Metastasis-free Survival Research Articles

Prostate Cancer Among Black Men in Canada

Prostate cancer is a prevalent disease among men worldwide, exhibiting substantial heterogeneity in presentation and outcomes influenced by various factors, including race and ethnicity. Disparities in incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival rates have been observed between Black men and those of other races and ethnicities. To compare prostate cancer outcomes between Black men and men with other race (Asian, Hispanic, Indigenous, Middle Eastern, White, Multiracial, and Other) in a universal health care system, with race and ethnicity self-reported. This was a prospective, observational cohort study of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between June 1, 2014, and August 28, 2023, who self-identified race and ethnicity. Participants included men who had been prospectively enrolled in the Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative from the 2 major urology referral centers in Alberta (University of Alberta and University of Calgary). All men with prostate cancer enrolled in the initiative were included. Race and ethnicity. The primary outcome was the stage and grade of prostate cancer at diagnosis. Further outcomes included age and prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, initial treatment modality, time from diagnosis to initial treatment, and prostate cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and overall survivals. A total of 6534 men were included; 177 (2.7%) were Black, and 6357 (97.3%) had another race or ethnicity. Men who identified as Black were diagnosed with prostate cancer at an earlier age (mean [SD], 62.0 [8.2] compared with 64.6 [7.7] years; P < .001) and had a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index rating (14% compared with 7% ≤ 1; P < .001) compared with men of other races. Men who identified as Black had similar prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis, TNM category (74% vs 74% with T1-T2; P = .83) and Gleason Grade Group (34% compared with 35% Gleason Grade Group 1; P = .63). Black men had similar rates of prostate cancer-specific (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.41-2.97; P = .85), metastasis-free (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.42-1.46; P = .44), and overall (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.25-1.24; P = .15) survival. The findings of this cohort study suggest that Black men, despite being diagnosed at a younger age, experience comparable prostate cancer outcomes compared with men of other races.

Assessing risk of lymph node invasion in complete responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

To investigate the lymph node invasion (LNI) rate in patients exhibiting complete pathological response (CR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to test the association of CR status with lower LNI and better survival outcomes. We included patients with bladder cancer (BCa; cT2-4a; cN0; cM0) treated with NAC and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at our institution between 2012 and 2022 (N = 157). CR (ypT0) and LNI (ypN+) were defined at final pathology. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between CR and LNI after adjusting for number of lymph nodes removed (NLR). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease free-survival (DFS) according to CR status. Overall CR and LNI rates were 40.1% and 19%, respectively. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) NLR was 26 (19-36). The LNI rate was lower in patients with CR vs those without CR (2 [3.2%] vs 61 [29.8%]; P < 0.001). After adjusting for NLR, CR reduced the LNI risk by 93% (odds ratio 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.25; P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier plots depicted better 5-year OS (69.7 vs 52.2%), MFS (68.3 vs 45.5%) and DFS (66.6 vs 43.5%) in patients with CR vs those without CR. After multivariable adjustments, CR independently reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.81; P = 0.008), metastatic progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.71; P = 0.002) and disease progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.70; P = 0.001). Based on these findings, we postulate that PLND could potentially be omitted in patients exhibiting CR after NAC, due to negligible risk of LNI. Prospective Phase II trials are needed to explore this challenging hypothesis.

Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 in acral melanoma: A nationwide study.

Previous studies demonstrated limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable acral melanoma (AM); it remains unclear how this translates to the adjuvant setting. This study investigates clinical outcomes of acral compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection. All stages III-IV AM and CM patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection between 2018 and 2022 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We analyzed recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression analysis of RFS was performed to adjust for potential confounders. We included 1958 (86 AM and 1872 CM) patients. At baseline, AM patients more frequently had KIT mutations, higher disease stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and fewer BRAF and NRAS mutations. Median RFS was 14.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5-29.3) in AM and 37.4 months (95% CI: 34.6 to not reached) in CM (p = .002). After correcting for potential confounders, AM remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HRadj 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.17; p = .019). Two-year DMFS tended to be worse for AM than for CM: 64.5% versus 79.7% (p = .050). Two-year OS was significantly lower in AM (71.5% vs. 84.3%; p = .027). The results of this study suggest a poorer outcome of adjuvant-treated AM compared to CM. Studies assessing the added value of adjuvant treatment in AM are needed. Future research should investigate alternative treatment strategies to improve outcomes of high-risk AM.

Stage III Melanoma: A Proposed Staging Model That Outperforms the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Staging System.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that clinical stage III melanoma patients may undergo ultrasound surveillance of the nodal basin in lieu of complete lymph node dissection (CLND). This has led to an inability to accurately classify patients according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition staging system because it uses the total number of positive lymph nodes from the CLND to assign a pathologic N stage. We propose a new model for clinical stage III melanoma patients that does not rely on the total number of positive lymph nodes. Instead, it uses Breslow depth, ulceration status, sentinel lymph node metastasis size, and extracapsular extension to stratify patients into groups 1 to 4. We compared our model's ability to predict melanoma-specific survival (MSS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS-LRFS) to the current AJCC system with and without CLND-data using a Cox proportional hazards model and Akaike Information Criteria weights. Although not reaching our predetermined level of statistical significance of 95%, our model was 5 times more likely to better predict MSS compared with the AJCC model with CLND. In addition, our model was significantly better than the AJCC model without CLND in predicting MSS. Our model performed significantly better than the AJCC model in predicting DMFS and DMFS-LRFS regardless of whether data from CLND were included.

Camrelizumab-based induction chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma: phase II clinical trial

This phase II trial aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of induction chemoimmunotherapy of camrelizumab plus modified TPF in locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA HSCC) (NCT04156698). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), larynx preservation rate (LPR), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Patients (cT3-4aN0-2M0), regardless of sex, received induction chemoimmunotherapy for three cycles: camrelizumab 200 mg d1, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 d1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d1-3, and capecitabine 800 mg/m2 bid d1-14, q21d. Patients were assigned to radioimmunotherapy if they had a complete or partial response, those with stable or progressive disease underwent surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. Camrelizumab was maintained post-radioimmunotherapy. Fifty-one patients were enrolled with a median follow-up duration of 23.7 months. After induction therapy, the ORR was 82.4% (42/51), meeting the prespecified endpoint. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 26 patients, and no treatment-related death occurred. As three-year outcomes were immature, two-year OS, PFS and LPR were reported. As no distant metastatic event had occurred, MFS was not reported here. The two-year OS, PFS, and LPR rates were 83.0%, 77.1%, and 70.0%, respectively. The induction chemoimmunotherapy of camrelizumab plus TPF showed a high ORR rate with an acceptable safety profile in LA HSCC.

BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 mRNA Expression as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

We examined the impact of the mRNA expression of breast cancer gene type 1 (BRCA1), breast cancer gene type 2 (BRCA2), and partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) on the metastasis-free survival (MFS) of patients with early BC using microarray gene expression analysis. The study was performed in a cohort of 461 patients with a median age of 62 years at initial diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 147 months. We could show that the lower expression of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is significantly associated with longer MFS (p < 0.050). On the contrary, the lower expression of PALB2 was correlated with a shorter MFS (p = 0.049). Subgroup survival analysis identified the prognostic influence of mRNA expression for BRCA1 among patients with luminal-B-like BC and for BRCA2 and PALB2 in the subset of patients with luminal-A-like BC (p < 0.050). According to our observations, BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 expression might become valuable biomarkers of disease progression.

Adoption of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy permits a minimally invasive option for management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in geriatric patients: comparison with non-geriatric patients with intermediate-term oncologic follow-up

To assess the oncologic efficacy and safety of robot-assisted approach to radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU) in geriatric versus younger patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2009 to 2022 of 145 patients (two cohorts: < 75 and ≥ 75 years old) with non-metastatic UTUC who underwent RARNU. Primary endpoint was UTUC-related recurrence of disease during surveillance (bladder-specific and metastatic). Safety was assessed according to 30-day, modified Clavien–Dindo (CD) classifications (Major: C.D. III–V). Survival estimates were performed using Kaplan–Meier method. There were 89 patients < 75 years (median 65 years) and 56 patients ≥ 75 years (median 81 years). Comparing the young versus geriatric cohorts: median follow-up 38 vs 24 months (p = 0.03, respectively) with similar 3-year bladder-specific recurrence survival (60% vs 67%, HR 0.70, 95% CI [0.35, 1.40], p = 0.31) and metastasis-free survival (79% vs 70%, HR 0.71, 95% CI [0.30, 1.70], p = 0.44). Expectedly, the younger cohort had a significant deviation in overall survival compared to the geriatric cohort at 1-year (89% vs 76%) and 3-years (72% vs 41%; HR 3.29, 95% CI [1.88, 5.78], p < 0.01). The 30-day major (1% vs 0) and minor complications (8% vs 14%, p = 0.87). Limitations include retrospective study design of a high-volume, single-surgeon experience. Compared to younger patients with UTUC, geriatric patients undergoing RARNU have similar oncologic outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up with no increased risk of 30-day perioperative complications. Thus, age alone should not be used to disqualify patients from definitive surgical management of UTUC with RARNU.

Surgical Management of Patients with Parotid Involvement from Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer of the Head and Neck.

We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study on a single-center series of patients who underwent parotidectomy in the management of advanced head and neck non-melanoma skin cancer (hnNMSC). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with worse outcomes. Forty-one men and nine women were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 78.9 years. The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves were 39.9%, 56.3%, 58.6%, and 82.1%, respectively. A univariate analysis showed that the status of the margins, facial nerve direct involvement, lymph vascular invasion, and histological grading were associated with worse outcomes (p < 0.05). Positive margins were associated with worse disease-specific survival also in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.001, HR = 32.02, and CIs 4.338 to 351.3). Because the resection in free margins is the most important prognostic factor, early diagnosis or, in the case of advanced disease, extensive surgical resection with concomitant reconstruction is needed. Adjuvant therapy is indicated in selected cases.

The Value and Safety of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy After Radical Cystectomy in Locally Advanced Urothelial Bladder Cancer: A Controlled Randomized Study

BackgroundAdjuvant radiotherapy after radical cystectomy in locally advanced bladder cancer was revived after the advancement in precise radiotherapy that decreased the normal pelvic tissue radiation hazards. However, there are still scarce controlled randomized studies addressing this issue. Patients and methodsOne hundred thirty-one cystectomized urothelial bladder cancer patients were enrolled; a hundred and twenty-two were randomized to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) 50 Gy/25 fractions, 4 weeks’ post-cystectomy or cystectomy alone (CY). Sixty-two were included in the ART arm and sixty in the CY arm. Twenty-four ART and 30 CY patients received Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eleven patients (9%) had cotenant neo-bladder diversion, 6 in ART, and 5 in CY arms. All ART patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with daily verification cone-beam CT (CBCT). The median follow-up was 42.7 months. ResultsThe 3-year adjusted Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rate was higher in the ART arm, measuring 81% (95%CI: 69-94) compared to 71% (95% CI: 60-80) (p=0.0457). ART significantly improved the locoregional relapse-free rate in the cystectomy bed and the pelvic side wall (p= 0.016 and 0.001, respectively). The overall survival, event-free, and distant metastasis-free survival did not rank to the level of statistical significance in the 2 arms. Even though the acute side effects were slightly higher in ART, the late toxicities were almost equal in the two groups. ConclusionsAdjuvant radiotherapy is safe and quite tolerable after radical cystectomy when using precise radiation techniques. These techniques significantly improved the LRFS but had insignificant improvement on the overall survival. ART did not affect the distant metastasis-free survival. Similar studies are performed in different centers around the world to confirm the value of ART in urothelial bladder cancer.

Outcomes of non-angiosarcoma radiation-associated soft tissue sarcomas of the chest.

Radiation-associated soft tissue sarcomas (RA-STS) are rare complications of patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) and are generally associated with a poor prognosis. Most of the literature surrounding RA-STS of the chest is centered on angiosarcoma. Therefore, we aim to document the management and outcome of patients with non-angiosarcoma RA-STS of the chest. We reviewed 17 patients (all female, median age 65 years) diagnosed with RA-STS. The most common primary malignancy was breast carcinoma (n = 15), with a median RT dose of 57.9 Gy. All patients underwent surgical resection; five patients (29%) received radiotherapy; and fivepatients (29%) received peri-operative chemotherapy. The 5-year local recurrence and metastatic-free survival were 61% and 60%, while the 5-year disease-specific survival was 53%. Local recurrence was associated with death due to disease (HR 9.06, p = 0.01). Complications occurred in nine of patients, most commonly due to a wound complication (n = 7). At the most recent follow-up, the median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score was 63%. RA-STS involving the chest wall are aggressive tumors with a high risk of local relapse and death due to disease. Local recurrence was associated with death due to disease; as such,we recommend aggressive surgical management with evaluation for adjuvant therapies.

Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer with mesorectal fascia involvement.

For the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), research on primary lesions with mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement is lacking. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes and efficacy of dose-escalated neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to patients with LARC involving MRF. We retrospectively reviewed 301 patients who were diagnosed with LARC involving MRF and underwent NCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) doses of ≤50.4 Gy were defined as the non-boost group, while ≥54.0 Gy as the boost group. Pathological tumor response and survival outcomes, including intrapelvic recurrence-free survival (IPRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. A total of 269 patients (89.4%) achieved a negative pathological circumferential resection margin and 104 (34.6%) had good pathological tumor regression grades. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, IPRFS, DMFS, and OS rates at 5-years were 88.6%, 78.0%, and 91.2%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis by RT dose, the boost group included more advanced clinical stages of patients. For the non-boost group and boost group, 5-year IPRFS rates were 90.3% and 87.0% (p = 0.242), 5-year DMFS rates were 82.0% and 71.3% (p = 0.105), and 5-year OS rates were 93.0% and 80.6% (p = 0.439), respectively. Treatment related toxicity was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.211). Although this retrospective study failed to confirm the efficacy of dose-escalated NCRT, favorable IPRFS and pathological complete response was achieved with NCRT followed by TME. Further studies combining patient customized RT dose with systemic therapies are needed.

Kidney-Sparing Surgery Has Equivalent Oncological Outcomes to Radical Nephroureterectomy for Ureteral Urothelial Carcinoma.

Introduction and Objective: Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has gained increasing interest recently. However, there is limited contemporary data regarding the role of KSS in ureteral urothelial carcinoma. Therefore, we investigated the survival outcomes of ureteral urothelial carcinoma after KSS from a large, prospective international UTUC registry. Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society-Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry included patients with UTUC who received KSS or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2014 and 2019. In this study, we included patients with ureteral UTUC only. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), upper tract recurrence-free survival (RFS), intravesical RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the tumor features' differences between groups. Results: Of the 391 patients with ureteral UTUC, 309 (79.0%) received RNU and 82 (21.0%) received KSS by ureteroscopy with laser ablation (n = 28) or segmental resection (n = 54). After PSM, there were no differences in OS (p = 0.525), CSS (p = 0.487), upper tract RFS (p = 0.147), intravesical RFS (p = 0.989), PFS (p = 0.617), and MFS (p = 0.336) between KSS and RNU. There were no significant differences between ureteroscopic ablation and segmental resection in OS, CSS, intravesical RFS, PFS, and MFS with RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse OS and CSS outcomes than other tumor locations following segmental resection. Conclusions: In patients with ureteral UTUC, no significant differences in long-term survival outcomes were observed between KSS and RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse survival outcomes over other tumor locations following segmental resection.

Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE): results after 20 years of experience.

To evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes and functional results of the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy (RP). A 10-yr survival analysis on 11069 RPs performed with or without the NeuroSAFE, between January 2002 to June 2011 was carried out. In the NeuroSAFE cohort, the neurovascular structure-adjacent prostatic margins are removed and stained for cryo-sectioning during RP. In case of a PSM, partial or full removal of the neurovascular bundle was performed. The impact of NeuroSAFE on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS), salvage radiation therapy-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years was analyzed. 1-year (1-yr) erectile function (EF), 1-yr, and 2-yr continence rates were assessed in propensity score-based matched cohorts. Median follow-up was 121 (IQR: 73, 156) months. No differences in BFS between NeuroSAFE and non-NeuroSAFE were recorded (10-yr BFS: NeuroSAFE vs non-Neurosafe, pT2: 81% vs 84%, p = 0.06; pT3a: 58% vs. 63%, p = 0.6; ≥pT3b: 22% vs. 27%, p = 0.99). No differences were found between the two groups in terms of sRFS (pT2: p = 0.1; pT3a: p = 0.4; ≥pT3b: p = 0.4) (Fig.1B, Table2), and MTS (pT2: p = 0.3; pT3a: p = 0.6; ≥pT3b: p = 0.9). The NeuroSAFE-navigated patients reported a better 1-yr EF than non-NeuroSAFE (68% vs. 58%, p = 0.02) and no differences in 1-yr and 2-yr continence rates (92.4% vs. 91.8%, and 93.4% vs. 93%, respectively). The main limitation is the retrospective study design. While the NeuroSAFE approach did not show significant improvements in long-term oncologic or continence outcomes, it did provide an opportunity for a higher proportion of patients to improve postoperative functional results, possibly through increased nerve-sparing procedures.

Individualized neoantigen therapy mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab in resected melanoma: 3-year update from the mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial.

LBA9512 Background: mRNA-4157 is a novel, mRNA-based individualized neoantigen therapy designed to increase endogenous antitumor T-cell responses by targeting unique patient (pt) tumor mutations. In the primary analysis of the Ph 2 mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial (median planned follow-up, 23 mo), pts with completely resected high-risk stage IIIB–IV cutaneous melanoma receiving mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab (pembro; combo) had prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) vs pembro alone (Weber JS, et al. Lancet. 2024). Methods: Pts were assigned 2:1 to mRNA-4157 (1 mg IM, max 9 doses) + pembro (200 mg IV, max 18 cycles) or pembro alone. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed RFS; secondary endpoints were DMFS and safety. This planned supportive analysis was triggered when the last randomized pt had ≥2 y follow-up. Translational subgroup analyses were also reported. HLA genotypes were analyzed by exome sequencing of DNA from PBMC. RFS and DMFS were not formally tested; nominal 2-sided p-values are descriptive. Results: With an additional year follow-up (data cutoff, 03 Nov 2023; median [range], 34.9 [25.1–51.0] mo) after primary analysis, minimal new events occurred. RFS benefit in the combo vs pembro arm was maintained with 49% risk reduction in recurrence and/or death (HR [95% CI], 0.510 [0.288–0.906]; 2-sided nominal p-value 0.019). The 2.5-yr RFS rate of combo treatment (tx) vs pembro alone was 74.8% vs 55.6%. Combo tx also produced clinically meaningful, sustained improvement in DMFS vs pembro alone (HR [95% CI], 0.384 [0.172–0.858], 2-sided nominal p-value 0.0154). OS favored combo vs pembro alone; 2.5-y OS rate was 96.0% vs 90.2% (HR [95% CI], 0.425 [0.114–1.584]). RFS benefit of combo vs pembro was maintained in TMB high (HR [95% CI], 0.564 [0.253–1.258]), TMB non-high (0.571 [0.245–1.331]), PD-L1 positive (0.471 [0.226–0.979]), PD-L1 negative (0.147 [0.034–0.630]), and ctDNA negative (0.207 [0.091–0.470]) subgroups; ctDNA positive HR was not estimable. No significant associations between individual HLA alleles and RFS were observed in either tx arm. Maximal heterozygosity at HLA class I genotype loci (A, B, C) improved RFS vs homozygosity for ≥1 locus in the pembro arm (HR [95% CI], 0.425 [0.179–1.01]) but not combo arm (1.252 [0.498–3.146]). mRNA-4157 was well tolerated and combo tx had a safety profile consistent with previous analysis with no potentiation of immune-related AEs. Conclusions: The current analysis with ∼3 y median follow-up showed durable and meaningful long-term RFS and DMFS benefit with mRNA-4157 + pembro vs pembro alone. A trend for improved OS with combo tx was also observed. HLA and translational subgroup results suggest mRNA-4157 + pembro may benefit a broader pt population vs pembro alone. Clinical trial information: NCT03897881 .

Phase 3 study (PIVOTAL) of neoadjuvant intralesional daromun vs. immediate surgery in fully resectable melanoma with regional skin and/or nodal metastases.

LBA9501 Background: PIVOTAL (NCT02938299) is an open label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 trial evaluating Daromun as a neoadjuvant intralesional therapy for resectable, locally advanced Stage III melanoma. Daromun, a combination of two antibody-cytokine fusions (L19IL2 and L19TNF) showed efficacy in a phase 2 study (NCT02076633) in unresectable melanoma patients (pts). Methods: PIVOTAL was run at 22 sites in 4 EU countries. Pts were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive up to 4 weekly intratumoral injections of Daromun followed by surgery (week 5 to 8; treatment arm) or surgery alone within 4 weeks from randomization (control arm). Each weekly administration of Daromun (13 Mio IU of L19IL2 and 400 μg of L19TNF) was distributed among all injectable tumor lesions. Cutaneous melanoma pts with skin and/or LN metastases amenable to complete surgical resection were eligible. Prior anti-tumor treatments including surgery, radiation therapy (RT) and systemic therapies were allowed. Any approved adjuvant treatment post-surgery during follow-up was equally allowed. Pts with uveal or mucosal melanoma, metastatic melanoma with unknown primary, or distant metastases at screening (ruled out by PET/CT) were not eligible. Results: From 07/2016 to 08/2023, 127 pts were randomized to the treatment and 129 to the control arm. Most pts had received previous treatments, including surgery, systemic therapy or RT (Table). The study’s primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), assessed by investigators and confirmed by retrospective Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of PET/CT scans. The primary outcome analysis shows an HR between the RFS of the treatment and control arm of 0.59 [95% CI 0.41-0.86; log-rank p=0.005] as per BICR assessment and 0.61 [0.41-0.92; p=0.018] as per investigator assessment (power = 85%; two-sided α = 0.05). Median RFS was 16.7 mo. in the treatment and 6.9 mo. in the control arm as per BICR. Moreover, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was significantly improved by the neoadjuvant treatment, with an HR of 0.60 [0.37-0.95; p=0.029]. Complete pathological responses (pCR) after surgery were recorded in 21% of treatment arm pts. The safety profile of Daromun was characterized mostly by low-grade, local adverse events (14% grade 3 TEAEs). Systemic AEs were limited and of low grade (no autoimmune TEAEs and no drug-related death recorded). Conclusions: The analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint RFS and of secondary endpoints DMFS, pCR and safety show that neoadjuvant Daromun is an effective and safe therapeutic option for resectable, locally advanced melanoma pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02938299 . [Table: see text]

Induction versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Concurrent Chemoradiation: What Is Beneficial in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma—A 5-Year Comparative Study at a Tertiary Care Center in North India

Background In locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been established as the current standard of care, but recently, the addition of induction chemotherapy to CCRT has presented an attractive multidisciplinary approach. Objectives The aim of the study was to explore the clinical outcome of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT and CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in LANPC. Material and Methods In this propensity score–matched retrospective cohort study, we enrolled LANPC patients from October 2016 to June 2022. Study variables were evenly distributed by propensity score matching. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression analysis, and the outcome between the two chemotherapy treatment combinations was compared for patients in different subgroups. Result A total of 80 patients were included in the study. Survival outcomes indicated that the IC followed by CCRT group (IC + CCRT) achieved a higher 5-year overall survival (OS; 90 vs. 81%, p = 0.253), failure-free survival (FFS; 80 vs. 77.50%, p = 0.17), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 88 vs. 82.50%, p = 0.314) compared with the CCRT followed by AC group (CCRT + AC), although it was not statistically significant. The stratified analysis revealed that IC followed by CCRT (IC + CCRT) was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.212; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.014–3.16; p = 0.0026) in N2 disease. However, the superiority of CCRT followed by AC (CCRT + AC) was only observed in LRRFS (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.05–0.89; p = 0.036) for the T4 subgroup. Conclusion In patients with LANPC, especially with T3 or N2 disease, IC should be strongly considered followed by CCRT.

Appropriate definition of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and optimal timing of androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI)

BackgroundDefined by rising PSA levels under androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) despite no visible metastases on conventional imaging, non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) represents a complex clinical challenge. A significant subset of these patients rapidly develops metastatic disease, negatively impacting survival. We examined the difference in prognosis of nmCRPC patients according to the timing of therapeutic interventions with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI).MethodsWe examined 102 nmCRPC patients treated with ARSI. We divided patients according to their PSA levels when ARSI was administered: Cohort A (PSA 0.5–2.0 ng/mL), Cohort B (PSA 2.0–4.0 ng/mL), and Cohort C (PSA > 4.0 ng/mL). Utilizing the Kaplan–Meier method for survival analysis, our analytical starting point was the moment when PSA levels exceeded 0.5 ng/mL post-ADT nadir, ensuring a fair comparison and minimizing lead-time bias.ResultsAfter excluding 5 patients whose PSA nadir after ADT > 0.5 ng/mL, patient distribution across Cohort A, Cohort B, and Cohort C was 32, 24, and 41 patients, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis highlighted a 2-year metastasis-free survival rate of 97% for Cohort A, 87% for Cohort B, and 73% for Cohort C. A marked statistical difference emerged when comparing Cohort A with Cohorts B and C, with a p-value of 0.043.ConclusionThe timely initiation of ARSI is paramount in nmCRPC management. Our findings strongly advocate for consideration of ARSI administration in nmCRPC patients before their PSA levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL. Our results indicated a PSA threshold of 1.0 ng/mL for nmCRPC definition which is more reasonable to administer ARSI without delay.

Real‑world retrospective study of early‑stage prostate cancer at a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Centre: The PEarlC study.

Despite the high prevalence of localised prostate cancer (LPC) and locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC), evidence on the characteristics of patients, treatments and clinical outcomes stratified by disease risk is limited. The PEarlC study was conducted to characterise a cohort of patients with early-stage prostate cancer that included real-world clinical outcomes. Retrospective data from a cohort of patients diagnosed with LPC/LAPC between 2015 and 2017 and followed up until December 2020 at a Portuguese comprehensive cancer centre (IPO Porto) was analysed. Patients were classified as LPC (high- or non-high-risk) or LAPC according to European Association of Urology guidelines, were eligible if diagnosed at stage I-III and followed up in Urology, Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology outpatient clinics of IPO Porto. Data was collected from the medical/administrative records database. Clinical outcomes included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), PSA response (palliative) and no evidence of residual tumour (prostatectomy). Time-to-event outcomes were compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. A total of 790 patients were included (54.8% non-high-risk LPC, 30.9% high-risk LPC, 14.3% LAPC) and the median follow-up was 46.7 months. Patients had a median age of 68.0 years. The majority of patients were stage II (52.9%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1 (99.9%) and received treatment with curative intent (85.4%). The median was only achieved in progression-free survival (29.9 months; 95% CI, 26.5-41.0 months), as evaluated in palliative patients. At year 5, 82.9% were free of PSA progression (curative), 87.5% were metastasis-free, 83.7% were disease-free, all patients in palliative treatment progressed and the 5-year OS rate was 92.9% (CI 95%, 90.2-95.7%). Among patients with LPC, OS was worse in high-risk vs. non-high-risk patients (5-year OS rate, 88.8% vs. 96.8%; hazard ratio=3.34, CI 95%, 1.64-7.05; P=0.001). PSA response rate was 81.4% in the palliative setting. There was no evidence of residual tumour in 61.6% of patients who underwent prostatectomy. Although most patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated at IPO Porto showed positive 5-year real-world outcomes, patients with high-risk LPC showed worse OS compared with patients with non-high-risk LPC and therefore a poorer prognosis. The present large-sample real-world study is an important contribution to reducing the evidence gap on prostate cancer.

Long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant-adjuvant targeted therapy in borderline resectable stage IIIB-D and IV melanoma.

Neoadjuvant-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma was expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment only. Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)/MEK inhibitors (MEKi) and surgery. Twelve (26%) patients achieved a pathological complete response and 10 (21%) patients achieved a near-complete response. In the whole group, median recurrence-free survival was 19.4 months and median distant metastasis-free survival (mDMFS) was 21.9 months. In patients with a pathological complete response (pCR)/near-pCR median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were significantly longer than in patients with minor pathological response with hazard ratio (HR)=0.37 (p=.005) for RFS and HR=0.33 (p=.002) for DMFS. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since BRAFi/MEKi therapy initiation was 25.1 months. The median time-to-treatment-failure since initiation of neoadjuvant therapy was 22.2 months and was significantly longer in patients with pCR/near-pCR (HR=0.45; p=.022). Neoadjuvant therapy did not result in any new specific complications of surgery. After 48 months, RFS and overall survival were 36.3% and 64.8% or 20% and 37.4% in patients with pCR/near-pCR and pathological partial response/pathological nonresponse, respectively. The authors confirmed that BRAFi/MEKi combination is an effective and safe regimen in the perioperative treatment of stage III/IV melanoma. Major pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence including DMFS in these patients. Our study presents a large comprehensive analysis of neoadjuvant-adjuvant systemic therapy in patients diagnosed with marginally resectable stage III or IV melanoma. Neoadjuvant therapy effectively reduced the volume of the disease, which facilitated subsequent surgical resection. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since therapy initiation was 25.1 months. Twelve patients had complete pathological response and 10 patients had a near-complete pathological response-and together they had median recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival significantly longer than in patients with pathological partial response or nonresponse. Complete/near-complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence-free, including distant metastasis-free, survival in these patients.

Additional PD-1 inhibitor improves complete response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

To investigate the treatment response and toxicity of the combination of induction chemotherapy (IC) and PD-1 inhibitor in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Patients with stage III-IVA NPC who received IC or IC + PD-1 inhibitor were included. The chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. A total of 225 patients were identified, including 193 (85.8%) and 32 (14.2%) who received IC alone and IC + PD-1 inhibitor, respectively. The addition of PD-1 inhibitor to IC significantly improved the tumor response than those treated with IC alone. The complete response (CR), partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates of 4.7% vs. 31.3%, 69.4% vs. 62.5%, 24.9% vs. 6.3%, and 1.0% vs. 0% in patients receiving IC alone and IC + PD-1 inhibitor, respectively (P<0.001). The results of the multivariate logistic regression showed that receiving PD-1 inhibitor was an independent predictor influencing the CR rate of patients (odds ratio 9.814, P<0.001). The most common toxicity by using IC and PD-1 inhibitor was hematological toxicity. In terms of non-hematological toxicity, 7 (21.9%) patients experienced thyroid dysfunction and all of them were hyperthyroidism. No grade 5 toxicities were found. In those who received IC and PD-1 inhibitor, the one-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 100%, 96.9%, 96.9%, and 100%, respectively. The addition of PD-1 inhibitor to IC has promise as an effective treatment approach for LANPC. More studies are expected to provide further insights into the optimal use of this treatment strategy, paving the way for more personalized and effective treatment options for patients with LANPC.