Among the most surprising findings in visual science of the last decade has been that photoreception in the mammalian retina is not restricted to the rods and cones, but extends to a small number of cells in the inner retina. These new photoreceptors, which comprise a small subset of retinal ganglion cells (1), are capable of driving a number of “non-image-forming” light responses including circadian photoentrainment and the regulation of pupil size even in the absence of functional rods and cones (2, 3). The so-called intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) absorb light through an opsin/retinaldehyde-based photopigment called melanopsin (4–8). Although the details of melanopsin’s photochemistry in mammals remain only partially defined, the evidence to date supports the hypothesis that, just like other opsin photopigments, the critical first event in melanopsin activation is photoisomerization of the retinaldehyde chromophore from a cis to an all-trans conformation (6–8). An important implication of such a mechanism is that to attain photosensitivity melanopsin requires a steady supply of cis-retinaldehyde. The primary source of chromophore in the vertebrate eye is a multistep enzymatic pathway, known as the retinoid or visual cycle, by which 11-cis retinaldehyde is regenerated from bleached all-trans originating in photoreceptor outer segments (Fig. 1 A). Critical elements of this pathway occur in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). As melanopsin is found in the more superficial layers of the retina, distant from the RPE, it would seem poorly placed to obtain cis-retinaldehyde from this source. This raises the question of how melanopsin recovers from bleach. An attractive hypothesis is that it uses an independent, more local, source of cis-retinaldehdye rather than relying on the RPE-based visual cycle. Two articles in this issue of PNAS (9, 10) test this hypothesis …