Mental Health Care For Refugees Research Articles

Task Sharing and Remote Delivery of Brief Interpersonal Counseling for Venezuelan Migrants and Refugees Living in Peru during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

Refugees and migrants experience an elevated risk for mental health problems and face significant barriers to receiving services. Interpersonal counseling (IPC-3) is a three-session intervention that can be delivered by non-specialists to provide psychological support and facilitate referrals for individuals in need of specialized care. We piloted IPC-3 delivered remotely by eight Venezuelan refugee and migrant women living in Peru. These counselors provided IPC-3 to Venezuelan refugee and migrant clients in Peru (n = 32) who reported psychological distress. Clients completed assessments of mental health symptoms at baseline and one-month post-intervention. A subset of clients (n = 15) and providers (n = 8) completed post-implementation qualitative interviews. Results showed that IPC-3 filled a gap in the system of mental health care for refugees and migrants in Peru. Some adaptations were made to IPC-3 to promote its relevance to the population and context. Non-specialist providers developed the skills and confidence to provide IPC-3 competently. Clients displayed large reductions in symptoms of depression (d = 1.1), anxiety (d = 1.4), post-traumatic stress (d = 1.0), and functional impairment (d = 0.8). Remote delivery of IPC-3 by non-specialists appears to be a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate strategy to address gaps and improve efficiency within the mental health system and warrants testing in a fully powered effectiveness study.

Digital mental health interventions for the mental health care of refugees and asylum seekers: Integrative literature review.

This study aimed to provide a critical analysis of the current literature on the use of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) for the management and treatment of mental health disorders among refugees and asylum seekers. These groups are among the most disadvantaged compared to the general population in terms of health and socio-economic status, due to conflicts and wars. The number of refugees fleeing their home countries is growing exponentially, and refugees experience trauma, torture, persecution and human right abuses, which have a profound effect on their mental health and overall well-being. The researchers conducted an integrative literature review from electronic databases Medline, CINAHL and Google Scholar, selecting articles published in English from 2010 to 2023. The thematic analysis of the 10 articles identified in the review revealed four main themes and two sub-themes: (1) types of digital health intervention/apps used; (2) barriers encountered in digital health intervention; (3) user experience of the digital health intervention and (4) mapping gaps. Two sub-themes were identified located in Theme 2: (2.1) Language and demographic barriers and (2.2) Structural barriers. The study showed that the use of DMHIs was associated with positive experiences among refugees and asylum seekers. Limited mental health care is offered to refugees and asylum seekers due to a range of logistical, political, economic, geographical, language, cultural and social barriers. DMHIs have the potential to overcome and/or moderate these barriers. The study concludes that the scaled implementation of effective DMHIs holds the possibility to improve the wider distribution of mental health care among refugees and asylum seekers. However, further research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of DMHIs and to scale up studies for their utilisation among this group. In summary, this study highlights the potential of DMHIs in improving the mental health care of refugees and asylum seekers. The results of this study have important implications for mental health service providers, policymakers and researchers to address the mental health needs of this vulnerable/priority group.

Blended-ALMAMAR app for inpatient mental health care for refugees: study protocol for a multicenter implementation study within the I-REACH consortium (Internet based REfugee mentAl healtH Care)

BackgroundRefugees are at high risk for developing mental illnesses. Due to language and cultural barriers, there is need for specifically adapted therapeutic procedures for refugees in inpatient mental health care settings. Internet-based applications in refugee mother tongues have the potential to improve the outcomes of mental health care for this vulnerable population. The key research question of the present implementation study is whether the newly developed “blended ALMAMAR” app for Arabic and Farsi speaking refugees in Germany is used and accepted by patients and professionals in routine inpatient mental health care (blended care).MethodsWe present the design of an observational, prospective multicenter implementation study in eight psychiatric hospitals. We plan to recruit 100 Farsi or Arabic speaking refugees receiving in-patient treatment due to depression, anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder or substance use disorders. These patients will get access to the “blended ALMAMAR” app during their inpatient stay in a blended-care approach. We will assess the usage (e.g., duration and frequency of use of the app) as well as subjective acceptability and usability of the intervention. To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with “blended ALMAMAR” usage, we will also perform clinical and questionnaire assessments.DiscussionThe newly developed “blended ALMAMAR” app may help to close communication gaps for the hard-to reach and vulnerable group of refugees in inpatient mental health care. It is the first blended-care intervention that addresses severely mentally ill refugees in an inpatient psychiatric setting in Germany.Trial registrationThe trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on November 11, 2021 (DRKS00025972) and adapted on November 14, 2023.

An ecosystemic view on refugee mental health care: on caring environments and their interaction.

Despite the burden of mental health problems among refugees, knowledge about mental health care for this group is limited. In this context, the comprehensive discussion is important because care is more than professional care, but takes place in everyday situations and between different groups of people. In this study, we look at expert views (based on profession and lived experience) on caring environments concerning refugees' mental health on different system levels. These levels include the individual level, family level, community level and the society. Additionally, we aimed to understand how these system levels interact. We conducted interviews with 11 psychotherapists from Germany and 12 participants who fled from Arabic-speaking countries to Germany. We analyzed transcripts following Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Interviewees shared ideas on how society in general (e.g. increase acceptance), professional actors (e.g. be sensitive about cultural differences), other refugees (e.g. exchange information), family/friends (e.g. provide emotional help) and refugees with mental health problems themselves (e.g. be open to involve others) could provide care. Participants provided examples of how system levels interacted, for example when legal norms made care among family members harder. The interactions between different system levels point to a multidisciplinary approach towards mental health care for refugees and call for building expert networks instead of viewing refugee mental health as a medical, psychiatric issue alone. To improve the mental health of refugees, different societal actors should keep in mind the interactions across different system levels and exchange their respective expert knowledge.

Psychiatric-psychotherapeutic and psychosocial care for refugees: effects and future prospects of the refuKey project - perspective of experts

Introduction Refugees have been shown to be a vulnerable population with increased psychiatric morbidity and lack of access to adequate mental health care. By establishing cooperations between psychosocial centers and psychiatric clinics the state funded project refuKey by NTFN e.V. and DGPPN aims to improve access to and quality of mental health care for traumatized refugees pursuing a stepped-care model.ObjectivesAs part of a larger project evaluation study four focus-groups among experts were conducted to explore the impact of refuKey on refugees’ mental health care.MethodsData analysis was conducted using Mayring qualitative content analysis as well as an additional quantitative survey with state refugee reception centers’ employees.ResultsThe results indicate that refuKey faciliated the access to mental health care for refugees in terms of systematic identification of mental disorders, eased transitions and increased networking between the mental health care institutions and sectors. Planning and implementation of treatment is described as being more coordinated, solution oriented and sustainable due to multiprofessional collaboration and regular use of qualified interpreters. Reduced distress as well as increased transcultural expertise was found for professionals.Conclusions The persisting barriers for refugees in access to mental health care, especially to psychotherapeutic treatment and the emotional burden for professionals underlines the need for further support and research. The experts highly endorse the continuance of refuKey. Furthermore, they call for expansion of the project in terms of staff and new sites and changes of health policies to guarantee the access to adequate health care for traumatized refugees.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Mental Health and Work Experiences of Interpreters in the Mental Health Care of Refugees: A Systematic Review

Background: Interpreters often play a crucial role in the health care of refugees. Although interpreters working with refugees are regularly confronted with emotionally stressful content, little is known about their work-related stress and psychological well-being. Primarily qualitative studies indicate increased emotional stress in interpreters, and difficulties in handling the traumatic content from their clients. Additionally, the working conditions of interpreters appear to be demanding, due to low payment and a lack of supervision or adequate preparation.Objective: The presented systematic review aimed to identify and summarise quantitative and qualitative research on the mental health of interpreters in the mental health care of refugees.Method: A systematic search was performed in five databases, and specific interpreting journals were searched. After removal of duplicates, 6,920 hits remained. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as case studies and grey literature. The studies aimed to examine mental health aspects or work experiences of spoken language interpreters in mental health care settings for adult refugees.Results: Altogether, 25 studies were identified, including six quantitative and 19 qualitative studies. Studies were analysed and presented narratively. In the analysis of the qualitative studies, three themes emerged: “Emotions, behaviour, and coping strategies,” “Working in a triad,” and “Working environment.” In the quantitative studies, interpreters showed heightened levels of emotional stress and anxiety, and secondary traumatic stress reactions. In several qualitative studies, interpreters described a devaluing health care system and stressful working conditions with a lack of support structures.Conclusion: Overall, the results indicate a high level of stress among interpreters working with refugees. Quantitative data are sparse, and studies employ heterogeneous assessments in diverse study settings. Therefore, future quantitative research is necessary to consistently investigate interpreters' mental health in different mental health care settings.Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42019117948.

Cross-cultural training program on mental health care for refugees - a mixed method evaluation

BackgroundRefugees tend to have a higher risk of mental ill-health and use mental health services less than the native-born population during their first 10 years in Sweden. Intercultural interactions between refugees and mental health professionals have been described as challenging. Cross-cultural training is proposed as one way to improve care for refugees. Evaluations of such training outcomes are sparse. The overall aim of this study was to evaluate Comprehensive Cross-Cultural Training for mental health care professionals in Stockholm, and to assess training outcomes for participants’ perceived knowledge regarding mental health and care for newly arrived refugee patients, asylum seekers and undocumented refugees. In addition, we analysed the dimensionality of the pre- and post-training questionnaires used.MethodsAn embedded mixed-method design was applied. We used pre-and post-training questionnaires (n = 248) and conducted six focus group discussions (FGDs) with mental health professionals after training. Quantitative data was analysed by t-tests and factor analysis, qualitative data was analysed using thematic content analysis.ResultsParticipants experienced gained knowledge and new perspectives in all aspects covered in the training. Training led to participants restructuring their existing knowledge. Those who had reported experience of refugee patients and working with interpreters pre-training in the past month, had higher ratings of perceived knowledge. Post-training, there were no significant changes in perceived knowledge between those with, and those without, experience of refugee patients and working with interpreters. Factor analysis resulted in 3 factors for the pre-training questionnaire, explaining 71% of the covariance, and 4 factors for the post-training questionnaire, explaining 78% of the covariance. Findings from the post-training FGDs, revealed that refugee patients were described as challenging. Also, that training promoted empathy towards refugees and strengthened participants’ professional role.ConclusionsThis cross-cultural training contributed to knowledge development and attitude changes. It was valuable regarding care providers’ professional role. Additional outcomes of the training were that participants not only gained knowledge about refugee mental health care but also restructured their existing knowledge.

12.L. Workshop: Addressing mental health needs in the context of mass immigration

Abstract Over the past decade, the global population of forcibly displaced people reaching a record high by growing to over 70 million in 2018. The largest group of refugees worldwide currently are the Syrians, and most of them have fled to countries neighboring Syria (e.g., Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon), whereas smaller but significant numbers of refugees fled to European countries. Over 50% of Syrian refugees are children, in many cases unaccompanied by their family. Increased rates of common mental disorders, including anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been documented in various refugee populations. Much less is known about the prevalence of other common mental health problems, such as substance use. In order to effectively address the mental health needs of Syrian refugees, increasing knowledge about self-identified problems and cultural idioms of distress within the Syrian community is imperative. This may also facilitate the development of effective mental health awareness programs within refugee communities. Further, the refugee crisis imposes highly challenging demands on health systems in Europe and the Middle East. Within the Middle East, there is a great lack of mental health workforce, and limited availability of evidence-based interventions. Within Europe, specialized mental health care services for refugee populations are available, yet the number of Arabic-speaking professionals is very limited. Other barriers to seeking and continuing mental health care for refugees include the use of interpreters, lack of culturally adapted interventions for a range of mental health problems, and stigma within refugee communities. Learning from evidence from low- and middle-income settings, task-sharing interventions delivered by non-professional helpers in the community instead of within specialized mental health care facilitate access to care. Within European settings, they can be successfully integrated within stepped care models used as a public mental health care strategy to reduce costs and increase mental health care use and continuation for refugee populations. In order to address the mental health needs of Syrian refugees, increasing knowledge about self-identified problems and cultural idioms of distress within the Syrian community is imperative. In addition, scalable task-sharing interventions addressing these problems should be developed and evaluated. This international workshop will focus on 1) self-identified problems and idioms of distress within the Syrian refugee community to inform the development of targeted psychosocial interventions; and 2) the effects of novel scalable psychosocial interventions to address common mental disorders across the health systems within Europe (Turkey and the Netherlands) and the Middle East (Jordan). The presenters are Naser Morina (Switzerland), Jutta Lindert (Germany), Richard Bryant (Australia), Dr. Ceren Acarturk (Turkey) and Marit Sijbrandij (the Netherlands). Key messages Scalable psychosocial interventions can successfully be implemented across refugee settings in the Netherlands, Turkey, the Netherlands and Jordan to address common mental disorders. To address major mental health concerns within refugee communities, culturally concepts of distress and general wellbeing indicators should be considered.

Barriers to access to outpatient mental health care for refugees and asylum seekers in Switzerland: the therapist\u2019s view

BackgroundMore than 120,000 refugees and asylum seekers are currently living in Switzerland. The prevalence of mental disorders among this population is significantly higher than that in the general population. While effective treatment options and cross-cultural, specialized treatment centers exist, they tend to be overloaded by their target populations. General outpatient primary health care providers might be able to compensate for the lack of specialized treatment slots. To date, however, it is unknown how often and under what conditions (e.g., length of waiting lists) refugees and asylum seekers are treated outside of specialized centers and whether there are barriers that prevent providers in outpatient settings from treating more patients in this subgroup. The present study aimed to assess the challenges and barriers faced by psychiatrists and psychotherapists working in outpatient settings in Switzerland in treating refugees and asylum seekers to determine the potential capacity of this group to provide mental health care.MethodsAn online survey was conducted during the winter of 2017/2018. The survey was constructed in three official languages and took 10–15 min to complete. Spearman’s correlations, Mann-Whitney U-Tests, and Chi-squared tests were conducted to analyze the data.ResultsEight hundred and sixty-seven (N = 867) psychotherapists and psychiatrists working in outpatient settings completed the survey: 43% of them reported having treated between 1 and 9 refugees or asylum seekers in the past 12 months, and a further 13% reported treating 10 or more. Interpreters were used for almost every other patient with a refugee or asylum-seeker background. At the same time, the funding of interpreters, as well as the funding of treatment in general, were reported to be the biggest hurdles to treating more refugees and asylum seekers.ConclusionsGiven the low number of patients rejected for capacity reasons (between 2 and 5%) and the median waiting times for the admission of new patients ranging between 2 and 3 weeks, outpatient primary mental health care providers might treat more refugees and asylum seekers and relieve specialized treatment centers. However, barriers such as lack of funding of interpreters seem to hinder them. Appropriate steps by the authorities are needed to improve the current situation.

A single case series using visuospatial task interference to reduce the number of visual intrusive memories of trauma with refugees.

The current worldwide so-called "refugee crisis" has led to an unprecedented increase in migration globally. Because of stigma and language barriers, mental health care for refugees is limited. There is a need for novel, scalable psychological interventions. We investigated whether a brief behavioural intervention involving a memory reminder cue and Tetris gameplay on a smartphone reduces intrusive memories in refugees using a single case (N = 4) ABAB withdrawal design. The baseline phase (A) included a no-intervention week; the intervention phase (B) included an in-person session with the researchers, comprised of the behavioural intervention followed by self-guided use in daily life the following week. All participants reported a decrease in intrusive memories after the intervention, as well as functional improvements (e.g., in concentration). Importantly, participants rated the intervention as feasible and acceptable. As one in-person session was effective in persistent intrusion reduction, ABAB proved not to be the optimal design as intrusions did not rebound in the withdrawal phase. Findings are promising and highlight the need for further evaluation of novel interventions for mental health problems in refugees.

Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic group intervention to enhance emotion regulation in young Afghan refugees: A pilot randomized controlled study

There are several challenges to providing mental health care for refugees, including high comorbidity and structural barriers. Targeting transdiagnostic processes in a low-threshold group intervention appears particularly promising to meet these challenges. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a new transdiagnostic intervention, Skills-Training of Affect Regulation–A Culture-sensitive Approach (STARC), focusing on conveying strategies to improve emotional clarity and to regulate emotions. A parallel-group (STARC vs. waitlist) randomized-controlled study with 44 young male Afghan refugees was conducted in a routine clinical setting (NCT03162679). In intention-to-treat analyses, participants of STARC significantly improved in self-reported difficulties in emotion regulation (ΔdSTARC-Waitlist = 1.22), transdiagnostic symptom severity (ΔdSTARC-Waitlist = 1.69), posttraumatic stress symptoms (ΔdSTARC-Waitlist = 1.19), and caregiver-reported emotional competence (ΔdSTARC-Waitlist = −0.90), but not anger reactions (ΔdSTARC-Waitlist = 0.50) compared to waitlist. Effects were maintained over 3 months. STARC is a feasible transdiagnostic intervention in a routine clinical setting and effective for young Afghan refugees. If replicated in large-scale studies with active control groups, it might be promising as an initial low-threshold intervention offered in a phased-based and/or stepped care approach.

Implementing a Need-Adapted Stepped-Care Model for Mental Health of Refugees: Preliminary Data of the State-Funded Project "RefuKey".

Introduction: Refugees have been shown to be a rather vulnerable population with increased psychiatric morbidity and lack of access to adequate mental health care. By expanding regional psychosocial and psychiatric-psychotherapeutic care structures and adapting psychiatric routine care to refugees’ needs, the state-funded project “refuKey” based in Lower Saxony, Germany, pursues to ease access to mental health care and increase service quality for refugees. A stepped-care treatment model along with intercultural opening of mental health care services is proposed. Methods: The project is subject to a four-part evaluation study. The first part investigates the state of psychiatric routine care for refugees in Lower Saxony by requesting data from all psychiatric clinics, participating and non-participating ones, regarding the numbers of refugee patients, their diagnoses, settings of treatment, etc. The second part explores experiences and work satisfaction of mental health care professionals treating refugees in refuKey cooperation clinics. The third part consists of interviews and focus group discussions with experts regarding challenges in mental health care of refugees and expectations for improvement through refuKey. The fourth part compares mental health parameters like depression, anxiety, traumatization, somatization, psychoticism, quality of life, as well as “pathways-to-care” of refuKey-treated refugees before and after treatment and, in a follow-up, to a non-refuKey-treated refugee control group. Results: RefuKey-treated refugees reported many mental health problems and estimated their mental health burden as high. The symptoms decreased significantly over the course of treatment. Mental health in the refuKey sample was strongly linked to post-migration stressors. Discussion: The state of mental health care for refugees is discussed. Implications for the improvement and the need for adaptation of routine mental health care services are drawn.

Mental Healthcare for refugees

The aim of this paper is to highlight some of the difficulties that mental health providers face when trying to provide the best standard of mental healthcare to refugees, especially in countries where the political environment is skeptic of, or even hostile to, creating programs specifically designed to improve the standard of living of this population. We also focus briefly on the dichotomy between the need to do research in this population in order to obtain data that will help us offer the best care possible to them, and the peril of undermining their autonomy by subjecting them to studies they might have otherwise refused to be part of, if they were in a less precarious position. Throughout the article, we offer practical advice that mental healthcare providers can follow to ensure that they are offering the best possible care to their patients while remaining respectful of their rights.
 Keywords: Mental health providers; Mental healthcare; Refugees.

Sleepless Nights because of Ethical Dilemmas in Mental Health Care for Asylum Seekers

The number of asylum requests in the Netherlands in 2015 was relatively high but comparable to 20 years ago. This article compares the social, political and cultural factors in mental health professionals' ethical dilemmas and reflections in both periods. The data consists of papers from an expert meeting in 1995 on Medical Ethical Standards in Mental Health Care for Refugees, and interviews and focus groups with health professionals on ethical dilemmas in mental health care for asylum seekers in 2015. Using a discursive approach to analyse the data, we found that, in 1995, as well as in 2015, the deliberations of mental health professionals reveal medical, social, cultural and judicial paradigms. In 2015, political factors tend to weigh more heavily than in 1995. We conclude that, in both periods, mental health professionals experience conflicts of values but the context of care for asylum seekers changed.

Mental health care for adult refugees in high-income countries.

Approximately one-third of people who have obtained refugee status live in high-income countries. Over recent years, the number of refugees has been increasing, and there are questions on how many of them need mental health care and which type of interventions are beneficial. Meta-analyses showed highly variable rates of mental disorders in adult refugees. This variability is likely to reflect both real differences between groups and contexts, and methodological inconsistencies across studies. Overall prevalence rates after resettlement are similar to those in host populations. Only post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is more prevalent in refugees. In long-term resettled refugees, rates of anxiety and depressive disorders are higher and linked to poor social integration. Research on mental health care for refugees in high-income countries has been extensive, but often of limited methodological quality and with very context-specific findings. The existing evidence suggests several general principles of good practice: promoting social integration, overcoming barriers to care, facilitating engagement with treatment and, when required, providing specific psychological treatments to deal with traumatic memories. With respect to the treatment of defined disorders, only for the treatment of PTSD there has been substantial refugee-specific research. For other diagnostic categories, the same treatment guidelines apply as to other groups. More systematic research is required to explore how precisely the general principles can be specified and implemented for different groups of refugees and in different societal contexts in host countries, and which specific interventions are beneficial and cost-effective. Such interventions may utilise new communication technologies. Of particular importance are long-term studies to identify when mental health interventions are appropriate and to assess outcomes over several years. Such research would benefit from sufficient funding, wide international collaboration and continuous learning over time and across different refugee groups.

Mental healthcare for refugees

Summary Introduction: The current refugee situation in Europa also leads to an increasing number of people with mental disorders. Which measures need to be taken to ascertain adequate mental healthcare for refugees during and after fleeing from their home countries? Methods: Review of the current tasks, areas of action and future challenges of refugee mental healthcare. Results: Refugee healthcare poses new challenges for the receiving and the transit countries. Besides dealing with the acute refugee situation, long term aspects of mental and general healthcare for refugees need to be considered. This will also include the reconstruction of the healthcare systems in the countries of origin of refugees.

Psychische Gesundheitsversorgung von Flüchtlingen

Introduction: The current refugee situation in Europa also leads to an increasing number of people with mental disorders. Which measures need to be taken to ascertain adequate mental healthcare for refugees during and after fleeing from their home countries? Methods: Review of the current tasks, areas of action and future challenges of refugee mental healthcare. Results: Refugee healthcare poses new challenges for the receiving and the transit countries. Besides dealing with the acute refugee situation, long term aspects of mental and general healthcare for refugees need to be considered. This will also include the reconstruction of the healthcare systems in the countries of origin of refugees.

The Experience of `Mental Trauma' and its Transcultural Application

Approaches to the mental health care of refugees and disaster survivors have recently been subject to sustained critique. This article critically examines the notion of ;mental trauma' as it has been used by psychosocial intervention programmes addressing the aftermath of the 2004 Asian tsunami. The objective is to shed light on the guidelines' implicit and explicit assumptions about how people are expected to act and feel after a disaster, thereby implying a certain 'metaphysic' of emotional experience. It will be argued that feelings can not be separated from intersubjective and public spheres, for they shape and motivate expression and experience. Instead, it is necessary to explore the particular ways in which cultural meaning and social structure relate to discourses and practices through which suffering is produced and represented. To conclude, a method is outlined to operationalize particular experiences of suffering and the institutionalized discourses and practices in which they obtain social meaning and force.

Broken Spirits: The Treatment of Traumatized Asylum Seekers, Refugees, War and Torture Victims. Edited by John P. Wilson and Boris Drožđek. New York: Brunner-Routledge, 2004. xxx + 706pp. $59.95, ISBN 0 415 94397 3 hb.

Broken Spirits is a comprehensive handbook, divided into seven parts, about theories, concepts, methodologies, clinical issues, and legal and moral aspects of mental health care for refugees and asylum seekers. Most of the authors are well-known professionals working in specialized, mainly Western European and Australian, mental health services. As the subtitle of the book reflects, its contents are based on Western constructs of trauma and therapy, but in various chapters the appropriateness of these concepts is discussed and substantial attention is given to their adaptation to the ethno-cultural diversity of the clients. A few chapters—Aroche and Coelho on ethno-cultural considerations, Turković et al. on strengthening psychological health, and Ekblad and Jaranson on psychosocial rehabilitation—describe community approaches and mental health preventive measures. However, the focus of the book is on individual, family and group therapy and directly related aspects, based on a wealth of experience built up by the authors...

Murug, Waali, and Gini: Expressions of Distress in Refugees From Somalia.

OBJECTIVE: To study how mental illness is understood, expressed, and treated among Somali refugees and how these factors influence use of health services for mental problems. METHOD: Seventeen adult Somali refugees (9 women, 8 men) were recruited by mail or by word-of-mouth to participate in the study. The study setting was an urban community health center in Rochester, N.Y., that provides family practice patient care to local Somali refugees. A qualitative design was used that incorporated a combination of methods, chiefly semistructured interviews. Interviews focused on the ways in which sadness, depression, and anxiety are expressed and on the participants' understanding of the origins of and treatment strategies for these problems. Interview transcripts were analyzed to identify recurrent themes. RESULTS: Nearly all participants felt that mental illness was a new problem for their community that did not exist to the same extent in prewar Somalia. Themes that emerged to explain the causes of mental illness included the shock and devastation of war; dead, missing, or separated family members; and spirit possession or a curse. Three major types of mental problems were identified that were associated with specific behaviors and treatment strategies: murug (sadness or suffering), gini (craziness due to spirit possession), and waali (craziness due to severe trauma). Rather than seek help from a clinician, participants preferred to first use family support, prayer, or traditional therapies for most situations. CONCLUSION: Somali refugees have distinct ways of conceptualizing, expressing, and treating commonly understood mental problems. Participants differed in their opinions about whether they would consult a doctor to discuss feelings of sadness or craziness. Effective mental health care of refugees should address culture-specific belief systems in diagnosis and treatment.