The Purdue hog cooling pad has previously been demonstrated to mitigate heat stress in lactating sows by conductively transferring heat from a sow to cool water running through an integral heat exchanger. Coolant effectiveness, which describes how much heat is removed per volume of water flushed through the cooling pad, is used to compare the operation under varying conditions. Past studies have indicated that the intermittent flow of cooling water achieves a greater coolant effectiveness than continuous flow operational schemes. An electronic control system was implemented with the current cooling pad design to allow for the automated control of a solenoid valve to create the intermittent flow conditions. All testing was performed using 18 ± 1 °C inlet water. Potential control schemes were categorized into two groups, temporal and temperature threshold. The temporal schemes opened the solenoid for 30 s, enough time to flush the entire contents of the cooling coils, before closing for 3, 6, or 9 min. The temperature threshold control schemes utilized feedback from thermal probes embedded beneath the surface of the cooling pad to open the solenoid for 30 s, when a maximum surface temperature was detected. Trigger temperatures of 28.0, 29.5, or 31.0 °C were used. The temperature threshold control schemes achieved greater heat transfer rates (348, 383, 268 W) compared to the temporal control schemes (324, 128, 84 W). The cooling effectiveness for all control schemes ranged from 46.6 to 64.7 kJ/L. The tested intermittent flow control schemes in this study achieved greater cooling effectiveness than continuous flow systems from previous studies (time: 51 kJ/L; temperature: 61 kJ/L; steady: 5.8 kJ/L), although the temporal control schemes exhibited lower heat transfer rates (time: 180 W; temperature: 330 W; steady: 305 W).