Management Of Rheumatic Diseases Research Articles

Multidisciplinary approach in the management of pregnancy and rheumatic diseases – the challenges for obstetricians and gynecologists

Rheumatic diseases (RD) primarily affect young women of reproductive age and therefore pregnancy in these patients requires more attention. Pregnancy in women with RD requires a multidisciplinary, carefully coordinated approach before, during and after pregnancy to ensure the best possible prognosis for the mother and the baby. Treatment of patients with RD during pregnancy and in the post-natal period may be a major challenge for both rheumatologists and obstetrics-gynaecologists. Risk stratification and pregnancy planning are key to ensuring normal pregnancy in women with RD and minimal risk of complications. On the other hand, the risks to the fetus are related to the activity of the mother's disease, presence of specific autoantibodies, and mother's therapy. It is of great importance to stabilize the disease, to replace the medication with pregnancy-compatible drugs, tests of the autoantibody status and organ damage assessment. For these reasons, active monitoring of pregnant women with RD should be carried out by rheumatologist and gynecologist.

Neutrophils in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatic Diseases.

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), are a group of auto-inflammatory disorders associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. One unifying feature of these diseases is the presence of abnormal neutrophils exhibiting dysregulated neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, degranulation, and pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion. Moreover, the release of autoantigens associated with NETs promotes the generation of autoantibodies and a breakdown of self-tolerance, thereby perpetuating inflammation and tissue injury in these patients. In recent years, targeted therapies directed at neutrophilic effector functions have shown promising results in the management of rheumatic diseases. In this review, we will highlight the emerging roles of neutrophils in the onset and progression of rheumatic diseases, and further discuss current and future therapeutic approaches targeting the pathogenic functions of neutrophils, which can modulate inflammation and hence improve patients' survival and quality of life.

Management of chronic rheumatic diseases in women 18–45 years of age in Asia Pacific: insights from patient and clinician surveys

ObjectivePerspectives of women aged 18–45 years with chronic rheumatic diseases (CRD), and clinicians, in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region are reported.MethodsOnline surveys were completed by women, pregnant in the past 2–5 years, with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and rheumatologists, obstetricians, orthopaedic surgeons who medically manage CRDs.ResultsAmong 210 (RA 122, PsA 48, axSpA 40) patients, 52% (n = 109/210) delayed their decision to have children, most commonly due to concerns of passing on disease to offspring. 33% (n = 70/210) discussed family planning with a healthcare professional at diagnosis. Patients most often initiated discussions. 94% (n = 193/205) stopped treatment around pregnancy due to fear of fetal harm. 66% (n = 139/210) of patients felt they did not receive all relevant information on the impact of CRDs and treatment on pregnancy.Among 335 clinicians who participated, 82% (n = 143/174) of rheumatologists, 86% (n = 72/84) of obstetricians and 43% (n = 33/77) of orthopaedic surgeons agreed good disease control during pregnancy was their primary goal. 69% (n = 120/174) of rheumatologists were ‘very comfortable’ with prescribing tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for women aged 18–45 years. Comfort levels generally decreased with the onset of family planning. More obstetricians and orthopaedic surgeons supported avoiding TNFi during pregnancy than rheumatologists (40% [n = 34/84]/38% [n = 29/77] versus 16% [n = 28/174]). Access to more TNFi safety data during pregnancy was considered paramount for increasing clinician comfort.ConclusionsPatients and physicians need current information and multidisciplinary discussions for improved management of CRD in women in APAC.

Health-seeking behaviour, referral patterns and associated factors among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases in Ghana: A cross-sectional mixed method study.

BackgroundChallenges exist in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in low and middle income countries due to factors, such as poverty and under-resourced healthcare infrastructure. Furthermore, other contributory factors such as societal, cultural and religious practices influence health seeking behaviour which has a bearing on access and delivery of healthcare.ObjectivesTo examine the health seeking behaviour and referral patterns of Ghanaian patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases and assess the associated factors that influence these.MethodA cross-sectional study using an explanatory sequential mixed method design was carried out in a Rheumatology clinic at a national referral centre. 110 participants were purposively recruited for the quantitative phase. The qualitative phase comprised 10 participants for in-depth interviews and 10 participants for a focus group discussion. Analysis using descriptive statistics, t-tests and logistic regression models were performed. Transcripts generated from the interviews and focused group discussion were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsMedian duration from onset of symptoms until seeking help was 1 week (IQR = 12); from seeking help until obtaining a final diagnosis was 12 months (IQR = 33). Multiple factors determined the choice of first facility visited, X2 (12, N = 107) = 32.29, p = .001. Only twenty-one participants (19.6%) had knowledge of their disease prior to diagnosis. Education predicted prior knowledge [OR = 2.6 (95% CI = .66–10.12), p < .021]. Unemployed participants had increased odds of seeking help after a month compared to those who were employed [Odds ratio = 2.60 (95% CI = 1.14–5.90), p = .02]. Knowledge of autoimmune rheumatic diseases was low with multiple causative factors such as biomedical, environmental and spiritual causes determining where patients accessed care. Forty (36.4%) participants utilised complementary and alternative treatment options.ConclusionWe observed that knowledge about autoimmune rheumatic diseases among Ghanaian patients was low. Patients sought help from numerous medical facilities, traditional healers and prayer camps often contributing to a delay in diagnosis for most patients. This was influenced by individual perceptions, cultural beliefs and socioeconomic status. Active awareness and educational programmes for the public and healthcare workers are required, as well as strategic planning to integrate the biomedical and traditional care services to enable earlier presentation, accurate diagnosis and better clinical outcomes for the patients.

Remotely delivered cognitive behavioural and personalised exercise interventions for fatigue severity and impact in inflammatory rheumatic diseases (LIFT): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial.

Chronic fatigue is a poorly managed problem in people with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Cognitive behavioural approaches (CBA) and personalised exercise programmes (PEP) can be effective, but they are not often implemented because their effectivenesses across the different inflammatory rheumatic diseases are unknown and regular face-to-face sessions are often undesirable, especially during a pandemic. We hypothesised that remotely delivered CBA and PEP would effectively alleviate fatigue severity and life impact across inflammatory rheumatic diseases. LIFT is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial to assess usual care alongside telephone-delivered CBA or PEP against usual care alone in UK hospitals. Patients with any stable inflammatory rheumatic disease were eligible if they reported clinically significant, persistent fatigue. Treatment allocation was assigned by a web-based randomisation system. CBA and PEP sessions were delivered over 6 months by trained health professionals in rheumatology. Coprimary outcomes were fatigue severity (Chalder Fatigue Scale) and impact (Fatigue Severity Scale) at 56 weeks. The primary analysis was by full analysis set. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03248518). From Sept 4, 2017, to Sept 30, 2019, we randomly assigned and treated 367 participants to PEP (n=124; one participant withdrew after being randomly assinged), CBA (n=121), or usual care alone (n=122), of whom 274 (75%) were women and 92 (25%) were men with an overall mean age of 57·5 (SD 12·7) years. Analyses for Chalder Fatigue Scale included 101 participants in the PEP group, 107 in the CBA group, and 107 in the usual care group and for Fatigue Severity Scale included 101 in PEP, 106 in CBA, and 107 in usual care groups. PEP and CBA significantly improved fatigue severity (Chalder Fatigue Scale; PEP: adjusted mean difference -3·03 [97·5% CI -5·05 to -1·02], p=0·0007; CBA: -2·36 [-4·28 to -0·44], p=0·0058) and fatigue impact (Fatigue Severity Scale; PEP: -0·64 [-0·95 to -0·33], p<0·0001; CBA: -0·58 [-0·87 to -0·28], p<0·0001); compared with usual care alone at 56 weeks. No trial-related serious adverse events were reported. Telephone-delivered CBA and PEP produced and maintained statistically and clinically significant reductions in the severity and impact of fatigue in a variety of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. These interventions should be considered as a key component of inflammatory rheumatic disease management in routine clinical practice. Versus Arthritis.

Autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases with mucocutaneous manifestations: A pediatric rheumatology perspective.

The presence of mucocutaneous manifestations has clinical significance, as it may be a part of the initial presentation or activation stage of both autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases. The cutaneous signs may display a particular morphological and topographic distribution according to taxonomy, whereas heterogeneity is likely observed among the individuals. The review aims to cluster and systematically approach the mucocutaneous manifestations met in autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases of childhood. The search strategy involved a comprehensive inquiry on Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases using relevant search terms such as "dermatologic, cutaneous, mucocutaneous, skin, rash" for each disease and category. The awareness of the distinctive mucocutaneous manifestations and their correlation with rheumatic diseases provides a convenient definition, well-timed control of the underlying condition, and prevention of cosmetic issues. In the management of rheumatic diseases, planning the pertinent differential diagnosis and determining the requirement of histopathological assessment are essential with a multidisciplinary approach to rheumatology, dermatology, and allergy-immunology specialties.

Management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases during and after malignancies

The management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in patients with asimultaneous or previous malignant disease is associated with complex questions. Difficulties and possible solutions in the interpretation of meaningful studies are presented. Recommendations in guidelines on this topic are discussed. National registries and health insurance databases were examined with respect to the risk of tumor recurrence under disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; however, these analyses mainly refer to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and rituximab. Data on tumor incidence and, if available, risk of tumor recurrence are summarized for commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Finally, an attempt is made to formulate proposals for rheumatological treatment in patients with ahistory of malignancy.

Research priority setting for paediatric rheumatology in the UK.

The evidence base that underlies the management of children and young people with paediatric rheumatic diseases is deficient. In this field, there are many crucial unanswered questions. The UK Paediatric Rheumatology Clinical Studies Group, supported by UK National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network: children and Versus Arthritis, elicited ideas for research priorities from paediatric rheumatologists, trainees, allied health-care professionals, nurse specialists, patients, parents of patients, carers, and charities. These ideas were collected through online surveys and face-to-face meetings. A modified Delphi process was used, which included online research priority ranking surveys and a consensus workshop. A longlist of 55 disease-specific research priorities and 37 general research priorities were voted on in the first survey. A list of 11 top general research priorities was produced. The top ten disease-specific research priorities were discussed in depth at a Delphi workshop to determine their final ranking. This Health Policy paper will help to guide clinicians, academics, and funding bodies to prioritise research in paediatric rheumatic diseases, specifically in areas of unmet patient needs.

Beyond the hand and upper extremity: The role of hand therapists in care of people with rheumatic diseases

Study designInvited Clinical Commentary BackgroundArthritis is one of the most frequently reported causes of disability in the United States and the prevalence is expected to increase in the coming decades. While many rheumatic diseases involve hand impairments, most are systemic and involve more than the musculoskeletal system. Functional and work disability are high and people would benefit from the services of occupational and physical therapists. Purpose of studyThis paper reviews concepts of self-management, and symptoms that contribute to limitations and restrictions to participation in daily life in people with rheumatic diseases and suggests roles for hand therapists beyond the immediate hand impairments. MethodsThe impact of selected rheumatic diseases on functional and work disability are reviewed along with strategies for symptom management and self-management. Upper extremity impairments of selected rheumatic diseases are also discussed. ResultsThe role for hand therapists in evaluating and addressing the complex needs of persons with rheumatic diseases, including less common diseases, is discussed. Outcome measures for fatigue, muscle involvement, ergonomics and computer use, and work disability are introduced. Finally, strategies for self-management and prevention of work and functional disability, along with symptom management for fatigue and pain are presented. ConclusionHand therapists can play a vital role in chronic rheumatic disease management to improve self-management and increase participation in meaningful activities. Patients, primary care and rheumatology providers need to be educated about the scope of services occupational and physical therapists provide beyond the hand impairments.

The Impact of Telemedicine on Rheumatology Care.

BackgroundThe pandemic disrupted the care of patients with rheumatic diseases; difficulties in access to care and its psychological impact affected quality of life. Telemedicine as an alternative to traditional face-to-face office visits has the potential to mitigate this impact.ObjectiveTo evaluate patient and provider experience with telemedicine and its effect on care.MethodsWe surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases and their rheumatology providers. The surveys were conducted in 2020 and repeated in 2021. We assessed data on quality of care and health-related quality of life.ResultsHundred patients and 17 providers responded to the survey. Patients reported higher satisfaction with telemedicine in 2021 compared to 2020 (94 vs. 84%), felt more comfortable with (96 vs. 86%), expressed a stronger preference for (22 vs. 16%), and higher intention to use telemedicine in the future (83 vs. 77%); patients thought physicians were able to address their concerns. While providers' satisfaction with telemedicine increased (18–76%), 14/17 providers believed that telemedicine visits were worse than in-person visits. There were no differences in annualized office visits and admissions. Mean EQ-5D score was 0.74, lower than general population (0.87) but equivalent to a subset of patients with SLE (0.74).ConclusionOur data showed a high level of satisfaction with telemedicine. The lower rheumatology provider satisfaction raises concern if telemedicine constitutes an acceptable alternative to in-person care. The stable number of office visits, admissions, and the similar quality of life to pre-pandemic level suggest effective management of rheumatic diseases using telemedicine/in-person hybrid care.

Rheumatic Valve Disease Surgery: Major Challenge in BURUNDI

Objective: to show major challenge, concerns about rheumatic valve disease surgery in Burundi and medium term results. Methods: Included in our study, all patients whom the diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease had been made and underwent open heart surgery abroad. Results: Middle age= 24, 72 ±11.8 years, 33 (61.1%) patients were female. The average duration of the follow up=3.46±1.61years. Mitral valve was the most affected (92.59%). The main surgical procedure was mitral valve replacement performed to 47 (94%) patients. During the follow up, 3(5.5%) patients died. Conclusion: Surgical management of rheumatic heart disease remains a major challenge in Burundi. Six areas of concerns must be considered to developp a local technique plateau.

P244 The use of anti-malarial therapy in UK Rheumatology practice. A UK-based pilot survey for the BILAG group

Abstract Background/Aims Antimalarials have an important role in the management of autoimmune rheumatic disease, especially lupus (SLE) and other connective tissue diseases (CTD). A large North American study demonstrated a risk of retinopathy with hydroxychloroquine, increasing at doses above 5mg/kg and after 10 years or more of continuous therapy. This has influenced the development of specific monitoring ocular guidance for hydroxychloroquine although there has been less attention to potential side effects in routine use. Our aim was to examine hydroxychloroquine use including the effect of changes in ophthalmology guidance Methods We designed a 21-question internet-based survey. This requested information on antimalarials including hydroxychloroquine brand, dosing, monitoring and concerns about use. We requested information about alternatives to hydroxychloroquine including mepacrine and chloroquine, barriers to and indications for prescribing these alternative antimalarials. Results We received 69 responses, 59 (86%) Consultants, 10 (14%) ST’s from across the United Kingdom of which 51% worked in a district general hospital (DGH) setting. Of the Consultants, 28 (47%) ran dedicated CTD clinics. Regarding hydroxychloroquine, 39 respondents (57%) used a defined local pathway for Hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening. While 59/69 (86%) did not know which hydroxychloroquine brand their pharmacy dispensed, of the remainder, 14/19 (74%) used Quinoric. Regarding hydroxychloroquine dosing, 83% targeted weight-based maintenance dosing with most of these (77%) maintaining at the currently recommended 5mg/kg body weight or less, while 23% used 6.5mg/Kg. No participants measured hydroxychloroquine drug levels. Potential ocular toxicity, cardiac arrythmias and skin hyperpigmentation were reported as the most significant concerns with hydroxychloroquine usage. Of the alternatives, mepacrine was never used by 39%, (77% for chloroquine) while only 4% used either often or very often. Barriers to prescription of these alternative antimalarials were most commonly GP or local Pharmacy unavailability (39% and 17 retrospectively). However, mepacrine/ hydroxychloroquine combination was used by 32% of respondents, most often for refractory skin disease (21 respondents), refractory joint disease (five respondents) and as a steroid sparing drug (six respondents). Conclusion Our results suggest several aspects in which hydroxychloroquine use could be improved. Although recent evidence demonstrates the potential for significant ocular toxicity with Hydroxychloroquine in those taking &amp;gt; 5mg/kg body weight and for &amp;gt;10 years we found practice still varied with 43% Rheumatologists not using a dedicated ocular screening pathway making monitoring long term potentially hazardous. Alternatives to hydroxychloroquine are not considered by 39% perhaps reflecting paucity of data for mepacrine and chloroquine, especially in circumstances including pregnancy but also cost and lack of availability. Our results suggest a need for standardised hydroxychloroquine monitoring processes including improved ophthalmic screening with Optical Coherence Tomography, a need for more evidence about the potential benefits and hazards of hydroxychloroquine and alternative antimalarials and availability of prescribing guidelines. Disclosure A. Kaul: Consultancies; Dr Kaul has received fees for Advisory Boards for AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Lilly. Member of speakers’ bureau; r Kaul has received speaker fees from AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen, Leo, Pfizer. A. Mason: None. C. Edwards: None. E. Vital: None.

The Emerging Era of Interventional Imaging in Rheumatology: An Overview During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Imaging has long been taking its place in the diagnosis, monitor, and prognosis of rheumatic diseases. It plays a vital role in the appraisal of treatment. Key progress in the clinical practice of rheumatology is the innovation of advanced imaging modalities; such as musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These modalities introduced a promising noninvasive method for visualizing bone and soft tissues to enable an improved diagnosis. The use of MSUS in rheumatology is considered a landmark in the evolution of the specialty and its ease of use and many applications in rheumatic diseases make it a forerunner instrument in the practice. The use of MSUS among rheumatologists must parallel the development rate of the excellence revealed in the specialty. Moreover, innovative interventional imaging in rheumatology (III-R) is gaining fame and key roles in the near future for a comprehensive management of rheumatic diseases with precision. This review article throws light on the emergence of these robust innovations that may reshape the guidelines and practice in rheumatology, in particular, efforts to enhance best practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are endorsed.

Telemedicine in the Management of Patients with Rheumatic Disease during COVID-19 Pandemic: Incidence of Psychiatric Disorders and Fibromyalgia in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis

The management of patients with immuno-rheumatological diseases has profoundly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine has played an important role in the disease follow-up. In addition to monitoring disease activity and any adverse events, especially infectious events, assessing the psychological situation of the patient can be fundamental. Furthermore, COVID-19 has a serious impact on mental health and, since the beginning of the pandemic, a significantly higher incidence of anxiety disorders and depressive symptoms especially in younger people was observed. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of depressive disorders, anxiety, and fibromyalgia (FM) in our patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis during the lockdown period due to the COVID-19 pandemic and we validate the use of telemedicine in the clinical management of these patients. Mental and physical stress during the COVID-19 pandemic can greatly worsen FM symptoms and intensify patients’ suffering without a clinical flare of the inflammatory disease for patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Telemedicine has allowed us to identify patients who needed a face-to-face approach for therapeutic reevaluation even if not related to a flare of the inflammatory disease. Even if our data does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine as greater than or equal to the standard face-to-face approach, we continue to work by modifying our approach to try to ensure the necessary care in compliance with safety and, optimistically, this tool will become an important part of rheumatic disease management.

BIOTHERAPY DURING CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: AN OVER-RISK OF TUBERCULOSIS REACTIVATION?

Anti-TNFα have revolutionized the management of chronic inflammatory rheumatic and intestinal diseases however, they are at high risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis. These are most often extra-pulmonary tuberculosis and disseminated forms which occur during the first year and which can be avoided by screening and prophylactic treatment. The aim of this publication is to describe the epidemiological, clinical, biological, radiological and evolving data of patients having triggered tuberculosis under anti TNFα treatment followed at the Hassan II hospital center (CHU) in Fez during the period between January 2012 and January 2021. During this period, we collected 130 patients under anti TNF alpha of which 84.5% of patients are on Infliximab 15.5% on Adalimumab. Active tuberculosis occurred in 4.6% of patients whose mean age is 35.5 years and the sex ration is 5H / 1F. The duration of onset is on average after 5 sessions of anti TNF alpha. A phtysio assessment was carried out in all our patients before starting the anti TNF α, 2 of which were IDR positive completed by quantifying it which came back positive in a single patient.

The impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the management of rheumatic disease: a national clinician-based survey.

This study aims to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the management of rheumatic diseases (RD). An online survey included 10 questions were designed to assess potential differences in rheumatology practice. The survey was conducted between March 2021 and June 2021. Marginal homogeneity test was used to compare frequencies of outpatient clinic patients between the pre-pandemic and pandemic. Other results were analyzed by descriptive statistics. One hundred three clinicians (75.7% in rheumatology practice for at least five years) responded to the survey. Almost 70% examined < 30 patients per day during the pandemic while nearly 70% examined ≥ 30 patients per day before the pandemic (p < 0.001). They indicated following reasons for decreasing outpatient clinic activity were concerns regarding COVID-19 transmission risk of the patients (95%) and the clinicians (53%), being able to supply chronic medications directly from the pharmacy (85%), lockdown (71%), limited outpatient appointments (64%) and using telemedicine (20%). The frequencies of rheumatology daily routine procedures were decreased as follows; patient hospitalization for diagnosing (80%) and treatment (78%), labial salivary gland biopsy (63%), Schirmer’s test/salivary flow rate test (56%), nail bed video-capillaroscopy (52%), musculoskeletal ultrasonography (51%) and Pathergy test (50%). Clinicians hesitated to use rituximab (63%) mostly, followed by cyclophosphamide (53%), glucocorticoids (43%), tofacitinib (41%), mycophenolate mofetil (36%), and azathioprine (33%). In this first national survey, the prominent differences in the management of RD have decreased outpatient clinic activity, reduced rheumatology daily procedures, and hesitancy to use some rheumatic drugs.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-022-05102-7.

Penicillin Reactions in Patients With Severe Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.

Secondary antibiotic prophylaxis with regular intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is the cornerstone of rheumatic heart disease management. However, there is a growing body of evidence that patients with rheumatic heart disease who have severe valvular heart disease with or without reduced ventricular function may be dying from cardiovascular compromise following BPG injections. This advisory responds to these concerns and is intended to: (1) raise awareness, (2) provide risk stratification, and (3) provide strategies for risk reduction. Based on available evidence and expert opinion, we have divided patients into low‐ and elevated‐risk groups, based on symptoms and the severity of underlying heart disease. Patients with elevated risk include those with severe mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, and aortic insuffiency; those with decreased left ventricular systolic dysfunction; and those with no symptoms. For these patients, we believe the risk of adverse reaction to BPG, specifically cardiovascular compromise, may outweigh its theoretical benefit. For patients with elevated risk, we newly advise that oral prophylaxis should be strongly considered. In addition, we advocate for a multifaceted strategy for vasovagal risk reduction in all patients with rheumatic heart disease receiving BPG. As current guidelines recommend, all low‐risk patients without a history of penicillin allergy or anaphylaxis should continue to be prescribed BPG for secondary antibiotic prophylaxis. We publish this advisory in the hopes of saving lives and avoiding events that can have devastating effects on patient and clinician confidence in BPG.

Review of publications evaluating opioid use in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease.

This article discusses publications assessing the prevalence, efficacy, and safety of opioid analgesics in patients with rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and systemic sclerosis. Recent studies show long-term opioid use is common in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease. We did not find any studies demonstrating improved function or pain control with long-term opioid use in people with rheumatic diseases. Some data shows potential adverse effects including increased risk for fractures and opioid poisoning hospitalizations. There is evidence demonstrating an association of opioid use with mental health disorders, fibromyalgia, obesity, and disability, although causative links have not been established. Only minimal reductions in opioid use were observed after initiation of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Studies have shown delayed DMARD initiation and reduced DMARD use in patients on opioids, raising concerns that these analgesics may delay care or initially mask symptoms of active disease. Available literature highlights high levels of opioid use in people with rheumatic disease, without scientific evidence to support efficacy for chronic pain control and increasing evidence of adverse events. These findings strongly suggest that opioids do not have a routine role in the chronic management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Contribution to the Valorization of Plants Used in the Management of Rheumatic Diseases in Burkina Faso

Joint pain is a real public health problem. According to recent studies, it is increasingly common in sub-Saharan Africa and represents a cause of greater loss of working days than accidents, heart disease and infections. The aim of this study was to study the pharmacochemical and therapeutic evidence of ten (10) plants used in the management of joint pain by traditional health practitioners in Ouagadougou. We conducted a meta-analysis of the data from December 2018 to September 2019. The anti-inflammatory activity of the ten (10) plants retained the maximum consensus internationally. Trichilia emetica Vahl (35.25%), Guiera senegalensis J.F.G.mel. (31%), Calotropis procera (Ait) Ait.F. (28.29%) and Crescientia cujete L. (25.12%) had more than 25% internationally reliability for their effects on joint pain. The structural analogy between conventional drugs and the molecules found in these plants has been confirmed. Additional studies should be carried out in order to improve and secure the use of these plants, which represent a prominent option in the therapeutic offer.

Spectrum of infections occurring in patients of autoimmune rheumatic diseases on treatment with biological versus conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A comparative study.

The era of biological therapy has revolutionized in the management of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. There have been conflicting results about the incidence of infections related to these drugs. The purpose of this study was to compare the spectrum and severity of infection between patients on biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) versus conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs). This hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, and a total 200 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients on either bDMARDs or cDMARDs for at least six weeks presenting with evidence of infection were included. Patients with known immunodeficiency states, multiple comorbidities, and patients on prednisolone >7.5 mg were excluded. Data was expressed as percentage and mean ± SD. Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis was performed for checking linearity of the data, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's HSD test were used to test the significance of difference between more than two parameters in parametric data. Rheumatoid arthritis in 58 patients (29%) were the commonest ones presenting with infections, followed by systemic lupus erythematosus in 37 patients (18.5%). 135 patients (67.5%) were on cDMARDs and 65 patients (32.5%) on bDMARDs. Respiratory tract infection in 47 (34.8%) patients was found to be the commonest infection due to cDMARDs. Incidence of infection was higher with biologics, and types of infection in patients receiving infliximab and etanercept were significantly different from that of cDMARDs. Patients receiving etanercept had higher risk of infections and re-infections, but they were milder compared to cDMARDs. A significantly higher frequency of re-infection was found in patients who had not received vaccination. This study emphasizes that TNF-α inhibitors are significantly associated with higher risk of infections. Patients on etanercept have significantly higher but milder infections as compared to cDMARDs. Vaccination plays a pivotal role in prevention of re-infections.