Memory Reactivation Research Articles

Memory reactivation and suppression modulate integration of the semantic features of related memories in hippocampus.

Encoding an event that overlaps with a previous experience may involve reactivating an existing memory and integrating it with new information or suppressing the existing memory to promote formation of a distinct, new representation. We used fMRI during overlapping event encoding to track reactivation and suppression of individual, related memories. We further used a model of semantic knowledge based on Wikipedia to quantify both reactivation of semantic knowledge related to a previous event and formation of integrated memories containing semantic features of both events. Representational similarity analysis revealed that reactivation of semantic knowledge related to a prior event in posterior medial prefrontal cortex (pmPFC) supported memory integration during new learning. Moreover, anterior hippocampus (aHPC) formed integrated representations combining the semantic features of overlapping events. We further found evidence that aHPC integration may be modulated on a trial-by-trial basis by interactions between ventrolateral PFC and anterior mPFC, with suppression of item-specific memory representations in anterior mPFC inhibiting hippocampal integration. These results suggest that PFC-mediated control processes determine the availability of specific relevant memories during new learning, thus impacting hippocampal memory integration.

The effects of sleep and targeted memory reactivation on the consolidation of relevant and irrelevant information

IntroductionSleep is assumed to facilitate the consolidation of new memories in an active process of covert reactivation of the underlying memory representations. Recent evidence suggests that this process is selective by favoring memories that are of future relevance, and can be externally triggered by learning-associated sensory cues presented during sleep [i.e., targeted memory reactivation (TMR)]. In the present study, we (1) set out to confirm the preferential sleep effect for relevant information, and then asked whether (2) simultaneous TMR of relevant and irrelevant information facilitates the advantage for relevant information, and (3) whether the preferential benefit of sleep and TMR for relevant information persists over time.MethodsTo test these questions, participants explicitly learned two sets of picture-location associations, of which one set was instructed (after encoding) to be relevant and the other to be irrelevant for later testing. In Experiment 1, memory was tested after ~12 h of night sleep (n = 28) or daytime wakefulness (n = 28) as well as again after ~1 week.ResultsResults showed overall better memory retention after sleep compared to wakefulness after 12 h as well as after 1 week. The relevant memories were overall retained better than the irrelevant memories. Interestingly, a trend toward a stronger sleep benefit for the relevant memories emerged after 1 week, although this effect failed to reach significance. In Experiment 2, learning of the relevant and irrelevant picture-location associations took place in the presence of an odor. During subsequent sleep, in the first phase of slow wave sleep (SWS), participants were either presented with the odor again (n = 23) or received an odorless vehicle (n = 20). Memory retention was assessed after the first SWS period (following awakening) as well as after ~one week. As in Experiment 1, relevant memories were overall retained better than irrelevant memories. However, TMR did not differentially affect the retention of relevant and irrelevant memories.DiscussionThese findings provide tentative evidence that the selective benefit of sleep for relevant memories evolves over time but is not further facilitated by TMR.

Corticosterone injection into the dorsal and ventral hippocampus impairs fear memory reconsolidation in a time-dependent manner in rats

Reconsolidation is an active process induced following the reactivation of previously consolidated memories. Recent studies suggest brain corticosteroid receptors may participate in the modulation of fear memory reconsolidation. Glucocorticoid receptors (GRs), with 10-fold lower affinity than mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs), are mainly occupied during the peak of the circadian rhythm, and after stress, so they probably have a more critical role than MRs in memory phases during stressful situations. This study investigated the role of dorsal and ventral hippocampal (DH and VH) GRs and MRs on fear memory reconsolidation in rats. Male Wistar rats with surgically implanted bilaterally cannulae at the DH and VH were trained and tested in an inhibitory avoidance task. The animals received bilateral microinjections of vehicle (0.3 µl/side), corticosterone (3 ng/0.3 µl/side), the GRs antagonist RU38486 (3 ng/0.3 µl/side), or the MRs antagonist spironolactone (3 ng/0.3 µl/side) immediately after memory reactivation. Moreover, drugs were injected into VH 90 min after memory reactivation. Memory tests were performed 2, 9, 11, and 13 days after memory reactivation. Results indicated that injection of corticosterone into the DH but not VH immediately after memory reactivation significantly impaired fear memory reconsolidation. Moreover, corticosterone injection into VH 90 min after memory reactivation impaired fear memory reconsolidation. RU38486, but not spironolactone reversed these effects. These findings indicate that corticosterone injection into the DH and VH via GRs activation impairs the reconsolidation of fear memory in a time-dependent manner.

Precise activation of antiviral memory T cells in solid tumors triggers a multi-cytokine response that ultimately drives tumor clearance.

Abstract The reactivation of CD8 +tissue-resident memory T cells (T RM) triggers a broad, yet local response that mobilizes adaptive and innate immune cells. This immunostimulatory process can be initiated in solid tumors when infiltrating antiviral memory T cells are reactivated. The intratumoral delivery of viral peptides is sufficient to clear poorly immunogenic tumors in mice and synergizes with immune checkpoint therapy. This study investigated the mechanisms required for this anti-tumor response and novel “Peptide Alarm Therapy” that is currently being tested in a Phase I clinical trial. In contrast to expectations, viral peptide presentation by cancer cells was not required for treatment efficacy, and while NK and CD4 T cells are activated and/or recruited to the tumor microenvironment (TME) following antiviral memory T cell activation, depletion of either population did not limit tumor clearance. Interestingly, inflammatory monocytes were greatly increased in both the TME and tumor-draining lymph node (tdLN) following therapy. Moreover, antigen presenting cells (APCs) containing tumor-derived antigen accumulated within the tdLN. TNFα, IFNγ, and IL-2 are cytokines that can signal to APC populations and are produced by activated T RM. When these cytokines were blocked collectively, but not independently, the treatment efficacy of Peptide Alarm Therapy was greatly reduced. Further, when these cytokines were intratumorally injected, they recapitulated some phenomena achieved by antiviral T cell activation. Thus, local reactivation of antiviral memory T cells, which infiltrate tumors and possess known specificities, drives a multi-cytokine response that promotes the immune-stimulation that effectuates tumor clearance. 1R01CA238439-01A1, 1F30CA253992-01

Hippocampal sharp wave ripples underlie stress susceptibility in male mice

The ventral hippocampus (vHC) is a core brain region for emotional memory. Here, we examined how the vHC regulates stress susceptibility from the level of gene expression to neuronal population dynamics in male mice. Transcriptome analysis of samples from stress-naïve mice revealed that intrinsic calbindin (Calb1) expression in the vHC is associated with susceptibility to social defeat stress. Mice with Calb1 gene knockdown in the vHC exhibited increased stress resilience and failed to show the increase in the poststress ventral hippocampal sharp wave ripple (SWR) rate. Poststress vHC SWRs triggered synchronous reactivation of stress memory-encoding neuronal ensembles and facilitated information transfer to the amygdala. Suppression of poststress vHC SWRs by real-time feedback stimulation or walking prevented social behavior deficits. Taken together, our results demonstrate that internal reactivation of memories of negative stressful episodes supported by ventral hippocampal SWRs serves as a crucial neurophysiological substrate for determining stress susceptibility.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors suppress sharp wave ripples in the ventral hippocampus

Biased memory processing contributes to the development and exacerbation of depression, and thus could represent a potential therapeutic target for stress-induced mental disorders. Synchronized spikes in hippocampal neurons, corresponding to sharp wave ripples (SWRs), may play a crucial role in memory reactivation. In this study, we showed that the frequency of SWRs increased in the ventral hippocampus, but not in the dorsal hippocampus, after stress exposure. Administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine and fluvoxamine inhibited the generation of ventral hippocampal SWRs and reduced locomotor activity and local field potential power in the gamma bands. These results suggest that the antidepressant effects of SSRIs may be mediated by the suppression of ventral hippocampal SWRs.

Memory consolidation during sleep involves context reinstatement in humans

New memories are not quarantined from each other when first encoded; rather, they are interlinked with memories that were encoded in temporal proximity or that share semantic features. By selectively biasing memory processing during sleep, here we test whether context influences sleep consolidation. Participants first formed 18 idiosyncratic narratives, each linking four objects together. Before sleep, they also memorized an on-screen position for each object. During sleep, 12 object-specific sounds were unobtrusively presented, thereby cuing the corresponding spatial memories and impacting spatial recall as a function of initial memory strength. As hypothesized, we find that recall for non-cued objects contextually linked with cued objects also changed. Post-cue electrophysiological responses suggest that activity in the sigma band supports context reinstatement and predicts context-related memory benefits. Concurrently, context-specific electrophysiological activity patterns emerge during sleep. We conclude that reactivation of individual memories during sleep evokes reinstatement of their context, thereby impacting consolidation of associated knowledge.

B cells and antibodies in refractory immune thrombocytopenia.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired bleeding disorder mediated by pathogenic autoantibodies secreted by plasma cells (PCs) in many patients. In refractory ITP patients, the persistence of splenic and bone marrow autoreactive long-lived PCs (LLPCs) may explain primary failure of rituximab and splenectomy respectively. The reactivation of autoreactive memory B cells generating new autoreactive PCs contributes to relapses after initial response to rituximab. Emerging strategies targeting B cells and PCs aim to prevent the settlement of splenic LLPCs with the combination of anti-BAFF and rituximab, to deplete autoreactive PCs with anti-CD38 antibodies, and to induce deeper B-cell depletion in tissues with novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and anti-CD19 therapies. Alternative strategies, focused on controlling autoantibody mediated effects, have also been developed, including SYK and BTK inhibitors, complement inhibitors, FcRn blockers and inhibitors of platelet desialylation.

Neural correlates of sleep-induced benefits on traumatic memory processing.

Recent findings indicate that sleep after trauma compared to sleep loss inhibits intrusive memory development, possibly by promoting adequate memory consolidation and integration. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are still unknown. Here, we examined the neural correlates underlying the effects of sleep on traumatic memory development in 110 healthy participants using a trauma film paradigm and an implicit memory task with fMRI recordings in a between-subjects design. To further facilitate memory integration, we used targeted memory reactivation (TMR) to reactivate traumatic memories during sleep. We found that sleep (i.e., nap) compared to wakefulness reduced the number of intrusive traumatic memories for the experimental trauma groups. TMR during sleep only descriptively reduced the intrusions further. On the level of brain activity, increased activity in the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, retrosplenial cortex and precuneus was found in the experimental trauma group compared to the control group after wakefulness. After sleep, on the other hand, these findings could not be found in the experimental trauma groups compared to the control group. Sleep compared to wakefulness increased activity in the cerebellum, fusiform gyrus, inferior temporal lobe, hippocampus, and amygdala during implicit retrieval of trauma memories in the experimental trauma groups. Activity in the hippocampus and the amygdala predicted subsequent intrusions. Results demonstrate the beneficial behavioral and neural effects of sleep after experimental trauma and provide indications for early neural predictor factors. This study has implications for understanding the important role of sleep for personalized treatment and prevention in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Rule Abstraction Is Facilitated by Auditory Cuing in REM Sleep.

Sleep facilitates abstraction, but the exact mechanisms underpinning this are unknown. Here, we aimed to determine whether triggering reactivation in sleep could facilitate this process. We paired abstraction problems with sounds, then replayed these during either slow-wave sleep (SWS) or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep to trigger memory reactivation in 27 human participants (19 female). This revealed performance improvements on abstraction problems that were cued in REM, but not problems cued in SWS. Interestingly, the cue-related improvement was not significant until a follow-up retest 1 week after the manipulation, suggesting that REM may initiate a sequence of plasticity events that requires more time to be implemented. Furthermore, memory-linked trigger sounds evoked distinct neural responses in REM, but not SWS. Overall, our findings suggest that targeted memory reactivation in REM can facilitate visual rule abstraction, although this effect takes time to unfold.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The ability to abstract rules from a corpus of experiences is a building block of human reasoning. Sleep is known to facilitate rule abstraction, but it remains unclear whether we can manipulate this process actively and which stage of sleep is most important. Targeted memory reactivation (TMR) is a technique that uses re-exposure to learning-related sensory cues during sleep to enhance memory consolidation. Here, we show that TMR, when applied during REM sleep, can facilitate the complex recombining of information needed for rule abstraction. Furthermore, we show that this qualitative REM-related benefit emerges over the course of a week after learning, suggesting that memory integration may require a slower form of plasticity.

Improving memory for unusual events with wakeful reactivation.

Memory consists of multiple processes, from encoding information, consolidating it into short- and long- term memory, and later retrieving relevant information. Targeted memory reactivation is an experimental method during which sensory components of a multisensory representation (such as sounds or odors) are 'reactivated', facilitating the later retrieval of unisensory attributes. We examined whether novel and unpredicted events benefit from reactivation to a greater degree than normal stimuli. We presented participants with everyday objects, and 'tagged' these objects with sounds (e.g., animals and their matching sounds) at different screen locations. 'Oddballs' were created by presenting unusual objects and sounds (e.g., a unicorn with a heartbeat sound). During a short reactivation phase, participants listened to a replay of normal and oddball sounds. Participants were then tested on their memory for visual and spatial information in the absence of sounds. Participants were better at remembering the oddball objects compared to normal ones. Importantly, participants were also better at recalling the locations of oddball objects whose sounds were reactivated, compared to objects whose sounds that were not presented again. These results suggest that episodic memory benefits from associating objects with unusual cues, and that reactivating those cues strengthen the entire multisensory representation, resulting in enhanced memory for unisensory attributes.

Data set of manuscript entiteld Targeted memory reactivation during post-learning sleep does not enhance motor memory consolidation in older adults

Data set of manuscript entiteld Targeted memory reactivation during post-learning sleep does not enhance motor memory consolidation in older adults

Reap while you sleep: Consolidation of memories differs by how they were sown.

Newly formed memories are spontaneously reactivated during sleep, leading to their strengthening. This reactivation process can be manipulated by reinstating learning-related stimuli during sleep, a technique termed targeted memory reactivation. Numerous studies have found that delivering cues during sleep improves memory for simple associations, in which one cue reactivates one tested memory. However, real-life memories often live in rich, complex networks of associations. In this review, we will examine recent forays into investigating how targeted sleep reactivation affects memories within complex paradigms, in which one cue can reactivate multiple tested memories. A common theme across studies is that reactivation consequences do not merely depend on whether memories reside in complex arrangements, but on how memories interact with one another during acquisition. We therefore emphasize how intricate study design details that alter the nature of learning and/or participant intentions impact the outcomes of sleep reactivation. In some cases, complex networks of memories interact harmoniously to bring about mutual memory benefits; in other cases, memories interact antagonistically and produce selective impairments in retrieval. Ultimately, although this burgeoning area of research has yet to be systematically explored, results suggest that the fate of reactivated stimuli within complex arrangements depends on how they were learned.

Muscarinic receptor activation overrides boundary conditions on memory updating in a calcium/calmodulin-dependent manner.

Long-term memory storage is a dynamic process requiring flexibility to ensure adaptive behavioural responding in changing environments. Indeed, it is well established that memory reactivation can "destabilize" consolidated traces, leading to various forms of updating. However, the neurobiological mechanisms rendering long-term memories labile and modifiable remain poorly described. Moreover, boundary conditions, such as the age or strength of the memory, can reduce the likelihood of this destabilization; yet, intuitively, these most behaviourally influential of memories should also be modifiable under appropriate conditions. Here, we provide evidence that salient novelty at the time of memory reactivation promotes integrative updating of resistant object memories in rats. Furthermore, blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs; with pirenzepine) or disruption of calcium/calmodulin (Ca2+/CaM) with KN-93, a Ca2+/CaM-binding molecule that inhibits calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) activation, in perirhinal cortex (PRh) prevented novelty-induced destabilization and updating of resistant object memories. Finally, PRh M1 mAChR activation (with CDD-0102A) was sufficient to destabilize resistant object memories for updating, and this effect was blocked by KN-93, possibly via inhibition of CaMKII activity. Thus, mAChRs and activation of CaMKII appear to interact as part of a mechanism to override boundary conditions on resistant object memories to ensure integrative modification with novel information. These findings therefore have important implications for understanding the dynamic nature of long-term memory storage and potential treatments for conditions characterized by maladaptive and inflexible memories.

Sleep disruption by memory cues selectively weakens reactivated memories.

A widely accepted view in memory research is that recently stored information can be reactivated during sleep, leading to memory strengthening. Two recent studies have shown that this effect can be reversed in participants with highly disrupted sleep. To test whether weakening of reactivated memories can result directly from sleep disruption, in this experiment we varied the intensity of memory reactivation cues such that some produced sleep arousals. Prior to sleep, participants (local community members) learned the locations of 75 objects, each accompanied by a sound naturally associated with that object. Location recall was tested before and after sleep, and a subset of the sounds was presented during sleep to provoke reactivation of the corresponding locations. Reactivation with sleep arousal weakened memories, unlike the improvement typically found after reactivation without sleep arousal. We conclude that reactivated memories can be selectively weakened during sleep, and that memory reactivation may strengthen or weaken memories depending on additional factors such as concurrent sleep disruption.

Does Motor Memory Reactivation through Practice and Post-Learning Sleep Modulate Consolidation?

Retrieving previously stored information makes memory traces labile again and can trigger restabilization in a strengthened or weakened form depending on the reactivation condition. Available evidence for long-term performance changes upon reactivation of motor memories and the effect of post-learning sleep on their consolidation remains scarce, and so does the data on the ways in which subsequent reactivation of motor memories interacts with sleep-related consolidation. Eighty young volunteers learned (Day 1) a 12-element Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) before a post-training Regular Sleep (RS) or Sleep Deprivation (SD) night, either followed (Day 2) by morning motor reactivation through a short SRTT testing or no motor activity. Consolidation was assessed after three recovery nights (Day 5). A 2 × 2 ANOVA carried on proportional offline gains did not evidence significant Reactivation (Morning Reactivation/No Morning Reactivation; p = 0.098), post-training Sleep (RS/SD; p = 0.301) or Sleep*Reactivation interaction (p = 0.257) effect. Our results are in line with prior studies suggesting a lack of supplementary performance gains upon reactivation, and other studies that failed to disclose post-learning sleep-related effects on performance improvement. However, lack of overt behavioural effects does not detract from the possibility of sleep- or reconsolidation-related covert neurophysiological changes underlying similar behavioural performance levels.

How our understanding of memory replay evolves.

Memory reactivations and replay, widely reported in the hippocampus and cortex across species, have been implicated in memory consolidation, planning, and spatial and skill learning. Technological advances in electrophysiology, calcium imaging, and human neuroimaging techniques have enabled neuroscientists to measure large-scale neural activity with increasing spatiotemporal resolution and have provided opportunities for developing robust analytic methods to identify memory replay. In this article, we first review a large body of historically important and representative memory replay studies from the animal and human literature. We then discuss our current understanding of memory replay functions in learning, planning, and memory consolidation and further discuss the progress in computational modeling that has contributed to these improvements. Next, we review past and present analytic methods for replay analyses and discuss their limitations and challenges. Finally, looking ahead, we discuss some promising analytic methods for detecting nonstereotypical, behaviorally nondecodable structures from large-scale neural recordings. We argue that seamless integration of multisite recordings, real-time replay decoding, and closed-loop manipulation experiments will be essential for delineating the role of memory replay in a wide range of cognitive and motor functions.

Hippocampal–cortical coupling differentiates long-term memory processes

Reactivation of long-term memories enables experience-dependent strengthening, weakening, or updating of memory traces. Although coupling of hippocampal and cortical activity patterns facilitates initial memory consolidation, whether and how these patterns are involved in postreactivation memory processes are not known. Here, we monitored the hippocampal-cortical network as rats repetitively learned and retrieved spatial and nonspatial memories. We show that interactions between hippocampal sharp wave-ripples (SPW-R), cortical spindles (SPI), and cortical ripples (CXR) are jointly modulated in the absence of memory demand but independently recruited depending on the stage of memory and task type. Reconsolidation of memory after retrieval is associated with an increased and extended window of coupling between hippocampal SPW-Rs and CXRs compared to the initial consolidation. Hippocampal SPW-R and cortical spindle interactions are preferentially engaged during memory consolidation. These findings suggest that specific, time-limited patterns of oscillatory coupling can support the distinct memory processes required to flexibly manage long-term memories in a dynamic environment.

Journal Digest: IRT; Motivational Therapy; Mental Health Apps; and More

Journal Digest: IRT; Motivational Therapy; Mental Health Apps; and More

Pairing non-invasive brain stimulation with memory reactivation: rapid learning (and unlearning) in the human brain

Pairing non-invasive brain stimulation with memory reactivation: rapid learning (and unlearning) in the human brain