I have been involved with our division's journal for more than seventeen years, first as a reviewer of reference books, and for the past seven years as the editor of the Alert Collector column. I am humbled to have this opportunity to assume a larger role with the journal. I know that I will need to work hard to continue the legacy of the many esteemed editors that came before me. In particular, I am profoundly aware that my immediate predecessors will be a hard act to follow. While Bill Katz edited the journal for the most consecutive number of years (ten), Connie Van Fleet and Danny Wallace have the distinction of editing the journal for the greatest number of years (twelve in total). What is even more remarkable is that they made it look so effortless all these years (and, of course, it is not, as editing a journal is hard work). Thanks to Van Fleet and Wallace's diligence, RUSQ has retained its status as a premier publication for academic and public librarians engaged in reference and user services. Their own contributions to the journal have significantly impacted our profession. Their cleverly titled spring 2002 editorial, O Librarian, Where Art Thou? has been widely cited and was integral to the 2002 RUSA President's Program on staffing and recruitment. In fact, it has become a seminal work on recruitment to the profession. Because they did such an excellent job of promoting RUSQ as a publication venue, the number of manuscript submissions has increased significantly during their most recent tenure as editors. Consequently, I will be working through an acceptance backlog. On a personal note, I want to thank Connie and Danny for all their help in orienting me to the editorial process to ensure a smooth transition. Additionally, JoAnn Palmeri and Rachel Mosman, their editorial assistants, graciously assisted me with the preparation of this issue. I strongly believe that one of the missions of RUSA is to respond to the continuing education needs of the Division's membership. Many members are unable to attend Midwinter Meeting and Annual Conference. Consequently, RUSQ plays an important role in serving the continuing-education needs of the entire RUSA membership. I view RUSQ as a forum for librarians to learn from one another. I strongly believe in the importance of research as a tool for strengthening professional practice. The journal must provide a balance of practical and empirically based articles on problems and issues that widely impact reference and public-services librarians. Librarians seek out thoughtful articles on new public-service configurations, alternate modes of reference service, innovative instruction, the impact of e-resources on reference and collection development, strategies for improving and marketing library services, institutional cooperation, and other timely topics. RUSQ is a vehicle to share information about these issues. The next few years will be critical ones for RUSQ. Findings from the 2005 readership survey conducted by Readex Research provide data on how well RUSQ currently meets the needs and interests of RUSA members. It also provides a measure of readers' interest in a digital version of the journal. This four-page readership survey was mailed to a random sampling of one thousand RUSQ readers and had a 54 percent response rate. As a follow-up to the survey, professionally facilitated focus-group interviews were conducted at the 2006 Midwinter Meeting to provide additional insight on the expectations of both public and academic librarians regarding the journal. Data from the readership survey provide a profile of readers and their preferences for future content. RUSQ readers are engaged with the journal. A typical recipient has read all four of the last four issues, spending forty-nine minutes reading or browsing each issue. Seventy-nine percent of recipients indicated that they do something as a result of reading an article or column. They visit Web sites, order a product, file articles for further reference, discuss articles with others, or pass along items to others. …