Health & History ● 12/1 ● 2010 141 Right continues to press for the removal of comprehensive sex education in schools. The book involves a certain amount of repetition, suggesting the potential for tighter organisation. There is also a tendency to describe issues as ‘complex’, and then move on without affording full explanations. On the other hand, Lord often affords an entertaining narrative. As one would imagine, the subject provides scope for plenty of pithy word play: Lord writes under headings such as ‘In Bed with the Fed’ and ‘Rooted in Abstinence’. Condom Nation effectively mines the enormous chasm between Americans’ public views on sex education and their sexual behaviour. MICHAEL STURMA MURDOCH UNIVERSITY Elizabeth Reis, Bodies in Doubt: An American History of Intersex (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009). ISBN 9780801891557 (HC). 15 halftones, 240 pp. Intersex is a contemporary term used to describe that which has historically been referred to as hermaphroditism. Elizabeth Reis traverses an epoch of American intersex that is book-ended by the seventeenth century ‘monstrous sign of providence’ and the twentyfirst century activist. Within each century, an intersex zeitgeist has reinforced a personhood or, as the case may be, a persona non grata. True hermaphroditism in humans is routinely written about as an impossibility. Those people with ambiguous or doubtful bodies have been met by a cultural milieu determined to find a place for them, that, more often than not, is a place of annihilation. Thus if there is a singular feature of an American history of intersex it is denial of existence. Early colonial references to bodies in doubt were dismissed as myth and fantasy, and the United States harbours a silence that is written into twenty-first-century medical management protocols, which surgically alter ambiguous genitalia to look acceptable. The protocols are inherited from John Money (and John and Joan Hampson) who, between the 1950 and 1970s decreed that if intersex individuals knew about their intersex status, they would at best lead unhappy lives and at worst commit suicide. Bodies in Doubt offers much-needed voice to the much-silenced lives of intersex Americans, and Reis eloquently writes the unwritten 142 BOOK REVIEWS history of intersex in the United States. Reis captures their stories as told by a plethora of masculinist and authoritative treatises, including autopsies, legal records, and medical texts, and to a lesser extent autobiographies. We witness the lives of these people as they were viewed, regulated, and categorised within the dominant discourses of their times that were bound to a need to similarly hide intersex and perpetuate social constructions of sex and gender. From this work we have an unprecedented view of not only the lives of intersex individuals, but also the cultural norms surrounding them. Through the social sanctioning of intersex we garner glimpses of women, heterosexuality, marriage, and the ubiquity of the notion that there are only two sexes and genders. Additionally, threaded throughout the piece are references to other social axes, namely vocation, property, class, and race. An American history of intersex is also marked by deceit. In the early centuries, intersex individuals were policed for the truth of their bodies. When bodies were in doubt and did not coincide with sex and gender, intersex individuals were accused of intentionally deceiving intimates (e.g., marital partners) and society (e.g., the law and medicine). When sex and gender was assigned, rarely were the person’s desires or wishes listened to. Medicine knew best, and the medical management protocols today continue to deny intersex as a viable ontology. The medical profession is still influenced by Money and also many theories that attempted to annihilate intersex and deny it existence. Reis does more than analyse the past; the epilogue documents what is unfolding in the first decade of the new millennium. Reis is aware that the history of American intersex continues with our own cultural stamp. We must concede that ‘our contemporary standpoint is no less fraught with cultural biases than our predecessors’ (p. 153). The terms ‘hermaphrodite’and ‘intersex’have a historical component, and remain controversial and thus culturally significant. The Chicago Consensus Conference in 2005 (where only two intersex adults were invited) posited ‘Disorders of sex development’(DSD...
Read full abstract