While parks and other public spaces are important to people experiencing homelessness for many reasons, there is a relative lack of research focused on their equitable management for this vulnerable user group. We contextualize our work in this gap, through the application of the Potential for Conflict Index2 (PCI2) approach. Using community survey data, we sought to understand perceived acceptability of various responses to scenarios involving unhoused park users among members of the housed public. Results indicate that respondents largely view people experiencing homelessness as legitimate park users, support their right to use parks in a variety of ways that align with norms of acceptable behavior in public spaces, and favor a variety of responses specific to the scenario at hand. Potential for conflict was greatest with overnight occupation and daytime sleeping, where those with positive and negative attitudes toward people experiencing homelessness held different priorities and endorsed different responses.
Read full abstract