Memory Destabilization Research Articles

Reactivation-dependent transfer of fear memory between contexts requires M1 muscarinic receptor stimulation in dorsal hippocampus of male rats.

Memory updating is essential for integrating new information into existing representations. However, this process could become maladaptive in conditions like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), when fear memories generalize to neutral contexts. Previously, we have shown that contextual fear memory malleability in rats requires activation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the dorsal hippocampus. Here, we investigated the involvement of this mechanism in the transfer of contextual fear memories to other contexts using a novel fear memory updating paradigm. Following brief reexposure to a previously fear conditioned context, male rats (n = 8-10/group) were placed into a neutral context to evaluate the transfer of fear memory. We also infused the selective M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine into the dorsal hippocampus before memory reactivation to try to block this effect. Results support the hypothesis that fear memory can be updated with novel contextual information, but only if rats are reexposed to the originally trained context relatively recently before the neutral context; evidence for transfer was not seen if the fear memory reactivation was omitted or if it occurred 6 h before neutral context exposure. The transferred fear persisted for 4 weeks, and the effect was blocked by M1 antagonism. These findings strongly suggest that fear transfer requires reactivation and destabilization of the original fear memory. The novel preclinical model introduced here, and its implication of muscarinic receptors in this process, could therefore inform therapeutic strategies for PTSD and similar conditions.

Dorsal raphe to basolateral amygdala corticotropin-releasing factor circuit regulates cocaine-memory reconsolidation.

Environmental stimuli elicit drug craving and relapse in cocaine users by triggering the retrieval of strong cocaine-related contextual memories. Retrieval can also destabilize drug memories, requiring reconsolidation, a protein synthesis-dependent storage process, to maintain memory strength. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) signaling in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) is necessary for cocaine-memory reconsolidation. We have hypothesized that a critical source of CRF in the BLA is the dorsal raphe nucleus (DR) based on its neurochemistry, anatomical connectivity, and requisite involvement in cocaine-memory reconsolidation. To test this hypothesis, male and female Sprague-Dawley rats received adeno-associated viruses to express Gi-coupled designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) selectively in CRF neurons of the DR and injection cannulae directed at the BLA. The rats were trained to self-administer cocaine in a distinct environmental context then received extinction training in a different context. Next, they were briefly re-exposed to the cocaine-predictive context to destabilize (reactivate) cocaine memories. Intra-BLA infusions of the DREADD agonist deschloroclozapine (DCZ; 0.1 mM, 0.5 µL/hemisphere) immediately after memory reactivation attenuated cocaine-memory strength, relative to vehicle infusion. This was indicated by a selective, DCZ-induced and memory reactivation-dependent decrease in drug-seeking behavior in the cocaine-predictive context in DREADD-expressing males and females at test compared to respective controls. Notably, BLA-projecting DR CRF neurons that exhibited increased c-Fos expression during memory reconsolidation co-expressed the glutamatergic neuronal marker, vesicular glutamate transporter 3. Together, these findings suggest that the DRCRF → BLA circuit is engaged to maintain cocaine-memory strength after memory destabilization, and this phenomenon may be mediated by DR CRF and/or glutamate release in the BLA.

Dual-step pharmacological intervention for traumatic-like memories: implications from D-cycloserine and cannabidiol or clonidine in male and female rats.

Therapeutic approaches to mitigating traumatic memories have often faced resistance. Exploring safe reconsolidation blockers, drugs capable of reducing the emotional valence of the memory upon brief retrieval and reactivation, emerges as a promising pharmacological strategy. Towards this objective, preclinical investigations should focus on aversive memories resulting in maladaptive outcomes and consider sex-related differences to enhance their translatability. After selecting a relatively high training magnitude leading to the formation of a more intense and generalized fear memory in adult female and male rats, we investigated whether two clinically approved drugs disrupting its reconsolidation remain effective. We found resistant reconsolidation impairment by the α2-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine or cannabidiol, a major non-psychotomimetic Cannabis sativa component. However, pre-retrieval administration of D-cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glycine-binding site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex, facilitated their impairing effects on reconsolidation. A similar reconsolidation blockade by clonidine or cannabidiol was achieved following exposure to a non-conditioned but generalized context after D-cycloserine administration. This suggests that sufficient memory destabilization can accompany generalized fear expression. Combining clonidine with cannabidiol without potentiating memory destabilization by D-cycloserine was ineffective. These findings highlight the importance of NMDA receptor signaling in memory destabilization and underscore the efficacy of a dual-step pharmacological intervention in attenuating traumatic-like memories, even in a context different from the original learning environment.

Destabilization of fear memory by Rac1-driven engram-microglia communication in hippocampus

Rac1 is a key regulator of the cytoskeleton and neuronal plasticity, and is known to play a critical role in psychological and cognitive brain disorders. To elucidate the engram specific Rac1 signaling in fear memory, a doxycycline (Dox)-dependent robust activity marking (RAM) system was used to label dorsal dentate gyrus (DG) engram cells in mice during contextual fear conditioning. Rac1 mRNA and protein levels in DG engram cells were peaked at 24 h (day 1) after fear conditioning and were more abundant in the fear engram cells than in the non-engram cells. Optogenetic activation of Rac1 in a temporal manner in DG engram cells before memory retrieval decreased the freezing level in the fear context. Optogenetic activation of Rac1 increased autophagy protein 7 (ATG7) expression in the DG engram cells and activated DG microglia. Microglia-specific transcriptomics and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that overexpression of ATG7 in the fear engram cells upregulated the mRNA of Toll-like receptor TLR2/4 in DG microglia. Knockdown of microglial TLR2/4 rescued fear memory destabilization induced by ATG7 overexpression or Rac1 activation in DG engram cells. These results indicate that Rac1-driven communications between engram cells and microglia contributes to contextual fear memory destabilization, and is mediated by ATG7 and TLR2/4, and suggest a novel mechanistic framework for the cytoskeletal regulator in fear memory interference.

Muscarinic receptor activation promotes destabilization and updating of object location memories in mice

The storage of long-term memories is a dynamic process. Reminder cues can destabilize previously consolidated memories, rendering them labile and modifiable. However, memories that are strongly encoded or relatively remote at the time of reactivation can resist destabilization only being rendered labile under conditions that favour memory updating. Using the object location recognition task, here we show in male C57BL/6 mice that novelty-induced destabilization of strongly-encoded memories requires muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) activation. Furthermore, we use the objects-in-updated locations task to show that updating of object location memories is mAChR-dependent. Thus, mAChR stimulation appears to be critical for spatial memory destabilization and related memory updating. Enhancing our understanding of the role of ACh in memory updating should inform future research into the underlying causes of behavioural disorders that are characterized by persistent maladaptive memories, such as age-related cognitive inflexibility and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 prevents memory reconsolidation impairment caused by protein synthesis inhibitors in young chicks.

Introduction: Reactivation of already consolidated memory can initiate its destabilization, making the memory trace labile. Normally, this destabilization is followed by reconsolidation of the memory trace, enriched by newly acquired experience. Disrupting the reconsolidation process, for example, by inhibiting protein synthesis, impairs subsequent memory retrieval, leading to reminder-related amnesia. Previous studies in various species have shown that this impairment can be prevented by using NMDA receptor antagonists, which interfere with memory destabilization. Methods: In the present study we examined this phenomenon using a one-trial passive avoidance learning model in newborn chicks, the hypothesis being that inactivation of the NMDA-mediated transmission during memory reactivation would inhibit the memory trace labilization and thus prevent the reminder-related amnesia. Results: We found that reminder-associated administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 or one of the protein synthesis inhibitors (anisomycin, cycloheximide, 2-deoxygalactose) each alone produced amnesia. However, when combined, injection of MK-801 before the reminder prevented amnesia induced by protein synthesis inhibitors. Discussion: We suggest that the observed paradoxical effect implicates the involvement of NMDA receptors in both protein synthesis-independent engram destabilization upon its retrieval and protein synthesismediated engram stabilization after its updating. This puzzling dual role of NMDA receptors in memory destabilization/restabilization requires further investigation.

Basolateral amygdala corticotropin releasing factor receptor 2 interacts with nonmuscle myosin II to destabilize memory in males

Preclinical studies show that inhibiting the actin motor ATPase nonmuscle myosin II (NMII) with blebbistatin (Blebb) in the basolateral amgydala (BLA) depolymerizes actin, resulting in an immediate, retrieval-independent disruption of methamphetamine (METH)-associated memory in male and female adult and adolescent rodents. The effect is highly selective, as NMII inhibition has no effect in other relevant brain regions (e.g., dorsal hippocampus [dPHC], nucleus accumbens [NAc]), nor does it interfere with associations for other aversive or appetitive stimuli, including cocaine (COC). To understand the mechanisms responsible for drug specific selectivity we began by investigating, in male mice, the pharmacokinetic differences in METH and COC brain exposure . Replicating METH’s longer half-life with COC did not render the COC association susceptible to disruption by NMII inhibition. Therefore, we next assessed transcriptional differences. Comparative RNA-seq profiling in the BLA, dHPC and NAc following METH or COC conditioning identified crhr2, which encodes the corticotropin releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF2), as uniquely upregulated by METH in the BLA. CRF2 antagonism with Astressin-2B (AS2B) had no effect on METH-associated memory after consolidation, allowing for determination of CRF2 influences on NMII-based susceptibility. Pretreatment with AS2B prevented the ability of Blebb to disrupt an established METH-associated memory. Alternatively, combining CRF2 overexpression and agonist treatment, urocortin 3 (UCN3), in the BLA during conditioning rendered COC-associated memory susceptible to disruption by NMII inhibition, mimicking the Blebb-induced, retrieval-independent memory disruption seen with METH. These results suggest that BLA CRF2 receptor activation during memory formation in male mice can prevent stabilization of the actin-myosin cytoskeleton supporting the memory, rendering it vulnerable to disruption by NMII inhibition. CRF2 represents an interesting target for BLA-dependent memory destabilization via downstream effects on NMII.

Molecular mechanisms underpinning deconditioning-update in fear memory.

Traumatic experiences are closely associated with some psychiatric conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder. Deconditioning-update promotes robust and long-lasting attenuation of aversive memories. The deconditioning protocol consists of applying weak/neutral footshocks during reactivations, so that the original tone-shock association is replaced by an innocuous stimulus that does not produce significant fear response. Here, we present the molecular bases that can support this mechanism. To this end, we used pharmacological tools to inhibit the activity of ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDA-GluN2B and CP-AMPA), the activity of proteases (calpains), and the receptors that control intracellular calcium storage (IP3 receptors), as well as the endocannabinoid system (CB1). Our results indicate that blocking these molecular targets prevents fear memory update by deconditioning. Therefore, this study uncovered the molecular substrate of deconditioning-update strategy, and, broadly, shed new light on the traumatic memory destabilization mechanisms that might be used to break the boundaries regarding reconsolidation-based approaches to deal with maladaptive memories.

Activating M1 muscarinic cholinergic receptors induces destabilization of resistant contextual fear memories in rats

Destabilization of previously consolidated memories places them in a labile state in which they are open to modification. However, strongly encoded fear memories tend to be destabilization-resistant and the conditions required to destabilize such memories remain poorly understood. Our lab has previously shown that exposure to salient novel contextual cues during memory reactivation can destabilize strongly encoded object location memories and that activity at muscarinic cholinergic receptors is critical for this effect. In the current study, we similarly targeted destabilization-resistant fear memories, hypothesizing that exposure to salient novelty at the time of reactivation would induce destabilization of strongly encoded fear memories in a muscarinic receptor-dependent manner. First, we show that contextual fear memories induced by 3 context-shock pairings readily destabilize upon memory reactivation, and that this destabilization is blocked by systemic (ip) administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine (0.3 mg/kg) in male rats. Following that, we confirm that this effect is dorsal hippocampus (dHPC)-dependent by targeting M1 receptors in the CA1 region with pirenzepine. Next, we show that more strongly encoded fear memories (induced with 5 context-shock pairings) resist destabilization. Consistent with our previous work, however, we report that salient novelty (a change in floor texture) presented during the reactivation session promotes destabilization of resistant contextual fear memories in a muscarinic receptor-dependent manner. Finally, the effect of salient novelty on memory destabilization was mimicked by stimulating muscarinic receptors with the selective M1 agonist CDD-0102A (ip, 0.3 mg/kg). These findings reveal further generalizability of our previous results implicating novel cues and M1 muscarinic signaling in promoting destabilization of resistant memories and suggest possible therapeutic options for disorders characterized by persistent, maladaptive fear memories such as PTSD and phobias.

NMDARs control object recognition memory destabilization and reconsolidation

Object recognition memory (ORM) allows identification of previously encountered items and is therefore crucial for remembering episodic information. In rodents, reactivation during recall in the presence of a novel object destabilizes ORM and initiates a Zif268 and protein synthesis-dependent reconsolidation process in the hippocampus that links the memory of this object to the reactivated recognition trace. Hippocampal NMDA receptors (NMDARs) modulate Zif268 expression and protein synthesis and regulate memory stability but their possible involvement in the ORM destabilization/reconsolidation cycle has yet to be analyzed in detail. We found that, in adult male Wistar rats, intra dorsal-CA1 administration of the non-subunit selective NMDAR antagonist AP5, or of the GluN2A subunit-containing NMDAR antagonist TCN201, 5 min after an ORM reactivation session in the presence of a novel object carried out 24 h post-training impaired retention 24 h later. In contrast, pre-reactivation administration of the GluN2B subunit-containing NMDAR antagonist RO25–6981 had no effect on ORM recall or retention but impeded the amnesia caused by Zif268 silencing and protein synthesis inhibition in dorsal CA1. Our results indicate that GluN2B-containing hippocampal NMDARs are necessary for ORM destabilization whereas GluN2A-containing NMDARs are involved in ORM reconsolidation, and suggest that modulation of the relative activity of these receptor subtypes during recall regulates ORM persistence.

Muscarinic receptor activation overrides boundary conditions on memory updating in a calcium/calmodulin-dependent manner.

Long-term memory storage is a dynamic process requiring flexibility to ensure adaptive behavioural responding in changing environments. Indeed, it is well established that memory reactivation can "destabilize" consolidated traces, leading to various forms of updating. However, the neurobiological mechanisms rendering long-term memories labile and modifiable remain poorly described. Moreover, boundary conditions, such as the age or strength of the memory, can reduce the likelihood of this destabilization; yet, intuitively, these most behaviourally influential of memories should also be modifiable under appropriate conditions. Here, we provide evidence that salient novelty at the time of memory reactivation promotes integrative updating of resistant object memories in rats. Furthermore, blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs; with pirenzepine) or disruption of calcium/calmodulin (Ca2+/CaM) with KN-93, a Ca2+/CaM-binding molecule that inhibits calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) activation, in perirhinal cortex (PRh) prevented novelty-induced destabilization and updating of resistant object memories. Finally, PRh M1 mAChR activation (with CDD-0102A) was sufficient to destabilize resistant object memories for updating, and this effect was blocked by KN-93, possibly via inhibition of CaMKII activity. Thus, mAChRs and activation of CaMKII appear to interact as part of a mechanism to override boundary conditions on resistant object memories to ensure integrative modification with novel information. These findings therefore have important implications for understanding the dynamic nature of long-term memory storage and potential treatments for conditions characterized by maladaptive and inflexible memories.

Trauma and Remembering: From Neuronal Circuits to Molecules.

Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) experience intrusions of vivid traumatic memories, heightened arousal, and display avoidance behavior. Disorders in identity, emotion regulation, and interpersonal relationships are also common. The cornerstone of PTSD is altered learning, memory, and remembering, regulated by a complex neuronal and molecular network. We propose that the essential feature of successful treatment is the modification of engrams in their unstable state during retrieval. During psychedelic psychotherapy, engrams may show a pronounced instability, which enhances modification. In this narrative review, we outline the clinical characteristics of PTSD, its multifaceted neuroanatomy, and the molecular pathways that regulate memory destabilization and reconsolidation. We propose that psychedelics, acting by serotonin-glutamate interactions, destabilize trauma-related engrams and open the door to change them during psychotherapy.

Dissociating the involvement of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors in object memory destabilization and reconsolidation

The content of long-term memory is neither fixed nor permanent. Reminder cues can destabilize consolidated memories, rendering them amenable to change before being reconsolidated. However, not all memories destabilize following reactivation. Characteristics of a memory, such as its age or strength, impose boundaries on destabilization. Previously, we demonstrated that presentation of salient novel information at the time of reactivation can readily destabilize resistant object memories in rats and this form of novelty-induced destabilization is dependent upon acetylcholine (ACh) activity at muscarinic receptors (mAChRs). In the present study, we sought to determine if this same mechanism for initiating destabilization of resistant object memories is present in mice and further expand our understanding of the mechanisms through which ACh modulates object memory destabilization by investigating the role of nicotinic receptors (nAChRs). We provide evidence that in mice mAChRs are necessary for destabilizing object memories that are readily destabilized and those that are resistant to destabilization. Conversely, nAChRs were found to be necessary only when memories are readily destabilized. We then investigated the role of both receptors in the reconsolidation of destabilized object memory traces and determined that nAChRs, but not mAChRs, are necessary for object memory reconsolidation. Together, these results suggest that nAChRs may play a more selective role in the re-storage of object memories following destabilization and that ACh acts through mAChRs to act as an override signal to initiate destabilization of resistant object memories following reactivation with novelty. These findings expand our current understanding of the role of ACh in the dynamic storage of long-term memory.

Procedures between training and reactivation influence the destabilization of instrumental sucrose memory.

Memory destabilization and reconsolidation is hypothesized to be a fundamental mnemonic process that can underpin memory updating. Instrumental memories have been shown recently to be destabilized following a reactivation session that involves a change in instrumental reward contingency. However, the acquisition and performance of an instrumental response occurs in the presence of the learning of other reward-related memories. This may influence the ability of a given reactivation session to destabilize the previously learned instrumental memory. Here we present a series of experiments in male rats involving an instrumental memory trained on an FR1 schedule over 10 days, and then reactivated in a session that imposed a VR5 schedule of reinforcement. When MK-801 was injected prior to the VR5 reactivation session, it reliably impaired subsequent instrumental performance at test only when the reactivation session occurred 48 h, and not 24 h, after the end of training. The interposition between the end of training and the reactivation session of a context extinction session, an additional VR5 reactivation session, or indeed the simple experience of being handled and injected with vehicle, resulted in MK-801 no longer having an amnestic effect on test performance. While we do not have a clear account for the process and mechanism underpinning this apparent selectivity of the effect of the VR5 session to destabilize the instrumental memory, it does additionally highlight the need for greater understanding of the conditions that facilitate reactivation-induced memory destabilization.

Appraising reconsolidation theory and its empirical validation.

Re-exposure to elements of prior experiences can create opportunities for inducing amnesia for those events. The dominant theoretical framework posits that such re-exposure can result in memory destabilization, making the memory representation temporarily sensitive to disruption while it awaits reconsolidation. If true, such a mechanism that allows for memories to be permanently changed could have important implications for the treatment of several forms of psychopathology. However, there have been contradictory findings and elusive occurrences of replication failures within the "reconsolidation" field. Considering its potential relevance for clinical applications, the fact that this "hot" research area is being dominated by a single mechanistic theory, and the presence of unexplainable contradictory findings, we believe that it is both useful and timely to critically evaluate the reconsolidation framework. We discuss potential issues that may arise from how reconsolidation interference has typically been deducted from behavioral observations, and provide a principled assessment of reconsolidation theory that illustrates that the theory and its proposed boundary conditions are vaguely defined, which has made it close to impossible to refute reconsolidation theory. We advocate for caution, encouraging researchers not to blindly assume that a reconsolidation process must underlie their findings, and pointing out the risks of doing so. Finally, we suggest concrete theoretical and methodological advances that can promote a fruitful translation of reminder-dependent amnesia into clinical treatment.

Interfering With Contextual Fear Memories by Post-reactivation Administration of Propranolol in Mice: A Series of Null Findings.

Post-reactivation amnesia of contextual fear memories by blockade of noradrenergic signaling has been shown to have limited replicability in rodents. This is usually attributed to several boundary conditions that gate the destabilization of memory during its retrieval. How these boundary conditions can be overcome, and what neural mechanisms underlie post-reactivation changes in contextual fear memories remain largely unknown. Here, we report a series of experiments in a contextual fear-conditioning paradigm in mice, that were aimed at solving these issues. We first attempted to obtain a training paradigm that would consistently result in contextual fear memory that could be destabilized upon reactivation, enabling post-retrieval amnesia by the administration of propranolol. Unexpectedly, our attempts were unsuccessful to this end. Specifically, over a series of experiments in which we varied different parameters of the fear acquisition procedure, at best small and inconsistent effects were observed. Additionally, we found that propranolol did not alter retrieval-induced neural activity, as measured by the number of c-Fos+ cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. To determine whether propranolol was perhaps ineffective in interfering with reactivated contextual fear memories, we also included anisomycin (i.e., a potent and well-known amnesic drug) in several experiments, and measures of synaptic glutamate receptor subunit GluA2 (i.e., a marker of memory destabilization). No post-retrieval amnesia by anisomycin and no altered GluA2 expression by reactivation was observed, suggesting that the memories did not undergo destabilization. The null findings are surprising, given that the training paradigms we implemented were previously shown to result in memories that could be modified upon reactivation. Together, our observations illustrate the elusive nature of reactivation-dependent changes in non-human fear memory.

Optogenetic inhibition of the dorsal hippocampus CA3 region during early-stage cocaine-memory reconsolidation disrupts subsequent context-induced cocaine seeking in rats.

The dorsal hippocampus (DH) is key to the maintenance of cocaine memories through reconsolidation into long-term memory stores after retrieval-induced memory destabilization. Here, we examined the time-dependent role of the cornu ammonis 3 DH subregion (dCA3) in cocaine-memory reconsolidation by utilizing the temporal and spatial specificity of optogenetics. eNpHR3.0-eYFP- or eYFP-expressing male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to lever press for cocaine infusions in a distinct context and received extinction training in a different context. Rats were then re-exposed to the cocaine-paired context for 15 min to destabilize cocaine memories (memory reactivation) or remained in their home cages (no-reactivation). Optogenetic dCA3 inhibition for one hour immediately after memory reactivation reduced c-Fos expression (index of neuronal activation) in dCA3 stratum pyramidale (SP) glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons and in stratum lucidum (SL) GABAergic neurons during reconsolidation. Furthermore, dCA3 inhibition attenuated drug-seeking behavior (non-reinforced lever presses) selectively in the cocaine-paired context three days later (recall test), relative to no photoinhibition. This behavioral effect was eNpHR3.0-, memory-reactivation, and time-dependent, indicating a memory-reconsolidation deficit. Based on this observation and our previous finding that protein synthesis in the DH is not necessary for cocaine-memory reconsolidation, we postulate that recurrent pyramidal neuronal activity in the dCA3 may maintain labile cocaine memories prior to protein synthesis-dependent reconsolidation elsewhere, and SL/SP interneurons may facilitate this process by limiting extraneous neuronal activity. Interestingly, SL c-Fos expression was reduced at recall concomitant with impairment in cocaine-seeking behavior, suggesting that SL neurons may also facilitate cocaine-memory retrieval by inhibiting non-engram neuronal activity.

Prelimbic proBDNF Facilitates Retrieval-Dependent Fear Memory Destabilization by Regulation of Synaptic and Neural Functions in Juvenile Rats.

Fear regulation changes as a function of the early life is a key developmental period for the continued maturation of fear neural circuitry. The mechanisms of fear retrieval-induced reconsolidation have been investigated but remain poorly understood. The involvement of prelimbic proBDNF in fear memory extinction and its mediated signaling have been reported previously. Specifically, blocking the proBDNF/p75NTR pathway during the postnatal stage disrupts synaptic development and neuronal activity in adulthood. Given the inherent high expression of proBDNF during the juvenile period, we tested whether the prelimbic proBDNF regulated synaptic and neuronal functions allowing to influencing retrieval-dependent memory processing. By examining the freezing behavior of auditory fear-conditioned rats, we found the high level of the prelimbic proBDNF in juvenile rats enhanced the destabilization of the retrieval-dependent weak but not strong fear memory through activating p75NTR-GluN2B signaling. This modification of fear memory traces was attributed to the increment in the proportion of thin-type spine and promotion in synaptic function, as evidenced by the facilitation of NMDA-mediated EPSCs and GluN2B-dependent synaptic depression at the prelimbic projection. Furthermore, the strong prelimbic theta- and gamma-oscillation coupling predicted the suppressive effect of juvenile proBDNF on the recall of postretrieval memory. Our results critically emphasize the importance of developmental proBDNF for modification of retrieval-dependent memory and provide a potential critical targeting to inhibit threaten memories associated with neurodevelopment disorders.

Characteristics of the Reminder that Triggers Object Recognition Memory Reconsolidation in Mice

Memories are initially labile and become stable through consolidation. Once consolidated, a memory can be destabilized by a reminder, requiring reconsolidation to become stable again. Memory reconsolidation has been evidenced in several learning tasks, including novel object recognition (NOR). But the features of the reminder that trigger memory destabilization and reconsolidation in this task are poorly characterized. Memory reconsolidation can be evidenced by delivering either an amnesic agent or a memory enhancer after reactivation and testing the resulting long-term memory alteration. Here we trained male mice for 15 min to induce a strong memory formation. Sulfasalazine, a specific inhibitor of the NF-κB pathway, was administered as an amnesic agent in the dorsal hippocampus. NF-κB is a key transcription factor required for consolidation and reconsolidation. We found that reconsolidation was induced when animals were re-exposed for 5 min to a combination of novel and familiar objects, but not to either two familiar or two novel objects. No destabilization was induced by re-exposure to the context without objects. Re-exposure to a combination of novel and familiar objects induced destabilization with a reactivation session as brief as 1 min. One minute of training induced a weak memory that could be enhanced by sodium butyrate, an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACs), after 1 min of re-exposure. Histone acetylation is an epigenetic mechanism involved in gene expression regulation which positively correlates with memory. Thus, in this study we have performed an accurate characterization of the features of the reminder effective in triggering hippocampal NF-κB-dependent reconsolidation.

Transient Destabilization of Declarative Memory-Opposing Impact of Physical Exercise or Rest after Encoding in Typically Developing Children and Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder but No Difference after Subsequent Sleep.

Background: Children are especially sensitive to a broad range of influences and show a remarkable capacity for learning. One prominent example is declarative memory, which may be influenced by a variety of factors and is impaired in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Exercise and sleep, or both combined, might foster declarative memory. Methods: Here, 12 typically developing children (TDC) and 12 age-matched children with ADHD participated in an exercise and rest condition before a night in the sleep laboratory. Declarative memory was encoded before exercise or rest and retrieved before and after a night of sleep. Results: Exercise in TDC but rest in ADHD lead to a transient destabilization of declarative memory, while there were no more differences after a night of sleep. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency was prolonged after exercise in both groups. Conclusions: Exercise leads to opposing effects on immediate declarative memory formation. The factors or contexts that promote or hinder declarative memory formation in children ADHD and TDC differ, and further work is needed to determine the recommendations for declarative learning in children with ADHD.