 dIT; 43 sIT with anti-CTLA4). In patients with stage IV disease, median OS was 1.70 and 3.66 years for the sIT and dIT cohorts, respectively (p=0.6). Median BMFS was 1.56 and 2.36 years in the sIT and dIT cohorts respectively (p=0.76). On multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, NRAS mutation was significantly correlated with a worse prognosis for BMFS. Conclusions: These data highlight the impact of combination anti-CTL4/ anti-PD1 immunotherapy in decreasing MBM incidence. The potential primary prophylactic role of dIT in MBM warrants prospective exploration, including mechanistic understanding.

The phase 3 INTerpath-002 study design: Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) V940 (mRNA-4157) plus pembrolizumab vs placebo plus pembrolizumab for resected early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

TPS8116 Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro; anti–PD-1) is indicated as adjuvant monotherapy following resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients (pts) with stage IB (T2a ≥4 cm), II, or IIIA NSCLC (per AJCC v7). However, many pts experience disease recurrence, and have limited treatment options available. V940 (mRNA-4157) is a novel individualized neoantigen therapy that encodes up to 34 neoantigens that is specifically tailored and manufactured for each pt derived from their tumor. V940 as monotherapy and in combination with pembro has shown preliminary antitumor activity in the phase 1 KEYNOTE-603 study in several solid tumor types, including NSCLC. Additionally, in pts with completely resected, high-risk stage IIIB/C/D and IV cutaneous melanoma in the KEYNOTE-942 primary analysis, V940 plus pembro demonstrated significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.561 [95% CI, 0.309–1.017]; P = 0.0266) and distant metastasis-free survival (HR, 0.347 [95% CI, 0.145–0.828]; P = 0.0063) vs pembro alone. Here we present the design of the phase 3, randomized, double-blind INTerpath-002 study (NCT06077760) of adjuvant V940 plus pembro vs placebo plus pembro in pts with completely resected and chemotherapy-treated stage II–IIIB (N2) NSCLC (AJCC v8). Methods: Eligible pts aged ≥18 years with completely resected stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC (per AJCC v8.0) where EGFR-directed therapy is not indicated as primary therapy (ie, absence of sensitizing EGFR mutations e.g. DEL19 or L858R), who have received 1–4 doses of adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy, have ECOG PS 0 or 1, and have available tumor tissue for next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 testing will be enrolled. Pts must not have received previous neoadjuvant therapy for NSCLC and must not have received or be candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive V940 1 mg IM or placebo Q3W for up to 9 doses plus pembro 400 mg IV Q6W for up to 9 cycles or until disease recurrence, pt withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or an additional malignancy requiring treatment. Randomization will be stratified by histology (squamous vs nonsquamous), PD-L1 TPS ( < 1% vs 1%–49% vs ≥50%), disease stage (II vs III), and geographic location (North America/Western Europe/Australia vs rest of world). The primary endpoint is disease-free survival per investigator review. Secondary endpoints include distant metastasis-free survival per investigator assessment, OS, lung cancer‒specific survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Tumor imaging will occur at baseline, every 12 wk until wk 48, every 24 wk through year 3, and every 48 wk thereafter. Enrollment began in October 2023 and is ongoing globally (NCT06077760). The abstract was originally presented and published in: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT281. Clinical trial information: NCT06077760 .

MRI-Linac radiation therapy outcomes in patients with prostate, breast and other advanced malignancies.

e13811 Background: MR-guided radiation therapy offers an innovative approach, providing superior soft tissue contrast that enables clinicians to deliver higher doses to the target site with fewer fractions. The objective of the study is to assess objective response rates and adverse effects related to a community-based single-institution experience with the ViewRay MRIdian. Methods: An IRB-approved registrational trial was conducted at the Providence Cancer Institute starting May 2020, with data cutoff of September 2023. All patients treated underwent MR screening, and the target site(s) were treated using hypofractionated radiation therapy in ≤5 fractions. The primary endpoint was to assess adverse effects attributed to radiation therapy. Secondary measures included local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for patients treated definitively for prostate cancer. The assessments were performed under the guidance of experienced radiation oncologists. Results: From May 2020 to September 2023, n=257 patients received treatment on the MRIdian with a median follow-up of 430 days [range 4-1221 days]. One and 2-year LRFS was 92% and 87%, and excluding prostate and breast cancer, 83% and 70%. Definitive prostatestereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) was delivered to 117 patients and significantly reduced PSA (mean difference -6.27, p<0.0001), with no local failures to date. One and 2-year DMFS was 75% and 67%, though if excluding definitive prostate SBRT and partial breast irradiation, these were 48% and 33%. The OS rate at 1 and 2 years was 86% and 76%. Excluding prostate and breast cancer, the 1 and 2-year OS was 74% and 55%. Grade 3+ adverse events possibly or definitely attributable to radiation therapy were noted in 5% (n=13/257) of patients, including 2 possible treatment-associated deaths (bowel perforation following liver SBRT, and respiratory failure following lung SBRT and trastuzumab-deruxtecan systemic therapy). Conclusions: Our institutional experience with the MRIdian demonstrated high levels of local control, while overall survival was driven by out-of-field failures. Serious adverse events were infrequent, but more common in abdominal targets highlighting the need for careful planning and tight organs at risk (OAR) constraints, particularly if systemic therapy is delivered soon after radiation.

Endostar combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC): A phase III, prospective, randomised-controlled, multicenter clinical trial.

6002 Background: Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has long been regarded as standard treatment for LA-NPC. However, approximately 30% of patients still fail to obtain a satisfactory effect. Endostar (Rh-endostatin), an anti-angiogenesis inhibitor, is well-tolerated and has been reported as a promising complement to CCRT. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding Endostar to CCRT for LA-NPC. Methods: In this prospective, randomized phase III study, patients with LA-NPC (stage III-IVb, 7th edition) were enrolled at 6 centers in China, and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Endostar plus CCRT (CCRT+E group, n=150) or CCRT alone (CCRT group, n=150). Endostar (7.5 mg/m2/day, days 1-10, 15 days/cycle) was given continuously intravenously for 5 cycles (3 concurrent from 5 days before radiotherapy, and 2 adjuvant from the first day after the completion of radiotherapy). The primary endpoint was the progress-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), local-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), the rate of complete response (CR) at 3 months after RT, and safety. Results: Between November 2016 and July 2020, 300 patients with LA-NPC were randomized (CCRT+E group, 150; CCRT group, 150). As of the data cutoff (December 2023), the median follow-up was 66 months. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients in the CCRT+E group achieved better CR rate at 3 months after RT (90.0% vs 80.7%, P=0.022). The 3-year PFS was 84.8% in the CCRT+E group, and 75.1% in the CCRT group (HR, 0.544; 95% CI, 0.336-0.879; Plog-rank=0.011). The 3-year OS was 89.2% vs. 85.3% (HR, 0.595; 95% CI, 0.361-0.982; Plog-rank=0.039). The 3-year DMFS was 89.7% vs. 80.5% (HR, 0.468; 95% CI, 0.266-0.821; Plog-rank=0.007). The 3-year LRRFS was 91.5% vs. 90.8% (HR, 0.808; 95% CI, 0.407-1.604; Plog-rank=0.541). Patients in the CCRT+E group and in the CCRT group had similar Grade 3-4 acute and late toxicity profile (61.7% vs. 65.3%, p=0.519 and 8.0% vs.7.3%, p=0.815). Conclusions: The addition of Endostar to standard CCRT significantly improved the 3-year PFS of LA-NPC patients with good safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02907710 .

Neoadjuvant pazopanib with radiation therapy in patients with localized sarcoma: Experience from a sarcoma center.

e23555 Background: Tissue oxygenation is critical to the success of radiation therapy (RT) in any tumor type. However, tumor vasculature is abnormally structured and dysfunctional. Anti-angiogenic molecules have been shown to stabilize the intratumoral vascular structures and improve tissue oxygenation, which may aid in the success of RT. Pazopanib (PAZO) is a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor. Here, we report the pathologic outcome and clinical correlates of concurrent use of neoadjuvant PAZO and RT in our cohort of patients with localized soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods: This is a retrospective, single institution study of patients diagnosed with localized STS between January 2019 and October 2023. Patients who received concurrent PAZO and pre-operative external beam RT (50 Gy in 25 fractions) were included. Patients with metastatic disease, unplanned resections, and those requiring excisional biopsy/curettage for diagnosis were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of major pathologic response (mPR) defined by > 90% necrosis on surgical pathology specimen. The secondary endpoint was local relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local and distant relapse rate (RR) at 6 months. All-grade toxicities from PAZO were recorded. Results: Ten patients with a median age of 51 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 34-76) were included. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma was the most common histologic subtype (50% patients). Median follow up was 24.2 months (IQR: 11-36). Six patients tolerated the maximum dose of PAZO until RT completion (800mg PO daily). The dose of PAZO was reduced in 4 patients due to grade 3 GI toxicity and HTN. Nine patients stayed on PAZO until RT completion. The median time to surgery after RT was 42 days (IQR: 37-77). The median largest tumor dimension prior to RT was 11.65 cm (IQR: 3.8 to 18), and 10.6 cm (IQR: 5.4 to 19.7) after RT completion. Nine of 10 patients had R0 resection, and 7 (70%) had mPR. Three of 7 (43%) patients had complete necrosis. All patients with R0 resection have no local recurrence after a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR: 11-36). Median local RFS was 20 months (IQR: 5-32), and DMFS was 6 months (IQR: 1-32). The local RR at 6 months was 10%, and the distant RR at 6 months was 30%. No correlation was observed between mPR and DMFS. Conclusions: Historically, neoadjuvant RT alone induces a mPR in ~30% of patients with localized STS. In our cohort, neoadjuvant PAZO with RT achieved an mPR in 70% of patients. Although dose reduction and grade 3 toxicity were noted in the majority of patients, these were reversible after stopping PAZO. There was no correlation between mPR and DMFS. However, a short course of PAZO with RT may help achieve R0 margins, which is the strongest predictor of better local RFS. A randomized trial is warranted to help understand the true impact of neoadjuvant PAZO with RT.

The Role of Elective Nodal Irradiation in Treating Clinically Node-Negative Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PurposeThis study aims to examine the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in clinically node-negative (cN0) sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) and to define the optimal radiation fields for ENI. Methods and MaterialsWe retrospectively reviewed 368 cN0 SNSCC patients treated between 2009 and 2021. The study evaluated the impact of ENI on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), regional-failure-free survival (RFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), along with the coverage areas of ENI. ResultsThe majority of patients underwent surgery (n=316, 85.9%), with 75% (n=276) having tumors in the maxillary sinus or nasal cavity and 67.7% (n=249) presenting with T4 disease. Additionally, 32.3% (n=119) of the tumors were poorly differentiated. The 5-year OS, PFS, RFS, and DMFS rates were 59.3%, 54.0%, 57.6%, and 58.8%, respectively. ENI was performed in 217 patients (59%), with sixteen experiencing neck relapse during follow-up. While ENI did not enhance survival rates, it significantly reduced the overall regional-failure rate (7.9% vs. 1.8%, χ2 =7.98, p<0.01) and the cumulative incidence of regional failure (p=0.045). Additionally, the subgroups with maxillary sinus origin (2.33% vs. 13.51%, p=0.025), T4 stage (1.80% vs. 8.54%, p=0.028), and poor differentiation (2.44% vs. 13.51%, p=0.029) had higher cumulative incidences of regional failure in patients without ENI. No significant difference was observed in survival and regional failure rates between patients treated with ENI to levels Ib and II with or without level III, as well as between cN0 patients with non-midline crossing lesions receiving unilateral or bilateral ENI. ConclusionsDespite no survival benefit, ENI significantly decreases the regional failure rate in cN0 SNSCC patients. For primary lesions not crossing the midline, ipsilateral ENI targeting levels Ib and II proves to be an effective strategy.

Sequential chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial.

6075 Background: Induction chemotherapy (IC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been regarded as standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) due to its favorable disease control. Now, distant metastasis was the main cause of failure. However, concurrent cisplatin is associated with intolerable toxicities and ineffective in preventing distant metastasis. Since IMRT enhances the local control and chemotherapy before or after radiotherapy decreases the risk of distant failure, it is worth exploring whether sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) regimen could replace IC+CCRT for patients with LA-NPC. Methods: This open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted from January 2018 to September 2021 in 6 centers in China. Patients aged 18–65 years with stage T1-4N2-3 or T3-4N0-1 M0 NPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2 cycles of IC with GP regimen (gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 d1,8 + cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d1-3, q21d) plus IMRT, followed by 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with the same regimen or IC with GP regimen for 2 cycles followed by IMRT plus concomitant weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m²). The primary endpoint was 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) with non-inferiority margin of 10% (HR&lt;1.6) and the incidence of grade ≥3 acute mucositis during radiotherapy. Efficacy analysis and safety analysis were dividedly performed in the intention-to-treat and safety population. Results: A total of 420 patients were randomly assigned to SCRT group (n = 210) or IC+CCRT group (n = 210). With a median follow-up of 47.0 months (IQR: 35.0-57.8), the 3-year FFS was 84.0% in SCRT group versus 79.8% in IC+CCRT group (log rank P=0.344), with an HR of 0.804 (95% CI, 0.510 to 1.266) and absolute difference of 4.2% (95% CI, -3.2 to 11.6). No significant differences were observed between groups in 3-year overall survival (97.4% vs. 94.5%; HR 0.413; 95% CI, 0.159 to 1.076; log rank P=0.061), locoregional control (91.7% vs. 88.8%; HR 0.767; 95% CI, 0.420 to 1.401; log rank P=0.386), or distant metastasis-free survival (93.6% vs. 91.5%; HR 0.756; 95% CI, 0.376 to 1.520; log rank P=0.430). Compared with IC+CCRT group, the SCRT group had significantly lower incidences of grade ≥3 acute nonhematological AEs due to the omission of concurrent chemotherapy (including acute mucositis 29.0% vs. 41.9%, P&lt;0.001; nausea 9.5% vs. 18.1%, P=0.011; and vomiting 3.8% vs. 9.5%, P=0.019), and higher incidences of grade ≥3 acute hematological AEs (including thrombocytopenia and leukopenia) due to the additional AC. Conclusions: For LA-NPC, SCRT was not inferior in 3-year FFS to IC+CCRT. It might be an alternative treatment for LA-NPC patients with fewer sever nonhematological AEs during IMRT. Clinical trial information: NCT03366415 .

INTerpath-001: Pembrolizumab with V940 (mRNA-4157) versus pembrolizumab with placebo for adjuvant treatment of high-risk stage II-IV melanoma.

TPS9616 Background: The anti−PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-C and stage III melanoma by AJCC 8th ed, following complete resection. Adjuvant pembrolizumab has improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with high-risk melanoma, but many patients experience disease recurrence. In the randomized phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study, the individualized neoantigen therapy V940 showed improved RFS and DMFS when used in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with stage III or IV melanoma. INTerpath-001 (NCT05933577) is a double-blind phase 3 randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab plus V940 versus pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage II-IV melanoma. Methods: Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with surgically resected stage IIB or IIC (pathologic or clinical), III, or IV cutaneous melanoma per AJCC 8th ed and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients are ineligible if they have received any prior systemic therapy and if more than 13 weeks has elapsed between last surgical resection and first dose of pembrolizumab. Patients with ocular or mucosal melanoma and past or current in-transit metastases or satellitosis are excluded. All patients must provide a blood sample and a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sample for sequencing. Patients will be stratified by risk (IIB, IIC, IIIA, and IIIB vs IIIC/D and IV) and age (&lt;65 years vs ≥65 years). Approximately 1089 patients will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg plus V940 1 mg or pembrolizumab 400 mg with placebo. Pembrolizumab will be administered intravenously every 6 weeks and v940 or placebo will be administered intramuscularly every 3 weeks. Treatment will continue for up to 9 doses or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary end point is RFS by investigator review. Secondary end points are DMFS by investigator review, overall survival, safety and tolerability, and quality of life. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs will be estimated using a stratified Cox regression model with the Efron method of handling ties. Between-treatment differences will be evaluated using a stratified log-rank test. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05933577 .

LC3AB protein-based gene (PbG) signatures as an indicator of relapse even after achieving pathological complete response.

e12552 Background: The application of tissue-based quantitative protein and morphological profiling of breast cancer tissues combined with RNA sequencing provides a flexible and generally applicable and scalable method to develop Protein-based Gene (PbG) signatures with significant prognostic value. Methods: A racially and subtype diverse breast cancer cohort (N=555) with available subset of RNA-seq data was used to develop gene expression-based signatures by stratifying patients according to protein expression (IHC) based on survival information and tumor lymphocyte infiltration (TILs) using survival-derived cutoff values. The predictive value of these signatures was then compared with other popular biomarkers scoring systems such as ROR.score, and OncotypeDx (Gene 21). Here we describe the predictive value of these signatures is evaluated by logistic regression modeling of publicly available gene expression data (N=996) from patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (anthracycline +/- taxane) with a final validation in an independent cohort (N=443) receiving similar therapy. Results: A model of PbG-derived signature from Kaiso, LC3A/B IHC and quantitative TIL-measurements together with ROR score, MAPK, PTEN, Immune and Gene21 signatures show significant prediction of distant metastasis-free survival in all patients: (DMFS, AUC= 0.737, 95% CI: 0.665- 0.819); and in non-pCR patients DMSF (AUC= 0.71, 95% CI: 0.633-0.773). When examining the role of all those markers among the patients who achieved the pCR and had relapse, the LC3A/B PbG-derived score was found to be highly predictive of those patients who would not achieve pCR and ultimately have recurrent disease. Conclusions: PbG-based signatures utilizing on LC3A/B protein values offer a novel and clinically relevant predictive biomarker of response to therapy and relapse in breast cancer patients.

Efficacy of nimotuzumab added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

6024 Background: To investigate the efficacy and toxicities associated with adding nimotuzumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) patients who received induction chemotherapy (IC). Methods: Patients with stage III-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received IC (TPF/TP/GP) and platinum-based CCRT between January 2017 and October 2021 were retrospectively included. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to balance and control confounding factors, and the matching variables included gender, age, T stage, N stage, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status. Patients were divided into two treatment groups: CCRT+nimotuzumab (200mg iv, weekly for 7 courses) and CCRT alone. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), the secondary endpoints were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Results: We screened 242 patients in the analysis. After PSM, 121 (50.0%) and 121 (50.0%) had CCRT+nimotuzumab and CCRT alone, respectively. The 3-year OS was 95.4% and 88.0% in those with and without nimotuzumab treatment (P=0.041), and the 3-year DFS of the CCRT+nimotuzumab group was significantly better than that in the CCRT alone group (90.3% vs. 77.5%, P=0.003). Similar LRFS was found between those with and without nimotuzumab treatment (96.5% vs. 93.7%, P=0.297). The 3-year DMFS for CCRT+nimotuzumab versus CCRT alone was 92.9% versus 82.5% (P=0.008). No significant differences in major toxicities were found between the two treatment arms including hematologic toxicities, hepatoxicity, nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal reactions, and mucositis (P&gt;0.05). Conclusions: The addition of nimotuzumab to CCRT after IC in LANPC has shown promising results in treatment outcomes and acceptable toxicities.

Endoscopic surgery combined chemoradiotherapy and PD-1 blockade in patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma.

e21552 Background: Primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare and aggressive disease different from cutaneous melanoma. The best treatment modality including the role of immune checkpoint blockade in SNMM has not been defined. Methods: Between 2021 and 2023, patients with previously untreated sinonasal melanoma were enrolled by three single-center investigator-initiated phase II clinical trials (ChiCTR2100046498 / ChiCTR2100045797/ ChiCTR2100049031). Eligible patients in ChiCTR2100045797 trial received postoperative radical chemoradiotherapy combined with toripalimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) for a year or until the disease progressed. Eligible participants in ChiCTR2100046498 study received surgery combined with radiation without immunotherapy. And for patients in ChiCTR2100049031 study, preoperative radiation was carried out firstly. The locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were the main efficacy goals. Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled (mean age 62 years, 33 males [61.1%] and 21 women [38.9%]) with 2y-OS rate 62.3±7.9%, 2y-RFS rate 67.1±8.2%, and 2y-DMFS rate 63.9±8.1%. Patients with T3 (n = 23), T4a (n = 14), and T4b (n = 17) stages, including12 patients with node-positive disease, were included at baseline. During a median follow-up of 11 months, 19 patients ultimately died, 10 experienced relapses, and 17 developed metastases. Tumor T staging was demonstrated to be an independent prognostic predictor according to the Cox univariate analysis. The primary factor contributing to a poor prognosis and the primary cause of death for 73.7% of patients was distant metastases. Preoperative radiation had an improved long-term survival with 2y-OS rate of 85.7±13.2%, and it can considerably lower the risk of distant metastases (p≤0.05). The overall survival rate for patients receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy was higher than that for patients not receiving immunotherapy (2y-OS rate 74.1±11.4% vs. 39.3±15.8%), although the difference was not statistically significant due to a small number of patients (p = 0.16). No immune-related adverse effects grade≥3 was recorded. Conclusions: The primary cause of the poor prognostic performance of SNMM is distant metastasis. The risk of distant metastases might be considerably decreased by preoperative radiation treatment. Surgery combined with radiation and immunotherapy could bring promising survival benefit. The way forward may involve investigating the combination of immunotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04879654 ; NCT05009446 .

Proton therapy re-irradiation outcomes and genomic landscape of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer

IntroductionRe-irradiation (re-RT) for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) is challenging. We describe clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) for recurrent HNC, and report genomic alterations associated with patterns of failure. Materials & methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of rHNC patients treated with PT. Outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to assess multiple patient factors. Next-generation sequencing and genomic analyses were performed on available samples. ResultsEighty-nine patients treated with PBS-PT for rHNC with a median follow-up of 12 mo (0–71 mo) were included. The 1- and 2-y local control (LC) rates were 80.8 % (95 % CI: 70.8–90.8) and 66.2 % (95 % CI: 50.7–81.7), and 1- and 2-y distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 41.0 % (95 % CI: 30.0–52.0) and 26.3 % (95 % CI: 15.7–36.9). The median overall survival (OS) was 13 mo (95 % CI: 9.3–16.7). On UVA and MVA, smaller gross tumor volume (GTV) was associated with improved OS (HR 1.002, P = 0.004), DMFS (HR 1.002, P = 0.004), and PFS (HR 1.002, P = 0.014). There were 35 late Gr3 + toxicity events (30.3 %). Patients with higher candidate gene-specific mutation burden (genes with [OR] > 2, P < 0.05) had inferior PFS. TP53, NOTCH4, and ARID1B mutations were associated with inferior DMFS (OR > 2, P < 0.05). ConclusionsPBS-PT is effective at achieving LC for rHNC with favorable toxicity. Distant metastases are common, and associated with TP53, NOTCH4, and ARID1B mutations. Inclusion of genomic alterations in the clinical decision process may be warranted.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with toripalimab and Endostar in high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial.

6086 Background: Even though induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) can improve the survival rate of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), the recurrence and/or metastasis rates for patients with stage IV (T4 and/or N3) diseases remain high. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of adding Toripalimab (PD-1 inhibitor) and Endostar (recombinant human endostatin) to IC-CCRT in patients with high-risk LA-NPC. Methods: High-risk LA-NPC patients were randomly divided (1:1) into either the IC-CCRT+TE group (gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with Toripalimab and Endostar) or the IC-CCRT group (gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy). Toripalimab (240mg, d1) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles (3 induction, 2 concurrent, and 7 adjuvant). Endostar (7.5mg/m2, d1-10) was continuously injected intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 5 cycles (3 induction and 2 concurrent). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: From September 7, 2020, to August 23, 2022, a total of 106 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the IC-CCRT+TE group (n = 53) and IC-CCRT group (n = 53). At a median follow-up of 25 months, the PFS was significantly improved in the IC-CCRT+TE group compared to the IC-CCRT group (HR=0.36, p=0.041). 28 patients (52.8%) in the IC-CCRT+TE group and 5 patients (9.4%) in the IC-CCRT group achieved complete response (CR) after induction chemotherapy, and the difference was statistically significant (P &lt; 0.001). The incidence of grade ≥3 acute adverse events in the IC-CCRT+TE group and IC-CCRT group was 66.0% and 62.3%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 late adverse events in two groups was 5.8% and 5.7%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was only 4.7%. Conclusions: IC-CCRT combined with Toripalimab and Endostar significantly improved PFS in patients with high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and the adverse events are manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT04447326 .

Ten-year outcomes of targeted axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

600 Background: When pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved in node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), identifying traces of the previous lesion becomes challenging which makes accurate surgery difficult. We conducted targeted axillary surgery (TAS) in node-positive breast cancer after NAC, which involves accurately targeting the lymph nodes where metastasis occurred and performing surgery using a less extensive method. The 10-year outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 235 patients with cT1-3N1-2 breast cancer who received NAC from 2012 to 2017. In this cohort, 78 patients underwent TAS only, and 157 underwent conventional ALND, including 31 patients who initially received TAS followed by additional ALND. Oncologic results, including locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were assessed over a 10-year follow-up period. Survival outcomes for all patients and each subtype were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. Results: The TAS group had significantly more postmenopausal patients (p=0.022), and the most common type of breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma [TAS: 75 (96.2%); ALND: 157 (100.0%)]. There was no statistical difference in the T stage and the number of lymph nodes suspected of metastasis at diagnosis (p=0.062, 0.985). Mastectomy was performed in 60.3% of patients in the TAS group and 93.0% in the ALND group (p&lt;0.001), and 68 (87.2%) of the TAS group and 41 (26.1%) of the ALND group received additional axillary radiotherapy (p=0.019). There was no significant difference in oncologic outcomes between the TAS and ALND groups in all patients (LRFS, p=0.673; DMFS, p=0.729; OS, p=0.396) and based on subtypes, including hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the HR-positive breast cancer group, the TAS and ALND groups showed very similar trends (LRFS, p=0.954; DMFS, p=0.993; OS, p=0.617). In HER2-positive breast cancer, although not statistically significant, the survival outcomes were better in the TAS group than in the ALND group (LRFS, p=0.967; DMFS, p=0.999; OS, p=0.423). However, the OS in the TAS group for TNBC was lower than that in the ALND group, though not significantly (LRFS, p=0.411; DMFS, p=0.697; OS, p=0.210). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that TAS is comparable to ALND in terms of 10-year oncological outcomes across different types of node-positive breast cancer, suggesting its potential as a viable alternative. However, further research focusing on patient quality of life and postoperative complications is essential to establish TAS as a superior surgical option to ALND.

Induction immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world experience.

e20057 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard consolidation therapy for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether induction ICIs combined with chemotherapy can further improve efficacy is controversial. In this study, we used real-world data to explore the possibility of ICIs plus chemotherapy before definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Methods: Patients with stage III NSCLC (including postoperative recurrence), who received definitive CRT from 2016 to 2022, was retrospective reviewed. Survival outcomes and the incidence of pneumonia were calculated and compared between patients with induction ICIs plus chemotherapy or not. Results: A total of 156 patients undergoing definitive RCT were analyzed. Among them, 103 patients received induction ICIs plus chemotherapy, and 53 patients received induction chemotherapy before RCT or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 75.0% and 44.4%, respectively. The median OS was not reached (NR) and 36.5 months, indicating a significant improvement of survival with the addition of induction ICIs (P = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in median progression-free survival (PFS) (22.4 vs. 13.6 months; P = 0.09), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (38.0 vs. 36.9 months; P = 0.73), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (37.8 vs. 25.5 months; P = 0.14). Multivariate analysis showed that induction ICIs plus chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.89; 95% CI, 1.24-6.75; P = 0.01). The incidence of grade 2 or higher pneumonia in the two groups was 37.2% and 29.2%, respectively (P = 0.35). Additionally, we found that patients with consolidation ICIs after induction ICIs had a better OS, with a 4-year OS rate of 90.7% and 65.5% (P = 0.03). Patients undergoing 5-6 cycles of induction ICIs seemed to have a better outcome compared to those with 3-4 cycles or 1-2 cycles (93.8% vs. 77.4% vs. 60.5%). Conclusions: For patients with stage III NSCLC receiving definitive CRT, the combination of induction ICIs and chemotherapy improves OS without a significant increase of pneumonia in real-world practice. This treatment strategy warrants further research.

Strategies for patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma involved internal carotid artery who are intolerant to embolization.

The surgical treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) involving the internal carotid artery (ICA) is challenging, as the massive bleeding caused by intraoperative rupture of the ICA is life-threatening. We reported that ICA embolization is an effective pretreatment to avoid fatal bleeding, but some patients cannot tolerate the procedure. We used endovascular vascular protection (ICA stents), vascular sacrifice (bypass grafting) and extravascular vascular protection (transcervical external stent placement) of the ICA to provide alternative options for these patients. METHODOLOGYy: This study enrolled patients with rNPC adjacent to or invading the ICA who were unsuitable for ICA embolization from January 2015 to June 2020. ICA pretreatment combined with endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) was performed for the 30 patients. We report the survival outcome and incidence of complications after ICA pretreatment. ICA pretreatment was performed for the 30 enrolled patients, among whom 8 underwent endoscopic-assisted transcervical protection of the parapharyngeal ICA combined with ENPG, 6 underwent bypass grafting, and 16 underwent ICA stent implantation followed by ENPG. After pretreatment, at a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 2-80 months), the 3-year locoregional overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 62.9%, 61.3%, 70.2%, and 71.4%, respectively. ICA pretreatment combined with salvage ENPG enables the feasible and effective resection of rNPC lesions involving the ICA in patients who cannot tolerate ICA embolization. Therefore, this treatment may be an effective method for improving outcomes. Multidisciplinary therapy is needed to reduce operation-related complications.

Phase II multi-center study of adjuvant nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in patients with high-risk uveal melanoma (HCRN MEL17-309).

9509 Background: High-risk uveal melanomas (UM) recur distantly in over 50% by 3 years (median distant metastatic-free survival (DMFS) 32 months). No effective treatment currently exists to reduce the risk of metastatic disease and patients (pts) with metastasis have a very poor prognosis with few therapeutic options. The combination of Nivolumab/Ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) has shown limited efficacy in pts with metastatic UM. However, preclinical data suggest differential biology between local vs metastatic UM. We performed a prospective multi-center phase II study of adjuvant Nivo/Ipi in pts high-risk UM patients to compare DMFS to a cohort of UM with the same tumor characteristics. Methods: This investigator-initiated study enrolled pts with high-risk UM, defined as a predicted 3-year distant relapse-free survival (DMFS) of approximately 50% (based on gene expression profiling (GEP) (DecisionDx-UM) class 2 with tumor largest basal diameter (LBD) of 12mm or higher). Pts received Nivo 240mg iv every 2 weeks and Ipi 1mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 48 weeks. The target sample size was 50 evaluable pts. The primary endpoint was 3-year DMFS. Secondary endpoints were median DMFS, overall survival (OS), and toxicity (AE). In addition, a propensity score method (double robust estimate in R adjusted curves) is used to estimate the average DMFS and compare the nonrandomized treatment (tx) and the control patients. 119 pts from the Cooperative Ocular Oncology Group (COOG) database were defined as high risk, matched for tumor characteristics (GEP class 2, LBD≧12mm) and were used as a control cohort. Results: Fifty-two pts were enrolled and 50 were treated from 12/18/2018-9/29/2021. As of 11/6/2023, with a median follow-up of 36 months, the 3-year DMFS rate vs COOG control, was 69.1% vs 45.1% (two-sided p = 0.012) without any adjustment; and 70.4% vs 43.4% (two-sided p = 0.018) with the propensity score method. The median DMFS was not reached (NR) in the tx cohort vs 33.8 months. There was a reduction in the risk of distant recurrence with Nivo/Ipi vs control cohort (RR 0.52, 95%CI, 0.309-0.888). Median OS has not been reached with only 7 deaths from UM in the tx cohort so far. Grade ≥3 any-cause AE occurred in 27 pts (54%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related (TR) AE occurred in 48%. 22 pts (44%) discontinued the treatment due to toxicity. One pt died due to immune-related myocarditis. Conclusions: This phase II study of adjuvant Nivo/Ipi resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in 3-year DMFS of 70.4% vs 43.4% in control for pts with high-risk UM from the COOG database matched for tumor characteristics. Further investigation of this regimen as adjuvant therapy of high-risk UM is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03528408 .

EDI3 knockdown in ER-HER2+ breast cancer cells reduces tumor burden and improves survival in two mouse models of experimental metastasis

BackgroundDespite progress understanding the mechanisms underlying tumor spread, metastasis remains a clinical challenge. We identified the choline-producing glycerophosphodiesterase, EDI3 and reported its association with metastasis-free survival in endometrial cancer. We also observed that silencing EDI3 slowed cell migration and other cancer-relevant phenotypes in vitro. Recent work demonstrated high EDI3 expression in ER-HER2+ breast cancer compared to the other molecular subtypes. Silencing EDI3 in ER-HER2+ cells significantly reduced cell survival in vitro and decreased tumor growth in vivo. However, a role for EDI3 in tumor metastasis in this breast cancer subtype was not explored. Therefore, in the present work we investigate whether silencing EDI3 in ER-HER2+ breast cancer cell lines alters phenotypes linked to metastasis in vitro, and metastasis formation in vivo using mouse models of experimental metastasis.MethodsTo inducibly silence EDI3, luciferase-expressing HCC1954 cells were transduced with lentiviral particles containing shRNA oligos targeting EDI3 under the control of doxycycline. The effect on cell migration, adhesion, colony formation and anoikis was determined in vitro, and significant findings were confirmed in a second ER-HER2+ cell line, SUM190PT. Doxycycline-induced HCC1954-luc shEDI3 cells were injected into the tail vein or peritoneum of immunodeficient mice to generate lung and peritoneal metastases, respectively and monitored using non-invasive bioluminescence imaging. Metabolite levels in cells and tumor tissue were analyzed using targeted mass spectrometry and MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI), respectively.ResultsInducibly silencing EDI3 reduced cell adhesion and colony formation, as well as increased susceptibility to anoikis in HCC1954-luc cells, which was confirmed in SUM190PT cells. No influence on cell migration was observed. Reduced luminescence was seen in lungs and peritoneum of mice injected with cells expressing less EDI3 after tail vein and intraperitoneal injection, respectively, indicative of reduced metastasis. Importantly, mice injected with EDI3-silenced cells survived longer. Closer analysis of the peritoneal organs revealed that silencing EDI3 had no effect on metastatic organotropism but instead reduced metastatic burden. Finally, metabolic analyses revealed significant changes in choline and glycerophospholipid metabolites in cells and in pancreatic metastases in vivo.ConclusionsReduced metastasis upon silencing supports EDI3’s potential as a treatment target in metastasizing ER-HER2+ breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage IIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

PurposeThis study aims to compare treatment outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage IIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients with stage IIB CSCC treated at Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2012 and June 2019. We compared overall survival (OS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) between the NACT + surgery and CCRT groups.ResultsA total of 257 patients were enrolled: 165 underwent NACT + surgery and 92 received CCRT. Before propensity score matching, the NACT + surgery group exhibited lower 5-year OS (68.2% vs. 85.6%; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–4.96; P = 0.009), LRFS (85.2% vs. 96.9%; HR = 5.88, 95% CI: 1.33–25.94; P = 0.019), and DMFS (81.9% vs. 97.4%; HR = 6.65, 95% CI: 1.51–29.23; P = 0.012) compared to the CCRT group. After propensity score matching, OS, LRFS, and DMFS remained worse in the NACT + surgery group compared to the CCRT group.ConclusionNACT followed by surgery is associated with decreased OS, LRFS, and DMFS compared to CCRT among patients with stage IIB CSCC.

Prostate cancer patients with lymphatic node involvement detected by immunohistochemistry. Is the effort worthwhile?

IntroductionLymph node (LN) status is one of the main prognostic factors in localized prostate cancer (CaP) patients after surgery. Examining palpable lymph nodes with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) is the most common approach in clinical practice; however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been reported to increase the LN detection rate. We reviewed the oncological results of patients with LN metastasis detected by IHC. MethodsRetrospective study of CaP patients who underwent lymphadenectomy at the time of the prostatectomy. Extended lymphadenectomy was performed with complementary indocyanine green (ICG) guidance. Three groups were considered according to LN status. Definition of the pN+ group was made if LNs were detected by HE, occulted lymph node-positive (OLN+) was considered when ≥ 1 LN was identified with IHC and occulted lymph node-negative (OLN-) if no metastatic nodes were found. Oncological outcomes were reported regarding PSA kinetics, biochemical recurrence (BCR), need for secondary treatments and metastasis-free survival (MFS). ResultsA total of 283 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months were included in the study. Immunohistochemical assessment revealed metastatic LNs in 8.9% of patients. The rate of locally advanced disease and positive surgical margins was higher in the OLN + and pN + groups vs the OLN – group (P < 0.05). At the end of follow-up, 19%, 44% and 52% of patients from the OLN -, OLN + and pN + groups experienced BCR (P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, 2.6%, 17% and 22% of patients developed metastatic progression from the OLN -, OLN + and pN+ group (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the OLN + group had a higher risk HR: 12 (95% CI, 2.4-56; P = 0.002) of metastatic progression in comparison with OLN – patients. This difference was not observed in the risk of biochemical recurrence HR 1.8 (95% CI, 0.9-3.8; P = 0.09). ConclusionConventional HE histological analysis underdiagnosed nearly 10% of patients. IHC-detected patients were at higher risk of metastasis development than OLN - patients. This report highlights the importance of optimizing the anatomopathological analysis properly.