Abstract
Approaches to the mental health care of refugees and disaster survivors have recently been subject to sustained critique. This article critically examines the notion of ;mental trauma' as it has been used by psychosocial intervention programmes addressing the aftermath of the 2004 Asian tsunami. The objective is to shed light on the guidelines' implicit and explicit assumptions about how people are expected to act and feel after a disaster, thereby implying a certain 'metaphysic' of emotional experience. It will be argued that feelings can not be separated from intersubjective and public spheres, for they shape and motivate expression and experience. Instead, it is necessary to explore the particular ways in which cultural meaning and social structure relate to discourses and practices through which suffering is produced and represented. To conclude, a method is outlined to operationalize particular experiences of suffering and the institutionalized discourses and practices in which they obtain social meaning and force.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
