s / Drug and Alcohol Dependence 146 (2015) e118–e201 e119 VASH may enable needed service use for homeless Veterans, through links to housing and primary care. Financial support: VAGLA CSHIIP. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.241 Receipt of opioid therapy guidelineconcordant care among HIV+ and HIV− veterans J.R. Gaither1, E. Edelman1, W. Becker1,2, S. Crystal4, K. Gordon2, J. Goulet1,2, R. Kerns1,2, M. Skanderson3, D. Weisberg1, K. Bryant5, A. Justice1,2, D. Fiellin1 1 Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States 2 VA CT HCS, New Haven, CT, United States 3 VA Pittsburgh HCS, New Haven, CT, United States 4 Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States 5 NIH/NIAAA, Bethesda, MD, United States Aims: To determine whether HIV+ and HIV− patients initiating opioid therapy (OT) are equally likely to receive care concordant with American Pain Society/American Academy of Pain Medicine opioid clinical practice guidelines. Methods: We performed a nested prospective cohort study on 17,961 patients from the Veterans Aging Cohort Study who initiated long-termOT (≥90-days) between 1999 and 2009. Unadjusted and adjusted models were used to evaluate associations between HIV status and outcomes on 12 indicators derived from national OT guidelines. We calculated summary scores (i.e., number of recommended indicators received per patient/number for which they were eligible×100) and examined trends in the receipt of individual indicators over time. Results: Receipt of guideline-concordant care was low for both patient groups. HIV+ patients (n=5,677) were more likely than HIV− patients (n=12,284) to receive a primary care provider (PCP) visit within 1 month (51% vs. 31%; p< .001); PCP follow-up within 6 months (89% vs. 73%; p< .001); urine drug tests (UDTs) within 1 month (8% vs. 6%; p< .001) and 6 months (18% vs. 14%; p< .001); a bowel regimen (31% vs. 25%; p< .001); and concurrent non-opioid pain medications (50% vs. 46%; p< .001). However, HIV+ patients were less likely to receive physical rehabilitation (24% vs. 31%; p< .001) or counseling (30% vs. 33%; p< .01) and more likely to receive sedative co-prescriptions (22% vs. 18%; p< .001). Overall, patients received no more than 35% of recommended care. Over time, we observed an increase in UDTs (10–19%; p for trend <.001) and a decrease in sedative co-prescriptions (22–17%; p for trend <.001). Conclusions: Strategies to increase the provision of OT guideline-concordant care are needed as the majority of HIV+ and HIV− patients receiving incident long-term OT did not receive recommended care and there were few clinically meaningful quality improvements over time. Financial support: F31DA035567, U24AA020794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.242 Prevalence of illicit drug use among patients of community health centers in East Los Angeles and Tijuana Marianna Garcia1, Melvin Rico1, John Scholtz1, Mani Vahidi1, Guillermina Natera3, Ronald Andersen2, Ietza Bojorquez4, Julia Yacenda1, Miriam Arroyo3, Mario Gonzalez5, Lillian Gelberg1,2 1 Family Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States 2 UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States 3 National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muniz, Mexico City, Mexico 4 El Colegio de la Frontera Norte Department of Population Studies, Tijuana, Mexico 5 National Commission Against Addictions, Mexico
Read full abstract