Median Number Of Citations Research Articles

Impact of presentation at conference with timed release of academic publication.

Fast-tracking publication of original research to coincide with a conference presentation ("coordinated publication") is a mechanism of rapidly disseminating new data. How often this occurs, whether its frequency is changing, and the impact of this approach on information dissemination, is unknown. Our objective wasto describe the characteristics of coordinated publications, how the practice has changed over time, and evaluate its potential impact on dissemination of study results. We conducted across-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in NEJM, Lancet, and JAMA between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Among the 1533 included randomized controlled trials, 502 (33%) had coordinated publications. Coordinated publications increased from 30% [n = 94] in 2015 to 37% [n = 136] in 2019. Coordinated publications were more likely to be unblinded (61% [n = 305] vs. 52% [n = 532]) and more likely to be funded by industry (50% [n = 249] vs. 30% [n = 311]). The strongest predictor of a coordinated publication was cardiovascular disease subspecialty (OR = 3.96, 95% CI [2.95, 5.36]). The median number of citations (188 vs. 98) and the median Altmetric score (318 vs. 182) were higher for coordinated publications than non-coordinated publications. These differences persisted in a multivariable regression model. Coordinated publication is increasingly common. While coordinated publications may generate greater attention, they were observed to be more likely to be unblinded and more likely to be funded by industry, raising questions about the value and intentions of such promotion.

The 100 most cited papers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma between 2000 and 2019: a bibliometric study.

To identify the 100 most-cited papers that have contributed to the understanding and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We searched the NPC-related papers between 2000 and 2019 using the Web of Science database on October 12, 2022. Papers were identified in descending order according to the number of citations. The top 100 papers were analyzed. These 100 most cited papers on NPC have been cited for a total of 35,273 times, with a median number of citations of 281 times. There were 84 research papers and 16 review papers. The Journal of Clinical Oncology (n=17), International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (n=13), and Cancer Research (n=9) published the most papers. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Lancet, Cancer Cell, Molecular Cancer, and the New England Journal of Medicine had the largest average citations per paper. China contributed the most papers (n=71), followed by USA (n=13), Singapore (n=4) and, France (n=4). There were 55 clinical research papers and 29 laboratory research papers. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy technology (n=13), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n=9), and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n=5) were the top three research topics. Epstein-Barr virus-related genes (n=9) and noncoding RNA (n=8) were the research domains in laboratory research papers. The top three contributors were Jun Ma (n=9), Anthony T C Chan (n=8), and Anne Wing-Mui Lee (n=6). This study provides an overview of the major areas of interest in the field of NPC with bibliometric analyses. This analysis recognizes some important contributions in the field of NPC and stimulates future investigations in the scientific community.

Association of literature metrics in gynecologic oncology with country classification by income level

ObjectiveBibliometric literature in gynecologic oncology is limited. We aimed to study the association between the level of income of the country of authorship and citation metrics.MethodsA retrospective study including all...

A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science.

This study aimed to bibliometrically analyse the main features of the 100 top-cited articles on the midwifery index on the Web of Science. Academic articles on midwifery' research published from 1985 to 2020 were included. VOSviewer 1.6.15, SPSS 22.0 software and a homemade applet were used to identify, analyse and visualise the citation ranking, publication year, journal, country and organisation of origin, authorship, journal impact factor and keywords along with the total link strength of countries, organisations and keywords. Among the 100 top-cited articles, the highest number of citations of the retrieved articles was 484. The median number of citations per year was 5.16 (interquartile range: 3.74-8.38). Almost two-thirds of the included articles (n = 61) centred on nursing and obstetrics/gynaecology. The top-cited articles were published in 38 different journals, the highest number of which was published by Midwifery (15%). Australia was the most productive country (24%). According to the total link strength, the sequence ran from the United States (28) to England (28) to Australia (19). The University of Technology Sydney and La Trobe University in Australia topped the list with four papers each. Hunter B was the most productive author (n = 4), and the average citations were positively related to the number of authors (r = 0.336, p < 0.05). This study identified the most influential articles on midwifery and documented the core journals and the most productive countries, organisations and authors along with future research hotspots for this field; the findings may be beneficial to researchers in their publication and scientific cooperation endeavours.

Impact of podcasting on novel and conventional measures of academic impact

ObjectiveAltmetric Attention Score (AAS) is an alternative metric for estimating the impact of academic publications. We studied the association of using podcasting to highlight publications about gynecological cancer with AAS...

Research landscape and trends of melanoma immunotherapy: A bibliometric analysis.

Immunotherapy for lung cancer has been a hot research area for years. This bibliometric analysis was intended to present research trends on melanoma immunotherapy. On April 1, 2022, the authors identified 2,109 papers on melanoma immunotherapy using the Web of Science and extracted their general information and the total number of citations. The authors then conducted a bibliometric analysis to present the research landscape, clarify the research trends, and determine the most cited papers (top-papers) as well as major journals on melanoma immunotherapy. Subsequently, recent research hotspots were identified by analyzing the latest articles in major journals. The total and median number of citations of these 2,109 papers on melanoma immunotherapy was 137,686 and 11, respectively. "Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma" by Hodi etal. was the most cited paper (9,824 citations). Among the journals, the top-paper number (16), average citations per paper (2,510.7), and top-papers rate (100%) of New England Journal of Medicine were the highest. Corresponding authors represented the USA took part in most articles (784). Since 2016, the hottest research area has changed from CTLA-4 to PD-1. This bibliometric analysis comprehensively and quantitatively presents the research trends and hotspots based on 2,109 relevant publications, and further suggests future research directions. The researchers can benefit in selecting journals and in finding potential collaborators. This study can help researchers gain a comprehensive impression of the research landscape, historical development, and current hotspots in melanoma immunotherapy and can provide inspiration for future research.

Natural Language Processing for Literature Search in Vascular Surgery: A Pilot Study Testing an Artificial Intelligence Based Application

The use of natural language processing (NLP) for a literature search has been poorly investigated in vascular surgery so far. The aim of this pilot study was to test the applicability of an artificial intelligence (AI) based mobile application for literature searching in a topic related to vascular surgery. A focused scientific question was defined to evaluate the performance of the AI application for a literature search and compare the results with the ground truth provided via a traditional literature search performed by human experts. Using pre-defined keywords, the literature search was performed automatically by the AI application through different steps, including quality assessment based on evaluation of the information available and quality filters using indicators of level of evidence, selection of publications based on relevancy filters using NLP, summarisation, and visualisation of the publications via the mobile app. A traditional literature search performed by human experts required 10 hours to check 154 original articles, among which 26 (16.9%) were truly related to the question, 63 (40.9%) related to the field but not to the specific question, and 65 (42.2%) were unrelated. The AI based search was performed in less than one hour, and, compared with traditional search, the method identified 17 original articles (48.6%) truly related to the question (p < .010), 18 (51.4%) related to the field but not to the specific question (p= .26), and no unrelated publications (p < .001). Fifteen truly related articles (88.2%) were identified jointly by the two methods. No significant difference was observed regarding the median number of citations, year of publications, and impact factor of journals. The AI based method enabled a targeted, focused, and time saving literature search, although the selection of publications was not completely exhaustive. These results suggest that such an AI driven application is a complementary tool to help researchers and clinicians for continuous education and dissemination of knowledge.

The Twitter factor: How does Twitter impact #Stroke journals and citation rates?

Twitter is a social media platform popularly used by health practitioners, a trend that has been followed by medical journals. The impact of Twitter in bibliometrics of stroke-related literature is yet to be determined. We aimed to qualitatively assess the usage of Twitter by stroke journals and study the relationship between Twitter activity and citation rates of stroke articles. We used Journal Citation Reports to identify stroke journals. We collected the 2021 Impact Factor (IF) and the top 50 articles contributing to each journal IF. Relevant metrics were collected through Twitonomy, Altmetric, and Web of Science. The association between Twitter activity and citation rates was tested by a negative binomial regression model adjusted to journal's IF. A bivariate correlation and a log-linear regression model adjusted to journal's IF tested the relationship between number of tweets, tweeters, and the number of citations. We collected 450 articles across nine stroke-dedicated journals, five of which had a Twitter account. Only 95 (21%) articles had no Twitter mentions. The median number of citations in articles with versus without Twitter activity was 19 (10-39) versus 11(7-17) (P < 0.001). Twitter activity was associated with higher citation rates controlling for the IF (odds ratio (OR): 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.12-3.38, P < 0.001). We found number of tweets to be predicted by the number of citations controlling for the IF (B = 0.33, 95% CI 0.29-0.40, β = 0.54, P < 0.001). Tweeted stroke articles tend to have higher citation rates which can be predicted by the number of tweets.

Space Weather Bibliometrics for 2022: Going Beyond Impact Factor

AbstractI discuss the impact factor of Space Weather for 2021, its small decrease with respect to the number in 2020, and potential causes for this decrease. The limitations of the impact factor are emphasized as reported in past studies, in particular due to the large weight of highly cited papers. For Space Weather, over several years, the median number of citations received by a paper per year is close to the impact factor at the time of publication, with very few papers receiving no citations. I expect that, as the solar cycle ramps up, the impact factor will start to grow again.

A Survey of Retracted Articles by Turkish Authors

Background: Not all manuscripts that are accepted and published in scientific journals have retained their status as published articles, and some of them are retracted after publication. There are various reasons for retraction that are usually grouped into a scientific error, such as statistical flaws, and research misconduct such as plagiarism. Nowadays the number of scientific publications are a source of career advancement and respect in the scientific community. To attain these, the focus of researchers is towards increasing the number of publications per year which sometimes compromises the quality of publications. Aim: The current study aimed to investigate the characteristics of retracted publications that were contributed by Turkish authors to scientific databases. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The search strategies were based on a combination of MeSH terms relevant to “retracted publication” and “Turkey.” The databases were searched on 23rd October 2021, without any restrictions on the search period. The inclusion criteria were: (i) retracted publication and, (ii) any authors of the study having affiliation with an institution in Turkey. The titles, authors' affiliations, and abstracts of the search results were screened and bibliographic information was extracted. Results: After removing duplicates and irrelevant studies, our search retrieved a total of 147 publications. The oldest retracted article was published in 1996; thereafter an increasing trend of retracted publications was evident. Regarding access to full-text status, 106 (72.1%) of full-texts were available. Overall 127 scientific journals have published these articles. Biochemical Genetics was the most frequent publisher with five publications. From the institutional point of view, Hacettepe University was the main university, contributing seven papers. The most common reason for retractions was duplication = 50 (34%), and most retracted notices have been issued by the editor-in-chief = 63 (42.9% of papers). The majority of publications were from Medical Science = 93 (63.3% of papers). Among the Medical Science publications, the highest number, 44, were from surgery and allied fields. Turkish authors had international collaborations with 20 countries. Sixteen papers have international collaborations with researchers from Iran. Only 10 of the retracted publications have received funding. Five of the first authors have submitted more than one retracted publication. Citation analysis indicates that the median number of citations received by retracted publications was two (IQR 0-7). The minimum time lag between publication and retraction was less than one year and the maximum was 13 years. Conclusion: The publish or perish pressure in academia sometimes leads to intentional and unintentional research misconduct. Although the number of retracted publications is fewer, their trend is increasing. To overcome the problem, it can be suggested that research methodology and research ethics training are essential in the under- and post-graduate curriculum.

Does the journal impact factor predict individual article citation rate in otolaryngology journals?

Citation skew is a phenomenon that refers to the unequal citation distribution of articles in a journal. The objective of this study was to establish whether citation skew exists in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) journals and to elucidate whether journal impact factor (JIF) was an accurate indicator of citation rate of individual articles. Journals in the field of OHNS were identified using Journal Citation Reports. After extraction of the number of citations in 2020 for all primary research articles and review articles published in 2018 and 2019, a detailed citation analysis was performed to determine citation distribution. The main outcome of this study was to establish whether citation skew exists within OHNS literature and whether JIF was an accurate prediction of individual article citation rate. Thirty-one OHNS journals were identified. Citation skew was prevalent across OHNS literature with 65% of publications achieving citation rates below the JIF. Furthermore, 48% of publications gathered either zero or one citation. The mean and median citations for review articles, 3.66 and 2, respectively, were higher than the mean and median number of citations for primary research articles, 1 and 2.35, respectively (P < .001). A statistically significant correlation was found between citation rate and JIF (r = 0.394, P = 0.028). The current results demonstrate a citation skew among OHNS journals, which is in keeping with findings from other surgical subspecialties. The majority of publications did not achieve citation rates equal to the JIF. Thus, the JIF should not be used to measure the quality of individual articles. Otolaryngologists should assess the quality of research through the use of other metrics, such as the evaluation of sound scientific methodology, and the relevance of the articles.

Gender Inequalities in Citations of Articles Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals: a Cross-Sectional Study

BackgroundBesides the number of publications, the number of citations is another key metric often used to compare researchers with each other. While women researchers tend to have fewer publications than their men colleagues, the data is scarce for the number of citations. We aimed to determine whether there is a gender gap in citations.MethodsWe used Web of Science to retrieve the number of citations per year for all research articles and reviews published between January 2015 and December 2019 in fourteen high-impact general medical journals (impact factor > 5). We used Gender API to identify the gender of the first/last authors. We compared the results by gender using multivariable negative binomial regressions (adjusting for intra-cluster correlations within journals).ResultsThe gender of the first/last author was determined for 13,218/13,350 (99%) and 11,894/12,026 (99%) articles, respectively. The proportion of women among first/last authors was 40% and 29%, respectively. The median number of citations per year was 5 (IQR = 11.3) for women and 6.8 (IQR = 17.8) for men for first authors (IRR = 1.5 [95% CI = 1.3–1.8], p value < 0.001), and 6 (IQR = 12.4) and 7.5 (IQR = 17.4) for last authors (IRR = 1.3 [95% CI = 1.2–1.5], p value < 0.001). Articles whose first and last authors were women were the least cited and those whose first and last authors were men were the most cited.ConclusionIn this cross-sectional study, we found that articles authored by women were cited less often than those authored by men. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for these gender differences in article citations.

The Impact of the CEDD-NET on the Evaluation of Rare Disorders: A Multicenter Scientific Research Platform in the Field of Pediatric Endocrinology

Objective:The database http://cedd.saglik-network.org (CEDD-NET) has been operating since 2013 in Turkey. All pediatric endocrinologists can propose projects to this network. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of CEDD-NET on the transformation of multicenter studies into scientific publications and assess the academic characteristics of the studies that have been transcribed into publication.Methods:All the studies that were opened to patient admission on the website between August 26, 2013 and March 1, 2021 were reviewed.Results:A total of 30 studies were accepted and opened for data entry. The median data collection period was 12 (1.5-24) months, while the median number of researchers participated was 23 (3-180), the median number of cases was 120 (26-192). The average cost was $2113 (1370-3118). Out of 30 studies, data entry was completed for 27. Sixteen publications were produced from 14 studies, 13 ot them have not published yet. The median time from the end of data entry to publication of the study was 686 (168-1608) days. While the median impact factor of the journals in which the studies were published was 1.803 (1.278-5.399), the median number of citations was 6.5 (0-49), and cited by 99 times in Web of Science indexed journals in total.Conclusion:CEDD-NET appears to be productive and effective as all the publications are of high quality that have been published in the Q1-Q2 categories. This study demonstrated the benefits and necessity of establishing nationwide databases, even covering more than one country, in specialized branches, such as pediatric endocrinology where rare diseases are of concern.

Relative Citation Ratios of Global Surgery, Obstetrics, Trauma, and Anesthesia: Implications and Lessons for Global Neurosurgery

The National Institutes of Health has developed a new metric, the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), to assess the impact of research articles and compare academic productivity across different fields. Global surgery, obstetrics, trauma, and anesthesia (SOTA) are young and increasingly popular fields attracting researchers and funding. This study analyzed the RCR of global neurosurgery; compared it with other global SOTA specialties; and discussed the implications for researchers, academic institutions, and aspiring global neurosurgeons. Metadata were downloaded from the National Institutes of Health RCR website for 12 established global surgery specialties, including global neurosurgery. The authors performed descriptive and bivariable inferential analyses to evaluate differences in the number of total publications, median number of citations per year, and median RCR for each specialty for which data were available. Global pediatric surgery had the highest median citations per year (2.00, interquartile range: 0.63-3.50; P= 0.048) and median relative citation ratio (1.36, interquartile range: 0.33-1.95; P= 0.693). In comparison, global neurosurgery articles had 0.20 median citations per year (IQR: 0-1.5) and 0.54 (IQR: 0.12-1.30) median relative citations. The median expected citations per year for all SOTA articles was 1.77. We observed strong development of global neurosurgery and SOTA research. Overall, the use of the RCR will facilitate standardized interfield and intrafield academic productivity comparisons. Based on the results presented in this study, global neurosurgery is a promising career route for young and aspiring academic neurosurgeons.

Research Trends and Most Influential Clinical Studies on Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy for Cancers: A Bibliometric Analysis.

In this study, a bibliometric analysis was carried out to identify the most influential clinical studies and research trends on anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (anti-PD1/PDL1) immunotherapy. On January 1, 2022, we used Web of Science to identify the 100 most frequently cited papers on clinical studies investigating anti-PD1/PDL1 immunotherapy, and extracted the following data: publication year, source title, country/region, institution, and the total number of citations. The research design and area were classified independently by the authors. Subsequently, we carried out a bibliometric analysis to determine the trends and identify the major journals on anti-PD1/PDL1 immunotherapy. The authors analyzed the current research hotspots based on papers published in major journals from 2020 to 2021. These 100 papers were cited a total of 138,840 times, and the median number of citations was 899.5 (range: 341–7,983). “Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer” by Topalian et al. had the highest number of citations (7,983 times). New England Journal of Medicine had the highest number of top-cited papers (40 papers), average citations per paper (1,558.3 citations), and rate of top-cited papers (65.6%). Authors from the USA contributed most of the papers (76 papers). Lung cancer (30 papers, 46,422 citations) and melanoma (20 papers, 30,881 citations) were the most cited research areas. In summary, anti-PD1/PDL1 has become standard treatment for various cancer, while adjuvant anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy is currently a research hotspot. New England Journal of Medicine was identified as the most influential journal in this area. Non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma are the most well-studied cancers, while nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the most commonly investigated anti-PD1/PDL1 antibodies. Further studies are warranted to identify effective predictive biomarkers or models, clarify the molecular mechanism of combined therapy, and establish optimal therapeutic strategies. This study may assist researchers in obtaining a comprehensive impression of the landscape and current trends in anti-PD1/PDL1 immunotherapy and gain inspiration to conduct further studies.

Global Research Status and Trends in Venous Thromboembolism After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty From 1990 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis.

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip or knee arthroplasty has attracted increasing attention over the past few decades. However, there is no bibliometric report on the publications in this field. The purpose of this study was to analyze the global research status, hotspots, and trends in VTE after arthroplasty.MethodsAll articles about VTE research after hip or knee arthroplasty from 1990 to 2021 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The information of each article including citation, title, author, journal, country, institution, keywords, and level of evidence was extracted for bibliometric analysis.ResultsA total of 1,245 original articles from 53 countries and 603 institutions were retrieved. The USA contributed most with 457 articles, followed by England and Canada. McMaster University in Canada was the leading institution for publications. The journals with the highest output and citation were the Journal of Arthroplasty and the Thrombosis and Haemostasis, respectively. The median number of citations was significantly different among the levels of evidence (F = 128.957, P < 0.001). The research hotspots switched from VTE diagnosis and heparin to factor Xa inhibitors (fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, apixaban) and direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran etexilate, ximelagatran), and finally to aspirin, risk factor studies, which can be observed from the keyword analysis and co-cited reference cluster analysis.ConclusionsThis study observed an increasing trend of research articles on VTE after arthroplasty. Publications with higher levels of evidence gained further popularity among researchers and orthopedic surgeons. Additionally, individualized VTE prevention and the development of new, safe, effective, and inexpensive oral agents would be emerging trends in the future.

Abstract TP76: The Impact Of Registries In Stroke Literature

Introduction: Registries represent a main source of data to the advances in medical literature. In stroke medicine, they serve as key points of discussion and elaboration for future clinical trials, as well as evaluation tools for several treatment modalities in different patient populations. We performed an analysis of recent stroke registries to evaluate their impact in literature. Methods: We performed PubMed and Google Scholar search using keywords with Boolean operators to identify studies deriving from stroke registries between January 2000 and June 2021. All registries identified were further characterized regarding study design, sample size, number of centers, number of peer reviewed articles or conference abstracts originating from it, with their respective number of citations and impact factor of journals. Results: A total of 51 registries were identified, comprising 43584 patients. Forty-three (84.3%) were prospective. Forty-five (88.2%) were multicenter. Sixteen (31.4%) focused in a specific device for mechanical thrombectomy. Twenty-seven (52.9%) were registered on clinicaltrials.gov. The most participating countries were United States in 16 (31.4%) and Germany in 8 (15.7%). Twenty-seven (52.9%) registries originated a total of 295 peer-reviewed articles, 6841 citations and a sum of impact factors of 1282.8. The median impact factor of journals publishing articles from registries was 5.51 (interquartile range, 3.27-7.91). The median number of citations per article was 13 (interquartile range, 4-37). Between registered and unregistered registries, there was no significant difference in the median number of publications (P=0.08), citations (P=0.158) or impact factor (P=0.124). Between registries specific and unspecific to a certain device, there was no significant difference in median number of publications (P=1.67), citations (P=0.631) or impact factor (P=0.509). Conclusions: Stroke registries provide a meaningful data source for literature regardless of registration or specificity to a certain device, and represent a key mechanism in the advances of stroke care. Contribution to stroke registries are key mechanism to elucidate clinical questions that require large sample size and should be incentivized.

Long-term Association of Altmetric Attention Scores With Citations in Selected Major Pharmacy Journals

Objective. To determine the long-term change in the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) and its components, as well as the impact of higher AAS on citation count for articles published in major pharmacy journals.Methods. This study evaluated articles from pharmacy journals ranked in the top 10% according to their AAS in the year 2017. Correlation between the AAS and number of citations (through November 2020) was assessed using the Spearman's correlation test. A Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance was used to compare the AAS across journals.Results. The median three-year AAS and citation count per article was 20 (25th, 75th percentile=15, 28) and 11 (6, 18), respectively. Between November 2018 and November 2020, there was no significant change in the median AAS for the 137 included articles. The only change in the AAS components was an increase in the number of Mendeley readers (22 [13, 34]). The median number of citations per article also increased (8 [4, 14]). We found a significant association between the three-year AAS and the three-year number of citations. The three-year number of Mendeley readers was associated with an increase in the 3-year number of citations. The mean three-year AAS was highest with articles published in the Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, while the mean three-year number of citations was highest for articles published in PharmacotherapyConclusion. Higher AAS scores appear to be associated with the number of citations for articles published in major pharmacy journals within three years of publication.

A BIBLIOMETRIC AND ALTMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE: TOP 100 ARTICLES

Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia in elderly people, and aging is the most important risk factor. Our aim is to provide bibliometric and altmetric approaches to Alzheimer’s disease for better evaluation. Materials and Method: The word ‘Alzheimer’ was searched from the Web of Science database and Altmetric.com website to create, respectively, the Top 100 citation and altmetric lists. The articles were analyzed and compared according to study type, topic of study, publication year, citation number, journal quartile in category, impact factor, and altmetric attention score. Results: The median citation number of Top 100 cited articles was 2,043 (range: 1,411-3,212) and median altmetric attention score was 22 (range: 0-566). The median altmetric attention score of T100 altmetric articles was 771 (range: 550-3,378) and median citation number was 43 (range: 0-1,917). There was a significant correlation between citation number and altmetric attention score in citation list (p &lt; 0.001, r = 0.438). In the citation list, most common study type, topic of study, and publication year were ‘original scientific paper,’ ‘pathophysiology, genetic,’ and ‘1993,’ while in the altmetric list, it was ‘original scientific paper,’ ‘etiology, risk factors,’ and ‘2017 and 2018,’ respectively. Conclusion: While academia tries to better understand disease mechanisms to find new treatment options, social media is more curious about how to be protected from a particular disease. Combining altmetric analysis with bibliometric analysis could be useful to develop convenient policies on the awareness of the society about Alzheimer’s disease. Keywords: Alzheimer Disease; Geriatrics; Dementia.

Bibliometric Analysis of Publication Activity in the Field of GIANT Cell Arteritis: A SCOPUS-based Study.

Objective Giant cell arthritis (GCA) is a type of vasculitis which is more common in female gender and is closely associated with Polymyalgia rheumatic. One of its important complication include visual impairment. The burden of disease is expected to be very high by 2050 and there is a need to compile the data on most influential studies on GCA to define future strategy to deal with this dangerous disease. Bibliometrics is a statistical analysis of published literature that reflects the value and impact of a particular publication within the specific field. Aim of our study is identify the most significant contributors and their quality of contribution in the field. Method We conducted this analysis utilizing SCOPUS database using different related MeSH terms. After a detailed screening, the list of top-50 articles were presented in the results in descending order of their ranks on the basis of their total number of citation. Most of our data comprises of publications from 1971–2012. Result The top-50 most cited articles on GCA were published between 1971 and 2012 with the median number of citations 274 ranging from 598–187. Annals of Internal Medicine was the top ranked journal with 13 publications from the list. The highly ranked author based on the number of publications was Hunder GG (20 publications) with h-index of 40, retaining affiliation with Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States. Mayo Clinic was the most frequently mentioned institute among the affiliations. The United States was found to be the most productive country rendering most of the articles (64%). Conclusion Our bibliometric analysis on Giant cell arteritis identifies the information which may direct future research contributions, identify field experts, guide researchers to fill knowledge gaps, and assist in research fund allocation.