Maqashid Shariah Research Articles

Perbandingan Kesejahteraan Antara Pengusaha dan Pegawai Perspektif Maqashid Syariah di Kelurahan Kejawan Putih Tambak Surabaya

This study aims to identify and analyze Comparison Between Employers and Employees Welfare maqashid Shariah Perspective in the Village Kejawan Putih Tambak Surabaya. That is the basis of interview questions to determine the welfare comparison between employers and employees in terms of five aspects, namely, religion, life, intellect, lineage and property.This study used a qualitative approach with ethnographic strategy. Data was collected through interviews and direct observation to study the object. The analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative analysis narrate the results of interviews and direct observation.The results of this study is that there is little difference between employers and employee welfare. The welfare of employers better meet the criteria Maqashid Shariah Perspective. The employers have more time to gather with family, having time to pray in the mosque, pay more attention to their health and have more social activities than employees. While employees have limited time togather with family, can not pray in a timely manner, rarely have time to socialize and do not have time for a workout. Therefore employers mental welfare is better than employees.

Memahami Hadis Misoginis Perspektif Maqasid Syari‘AH: Studi Hadis yang Menyamakan antara Keledai, Anjing dan Perempuan

This study aims at applying the concept of maqashid shariah to understand a problematic hadith narrated by Abû Dzâr al-Ghifari and Abû Hurairah. Such hadith has attracted serious attentions due to its narration which equated between a donkey, a dog and a woman among many Moslem scholars throughout the Islamic intellectual history. In the first part of the article, a critical review of interpretation method employed by previous ulamas, both from classical and modern period has been presented. From such an examination, it becomes clear that there is a gap which has not been adequately answered by the previous methods. Therefore, in this context, the maqashid is situated as the alternative method. Here the maqashi concept is projected as a ratio legis and parameter of the validity of ijtihad, following al-Syâtibi and Jasser Audah’s notion. Having employed maqashid to the hadith, this article concludes that the hadith contradicts one of al-kulliyah al-sittah (the six general principles of maqashid), which is hifzh al‘ird. As a consequence of this contradiction, the hadith is irrelevant as practice.[Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menerapkan konsep Maqasid Syari’ah untuk memahami hadis problematis yang diriwayatkan oleh Abû Dzâr al-Ghifari dan Abû Hurairah. Hadis tersebut telah menarik perhatian serius banyak sarjana muslim sepanjang sejarah intelektual Islam karena memuat narasi yang menyamakan antara keledai, anjing dan perempuan. Pada bagian awal tulisan, terlebih dahulu disajikan ulasan kritis mengenai metode-metode interpretasi yang digunakan oleh ulama klasik dan modern. Dari pengujian terhadap metode-metode tersebut diketahui bahwa terdapat ruang kosong yang masih tersisa dan belum terjawab dengan baik. Oleh karena itu, maqashid dalam tulisan ini diletakkan sebagai metode alternatif di mana konsep maqashid diajukan sebagai kausa hukum dan parameter kebenaran sebuah ijtihad, mengikuti gagasan al-Syâtibi dan Jasser Audah. Tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa hadis yang didiskusikan berbenturan dengan salah satu dari enam tujuan pokok hukum Islam, yaitu hifzh al-‘ird. Sebagai implikasinya, hadis ini menjadi tidak dapat diamalkan.]

Kawin Beda Agama dalam Legislasi Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia Perspektif HAM

In the universal standards and appropriate covenants on civil and political rights is stated that any institution is not allowed to handcuff someone's freedom to choose a partner. However, in practice in the context of Indonesia is not as easy as that discourse. In this context the concept of utilitarianism Maqashid Shariah and legal formulation laid spirited serious benefits. Two of these concepts turned out to affect the dynamics of the formulation of the rules of marriage in Indonesia. In Article 2 of the Act No.1 / 1974 of the marriage has been declared that the marriage is valid if conducted according to religion and belief. Furthermore, a very sharp contradiction is visible on the existence of Presidential Directive 1991 on the Compilation of Islamic Law and Counter Legal Draft of Compilation of Islamic Law. In the CLD-KHI in Article 54 states unequivocally that interfaith marriages are allowed to keep records to fulfill the purpose of marriage, the happiness of the couple. Here, the formulation is consistent with the concept of utilitarianism serious benefits. In the context of human rights, human happiness (the couple) would be used as a right that can not be reduced under any circumstances (non-derogable rights), while the interest of following the religion as an interest that could be reduced in certain circumstances (derogable rights / interests). Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:Table Normal; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:Calibri,sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}