The origin of garnetites, which are quite abundant in highpressure metamorphic complexes, is still debatable. The idea about primary magmatic differen� tiation of basites to Fe-Ti (garnetite protolith) and Mg (protolith of metabasite complimentary to garnetite) parts is the most popular (1 and others). There are assumptions about the formation of garnetite as a result of metamorphic differentiation from active infiltration of fluid (2) and metasomatism with the for� mation of a metasomatic column (3). Extensive garnetization of eclogitic bodies as linear bands up to the appearance of garnetite containing up to 50% garnet and more was registered in Salma eclog� ites within the northwestern part of the Belomorian mobile belt (BMB). The authors studied in detail the body of massive eclogites (Sample 46) with a size of up to 10 m in diameter in the key area of Salma eclogites, in the KuruVaara deposit mine. This body occurs in migmatizes tonolite-trondhjemite gneiss intruded by numerous veins of ceramic pegmatites (4). Eclogites are strongly amphibolized at the contact with host gneiss with the formation of a garnet amphibolite rim (Sample 50) with a thickness of 1-2 m. The garnetite layer with a thickness of up to 60 cm (Sample 48) occurs between the amphibolite rim and the eclogite. Garnetite (Sample 48) contains garnet porphyro� blasts with a size of ~1 mm (up to 50%), intergranular brownishgreen amphibole (20%), andesine (14%), rutile, and ore mineral (5%). In contrast to eclogitic garnet (Sample 46), garnet from garnetite contains numerous poikilitic inclusions of prevailing quartz (10% of the whole rock volume), abundant horn� blende and rutile, and single grains of monoclinic pyroxene and biotite. Garnetite (Sample 48) and eclogite (Sample 46) located within the same body differ significantly in the chemical composition. Garnetite differs from eclogite by the high concentration of FeO* (18.0 and 12.1 wt %, respectively) and TiO2 (1.38 and 0.43 wt %) and the low concentrations of MgO (6.1 and 12.1 wt %) and CaO (11.1 and 13.4 wt %). Garnetite is significantly enriched in V (by a factor of 6) and depleted in Ni, Cr, and Ba by one order of magnitude in comparison with eclogite. The concentrations of Y, Zr, Hf, Th, and REE in garnetite are almost two times higher. A difference in major and minor elements is regu� larly observed in characteristic minerals of garnetite and eclogite as well. Garnet from garnetite differs from eclogitic garnet by the high concentrations of Fe, Ca, HREE, Y, and V and by low contents of Mg and Cr (4); amphibole and monoclinic pyroxene, by the high Fe#, Ti, and V contents; and rutile, by the high con� centrations of V, Zr, and Hf and the low contents of Cr and Nb. The contrasting chemical compositions of garnetite and eclogite do not result in qualitative change of the mineral association upon transforma� tion of eclogite to garnetite, but have an impact on the compositions of rockforming, as well as accessory, minerals.