Median Overall Survival For Patients Research Articles

Assessing survival in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery: before and after the start of the targetable mutation era.

Targeted treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs) may be combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to optimize survival. We assessed patient outcomes after SRS for NSCLC BMs, identifying survival trajectories associated with targetable mutations. In this retrospective time-dependent analysis, we analyzed median overall survival of patients who received ≥ 1 SRS courses for BM from NSCLC from 2001 to 2021. We compared survival of patients with and without targetable mutations based on clinical variables and treatment. Among the 213 patients included, 87 (40.8%) had targetable mutations-primarily EGFR (22.5%)-and 126 (59.2%) did not. Patients with targetable mutations were more often female (63.2%, p <.001) and nonsmokers (58.6%, p <.001); had higher initial lung-molGPA (2.0 vs. 1.5, p <.001) and lower cumulative tumor volume (3.7 vs. 10.6 cm3, p <.001); and received more concurrent (55.2% vs. 36.5%, p =.007) and total (median 3 vs. 2, p <.001) systemic therapies. These patients had lower mortality rates (74.7% vs. 91.3%, p <.001) and risk (HR 0.298 [95%CI 0.190-0.469], p <.001) and longer median overall survival (20.2 vs. 7.4 months, p <.001), including survival ≥ 3 years (p =.001). Survival was best predicted by SRS with tumor resection in patients with non-targetable mutations (HR 0.491 [95%CI 0.318-757], p =.001) and by systemic therapy with SRS for those with targetable mutations (HR 0.124 [95%CI 0.013-1.153], p =.067). The presence of targetable mutations enhances survival in patients receiving SRS for NSCLC BM, particularly when used with systemic therapies. Survival for patients without targetable mutations was longest with SRS and surgical resection. These results inform best practices for managing patients with NSCLC BM based on driver mutation status.

Selective internal radiation therapy for unresectable HCC: The SIRT downstaging study.

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is recommended as a downstaging (DS) strategy for solitary unresectable HCC <8cm. The aim of this study was to report the results of acquired experience in a tertiary center for all unresectable HCCs. We conducted a retrospective, observational study using data collected from consecutive patients undergoing SIRT between October 2013 and June 2020. DS was considered achieved when a curative treatment could be proposed 6 months after SIRT. One hundred twenty-seven patients were included (male = 90%, 64 ± 11y), of whom 112 (n = 88%) had cirrhosis. HCC was classified as BCLC stage C in 64 patients (50%), with a median diameter of 61mm, an infiltrative pattern in 51 patients (40%), and portal vein invasion in 62 (49%) patients. Fifty patients (39%) achieved DS 6 months following SIRT, with 29 of them (23%) undergoing curative treatment in a median time of 4.3 months: 17 (13%) were transplanted, 11 (85%) had liver resection, and 1 patient had a radiofrequency ablation. The median overall survival of patients with or without DS was 51 versus 10 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients who achieved DS, progression-free survival was higher in patients who underwent surgery: 47 versus 11 months (p < 0.001). Four variables were independently associated with DS: age (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: [0.92, 0.99]; p = 0.032), baseline α-fetoprotein (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.00]; p = 0.034), HCC distribution (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: [0.11, 0.75]; p = 0.012), and ALBI grade (OR: 0.34. 95% CI: [0.14, 0.80]; p = 0.014). These results suggest that SIRT in patients with unresectable HCC could be an effective treatment: DS was achieved for around 39% of the patients and more than half of these then underwent curative treatment.

Ascites Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and May Be Undertreated: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with significant morbidity and mortality as most patients present with advanced disease. The development of ascites has been associated with poor outcomes and further characterization and contemporary management strategies are needed. A total of 437 patients enrolled in the Gastrointestinal Biobank at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center who had epithelial pancreatic malignancy were included in the prospective cohort group. Overall, 41.7% of patients included in this study developed ascites. Most patients with ascites (>80%) had high serum-ascites albumin gradient ascites. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, a history of ≥1 form of chemotherapy was significantly associated with ascites. Estimated median overall survival in patients with ascites was significantly lower than in patients without ascites, 473 days vs 573 days, and ascites had a hazard ratio of 1.37. Patients with ascites who received diuretics and indwelling peritoneal catheter had an estimated median survival of 133 days from diagnosis of ascites, and those who received only the indwelling peritoneal catheter without diuretics had an estimated median survival of only 54 days. The estimated median survival from the diagnosis of ascites was 92 days, and the median time to puncture was 7 days. The median time from first tap to death was 45 days. The use of diuretics is lower than would be expected for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with elevated serum-ascites albumin gradient. Other therapies such as beta blockers should be investigated in this subset of patients. The etiology of ascites in these patients is poorly understood, and further research is needed to establish treatment guidelines and improve outcomes.

MGMT promoter methylation in prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed IDH1 wildtype Glioblastoma

The objective of this study was to analyse the prognosis values of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation on the overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) wild-type glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). A retrospective observational study was conducted on 108 IDH1 wild-type glioblastoma patients who underwent tumour resection at neurosurgical centres, including Hanoi Medical University Hospital and Viet Duc University Hospital, from October 2017 to December 2021. The MGMT status was assessed using methylation-specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (MSP). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. Of 108 patients, 79.6% had methylated MGMT. The median overall survival of patients with IDH1 wild-type GBM was 8.47 months (95%Confidence Interval (CI) =6.93-11.07). Patients with Methylated MGMT had a lower mortality risk (Hazard Ratio (HR) =0.63, 95%CI=0.41-0.98) than those without Methylated MGMT. Patients aged &lt;55 HR=0.55, CI=0.35-0.85)&gt;=55 years old. Having tumours on both sides of the hemisphere was associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR=3.18, 95%CI=1.68-6.00) compared to patients with tumours on the right side of the hemisphere. To conclude, our data underline the impact of the MGMT promoter methylation status in the treatment response of IDH1-wildtype GBM. In addition, age, tumour size and hemisphere were also significant prognostic factors in the overall survival of patients.

Comparison of Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab and Durvalumab in Combination With Chemotherapy for First-line Treatment of Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer.

The combination of programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for first-line therapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study compared the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and durvalumab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of ES-SCLC in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with ES-SCLC treated with atezolizumab plus chemotherapy or durvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy at the Fukuoka University Hospital between October 2019 and November 2022. Among the 40 patients, 20 were treated with atezolizumab and 20 were treated with durvalumab. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the two groups; five patients who received atezolizumab and one who received durvalumab showed a performance status of 2 or higher. The median progression-free survival of patients who received atezolizumab or durvalumab was 5.6 and 5.4 months, respectively (p=0.881). The median overall survival of patients who received atezolizumab or durvalumab was 10.0 and 17.1 months, respectively (p=0.163). The objective response rate of the patients who received atezolizumab or durvalumab was 80.0% and 85.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of immune-related adverse events between the groups. This retrospective study was the first to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab or durvalumab, in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in treatment-naïve ES-SCLC Japanese patients in a real-world setting. Both regimens, atezolizumab or durvalumab with carboplatin and etoposide, were effective and well-tolerated in Japanese ES-SCLC patients, in line with clinical trial findings.

Benefits of NGS in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Vary by Populations and Timing of Examination.

Despite the widespread application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in advanced lung adenocarcinoma, its impact on survival and the optimal timing for the examination remain uncertain. This cohort study included advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NGS testing. We categorized patients into four groups: Group 1: treatment-naïve, upfront NGS; Group 2: Treatment-naïve, exclusionary EGFR/ALK/ROS1; Group 3: post-treatment, no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1; Group 4: known driver mutation and post-TKI treatment. A total of 424 patients were included. There were 128, 126, 90, and 80 patients in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. In Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, targetable mutations were identified in 76.6%, 49.2%, 41.1%, and 33.3% of the patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Mutation-targeted treatments were applied in 68.0%, 15.1%, 27.8%, and 22.5% of the patients, respectively (p < 0.001). In the overall population, patients receiving mutation-targeted treatments exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.54 [95% CI 0.37-0.79], p = 0.001). The most profound benefit was seen in the Group 1 patients (not reached vs. 40.4 months, p = 0.028). The median OS of patients with mutation-targeted treatments was also significantly longer among Group 2 patients. The median post-NGS survival of patients receiving mutation-targeted treatments was numerically longer in Group 3 and Group 4 patients. In conclusion, mutation-targeted therapy is associated with a favorable outcome. However, the opportunities of NGS-directed treatment and the survival benefits of mutation-targeted treatment were various among different populations.

Molecular Characteristics and Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictors of Durable Clinical Benefit from Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundPrior research in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has shown that tumors with specific driver mutations may be less likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In this analysis, we evaluated the characteristics of patients with durable clinical benefit (DCB) to ICI compared to those with no durable clinical benefit (NDB), with emphasis on the role of molecular alterations in EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 and pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). MethodsWe retrospectively collected clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients who initiated ICI monotherapy for advanced NSCLC at Stanford University between April 2015 and May 2018. Patients were classified as having DCB if time on ICI therapy was greater than or equal to 180 days, or NDB if less than 180 days. Outcomes included best radiographic benefit while on ICI and survival from time of ICI initiation. ResultsOf 123 patients treated with ICI for NSCLC, 28 patients had DCB (23%), while 95 had NDB (77%). Median overall survival from initiation of ICI in the 33 patients with molecular alterations in EGFR (n = 31), ALK, or ROS1 and NLR of 5.9 or higher was 2.0 months, compared to 8.1 months in patients with these genomic alterations and NLR less than 5.9. Median overall survival in patients without alterations in EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 and NLR of 5.9 or higher was 4.3 months, compared to 12.1 months in patients with NLR less than 5.9 (P = .023). ConclusionsElevation in pretreatment NLR was associated with significantly lower overall median survival from initiation of ICI, particularly when in combination with NSCLC with alterations in EGFR, ALK, or ROS1. This finding could influence clinical practice as NLR is readily available through routine blood testing.

A phase III randomized, open-label study to establish the superiority of triple oral metronomic therapy (OMCT) used in addition to chemotherapy regimen (paclitaxel + carboplatin) over chemotherapy alone for the treatment of advanced unresectable head and neck cancer squamous cell cancer (HNSCC).

LBA6053 Background: Advanced HNSCC has poor outcomes and limited treatment options, especially in resource-constrained settings. Immunotherapy is affordable for less than 5% of patients in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Triple OMCT, employing low-dose continuous chemotherapy, shows promise, but its safety and efficacy along with chemotherapy remain unproven. We aimed to assess whether the addition of OMCT to first-line chemotherapy can improve overall survival (OS) as compared to chemotherapy alone. Methods: This phase 3 randomized, prospective, open-label, superiority design study enrolled patients with advanced HNSCC who were planned for palliative intent platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were stratified for the site of the tumor and ECOG PS, and were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either triple OMCT (Erlotinib 150 mg OD, Celecoxib 200 mg BD and Methotrexate 9mg/m2 once weekly) in addition to 3-weekly paclitaxel carboplatin (PC) chemotherapy (Arm A) or, PC chemotherapy alone (Arm B). Sample size calculation assumed no OS improvement with OMCT+PC (5% type I error, 80% type II error). The primary endpoint was OS, while secondary endpoints included PFS, quality of life (QoL) assessments, and safety. OS and PFS were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test; HR estimated via Cox proportional hazard models. QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee and registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI/2022/10/046520). Results: Between Nov 02, 2022, and Dec 20, 2023, 238 patients were randomly assigned with 119 in each arm. Median age was 47 years, with 97.8% being males, and 78% of patients had ECOG PS 0-1. The median OS for patients in Arm A was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.3-10.4) while it was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.7-7.4), in Arm B (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47–0.83; p=0.00011). The corresponding median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.3-8.8) and 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.2-4.7) (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.98-3.93; P&lt;0.000). Significant differences in EORTC-C30 were found for the physical functioning domain between baseline and 1-month follow-up visit. PC chemotherapy combined with triple OMCT showed good tolerability, with common toxicities including fatigue (40.3%), and hyponatremia (25.4%), similar to the incidence observed with PC chemotherapy alone. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the addition of triple OMCT to paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with advanced HNSCC in platinum-sensitive settings. This treatment option is particularly valuable in LMICs, where cetuximab and pembrolizumab are not feasible. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2022/10/046520 . [Table: see text]

Diffusion weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic biomarker in evaluating chemotherapy-antiangiogenic treated stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective, single-arm, open-label, clinical trial (BevMar)

PurposeWhen treating Lung Cancer, it is necessary to identify early treatment failure to enable timely therapeutic adjustments. The Aim of this study was to investigate whether changes in tumor diffusion during treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab could serve as a predictor of treatment failure. Material and MethodsA prospective single-arm, open-label, clinical trial was conducted between September 2014 and December 2020, enrolling patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patients were treated with chemotherapy-antiangiogenic combination. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed at baseline, two, four, and sixteen weeks after initiating treatment. The differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between pre- and post-treatment MRIs were recorded as Delta values (ΔADC). We assessed whether ΔADC could serve as a prognostic biomarker for overall survival (OS), with a five year follow up. Results18 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with a ΔADC value ≥ -3 demonstrated a significantly longer OS with an HR of 0.12 (95 % CI; 0.03– 0.61; p = 0.003) The median OS in patients with a ΔADC value ≥ -3 was 18 months, (95 % C.I; 7–46) compared to 7 months (95 % C.I; 5–9) in those with a ΔADC value < -3. ConclusionOur findings suggest that early changes in tumor ADC values, may be indicative of a longer OS. Therefore, DW-MRI could serve as an early biomarker for assessing treatment response in patients receiving chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy.

Incidence and potential prognostic implications of fibroblast growth factor receptor gene alterations and coexisting mutations in colorectal cancer.

e15558 Background: The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family comprises four tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFR1-4). FGFR1 amplification (6.3%) as well as overexpression of FGFR1 (10.1%), FGFR2 (5.5%) and FGFR3 (16.2%) have been demonstrated in primary colorectal cancer (CRC, incidence in brackets). The prognostic utility of testing FGFR alterations and association with response to FGFR-inhibitors are still emerging. Here, we report FGFR alteration data with clinicopathological correlations and survival outcomes from a Sydney based Local Health District in Australia. Methods: Clinicopathological data was analysed from 341 ethnically diverse patients with CRC treated at Southwestern Sydney Local Health District from 2014-2021. Next generation sequencing for point mutations, deletions, and amplifications was performed using the Qiagen 30-gene panel. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined using immunohistochemical staining. Demographic characteristics, histological features and survival outcomes were recorded from electronic medical records. Results: Of the 341 patients, 42 (12.3%) had FGFR alterations of which 52% were men and 48% women. 32 patients were Caucasian, 4 Middle Eastern, 5 Asian and 1 South American. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years. Of the 42 patients, FGFR1 mutations were present in 26.2%, FGFR1 amplifications in 4.7% and FGFR1 deletions in 4.7%. FGFR2 mutations were present in 16.7%, and 50% had FGFR3 mutations. One patient had concurrent FGFR1 and FGFR3 mutations. The vast majority were adenocarcinoma (81%), followed by mucinous adenocarcinoma (17%) and adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features (2%). 21.4% of patients with FGFR alterations had concurrent KRAS mutations, 28.6% had concurrent BRAF mutations (91.6% V600E) and MMR-deficiency was present in 19%. Median overall survival of patients with FGFR alterations was 44 months, for those who also had deficient MMR 48 months, concurrent BRAF V600E mutations 51 months and concurrent KRAS mutations 71 months. 43% (18 patients) were stage 4 at presentation. Of these 18 patients, 7 had FGFR1 mutations, 1 had a FGFR2 mutation and 10 had FGFR3 mutations. The median overall survival of patients with stage 4 disease was 11 months and those with concurrent BRAF V600E mutations 17 months. Two patients had concurrent KRAS mutations (both G12V), with median overall survival of 5.5 months and 1 patient had MMR deficiency, with an overall survival of 9 months. Conclusions: FGFR alterations were identified in 12.3% of patients with colorectal cancer in an ethnically diverse cohort in Australia. Concurrent KRAS and BRAF mutations appear to affect survival outcomes. Further multivariate analyses are underway.

The real-world impact of next-generation sequencing in advanced stages of solid tumor malignancies.

e23066 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a revolutionary technology that allows for DNA and RNA genomic analysis of malignant tumors via tissue or blood sample to aid in diagnosis and treatment while providing predictive and prognostic data about cancer patients. 75.6% of US oncologists use NGS in advanced cancer patients. As there are now site-agnostic approvals of certain targeted therapies, ASCO published a provisional clinical opinion stating that there is a rationale for genomic testing of all solid tumors. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of NGS testing in advanced solid tumor patients in a community based cancer center in Florida. Methods: Patients were diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 solid malignancy between January 1st, 2019 - December 31st, 2022. 496 patients were reviewed of which 269 patients were included in the study as they underwent NGS testing with either tissue (70.6%), blood (25.3%) or both (4.1%). Results: Median age of the study population was 71% with 87% of patients being insured with Medicare. 52.4% of patients were male. Overall, 67.7% of patients had biomarkers identified, 47.2% had FDA approved targeted therapies, and 77.3% had clinical trials identified. NGS testing impacted first line therapy in only 10% of patients where a matched therapy was initiated as first line treatment. Median time from initial diagnosis to NGS result was 53 days while the median time from diagnosis to initiation of first line of therapy was 47.5 days. In the entire study population, 14.1% never received therapy and 40.9% of patients passed. Of the 110 patients who passed, median overall survival in patients who had a biomarker identified through NGS testing was 6 months compared to 7 months in patients without a biomarker. Rates of biomarker identification and availability of FDA approved therapy were similar between deceased patients (67.3% and 45.5%) and those who were alive at time of analysis (63.1% and 48.4%). Conclusions: NGS testing has become part of routine oncologic care in patients with advanced solid malignancies, however in only 10% of cases did it impact first line therapy. Though currently NGS testing has a limited role in the initial management of advanced solid tumors, it is imperative that this technology continues to be used and developed as it leads to hypothesis generating and clinically relevant questions in discovery of oncogenic drivers, targets for novel therapeutics, and mechanisms of resistance to therapies. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and toxicity of BRAF targeted therapy in elderly patients with melanoma.

e23270 Background: Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer which have seen drastic improvement in patient survival over the last decade. BRAF is the most common driver mutation in melanoma, seen in ≈50% of all patients (≈30% of patients &gt; 65). The use of BRAF &amp; MEK inhibitors yields high response rates, though it is limited by toxicity and development of acquired resistance. Acknowledging these limitations, we aimed at assessing the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in melanoma patients &gt; 65. Methods: We identified electronic medical records of all melanoma patients &gt; 65 that were treated with BRAF &amp; MEK inhibitors at our institution over the years 2017-2023. Data was retrospectively collected including demographics, disease characteristics, treatment given, response patterns and toxicity. Results: 106 patients were identified. The median age was 71 (65-89), 55% were males. The median follow up was 28.9 months. 32 (30%) patients were treated at first line, 58 (55%) at second line and 16 (15%) at third line. 88 (83%) evaluable patients received treatment for unresectable/metastatic disease of which 84% had an objective response (60% partial response, 24% complete response). Response rate (RR) was 82%, 85% and 87% for first, second and third line respectively. RR was 86% for patients with an increased serum lactate dehydrogenase. 33% of patients had active central nervous system (CNS) metastases at treatment initiation, for whom the systemic RR was 80% and the CNS RR was 39%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months, with a PFS of 6, 8.3 and 13.4 months for first, second and third line respectively. The median PFS was 5.7 months for patients with active CNS disease. The median overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation was 15.7 months (12.5, 14.5, 31.9 for first, second &amp; third line respectively). The median OS for patients with CNS disease was 9.8 months. 16 patients were treated in the adjuvant setting, of which 6 (37%) finished treatment as planned, 3 stopped due to disease progression (19%) and 6 stopped due to toxicity (37%). 88% of patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade, with 27% having grade 3-4 toxicity. There were no grade 5 toxicities reported. 36% of patients experienced one AE, while 52% experienced two or more. 21% of patients stopped treatment due to toxicity, 28% needed a dose reduction and 20% changed to different BRAF/MEK inhibitors. 10% of patients needed systemic corticosteroids to treat AEs. The most common toxicities seen were fever (30%), fatigue (30%), skin rash (22%), elevated liver function tests (20%), arthralgia/myalgia (15%), nausea (14%) and diarrhea (11%). 7% had decrease in cardiac ejection fraction with one grade 3 leading to treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Treatment with BRAF &amp; MEK inhibitors is challenging in older patients, with a high prevalence of toxicity leading to treatment modifications and discontinuation. Efficacy seems to be the same as in the general population.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer with pseudoprogression.

2620 Background: Pseudoprogression (PsP) is quite a common phenomenon in cancer patients undergoing therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). It could be defined as temporary increase of tumor volume or the number of tumor lesions after beginning of ICI treatment (immune unconfirmed progressive disease - iUPD) followed by clinical response. However, many specialists in real clinical practice are hesitant to continue ICI therapy in patients with iUPD because of medical or financial constraints. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ICI in patients with clinical evidence of PsP. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1001 cases of ICI treatment (male 58,4%, age 28-90 years) in patients with various solid malignancies: melanoma – 316, lung – 280, kidney – 247, GI cancer – 96, cervix of the uteri – 62. The patients were treated in 2 regional referral centers in Moscow and Moscow Region between June 2018 and Dec. 2022. Unconfirmed progressive disease (iUPD) according to iRECIST criteria was diagnosed in 316 patients at the first imaging control after the beginning of ICI treatment (31,6%). Results: Among 316 patients with iUPD the presence of progression (immune confirmed progressive disease – iCPD) was verified in 105 (33,2%): melanoma – 109 (34,5%), lung – 86 (30,7%), kidney – 75 (30,4%), GI cancer – 42 (43,8%), cervix of the uteri – 4 (6,5%). Stable disease was found in 144 (45,6%), partial response in 50 (15,8% - iPR), complete response in 17 patients (5,4% - iCR). Altogether, PsP was diagnosed in 211 of 1001 patients (21,1%). Overall objective response rate in 316 patients with iUPD reached 21,2%, control over disease was achieved in 66,8% of cases. Severe immune-mediated adverse events (3-4 st. according to CTC AE 5.0) were diagnosed in 9 patients (2,8%). Median overall survival in patients with iUPD and ORR was 60,65 mon (95%CI 57,54-63,76), in patients without iUPD and ORR – 147,56 mon (95%CI 137,2-157,93). Conclusions: PsP was diagnosed in 21,1% of patients getting ICI treatment in real clinical practice with median survival in PsP patients with objective response of about 60 months. Only 10,5% of patients had iCPD after their second follow-up. We feel that close adherence to iRECIST criteria to verify true progression is mandatory in patients under ICI treatment to exclude unnecessary cessation of treatment.

Changing treatment patterns for hepatocellular carcinoma: A SEER-Medicare study.

e16166 Background: Sorafenib was the first systemic therapy approved in 2005 for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), then 9 new therapies were approved between 2017-2022. No studies have evaluated treatment patterns of systemic therapy since these therapies became available. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used SEER-Medicare data to identify patients with a new diagnosis of HCC between 2014-2019 and associated comorbidity and treatment claims through 2020. Patients had continuous coverage with Medicare Parts A/B/D from 3 months before diagnosis to the earlier of 3 years, death or censoring. We excluded deaths reported by death certificate or autopsy. We used claims to identify receipt of local therapies (ablation, transplant, resection, transarterial bland/chemo/radioembolization, external/stereotactic radiation, brachytherapy) and all FDA-approved systemic therapies for HCC. We described cohort characteristics, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) and used Chi-squared statistics to compare treatment patterns and OS for patients diagnosed between 2014-17 vs 2018-19. Results: 11,799 patients were included (69.2% male, 76.9% White, median age: 71 years, 36.2% NAFLD, 44.1% Hepatitis C, 10.6% Hepatitis B, 28.1% alcoholic liver disease). Within one year of diagnosis, 76.3% of all patients received any local or systemic treatment, which did not change over time (2014-17: 76.1%, 2018-19: 76.6%, p=0.60). Receipt of local therapy within 1 year was unchanged (2014-17: 73%, 2018-19: 73.2%, p=0.77) and there were no clinically significant changes in treatment rates for specific local therapies. Receipt of systemic therapy in the first year decreased slightly (2014-17: 16.97%, 2018-19: 15.2%, p=0.012). First line systemic treatment changed drastically: 83.7% of patients diagnosed in 2014-17 received first-line sorafenib vs only 40.1% of those diagnosed 2018-19 (Table). Median overall survival for patients receiving no treatment, systemic therapies first or local therapies first was 1.9, 11 and 16.3 months, respectively. Among patients receiving systemic therapy first, survival from initiation of first line treatment increased from 9.1 to 11.2 months for patients diagnosed in 2014-17 vs 2018-19 (p= &lt;.0001). Conclusions: While overall local and systemic treatment rates have not changed substantially, more recent patients with HCC are more likely to receive first-line novel therapies over first-line sorafenib and associated survival has modestly increased. [Table: see text]

Aprospective study of detection and clinical significance of bone marrow tumor cells in small cell lung cancer

Objective: To investigate the detection of bone marrow tumor cells in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients and their relationship with clinical features, treatment response and prognosis. Methods: A total of 113patients with newly diagnosed SCLC from January 2018 to October 2022 at Beijing Chest Hospital were prospectively enrolled. Before treatment, bone marrow was aspirated and separately submitted for tumor cells detection by liquid-based cytology and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) detection by the substrction enrichment and immunostaining fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH) platform. The correlation between the detection results of the two methods with patients' clinical features and treatment response was evaluated by Chi-square. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to create survival curves and the Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results: The positive rate of bone marrow liquid-based cytology in SCLC was 15.93% (18/113). The liver and bone metastases rates were significantly higher (55.56% vs 11.58% for liver metastasis, P＜0.001; 77.78% vs 16.84% for bone metastasis, P＜0.001) and thrombocytopenia was more common (16.67% vs 2.11%, P=0.033) in patients with tumor cells detected in liquid-based cytology than those without detected tumor cells. As for SE-iFISH, DTCs were detected in 92.92% of patients (105/113), the liver and bone metastasis rates were significantly higher (37.93% vs 11.90% for liver metastasis, P=0.002; 44.83% vs 20.23 % for bone metastasis, P=0.010), and the incidence of thrombocytopenia was significantly increased (13.79% vs 1.19%, P=0.020) in patients with DTCs≥111 per 3 ml than those with DTCs＜111 per 3 ml. The positive rates of bone marrow liquid-based cytology in the disease control group and the disease progression group were 12.00% (12/100) and 46.15% (6/13), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.002). However, the result of SE-iFISH revealed the DTCs quantities of the above two groups were 29 (8,110) and 64 (15,257) per 3 ml, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.329). Univariate analysis depicted that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) of liquid-based cytology positive patients were significantly shorter than those of tumor cell negative patients (6.33 months vs 9.27 months for PFS, P=0.019; 8.03 months vs 19.50 months for OS, P=0.019, P=0.033). The median PFS and median OS in patients with DTCs≥111 per 3 ml decreased significantly than those with DTCs＜111 per 3 ml (6.83 months vs 9.50 months for PFS, P=0.004; 11.2 months vs 20.60 months for OS, P=0.019). Multivariate analysis showed that disease stage (HR=2.806, 95%CI:1.499-5.251, P=0.001) and DTCs quantity detected by SE-iFISH (HR=1.841, 95%CI:1.095-3.095, P=0.021) were independent factors of PFS, while disease stage was the independent factor of OS (HR=2.538, 95%CI:1.169-5.512, P=0.019). Conclusions: Both bone marrow liquid-based cytology and SE-iFISH are clinically feasible. The positive detection of liquid-based cytology or DTCs≥111 per 3 ml was correlated with distant metastasis, and DTCs≥111 per 3 ml was an independent prognostic factor of decreased PFS in SCLC.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis

Objectives: To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of bone metastasis of gastric cancer, analyze the influencing factors of bone metastasis and the effects of different treatment methods, and provide a basis for early detection and treatment optimization of bone metastasis of gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 142 gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis admitted to the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2011 to December 2021 were enrolled, including 60 cases of simple bone metastasis and 82 cases of bone metastasis combined with extraosseous metastasis. 142 patients with stage Ⅲgastric cancer without distant metastasis and 142 gastric cancer patients with visceral metastasis admitted to this hospital during the same period were also enrolled for comparison. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the influencing factors of bone metastasis, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the influencing factors of overall survival (OS) of patients with bone metastasis. Results: Among the 142 patients with bone metastasis, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was the main type (123 cases), and 45 patients had simultaneous bone metastasis. Rib metastasis (100 cases), spine metastasis (88 cases), and pelvis metastasis (84 cases) were more common. A total of 110 patients had multiple bone metastasis, and 82 patients had extraosseous metastasis. Results of the stage Ⅲ gastric cancer group, the visceral metastasis group, the bone metastasis group, and the bone metastasis with extraosseous metastasis group were compared. There were significant differences in age, degree of differentiation, Borrmann type, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, serum calcium, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase isoenzyme, lymphocyte, hemoglobin, platelet, CEA, CA19-9, and CA724 (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Borrmann type was an independent protective factor of bone metastasis of gastric cancer (type 3: OR=0.07, 95%CI: 0.01-0.64, P=0.018). Alkaline phosphatase (OR=2.54, 95% CI: 1.07-6.01, P=0.034), serum calcium (OR=2.71, 95% CI: 1.15-6.41, P=0.023), creatine kinase isoenzyme (OR=16.33, 95% CI: 1.83-145.58, P=0.012), platelet (OR=10.08, 95% CI:1.89-53.85, P=0.007), and CA19-9 (OR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.14-5.05, P=0.021) were independent risk factors of bone metastasis of gastric cancer. The median OS of the stage Ⅲ gastric cancer group, the visceral metastasis group, the bone metastasis group, and the bone metastasis with extrabony group were 47, 13, 18, and 6 months, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The median OS of patients with bone metastasis only who underwent primary tumor surgery was 33 months, better than 6 months of patients without surgery (P=0.048). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that extraosseous metastasis (HR=2.45, 95% CI: 1.56-3.85, P<0.001) and decreased hemoglobin (HR=1.54, 95%CI: 1.02-2.34, P=0.042) were independent risk factors of OS of gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis. Conclusions: The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis alone is significantly better than that of other stage Ⅳ patients. For such patients, surgery on the primary site combined with chemotherapy after full evaluation may prolong the survival time.

Cadonilimab with chemotherapy in HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the phase 1b/2 COMPASSION-04 trial.

Treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy and chemotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy is enriched in patients with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS)-positive or CPS-high tumors compared with patients with PD-L1 CPS-negative or CPS-low tumors. In this phase 1b/2 study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for phase 1b and the objective response rate for phase 2. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate, duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS) and safety. The primary endpoint was met. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during dose escalation in phase 1b; the recommended phase 2 dose was determined as 6 mg kg-1 every 2 weeks. The objective response rate was 52.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 41.6-62.5), consisting of complete and partial responses in 4.3% and 47.9% of patients, respectively. The median duration of response, progression-free survival and OS were 13.73 months (95% CI = 7.79-19.12), 8.18 months (95% CI = 6.67-10.48) and 17.48 months (95% CI = 12.35-26.55), respectively. The median OS in patients with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 was 20.32 months (95% CI = 4.67-not estimable); in patients with a PD-L1 CPS < 1, the median OS reached 17.64 months (95% CI = 11.63-31.70). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (19.1%), decreased platelet count (16.0%), anemia (12.8%) and decreased leukocyte count (8.5%). No new safety signal was identified. The current regimen showed promising clinical activity and manageable safety in patients with gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma regardless of PD-L1 expression. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn registration: CTR20182027.

Real-world study of the use of azacitidine in myelodysplasia in Australia.

Hypomethylating agents are the most widely used upfront therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are not suitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In Australia, azacitidine was, until recently, the only approved and subsidized treatment for patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and low blast acute myeloid leukemia. We analyzed prescription data to evaluate the real-world persistence and overall survival (OS) of patients prescribed azacitidine for the first time in Australia. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who had been prescribed Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-listed azacitidine for the first time, between January 2016 and April 2021, was conducted using the PBS 10% dataset. Treatment persistence and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The impact of the number of treatment cycles and treatment adherence on OS was also estimated. There were 351 patients in the PBS 10% dataset who initiated treatment with azacitidine. The average age (standard deviation [SD]) at azacitidine initiation was 71.9 (11.1) years and the average number (SD) of azacitidine prescriptions was 5.6 (0.2). The median persistence on azacitidine was 15.6 months, and the OS was 13.4 months. The median OS for patients who had six or more cycles of azacitidine treatment was greater compared to patients who had five or less cycles of treatment. The data from this real-world study illustrate the unmet medical needs of patients with MDS treated with azacitidine in Australia. The majority of patients are not treated with the optimal number of cycles of azacitidine, which is negatively correlated with patient outcomes.

Preoperatively predicting thelymphnodemetastasis and prognosis for gastric cancer patients.

The preoperative distinguishment of lymph nodes (LN) with metastasis plays a pivotal role in guiding the surgical extension for gastric cancer (GC). We aim to identify the preparative risk factors for LN metastasis in GC patients. We retrospectively reviewed 424 patients who underwent radical GC resection in our medical center between Jan 2011 and Dec 2018. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors for LN metastasis, while multivariate COX regression was utilized to evaluate prognostic factors. The median overall survival of patients with or without LN metastases was 31 and 58months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, lower albumin (OR = 0.512; P = 0.004) and prealbumin (OR = 0.367, P = 0.001) and higher CEA (OR = 3.178, P < 0.001), CA199 (OR = 2.278, P = 0.002) and platelets (OR = 1.697, P = 0.017) were found to be significantly associated with LN metastasis. In survival analysis, older age (HR = 1.712), larger tumors (HR = 1.082), higher D-dimer (HR = 1.561) and CA199 (HR = 1.553), advanced staging (stage II, HR = 3.446; stage III-IV, HR = 11.089), lower prealbumin levels (lower level for reference, HR = 0.63), and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.396) was discovered to be associated with poorer overall survival (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, our results demonstrated that preoperative prealbumin-bound tumor markers can effectively predict LN metastasis. Additionally, prealbumin was found to possess prognostic value as well.

Role of systematic lymphadenectomy at the time of interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma who achieved complete gross resection

ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of systematic lymphadenectomy at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma who achieved complete gross resection.MethodsThe National Cancer DataBase was...