Mayo Score Research Articles

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SUBCUTANEOUS INFLIXIMAB AND VEDOLIZUMAB MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CROHN’S DISEASE AND ULCERATIVE COLITIS: AN INDIRECT COMPARISON FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Abstract BACKGROUND In a previous meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials (RCT) in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), infliximab (IFX) showed better efficacy in the induction phase and comparable efficacy during the maintenance phase and an overall similar safety profile as compared to vedolizumab (VDZ).1 The objective of this study is to indirectly compare the 1-year efficacy and safety results between subcutaneous IFX (SC IFX) and VDZ as maintenance therapies in moderate-to-severe CD and UC patients. This analysis incorporates data from three recently published clinical trials: LIBERTY-CD2, LIBERTY-UC3, and VISIBLE24. METHODS Separate pooled analyses were conducted for patients with CD and UC, combining data for predefined efficacy and safety outcomes. These outcomes included the proportions of patients achieving clinical remission (CD: absolute CDAI score of <150; UC: Total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual sub-score >1; or partial Mayo score of ≤1 point), clinical responses (CD: decrease in CDAI score of ≥100 from baseline; UC: a decrease in total Mayo score from baseline of ≥3 points and ≥30%; or a decrease in partial Mayo score from baseline of ≥2 points), and the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, serious infections, or discontinuation due to AEs during the 1-year maintenance phase. Data were pooled using a random-effect model. The heterogeneity between studies was examined. RESULTS A total of 2,028 patients (IFX SC, n=655; VDZ, n=1,373) were included in this pooled analysis. In CD patients, a higher proportion of patients treated with SC IFX achieved clinical remission and CDAI-100 response, with non-overlapping 95% CI during the maintenance phase compared to patients treated with VDZ (Fig.1A, B). In UC, the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission and clinical response during the maintenance phase was similar between the two treatment groups, with overlapping 95% CIs (Fig.1C, D). Safety profiles were generally similar for both indications (Fig.2). CONCLUSION In this indirect comparison, patients treated with SC IFX achieved better efficacy in terms of clinical remission and response compared to those treated with VDZ during 1-year maintenance therapy in CD, and similar rates in UC. Subcutaneous IFX showed a similar safety profile to VDZ, with limitations in duration of follow-up and number of patients. These findings align with the results of a network meta-analysis5 showing that SC IFX ranks highest among biologics for achieving clinical remission during maintenance therapy. REFERENCES 1. Peyrin-Biroulet et al., BMC Gastroenterol 2022;22(1):291 2. Colombel J F et al., JCC 2023;17(S1):i161-i162 3. Sands B E et al., JCC 2023;17(S1):i623-i624 4. Severine Vermeire et al., JCC 2022;16(1):27-38 5. Peyrin-Biroulet L et al., JCC 2023:17(S1):i574–i576

IDENTIFICATION OF DISEASE SEVERITY DEFINITIONS FOR ULCERATIVE COLITIS AND CROHN’S DISEASE

Abstract BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that, in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD), those with moderate disease may achieve better outcomes with vedolizumab than those with severe disease. However, no consensus definition of moderate disease exists for UC or CD, as confirmed by a comprehensive literature review published in 2016.1 We aimed to identify definitions of disease severity for UC and CD in studies published since the approval of vedolizumab. METHODS The first stage of the research comprised a systematic literature review (SLR) that complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement and was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023427948). Literature searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases on May 16, 2023 to identify publications from 2015 onwards. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review was undertaken by two blinded reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data on disease severity indices and thresholds used to define mild, moderate, and/or severe disease were extracted from eligible primary publications. RESULTS Data were extracted from 119 eligible publications (Figure 1), of which 109 related to UC only, 7 to CD only, and 3 to both UC and CD. For UC, the most common disease severity index was Truelove and Witts’ criteria (N = 82), followed by Mayo score or one of its derivatives such as partial Mayo score or Mayo sub-score (N = 29), Lichtiger index (N = 9), Montreal classification (N = 4), Rachmilewitz score (N = 3), and Oxford criteria (N = 3). The definitions identified for mild and moderate disease were similar across studies; however, numerical thresholds used to define moderate and severe disease with Mayo score, partial Mayo score, and Lichtiger index overlapped (Figure 2). For CD, the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (N = 6) was the most commonly used disease severity index, followed by the Harvey–Bradshaw index (HBI) (N = 2). Moderate disease was defined as a CDAI score of 200–450 or 220–450 or a HBI score of 8–16. CONCLUSION For UC, the thresholds used to define moderate disease were similar across studies but overlapped with those used for severe disease in some cases. Too few CD publications were identified to draw robust conclusions, likely due to the exclusion of those describing patients with mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe disease without further stratification in the title or abstract. A targeted literature review of publications reporting phase 3 clinical trials of drugs for UC or CD is ongoing; the thresholds of all measurements used to stratify the patient cohorts in these trials will be extracted to further understand the characteristics of patients with moderate disease. 1. Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(3):348-354.e17. Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram. Figure 2 Numerical ranges used to define mild, moderate, and severe disease for UC.

HIGH COPY NUMBER POLYMORPHISMS OF ALPHA DEFENSIN 1-3 ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THERAPEUTIC RESPONSIVENESS IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Prednisolone therapy is the first choice for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), however, the refractory case is sometimes observed. Alpha defensin 1-3 (DEFA1A3) stored in neutrophils acts as an effector factor of innate immunity. It has been reported that the copy number variation of the DEFA1A3 gene is associated with the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the impact of DEFA1A3 in response to treatment have not been fully investigated. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the relationship between the number of DEFA1A3 copies and UC prednisolone treatment response. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Patients with UC who had attended our department and related facilities and had the number of DEFA1A3 copies measured were included between 2020 and 2022. The number of DEFA1A3 copies were measured using droplet digital PCR after DNA extraction from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Mayo score was used to determine the response to prednisolone and severity of UC. ASUC was defined as presence of more than 6 bloody stools/d along with any one of the following: pulse rate> 90 bpm, temperature > 37.8 °C, hemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL, and/or CRP > 30mg/L. Clinical background and various parameters were extracted from medical record information. RESULTS The 47 ASUC patients were included in the study. The median DEFA1A3 copy number of the patients was 9, the median DEFA1A3 copy number in ASUC was higher than that in healthy subjects. The DEFA1A3 copy number was significantly higher in the non-remission group than in the remission group after treatment with prednisolone.There were no differences in other parameters such as CRP and WBC between the two groups. CONCLUSION DEFA1A3 copy number may be a predictive marker of prednisolone treatment response.

REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS OF USTEKINUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary treatment goals for ulcerative colitis (UC) are to induce and maintain long-term disease remission and reduce the prevalence of symptoms such as bowel urgency and abdominal pain. Ustekinumab (UST) is a biologic approved for treating adult patients with moderate-severe UC, but real-world effectiveness data remain limited. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess real-world effectiveness of UST in patients with UC. METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World UC Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection of gastroenterologists and their patients in the United States of America (USA) from December 2022–September 2023. Two samples were utilised; a sample where physicians provided data for their next six consecutive patients with UC, and an oversample where physicians provided data for their next four consulting patients with UC receiving UST. Patients receiving UST for >1 day at time of consultation (assumed to have received ≥1 UST dose) from either sample were included in the analysis. Data collected included clinical status, disease duration and location, symptoms and treatment profiles. Remission defined by Mayo score was reported separately for advanced therapy (AT)-naïve (UST received as first AT) and AT-experienced (UST received as second or later line of AT) patients. Descriptive statistics for each variable were reported for patients with known data. McNemar’s test was used for symptom prevalence and disease severity comparisons. RESULTS Data for 160 patients were included in this study from 50 physicians. Patients had been diagnosed with UC for median (interquartile range; IQR) of 2.2 (0.5, 4.5) years; mean (standard deviation) age was 39.7 (13.0) years and 50.0% of patients were male. UST was received as first AT for 68.1% of patients, second AT for 18.1% and third AT for 11.3%. Median (IQR) time on UST was 8.7 (4.1, 18.6) months, with 83.9% of patients receiving UST for ≥3 months. For patients in maintenance phase of treatment, 65.8% were on UST USA label dose, 17.9% were receiving an increased and 16.3% decreased dose. According to Mayo scores, 53.6% of AT-naïve and 58.3% of AT-experienced patients were in remission at consultation (Table 1). Improvement in disease severity was evidenced by a reduced proportion of patients with moderate/severe disease at consultation (34.4%) compared to prior to initiation of UST (90.9%; p<0.01). Similarly, there was a significantly lower prevalence of all symptoms between UST initiation and consultation, including abdominal pain (72.1% vs 30.2%), bowel urgency (55.1% vs 22.0%) and bloody diarrhea (54.4% vs 17.6%) (all p<0.01; Figure 1). CONCLUSION Our study showed real-world effectiveness of UST in patients with UC in the USA; most patients receiving UST achieved remission and demonstrated reduced prevalence of symptoms following UST initiation. Table 1 Physician-reported characteristics of patients receiving ustekinumab at the time of consultation. Figure 1 Physician-reported prevalence of (A) symptoms and (B) moderate/severe disease severity prior to initiation of ustekinumab and at time of consultation.

REAL WORLD EFFECTIVENESS OF JAK INHIBITOR UPADACITINIB IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS VERSUS CROHN’S DISEASE IN AN IBD TERTIARY CARE CENTER

Abstract BACKGROUND Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the management of Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). AIMS To compare response to upadacitinib between patients with UC and CD in a real world tertiary care center. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with CD vs UC seen at UCSF Colitis and Crohn’s Disease Center from 2019-2023. The primary outcome was endoscopic remission as noted in post-induction staging scope. Endoscopic remission was assessed using SES-CD and Mayo scores for CD and UC, respectively. Outcomes were assessed at 3 or 6 months after starting upadacitinib for UC and CD, respectively. Failure was considered failure to meet remission criteria, change in medications shortly after induction, or surgery. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were reviewed, 26 with Crohn’s Disease and 34 with Ulcerative Colitis, who had taken Upadacitinib and had post-induction follow up data in EHR review. 10 patients with CD achieved remission (38.5%) compared to 17 patients with UC (50%). This difference was found to be nonsignificant (P=0.38). CONCLUSION In this real-world cohort of IBD patients seen at a tertiary care center, there was no significant difference in response between patients with CD or UC.

SUBCUTANEOUS INFLIXIMAB (CT-P13 SC) DOSE ESCALATION AS AN OPTION FOR MANAGING THE LOSS OF RESPONSE IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE POST HOC ANALYSIS OF LIBERTY-UC AND LIBERTY-CD STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION Dose escalation of IV infliximab is an option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who lose response after induction therapy. However, as yet, there is limited data for CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (CT-P13 SC) dose escalation in IBD patients. AIMS & METHODS The aim of the post hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of treatment with CT-P13 SC dose escalation in patients who initially responded but then lost response according to the loss of response (LOR) criteria in LIBERTY-UC and LIBERTY-CD studies, which were conducted in parallel over 54 weeks. Patients with moderately to severely active UC and CD were treated with 3 doses of infliximab IV 5mg/kg as induction therapy. Clinical responders at Week 10 were randomized (2:1) to receive either CT-P13 SC 120 mg or placebo every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy. From Week 22, the patients who received CT-P13 SC 120 mg every 2 weeks and who met LOR criteria were permitted to escalate the dose to CT-P13 SC 240 mg (double injection [2 shots] of CT-P13 SC 120 mg) every 2 weeks. RESULTS A total of 294 and 231 patients were randomized to CT-P13 SC 120mg in UC and CD study, each. Among them, dose escalation from CT-P13 SC 120 mg to CT-P13 SC 240 mg prior to Week 54was more common in UC than CD [27.6% (81/294) vs 16.9% (39/231)]. Of dose-escalated patients, 74.1% (60/81) and 51.3% (20/39) received their first dose of CT-P13 SC 240 mg at Week 22 in the UC and CD studies, respectively. In both UC and CD studies, patients showed improvement in terms of clinical remission [In UC, 24.7% (20/81), In CD, 53.8% (21/39)] or endoscopic response [In CD, 28.2% (11/39)] after dose escalation. Compared to the first dose escalation visits, patients who escalated the dose had almost a half, statistically significant, reduction in modified Mayo score in UC and CDAI score in CD at Week 54. (Table 1). The incidence rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the maintenance period of both studies was comparable between patients with and without dose escalation. [In UC, 72.8% (67/92) vs 65.2% (133/204), In CD, 71.1% (32/45) vs 72.5% (140/193)]. Among these, TEAEs of infection were as follows [In UC, 27.2% (25/92) vs 28.4% (58/204), In CD, 35.6% (16/45) vs 30.1% (58/193)]. In both studies, rates of anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive conversion up to Week 54 showed no difference in patients with and without dose escalation as follows [In UC, ADA 55.7% (49/88) and 67.3% (134/199), respectively. In CD, ADA 68.2% (30/44) and 64.4% (121/188), respectively]. CONCLUSION Dose escalation of CT-P13 SC from 120 mg to 240 mg every 2 weeks may be effective in restoring efficacy. Safety profiles including immunogenicity results were generally comparable between patients with or without dose escalation. No new safety concerns were found after dose escalation.

COST PER REMISSION FOR MIRIKIZUMAB VS USTEKINUMAB IN THE MAINTENANCE PHASE FOR MODERATELY-TO-SEVERELY ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS TREATMENT FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAYER PERSPECTIVE

Abstract BACKGROUND In phase 3 studies, mirikizumab (MIRI), an IL-23p19 antibody, demonstrated efficacy vs placebo in adult patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is being developed for the United States Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of UC. Ustekinumab (USTE), an IL-12/23p40 antibody, is currently the most utilized second line treatment in UC patients. Physicians may prescribe MIRI in a similar placement to USTE, and payers may compare them when making formulary decisions for IL-23 inhibitors. Given the need for continued maintenance therapy to manage UC, it is of interest to evaluate the relative cost-efficiency of MIRI vs USTE. We estimated and compared the cost of MIRI vs USTE for achieving remission in one additional patient during the maintenance phase in biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)-experienced patients with UC. METHODS This study used a network meta-analysis (NMA) of published randomized controlled trials of maintenance phase therapy to derive the number needed to treat (NNT) for achieving clinical remission among those who responded to induction therapy. In NMA, clinical remission was defined as a total Mayo score of ≤2 points, with no individual sub-score >1. An Excel-based analytic model was developed to estimate cost per additional patient achieving clinical remission at the end of maintenance trial period. The model included the cost of maintenance therapy from a US commercial payer perspective and the NNT of achieving clinical remission for MIRI and USTE in the biologic/JAKi-experienced population. Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) of USTE was taken from Micromedex Redbook. A scenario with USTE biosimilar was also considered where NNT was considered the same as USTE, but the WAC was considered 50% lower than the current WAC of USTE. RESULTS The costs per biologic/JAKi-experienced patient achieving clinical remission during the maintenance phase were $501,472 and $1,027,799 for MIRI and USTE. The lower cost per remission for MIRI in maintenance was the result of both lower relative NNT and lower anticipated WAC of MIRI compared to USTE. The scenario also resulted in a comparable cost per remission for MIRI vs a USTE biosimilar. CONCLUSION MIRI is projected to have a lower cost per remission during maintenance therapy compared to USTE. Given the need for long-term treatment for this chronic condition, MIRI appears to be a cost-efficient treatment option based on its lower NNT and anticipated acquisition cost in the maintenance phase.

Extended Induction and Prognostic Indicators of Response in Patients Treated with Mirikizumab with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in the LUCENT Trials.

Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab, a p19-targeted anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis was demonstrated previously. We evaluated clinical response, baseline characteristics, and clinical status in patients not responding by 12 weeks (W) of induction who then received extended induction treatment. Patients unresponsive to 300mg of intravenous (IV) mirikizumab every 4 weeks by W12 received 3 additional 300mg IV doses every 4 weeks. Week-4 responders received 200mg mirikizumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously until W52. Patients responding by W12 but subsequently losing response received rescue therapy with 300mg IV for 3 doses every 4 weeks. Logistic regression modelling was performed for patients not achieving W12 clinical response to assess baseline characteristics and W12 efficacy parameters and potential prognostic factors of clinical response at W24. Of patients not achieving clinical response during induction, 53.7% achieved response following extended induction. After 52W, 72.2%, 43.1%, and 36.1% of patients achieved clinical response, endoscopic, and clinical remission, respectively. Of induction responders who subsequently lost response, 63.2% and 36.8% achieved symptomatic response and remission, respectively, after receiving rescue therapy No prior biologic or tofacitinib treatment, no immunomodulators at baseline, age older than 40 years, and W12 modified Mayo Score improvement were positively associated with a response to extended induction. The safety profile was similar to initial induction, with 38.3% treatment emergent adverse events, mostly mild. With "extended induction," total of 80.3% mirikizumab-treated patients achieved clinical response by W24. Potential prognostic factors determining response include disease severity, disease phenotype, C-reactive protein, and previous biologic therapy.

PROTECTIVE ROLE OF SAFFRON TO REDUCE INFLAMMATION AND IMPROVE CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS

Abstract BACKGROUND We studied saffron as an additional intervention to improve clinical manifestations of Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. METHODS This is a study at Yazd university where 30 UC patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=9), low (n=9, 25 mg), or high dose saffron (n=12, 50mg), two times a day for 8 weeks. Hemoglobin, platelet levels, CRP, ESR, and fecal calprotectin along with clinical data Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), Partial Mayo Score, and Hamilton Depression Anxiety Score (HDRS) were recorded at baseline and completion of treatment. For validation, we recruited 3 UC patients at Howard University who received 50mg of Saffron twice daily for 8 weeks, two underwent a wash-out period and received saffron for a second cycle. Inflammatory markers, CRP, stool calprotectin, and the cytokines from PMA/ionomycin stimulated PBMCs, at baseline and 8 weeks Saffron treatment were compared. 16S rDNA analysis was performed on stool DNA for gut microbiome. RESULTS In Yazd study of 30 patients, all participants completed the study successfully. The high dose group showed significant improvement in HDRS score (p=0.001), SCCAI (p=0.04), Partial Mayo score (p=0.01), fecal calprotectin (p=0.009), and CRP (p=0.001) compared to baseline. The low dose group also improved in HDRS score (p=0.01; Table 1, Fig 1). No adverse events were reported. In HU data, saffron improved Partial Mayo Score, health related quality of life and HDRS. Pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα, INFγ, IL-6, IL-2, IL-17a decreased while anti-inflammatory IL-10, TGF-β increased. Fecal calprotectin levels of 228 μg/g and 169 μg/g decreased to 63 μg/g and 16 μg/g in two individual patients, respectively. After the wash-out period, fecal calprotectin increased. A second saffron treatment cycle reduced it again further validating the causal relationship. Saffron led to a decrease in gamma Proteobacteria, and enrichment in Ruminococcaceae. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that saffron led to improvements in clinical response including reduction in partial Mayo scores, HDRS scores, and inflammatory markers such as fecal calprotectin and CRP. These findings suggest that the use of saffron supplements alongside standard treatment protocols may yield beneficial effects for individuals with UC. Table 1. Basic characteristics, clinical variables, and laboratory variables among the study participants in three arms of the clinical trial. Figure 1 Effect of Saffron on quality of life and Inflammatory markers.

P935 Remission rates of biologics and small molecules in extension studies of moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis; A systematic review and Network Meta-analysis

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis is a relapsing and remitting inflammatory bowel disease characterised by symptoms of bloody diarrhoea and abdominal pain. In recent years, newer therapies have emerged such as biologics and small molecule therapies. However, these therapies have not been compared head-to-head in the longer term, and the choice in clinical practice is often at the discretion of the clinician. In this study we aim to compare these biologics and small molecule therapies across outcomes such as remission (as defined by the Mayo score) as well as histological, endoscopic and corticosteroid free remission in data beyond 52 weeks of medication administration. Methods Medical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched for phase III and IV randomised control trials examining efficacy of biologic and small molecule therapies in adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis beyond 52 weeks. A network meta-analysis was performed using the frequentist model to compare the aforementioned outcomes with pooled relative risk, heterogeneity and P values used to rank treatments. Results 13 randomised control trials (RCT) were included for analysis from a screen of 2516 abstracts. Of these 13 RCTs, there were 8 treatments directly compared to placebo beyond week 52. In terms of remission as defined by the Mayo score, Upadacitinib 30mg was found to be the best treatment for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis when compared to Upadacitnib 15mg, Vedolizumab and Etrolizumab in consecutive order. In achieving histological remission, Upadacitinib 30mg was superior to Upadacitinib 15mg, Filgotinib (200mg and 100mg) and Etrolizumab. For endoscopic remission, Upadacitinib 30mg was superior to Upadacitinib 15mg, Filgotinib (200mg and 100mg), Vedolizumab, Etrolizumab and Golimumab. For corticosteroid free remission, Filgotinib 200mg was superior to Golimumab, Upadacitinib (30mg and 15mg), Vedolizumab and Etrolizumab. Conclusion Large head-to-head trials of biologic and small molecule therapies in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis beyond 52 weeks have not been performed. However, our results show Upadacitinib 30mg to be efficacious in terms of remission defined by the Mayo score as well as histologic, endoscopic and corticosteroid free remission when compared to other biologics and small molecule therapies. Whilst these newer therapies show promise, their overall performance over an extended period remains unclear and their use often precludes the efficacy of subsequent biologic or small molecule therapies. As such, the first choice of therapy must be made carefully to increase the probability of remission whilst also balancing the burden of adverse events.

DOP46 Tofacitinib for hospitalized acute severe Ulcerative Colitis – the TRIUMPH study

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is a rapidly acting Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with several case series reporting effectiveness in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, there remains a paucity of prospective data evaluating its efficacy and rapidity of onset in ASUC. Methods The TRIUMPH study is a phase 4 prospective interventional trial of tofacitinib in ASUC conducted in five hospitals across Canada (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04925973). Patients with ASUC (biologic naïve and experienced) refractory to three days of intravenous corticosteroids (Modified Truelove-Witts Severity Index [MTWSI] > 10 despite steroids) were eligible for enrollment. Patients were treated with tofacitinib 10mg bid and assessed daily while in hospital. The primary outcome was day 7 clinical response (MTWSI reduction of > 3 from baseline and < 10). Secondary outcomes included rapidity of clinical and biomarker improvements over the first 7 days, colectomy over the course of one year, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission (total Mayo score < 2), endoscopic improvement (endoscopic Mayo score 0 or 1), and adverse events at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results This is an interim analysis as the study has been fully recruited with six-month follow-up available for all participants. 24 patients with ASUC were recruited and received tofacitinib 10mg bid. The mean total baseline Mayo score was 10.1 (SD 1.4) and all patients had a baseline Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 (25%, 6/24) or 3 (75%, 18/24). One third of the patients (8/24) had previous anti-TNF failure. Day 7 clinical response was achieved in 58.3% (14/24) patients. The mean number of days to achieve clinical response was 2.4 days (SD 1.3). Marked reduction in C-reactive protein was observed in responders as soon as one day after tofacitinib initiation compared to non-responders (Figure 1). Colectomy occurred in 16.7% (4/24) patients by day 7 and 25% (6/24) by six months. At six months, 45.8% (11/24) patients remained on tofacitinib (including 78.6% (11/14) of day 7 responders), with 33.3% (8/24) having achieved endoscopic improvement and corticosteroid-free clinical remission. A total of six patients reported adverse events, one of which was considered severe (stroke at day 3 after initiation of tofacitinib). Conclusion Tofacitinib may be an effective induction strategy in patients hospitalized with steroid-refractory ASUC. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare JAK inhibitors with infliximab for steroid refractory ASUC.

P345 Application of bowel sound computational analysis in inflammatory bowel disease

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) is a chronic disease. Although colonscopy is the gold standard for assessing activity, itcarries a considerable discomfort. We evaluate the value of bowel sound computational analysis (BSCA) as a tool in assist diagnosis and severity in Crohn’s disease(CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We used homemade BSCA as a tool in assist bowel sound(BS). Five minutes recordings were taken for patients. The BS activity, sound duration, peak frequency (Hz) and bowel sound index (SI) was recorded. Results We enrolled 16 CD, 22 UC and 20 healthy controls. In CD patients, BS peak frequency was significantly higher than UC and controls (p=0.01). In UC patients, BS SI was significantly higher than CD and controls (mean 2024 V/min vs 1687 and 1181, p=0.04 and 0.01, respectively). We further evaluated the relation between these two parameters and the degree of severity. In CD patients, BS peak frequency were higher in patients with CDAI over 150 than CDAI under 150 (mean 370.7 Hz vs 358.2 Hz, p=0.045). In UC patients, BS SI was significantly higher in patients with mayo score(MS) larger than 6,compare to MS 3-5, MS 0-2, and controls (mean 2269 V/min vs 1863,1638, and1181, P all=0.01). Conclusion CD patients had higher BS peak frequency and UC patients had higher bowel sound index. These characteristic of BS changes seemed correlated to the severity of IBD.

P040 Prediction of endoscopic features of disease from single-cell RNA sequencing data in sigmoid colon of patients with ulcerative colitis

Abstract Background Patients suffering from ulcerative colitis (UC) have reduced life qualities and an increased risk of developing cancer. Current treatment options are limited and have a ceiling effect with remission rates of ~35%. A possible reason is the multi-factorial aetiology, which are associated with an overactivation of the immune system and a dysbiosis of the gut microbiome. An important step towards a better understanding is the characterization of epithelial lesions. Their severity is classified by the Mayo score system based on their macroscopic appearance. While previous studies analysed cellular changes within the colon in UC patients, a detailed characterization of different UC-associated lesions are still missing, which is the aim of our study in collaboration with Sanofi Pharmaceuticals. Methods We recruit patients with active disease at our endoscopy unit and collect different biopsies from multiple regions within these patients to compare the reproducibility of single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) results of similar appearing lesions within and between patients. For the sample preparation, we include a cellular enrichment step for immune, epithelial and stromal cells before performing 10x scRNAseq to obtain equal numbers for each cell fraction from every sampled area. Results Our cellular isolation strategy allows successful recovery of fibroblast, epithelial and immune cell fractions from each lesion. All expected epithelial cell types as previously described are detected in our dataset as well. Moreover, our experimental setup to obtain comparable numbers of fibroblasts, epithelial and immune cells enables us now to investigate cell-cell communication differences within different Mayo score lesions. For example, CXCL signal increased with the severity of macroscopic lesions and involves multiple cell types. Conclusion Our preliminary results promise exciting insights into cell-cell communications at an unprecedented depth, which identifies aberrant signalling pathway that may contribute to treatment failure in the clinics.

P689 Adaptive steroid tapering impedes corticosteroid-free remissions compared to forced tapering in UC clinical trials

Abstract Background Protocols for managing steroids in clinical trials of ulcerative colitis (UC) vary. Most trials mandate steroid tapering at the beginning of maintenance phase. Adaptive steroid tapering allows for some discretion on whether to taper steroids for a patient. It remains unclear what impact steroid tapering protocols have on trial outcomes. Methods This post-hoc analysis from many clinical trials of advanced therapies in UC (VARSITY, ACT 1/2, PURSUIT, GEMINI1, OCTAVE and ULTRA2) was carried out under protocols with Vivli (00007656) and YODA (20224882). Responders to induction therapy with baseline corticosteroid use were considered as the primary population of interest. Adjustments were made to account for re-randomization designs and treatment exposure. Univariate analyses were conducted to identify baseline variables that had an association with the primary outcome of interest, one-year corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CR). All covariates with a significant univariate association (p < 0.05) were considered for inclusion in the multivariate model. Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of steroid-weaning regimen on the outcome of interest. Secondary outcome of interest was one-year CR. Results There was a total of 861 patients from the seven included trials who had achieved clinical response after induction and were using corticosteroids. Within multivariate analysis, patients using adaptive steroid weaning regimens were less likely to achieve one year corticosteroid-free CR (odds ratio (OR) 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.92), p=0.015). Patients with higher partial Mayo scores were also less likely to achieve one year corticosteroid-free CR (OR 0.88 (95% 0.8-0.97), p=0.012). Other variables found significant on univariate analysis were no longer significant once considered within the multivariate model (smoking, race, albumin, endoscopic Mayo score). For the secondary outcome of one year CR, patients using adaptive steroid weaning regimens had increased odds for achieving one year CR as compared to those using fixed regimens (OR 1.9 (95% 1.43-2.52), p<0.001). Several other variables were also found to have an association with one year CR within the multivariate model (Table 1). Conclusion Among patients with UC on corticosteroids at the time of study enrolment, adaptive steroid weaning regimens were less likely to achieve one-year corticosteroid-free CR but more likely to achieve one-year CR. This may help explain the findings within the VARSITY study, where patients treated with vedolizumab had increased odds for one-year CR but were less likely to achieve one-year corticosteroid-free CR. Consideration should be given to implementing mandatory steroid weaning protocols in future clinical trials of UC.

P931 Burden of disease among Ulcerative Colitis patients with isolated proctitis in the United States and Europe

Abstract Background Isolated proctitis (IP), or ulcerative proctitis, a subtype of ulcerative colitis (UC), is associated with distressing symptoms such as abdominal pain and bowel urgency. As patients with IP not responding to conventional treatment are understudied and underrepresented in clinical trials, treatment guidance is limited. We aimed to understand disease burden among IP patients by describing patients delineated by disease extension and treatment experience. Methods Data were drawn from the Adelphi UC Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists (GIs) and their consulting patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States from October 2020 – March 2021. GIs reported patient demographics, disease extension, symptoms, components of the full Mayo score (allowing total scores to be calculated for patients), and treatment profile at time of consultation. Patients with a history of physician-assessed moderate-severe disease were included. Patients were categorised as IP (IP at diagnosis and consultation) or as more extensive UC (MEUC; where disease extended beyond IP at both diagnosis and consultation). According to ECCO consensus guidelines1, patients are considered refractory if they have failed oral steroids combined with oral and rectal 5-ASA therapy. In this analysis, non-refractory IP patients had only received 5-ASAs and/or steroids; refractory IP patients had received an immunomodulator (IM) and/or advanced therapy (AT; biologics, Janus kinase inhibitors). All analyses were descriptive. Results Overall, 221 IP patients (118 non-refractory, 103 refractory) and 1607 MEUC were analysed (Table 1). Among IP, non-refractory IP, refractory IP, and MEUC 49.3%, 55.1%, 42.7%, and 55.4% were male, respectively, and mean age ranged 39.0-40.2 years. Symptoms most reported by IP, non-refractory IP, refractory IP, and MEUC patients were abdominal pain (33.8%, 26.5%, 41.7%, 26.0%), fatigue/tiredness (22.7%, 20.4%, 25.2%, 23.8%) and bowel urgency (22.7%, 25.7%, 19.4%, 23.6%). According to Mayo scores at consultation, 40.3% of IP, 44.9% of non-refractory IP, 34.9% of refractory IP, and 50.4% of MEUC patients were in remission. Since diagnosis, 33.5% of IP, 71.8% of refractory IP, and 69.1% of MEUC cohorts had received AT. Conclusion Patients with IP experience a similar symptom burden to the MEUC population, despite currently available treatments for UC. The high AT use and low rate of remission indicates undertreatment of IP patients and a need for therapies with proven efficacy in this population, particularly after conventional therapy use. 1. Harbord et al. J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jul 1;11(7):769-784.

P631 Effectiveness of Early Thiopurine Use in Korean Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort (MOSAIK) study

Abstract Background Thiopurines play an important role in the management of steroid-refractory steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the effectiveness of the early use of thiopurines in UC remains controversial. Methods In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we divided patients with UC into those who underwent early (within 6 months of diagnosis) and late (6 months after diagnosis) thiopurine therapy to determine the effectiveness of early thiopurine treatment. The primary outcome was the cumulative rate of clinical relapse (Mayo score >2 points). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent clinical factors associated with the outcomes. Results Overall, 333 patients with moderate-to-severe UC were included in the MOSAIK study. Of the 118 patients treated with thiopurines, 65 (55.1%) and 53 (44.9%) received thiopurine therapy within and after 6 months of diagnosis. The cumulative use rate of thiopurines was 38.96% at 3 years after diagnosis. The median initial dose of thiopurines was 0.7 mg/kg (0.3–2.0), and the median maintenance dose was 1.1 mg/kg (0.3–2.4). The cumulative rate of clinical relapse was not significantly different between patients who started thiopurine therapy within 6 months of diagnosis and those who started therapy 6 months after diagnosis during a 3–year period (p = 0.712). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of extraintestinal manifestations (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.674, 95% CI: 1.210–18.061, p = 0.025) independently predicted an increased risk of clinical relapse. Conclusion Patients with UC who received early thiopurine therapy did not differ significantly in terms of clinical relapse compared with those who received late therapy.

P687 Ozanimod as a once-daily oral therapy for Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: results from the induction period of a Phase 2/3 study (J-True North)

Abstract Background Ozanimod is an oral, small molecule sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that selectively targets the S1P1 and S1P5 receptor subtypes. Ozanimod is approved in multiple countries outside Japan for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and/or relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. We herein report the efficacy and safety results during the induction period of J-True North, a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical Phase 2/3 study consisting of a 12-week induction period, followed by a 40-week maintenance period and an open-label extension period in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC. Methods Japanese male and female UC patients aged 18 to 75 years with moderately to severely active UC (defined as Mayo score of 6 to 12, with endoscopic subscore ≥2, rectal bleeding score (RBS) ≥1, and stool frequency score ≥1) were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either 0.46 mg or 0.92 mg ozanimod, or placebo capsules orally once daily. All patients had received prior treatment with aminosalicylates or corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was clinical response at Week 12 (defined as a reduction from baseline in the complete Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, and a reduction from baseline in the RBS of ≥ 1 point or an absolute RBS of ≤ 1 point), and key secondary endpoints were clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, mucosal healing and safety at Week 12 and 52. Results Patients were randomised to the ozanimod 0.46 mg group (n=68), 0.92 mg group (n=65), and the placebo group (n=65). At baseline, 36.4% of patients were female, mean age was 42.6 y and mean complete Mayo score was 8.4. The clinical response rate at Week 12 was 52.9%, 61.5%, and 32.3% in the ozanimod 0.46 mg, 0.92 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement of ozanimod vs placebo (Figure 1). Similarly, higher improvement rates were observed in all key secondary clinical and endoscopic endpoints in the ozanimod groups compared with the placebo group at Week 12. Frequent adverse events (AEs) observed in the induction period were nasopharyngitis, headache, et.al. (Table 1). AEs observed in the study were similar to those in the global phase 3 True North study with 0.92 mg ozanimod, and there were no new safety signals with ozanimod in the J-True North study. Conclusion Ozanimod as a once-daily oral therapy was effective as induction therapy for Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC, and the safety profile was consistent with the results of previous studies. Figure 1 Table 1

P582 Combination of granulocyte–monocyte apheresis and ustekinumab: multicentre and retrospective study

Abstract Background Granulocyte–monocyte apheresis (GMA) selectively removes activated leukocytes and immune mediators, and it has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous reports have also described its combination with biologics, mainly with anti-TNF. Methods The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab (UST) in patients with UC. A retrospective, multicentric study was performed in 12 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC who received combined GMA plus UST. The number of GMA sessions, its frequency, filtered blood volume and time of each session were compiled, along with the clinical data. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing the GMA by partial Mayo score, CRP and faecal calprotectin. Data regarding UST intensification, need for new immunomodulators/biologics and surgery were also compiled. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis. Results Nineteen patients were included (15 UC, 2 Crohn’s disease, 2 unclassified IBD; median age 48 years (IQR, 36-63); 68% male). At baseline, 78% were receiving steroids and 23% immunomodulators. Most patients (89%) had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents and 53% to vedolizumab. Baseline Mayo score was 6.5 (IQR, 5-7), with a median CRP of 9 mg/L (IQR, 4.8-20.8) and faecal calprotectin 1,612 mg/kg (IQR, 873-4,152). GMA was started mostly after PNR in 83%, the median number of GMA sessions was 16 (IQR, 11-27) and 50% of patients started maintenance GMA. Partial Mayo score significantly decreased 6 months after the last GMA session (p=0.019). During follow-up, 27% started a new biologic therapy and 13% required surgery. 64% of patients under steroids at baseline were able to stop them. Adverse events were reported in 5% of patients. Conclusion GMA can safely recapture the response to UST in refractory patients after PNR or LOR to this drug.

P943 Real world Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in patients with Ulcerative Colitis: 6 months follow-up of the French TOFAST study

Abstract Background TOFAST is an observational, prospective, multicenter cohort study aiming to describe the real-life clinical benefit of tofacitinib in moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Methods We report the results of the interim analysis after 6 months of follow-up, describing patient's characteristics, effectiveness, including change in daily PRO2 scores [RB and stool frequency (SF)] during the first 14 days and the median time to relief, and safety. Clinical response was defined as a decrease in partial Mayo score (PMS) (≥ 3 points and ≥30%) from inclusion with a concomitant decrease in rectal bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point (absolute subscore of 0 or 1). Clinical remission was defined as PMS ≤2 with no subscore >1. Symptomatic relief was reported by patients as the time in days from initiation of tofacitinib to improvement of their symptoms. Safety has been been reported as the % of Adverse Events (AE), serious AE and AE of special interest. Results 88 patients were included in the safety analysis (one patient was excluded from the effectiveness analysis as he did not meet the eligibility criteria) with a median exposure duration of 11.7 [Q1; Q3: 6.0; 22.1] months. Of these patients, 67 completed a 6-month follow-up visit by 15/07/2023 and were included in the effectiveness analysis. At inclusion 59.8% of patients were male with a mean (± SD) age of 37.5 ±13.2 years, a median disease duration of 5.9 years [Q1; Q3: 2.7; 13.1]. 46.5% of patients had pancolitis. The mean total Mayo Score was 8.1 ±2.4. 94.3% of patients had previously received at least one anti-TNF agent, 67.8% vedolizumab and 35.6% ustekinumab. Tofacitinib was initiated at 10 mg b.i.d, in combination with corticosteroids for 35.6% of patients. At 6 months, 53 (77.9%) patients were still treated with tofacitinib, 58.5% at 10 mg BID dose. Corticosteroids were ongoing in 22.9% of patients. Clinical response and remission were observed in 64.2% and 61.2% of patients, respectively. For the 68 (78.2%), patients who reported improvement the median time to relief was 7 days [Q1; Q3: 3.5 ;14.5]. PRO2 scores normalization during the first 14 days is shown in the figure. 84.1% of patients reported at least one adverse event (AE) and 21.6% reported at least one serious AE. Seventeen (19.3%) infections and 3 (3.4%) cases of herpes zoster were observed as well as one non-invasive low-grade urothelial carcinoma. No major cardiovascular or venous thromboembolic event, nor malignancy or death were observed (Table). Conclusion In this real-life cohort of patients with refractory UC, tofacitinib induced a clinical response and remission in over 60% of patients, with symptoms relief observed as early as the first two weeks. AEs were consistent with the known tofacitinib safety profile.

P673 Accelerated intravenous ustekinumab dosing as rescue therapy in Moderate- Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an accepted treatment for patients with moderate- severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) following failure with corticosteroids and/or anti-TNF. Some studies suggest that intravenous (IV) administration, in an accelerated schedule, could improve outcomes in this difficult-to-manage group with a high risk of colectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis in patients with moderate-severe UC who received UST (IV) as rescue treatment, following failure with corticosteroids and infliximab. UST was administered intravenously, with an initial dose of 6mg/Kg followed by 130mg every four weeks. Clinical activity was determined by the Partial Mayo Score (PMS), and endoscopic activity by the Mayo Score (SM). Clinical Remission (CR) was defined as PMS<2, and Clinical Response (CRp) as a reduction in activity of ≥30%. Results The study included 17 patients, 8 (47%) women, 9 (52.9%) of whom were hospitalized at baseline, and 11/17 required transfusion or intravenous iron. According to PMS, clinical activity was severe in 16 (94.12%) and moderate in one. Endoscopic activity according to SM was severe in 13 (76.4%). Clinical remission and response were as follows: 1 (5.8%) / 7 (41.1%) patients respectively at week 4; 8 (47%) / 16 (94.1%) patients at week 12; and at week 26, 15 patients had completed the study, 10 (66.6%) in CR, and 12 (80%) in CRp. Ustekinumab was withdrawn in one case due to an infusion reaction, and one patient underwent colectomy. No independent predictors of response to UST were found in this study. Conclusion Intravenous ustekinumab in an accelerated dosing schedule is effective in moderate-severe UC, achieving clinical response in more than two-thirds of patients at week 26.