Management Of Aortic Dissection Research Articles

Radiomics-Based Risk Assessment Correlates With Outcomes in Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Repair.

Our study aimed to investigate the correlations between radiomics-based assessment and outcomes, including positive aortic remodeling (PAR), reintervention for dissection at 1 year, and overall survival, in patients with Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. The cohort comprised 104 patients who had undergone TEVAR of TBAD in our institution between January 2010 and October 2022. We segmented preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the patients' descending aorta regions, then extracted a comprehensive set of radiomic features, including first-order features, shape features (2D and 3D), gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level size zone matrix, gray-level run length matrix, gray-level dependence matrix, neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix, from the regions of interest. Next, we selected radiomics features associated with total descending aorta positive aortic remodeling (TDA-PAR) and reintervention by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and features associated with survival by LASSO-Cox regression. This enabled us to calculate radiomics-based risk scores for each patient. We then allocated the patients to high and low radiomics-based risk groups, the cutoff being the median score. We used 3 different models to validate the radiomics-based risk scores. The patients' baseline characteristics did not differ between those who achieved TDA-PAR and those who did not. The radiomics-based risk scores were significantly and independently associated with all 3 outcomes. As to the impact of specific radiomics features, we found that GLSZM_SmallAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis and shape_Maximum2DDiameterColumn had positive impacts on both reintervention and survival outcomes, whereas GLCM_Idmn positively affected survival but negatively affected reintervention. We found that radiomics-based risk for TDA-PAR correlated most significantly with zone 6 PAR. Radiomics-based risk scores were significantly associated with the outcomes of TDA-PAR, reintervention, and overall survival. Radiomics has the potential to make significant contributions to prediction of outcomes in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR. In this study of 104 patients with Type B aortic dissection, we demonstrated associations between radiomics-based risk and postoperative outcomes, including total descending aorta positive aortic remodeling, reintervention and survival. These findings highlight radiomics' potential as a tool for risk stratification and prognostication in acute Type B aortic dissection management.

Unraveling phenotypic heterogeneity in stanford type B aortic dissection patients through machine learning clustering analysis of cardiovascular CT imaging

ObjectiveAortic dissection remains a life-threatening condition necessitating accurate diagnosis and timely intervention. This study aimed to investigate phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) through machine learning clustering analysis of cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) imaging. MethodsElectronic medical records were collected to extract demographic and clinical features of patients with TBAD. Exclusion criteria ensured homogeneity and clinical relevance of the TBAD cohort. Controls were selected on the basis of age, comorbidity status, and imaging availability. Aortic morphological parameters were extracted from CT angiography and subjected to K-means clustering analysis to identify distinct phenotypes. ResultsClustering analysis revealed three phenotypes of patients with TBAD with significant correlations with population characteristics and dissection rates. This pioneering study used CT-based three-dimensional reconstruction to classify high-risk individuals, demonstrating the potential of machine learning in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment strategies. Recent advancements in machine learning have garnered attention in cardiovascular imaging, particularly in aortic dissection research. These studies leverage various imaging modalities to extract valuable features and information from cardiovascular images, paving the way for more personalized interventions. ConclusionThis study provides insights into the phenotypic heterogeneity of patients with TBAD using machine learning clustering analysis of cardiovascular CT imaging. The identified phenotypes exhibit correlations with population characteristics and dissection rates, highlighting the potential of machine learning in risk stratification and personalized management of aortic dissection. Further research in this field holds promise for improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes in patients with aortic dissection.

Streamlining Acute Abdominal Aortic Dissection Management-An AI-based CT Imaging Workflow.

Life-threatening acute aortic dissection (AD) demands timely diagnosis for effective intervention. To streamline intrahospital workflows, automated detection of AD in abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans seems useful to assist humans. We aimed at creating a robust convolutional neural network (CNN)-based pipeline capable of real-time screening for signs of abdominal AD in CT. In this retrospective study, abdominal CT data from AD patients presenting with AD and from non-AD patients were collected (n 195, AD cases 94, mean age 65.9years, female ratio 35.8%). A CNN-based algorithm was developed with the goal of enabling a robust, automated, and highly sensitive detection of abdominal AD. Two sets from internal (n = 32, AD cases 16) and external sources (n = 1189, AD cases 100) were procured for validation. The abdominal region was extracted, followed by the automatic isolation of the aorta region of interest (ROI) and highlighting of the membrane via edge extraction, followed by classification of the aortic ROI as dissected/healthy. A fivefold cross-validation was employed on the internal set, and an ensemble of the 5 trained models was used to predict the internal and external validation set. Evaluation metrics included receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy. The AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores of the internal dataset were 0.932 (CI 0.891-0.963), 0.860, and 0.885, respectively. For the internal validation dataset, the AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores were 0.887 (CI 0.732-0.988), 0.781, and 0.875, respectively. Furthermore, for the external validation dataset, AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores were 0.993 (CI 0.918-0.994), 0.933, and 1.000, respectively. The proposed automated pipeline could assist humans in expediting acute aortic dissection management when integrated into clinical workflows.

A RARE CASE OF TYPE A AORTIC DISSECTION PRESENTING AS ACUTE STROKE: A DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE

Abstract A 60–year–old woman presented to the emergency department with acute left hemiplegia, not chest pains. Past medical history was significant for family history of aortic aneurysm, arterial hypertension. At brain–CT was reported hypodensity areas in posterior arm of the right internal capsule and in right tempero–polar lobe, confirmed on brain–MRI, and compatible with acute ischemic injury. Echocolor–dopper of epiaortic vessels documentated ulcerated plaque into the right common carotid artery (CCA). Selective catheterization found focal dissection obstructing the flow, treated with self–expanding stent. On echocardiography evalutation for suspiction of TAAD: dilatation of ascending aorta with flap oscillation, severe arotic regurgitation, pericardial effusion (Fig. 1). CT–Angiography was performed with evidence of type A dissection extending superiorly to the right CCA and inferiorly to the iliac bifurcation. For coma state, the patient was mechanically ventilated, and seriate CTs showed new ischemic lesions and hemorrhagic infarction of previous. Because of contraindication for cardiac surgery due neurological state, the patient was referred at medical therapy as bridge to hybrid aortic arc substitution at resolution of intracranial hemorrhages. In the next days there was progressive improvement neurological status with restoration of sensory and autonomic breathing with hemodynamic stability. Aortic dissection (AD) is defined as a disruption of the medial layer leading to the formation of two lumens separated by an intimomedial flap. AD is a critical diagnosis to make due to life–threatening outcomes and its non–specific presentation as in the case of our patient where the management of AD was delayed due to an unusual initial clinical presentation. Multimodality imaging approach has been fundamental for correct diagnosis and risk stratification. A limited number of studies have reported cases with stroke as the first symptom with concomitant TAAD. Concomitant intracerebral hemorrhage and TAAD is a very rare presentation and the optimal timing of surgery in these patients is unknown. In our opinion, patients who presents acute stroke should be carefully evaluated using multimodal imaging to exclude TAAD before administering reperfusion therapy. In addition, performing CAS before surgery for TAAD is challenging but might be a valid treatment option to maintain good brain perfusion and improve prognosis, but further investigations are needed.

Three-Dimensional-Evaluation of Aortic Changes after Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) in Zone 0 vs. Zone 2 in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Introduction: The management of aortic dissection has evolved significantly over the decades, with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure emerging as a key technique for treating complex aortic pathologies. Recent practices involve deploying the FET prosthesis more proximally in the aorta (Zone 0) to reduce complications, leading to questions about its impact on long-term aortic remodeling compared to traditional Zone 2 deployment. Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized 3D segmentation software to assess the volumetric changes in aortic remodeling after acute Type A aortic dissections, comparing FET stent graft deployment in Zone 0 and Zone 2. The study included 27 patients operated on between 2020 and 2022, with volumetric measurements taken from postoperative and 6-month follow-up CT scans. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the differences in the aortic true lumen (TL) and the perfused false lumen (PFL) between the two groups. Results: Both Zone 0 and Zone 2 deployments resulted in significant true lumen (TL) increases (Z0 p = 0.001, Z2 p < 0.001) and perfused false lumen (PFL) decreases (Z0 p = 0.02, Z2 p = 0.04), with no significant differences in volumetric changes between the groups (p = 0.7 post op and p = 0.9 after 6 months). The distal anastomosis in Zone 0 did not compromise the aortic remodeling outcomes and was associated with reduced distal ischemia and cerebral perfusion times (p = 0.041). The angle measurements in Zone 0 did not show any significant changes after the 6-month control (p = 0.2). However, in Zone 2, a significant change was detected. (p = 0.022). The part comparison analyses did not indicate significant differences in aortic deviation between the groups (p = 0.62), suggesting comparable effectiveness in aortic remodeling. Conclusions: Performing the distal anastomosis more proximally in Zone 0 offers technical advantages without compromising the effectiveness of aortic remodeling compared to the traditional Zone 2 deployment. This finding supports the continued recommendation of Zone 0 deployment in the management of acute Type A aortic dissections, with ongoing studies being needed to confirm the long-term outcomes and survival benefits.

Unraveling the Enigma of Aortic Dissection: From Genetics to Innovative Therapies.

Aortic dissection (AD) presents a critical medical emergency characterized by a tear in the aortic wall, necessitating prompt recognition and management to mitigate catastrophic complications. Despite advancements in medical technology and therapeutic interventions, AD remains a formidable challenge, often resulting in severe morbidity and mortality. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of AD, encompassing its clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, and management strategies, while also exploring emerging trends and innovations in its management. Genetic predispositions significantly influence AD pathogenesis, with over 30 contributory genes identified, emphasizing the importance of genetic screening and counseling. Classification systems such as Stanford and DeBakey, alongside their revised counterparts, aid in categorizing AD and guiding treatment decisions. Advancements in diagnostic imaging, including transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography angiography, have enhanced diagnostic precision, augmented by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms. Pharmacological innovations focus on optimizing medical therapy, while surgical and endovascular approaches offer minimally invasive treatment options. Hybrid procedures and aortic valve-sparing techniques broaden treatment avenues, while bioresorbable stent grafts hold promise for tissue regeneration. Collaborative efforts and ongoing research are essential to address remaining challenges and improve outcomes in managing AD. This review contributes to the understanding of AD's complexity and facilitates informed decision-making in clinical practice, underscoring the imperative for continued innovation and research in AD management.

Roles of pyroptosis and immune infiltration in aortic dissection.

Introduction: Aortic dissection (AD) is often fatal, and its pathogenesis involves immune infiltration and pyroptosis, though the molecular pathways connecting these processes remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the role of immune infiltration and pyroptosis in AD pathogenesis using bioinformatics analysis. Methods: Two Gene Expression Omnibus datasets and a Gene Cards dataset of pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) were utilized. Immunological infiltration was assessed using CIBERSORT, and AD diagnostic markers were identified through univariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Interaction networks were constructed using STRING, and weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was employed to identify important modules and essential genes. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis determined immune infiltration, and Pearson correlation analysis assessed the association of key genes with infiltrating immune cells. Results: Thirty-one PRGs associated with inflammatory response, vascular epidermal growth factor receptor, and Rap1 signaling pathways were identified. WGCNA revealed seven important genes within a critical module. CIBERSORT detected immune cell infiltration, indicating significant changes in immune cell infiltration and pyroptosis genes in AD and their connections. Discussion: Our findings suggest that key PRGs may serve as indicators for AD or high-risk individuals. Understanding the role of pyroptosis and immune cell infiltration in AD pathogenesis may lead to the development of novel molecular-targeted therapies for AD. Conclusion: This study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying AD pathogenesis, highlighting the importance of immune infiltration and pyroptosis. Identification of diagnostic markers and potential therapeutic targets may improve the management of AD and reduce associated morbidity and mortality.

Comparison of endovascular therapy to medical therapy in the management of aortic dissection

Comparison of endovascular therapy to medical therapy in the management of aortic dissection

Type B Aortic Dissection Management: A Narrative Review of Guidelines and Systematic Reviews.

Surgical or medical treatment for type B or descending aortic dissections with difficult presentation or stable hemodynamics is debatable. This study aimed to review the type B aortic dissection therapy to assess safety and effectiveness. Online databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched for relevant systematic reviews, guidelines, and meta-analysis studies on the management of type B aortic dissection, up to July 2023. The conclusions were qualitatively synthesized. Best medical therapy (BMT], thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR), and open surgeries (OS) were management approaches. Hemodynamics classify type B aortic dissection as complex or simple. Both examples reveal decreased in-hospital all-cause mortality with TAVR than OS. Guidelines recommend TEVAR for difficult situations and OS if it fails. Complication analyses favour TEVAR, however left subclavian artery coverage without revascularization increases stroke risk. Studies show Type B aortic dissection is simpler than TEVAR and BMT. Acute or subacute presentation did not affect reintervention rates between treatments. TEVAR had a greater early stroke risk than BMT but a decreased long-term aortic-related and all-cause mortality. The best data showed no differences in in-hospital mortality or early re-intervention between regimens. BMT reduced early stroke but increased late all-cause death. In conclusion, addressing Type B aortic dissection is complicated, depending on presentation and hemodynamics. TEVAR is best for difficult patients, however BMT and OS also work. TEVAR may reduce in-hospital mortality but increase early stroke risk.

Traumatic Aortic Dissection Management with Stent Graft Placement

Traumatic Aortic Dissection Management with Stent Graft Placement

Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Dissection in a Pediatric Patient With Turner Syndrome: A Simulation.

Aortic dissection is exceedingly rare in the pediatric population. However, it is much more common among children and adolescents with certain underlying syndromes, including Turner syndrome. Furthermore, aortic dissection carries significant mortality without prompt diagnosis and management. Therefore, pediatric emergency providers should know how to recognize and treat pediatric aortic dissection in a patient with Turner syndrome. We designed this simulation for pediatric emergency medicine fellows. A simulated adolescent female patient with a known history of Turner syndrome presents with chest pain, tachycardia, and hypertension. Participants must order and interpret the appropriate diagnostics, diagnose aortic dissection, and manage aortic dissection adequately. This simulation was completed by six pediatric emergency medicine fellows and one pediatric resident. After completing the simulation, six participants (85.7%) provided anonymous feedback on a five-point Likert scale (one = strongly disagree, five = strongly agree). Feedback was positive, and participants agreed that the case content was relevant to their clinical practice and that the event will improve their clinical practice. This simulation encourages participants to recognize and manage pediatric aortic dissection in patients with Turner syndrome. Participants felt that the simulation was relevant and will improve their clinical practice.

Lack of Access to Primary Care Reduces Survival Following Aortic Dissection

Optimal medical management is critical for the long-term treatment of aortic dissections (AD) to prevent complications and improve survival. Medical management is known to be influenced by various social determinants of health (SDOH), including health insurance, social support, distance to the hospital, and primary care provider (PCP) access. This study was designed to determine the relative impact of these different geographic and SDOH factors on the long-term survival of patients after diagnosis and treatment for acute AD. We retrospectively analyzed patients presenting to a single academic tertiary medical center for surgical and medical management of acute AD (types A and B) from January 2010 to December 2020. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, perioperative hospital course, and SDOH factors such as home/social status, primary and secondary insurance status, PCP access following surgery, distance to the hospital, and 2020 Area Deprivation Ondex scores. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the risk-adjusted association between SDOH variables and mortality following acute AD. We identified 124 patients who presented with an acute AD during the study period (25% type A, 25% type B, and 50% with both type A and B components), who were predominantly male (68%) with a mean age of 60 years. Patients resided a median distance of 30.2 miles from the medical center, 18% lived alone, and 9% were uninsured. Roughly one-half of the cohort (52%) was documented to have access to a PCP, and patients with a PCP were significantly more likely to be maintained on antihypertensive (anti-HTN) medication therapy during follow-up (Fig 1). The most common anti-HTN agents were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (56%), followed by beta-blockers (44%), and calcium channel blockers (26%). Over a median follow-up of 14.6 months, 43 patients (35%) died, with reduced survival observed among patients with no PCP access (Fig 2). In risk-adjusted models, increasing age, no PCP access, and lack of insurance were all found to be independent predictors of mortality following acute AD. Further, uninsured patients with no-PCP access or medication use had the highest risk for mortality (hazard ratio, 27.6; 95% confidence interval, 8.95-85.23; P < .001). Lack of access to a PCP and anti-HTN therapy following acute AD significantly increases the risk of short- and long-term mortality. These findings are independent of how far patients live from the hospital or other SDOH factors, highlighting the importance of community outreach programs to maintain medical management for uninsured AD patients.Fig 2Kaplan-Meier survival curves following acute aortic dissection, stratified by whether patients had access to a primary care provider (PCP).View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

National Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Type B Aortic Dissection Management at Safety-Net Hospitals.

Patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) are often underinsured and urgently admitted for open or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The present study evaluated the association of safety-net status with outcomes among patients with TBAD. The 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all adults admitted with type B aortic dissection. Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) were defined as institutions in the top 33% for the annual proportion of uninsured or Medicaid patients. Multivariable regression models were utilized to assess the association of SNH with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost, and non-home discharge. Of an estimated 172 595 patients, 61 000 (35.3%) were managed at SNH. Compared to others, patients admitted to SNH were younger, more commonly non-white, and more frequently non-electively admitted. From 2012 to 2019, the annual incidence of type B aortic dissection increased in the overall cohort. Additionally, utilization of TEVAR at non-SNH increased significantly (2012: 6.5% vs 2019: 9.8%), while that of SNH remained similar (2012: 7.4% vs 2019: 7.9%). Patients undergoing open repair had higher mortality at both SNH (12.4 vs 7.8%, P < .001) and non-SNH (13.1 vs 6.1%, P < .001) compared to those receiving TEVAR. After risk adjustment, compared to non-SNH, SNH status was associated with greater odds of mortality, perioperative complications and non-home discharge. Our finding suggests that SNH have inferior clinical outcomes for TBAD as well as reduced adoption of endovascular management strategies. Future studies to identify barriers to optimal aortic repair and ameliorate disparities at SNH are warranted.

Anaesthesia for vascular emergencies - a state of the art review.

In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the presenting symptoms and management strategies for vascular emergencies. Although vascular emergencies are best treated at a vascular surgical centre, patients may present to any emergency department and may require both immediate management and safe transport to a vascular centre. We describe the surgical and anaesthetic considerations for management of aortic dissection, aortic rupture, carotid endarterectomy, acute limb ischaemia and mesenteric ischaemia. Important issues to consider in aortic dissection are extent of the dissection and surgical need for bypasses in addition to endovascular repair. From an anaesthetist's perspective, aortic dissection requires infrastructure for massive transfusion, smooth management should an endovascular procedure require conversion to an open procedure, haemodynamic manipulation during stent deployment and prevention of spinal cord ischaemia. Principles in management of aortic rupture, whether open or endovascular treatment is chosen, include immediate transfer to a vascular care centre; minimising haemodynamic changes to reduce aortic shear stress; permissive hypotension in the pre-operative period; and initiation of massive transfusion protocol. Carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis is managed with general or regional techniques, and anaesthetists must be prepared to manage haemodynamic, neurological and airway issues peri-operatively. Acute limb ischaemia is a result of embolism, thrombosis, dissection or trauma, and may be treated with open repair or embolectomy, under either general or local anaesthesia. Due to hypercoagulability, there may be higher numbers of acutely ischaemic limbs among patients with COVID-19, which is important to consider in the current pandemic. Mesenteric ischaemia is a rare vascular emergency, but it is challenging to diagnose and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Several peri-operative issues are common to all vascular emergencies: acute renal injury; management of transfusion; need for heparinisation and reversal; and challenging postoperative care. Finally, the important development of endovascular techniques for repair in many vascular emergencies has improved care, and the availability of transoesophageal echocardiography has improved monitoring as well as aids in surgical placement of endovascular grafts and for post-procedural evaluation.

Current Understanding of Aortic Dissection

The aorta is the largest artery in the body, delivering oxygenated blood from the left ventricle to all organs. Dissection of the aorta is a lethal condition caused by a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta, followed by blood loss within the aortic wall and separation of the layers to full dissection. The aorta can be affected by a wide range of causes including acute conditions such as trauma and mechanical damage; and genetic conditions such as arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and connective tissue disorders; all increasing the risk of dissection. Both rapid diagnostic recognition and advanced multidisciplinary treatment are critical in managing aortic dissection patients. The treatment depends on the severity and location of the dissection. Open surgical repair is the gold standard of treatment for dissections located to the proximal part of the aorta and the arch, while endovascular interventions are recommended for most distal or type B aortic dissections. In this review article, we examine the epidemiology, pathophysiology, contemporary diagnoses, and management of aortic dissection.

Chronic Thoracic Aortic Dissection: How to Treat, When to Intervene.

Thoracic aortic dissection (AD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Acute aortic syndrome is the first presentation of the disease in most cases. While acute AD management follows concrete guidelines because of its urgent and life-threatening nature, chronic AD is usually overlooked, although it concerns a wide spectrum of patients surviving an acute event. Acute AD survivors ultimately enter a chronic aortic disease course. Patients with chronic thoracic AD (CTAD) require lifelong surveillance and a proportion of them may present with symptoms and late complications demanding further surgical or endovascular treatment. However, the available data concerning the management of CTAD is sparse in the literature. The management of patients with CTAD is challenging as far as determining the best medical therapy and deciding on intervention are concerned. Until recently, there were no guidelines or recommendations for imaging surveillance in patients with chronic AD. The diagnostic methods for imaging aortic diseases have been improved, while the data on new endovascular and surgical approaches has increased significantly. In this review, we summarize the current evidence in the diagnosis and management of CTAD and the latest recommendations for the surgical/endovascular aortic repair of CTAD.

Aortic Dissection Presenting as a STEMI.

This scenario was developed to educate emergency medicine residents on the presentation and management of a patient with a Stanford type A aortic dissection. Chest pain is one of the most common chief complaints seen in the emergency department with a deadly differential diagnosis list. A "can't miss" diagnosis, aortic dissection occurs when an intimal tear creates a false lumen in the aorta, with a variably reported incidence of approximately 2.5-5 per 100,000 person-years.1 This amounts to an estimated 8,000-16,000 cases per year in the United States with a mortality likely underestimated due to prehospital death ranging from 20-40% within 24 hours and 30-50% at 5 years.2,3,4 There is a reported increase in mortality by 1% for every hour the diagnosis is delayed, and half of diagnoses are made greater than 24 hours after presentation.5 The symptoms can range from chest pain to back pain, abdominal pain or extremity pain, to syncope or isolated neurologic deficits, even to shock or cardiac arrest.6 Aortic dissection is most commonly categorized into two groups: Stanford type A, involving the ascending aorta, and Stanford type B, involving only the descending aorta, and are generally managed surgically vs. medically respectively based on this paradigm.7,8 Stanford type A can be complicated by severe aortic regurgitation, pericardial tamponade or coronary artery occlusion mimicking ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). These potentials make it important to switch from heuristic to analytical thinking when developing a differential diagnosis.9 A high index of suspicion with early recognition and management is critical in this catastrophic disease state, especially given the propensity for complications and a wide variety of presentations. At the conclusion of the simulation session or during the debriefing session, learners will be able to: 1) Verbalize the anatomical differences and management of Stanford type A and type B aortic dissections, 2) Describe physical exam findings that may be found with ascending aortic dissections, 3) Describe the various clinical manifestations of the propagation of aortic dissections, 4) Discuss the management of aortic dissection, including treatment and disposition. This session was conducted using a simulation scenario with a high-fidelity manikin as the patient and confederate/actor in the nursing role, followed by a post-scenario debriefing session on the presentation, differential diagnosis, potential physical exam findings, and management of patients with aortic dissection. Debriefing methods may be left to the discretion of the educators, but the authors have utilized advocacy-inquiry techniques.10 This scenario may also be run as an oral board examination case. The residents are provided an electronic survey at the completion of the debriefing session to anonymously rate different aspects of the simulation, as well as provide qualitative feedback on the scenario. This survey is specific to the local institution's simulation center. Twenty learners completed a feedback form. This session received all 6 and 7 scores (consistently effective/very good and extremely effective/outstanding, respectively) other than one isolated 5 score. The lowest average score was 6.5 for, "Before the simulation, the instructor set the stage for an engaging learning experience," and the highest average score was 6.84 for, "The instructor identified what I did well or poorly - and why." Feedback from the residents was overwhelmingly positive (available upon request). All groups initially gave aspirin upon identification of the STEMI and several gave heparin. Debriefing topics included STEMI mimics, physical exam findings for aortic dissection, imaging and laboratory workup for aortic dissection, blood pressure and heart rate goals and pharmacologic management, uncomplicated STEMI management, and Type I versus Type II decision-making. This is an easily reproducible method for reviewing management of patients with aortic dissection. There are multiple potential presentations and complications of aortic dissections to further customize the experience for learners' needs. While it was discussed during debriefing that heparin administration was unlikely to cause immediate cardiopulmonary arrest, this state was included to reflect downstream hemorrhagic complications that may occur in the setting of antiplatelet administration for acute aortic dissection. Facilitators may choose to omit the arrest at their discretion. Medical simulation, emergency medicine, aortic dissection, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiovascular emergencies, hypertensive emergencies, STEMI mimics, vascular surgery, cardiothoracic surgery.

Prognostic Impact of Blood Pressure Change Patterns on Patients With Aortic Dissection After Admission.

ObjectivesHypertension is a predominant risk factor for aortic dissection (AD), and blood pressure (BP) control plays a vital role in the management of AD. However, the correlation between BP change and the prognosis for AD remains unclear. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of BP change patterns on AD prognosis.MethodsThis retrospective study included AD patients at two institutions (Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the Vascular Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University) between 2004 and 2018. The systolic BP (SBP) change patterns of these patients were analyzed by functional data analysis (FDA). The relationship between BP change patterns and the risk of adverse events (AEs) was assessed using survival analysis.ResultsA total of 458 patients with AD were eligible for analysis. The logistic regression analysis indicated that compared with that in patients with low SBP variation (SBPV), the incidence of AEs in patients with high SBPV was significantly higher (35.84 vs. 20.35%, OR 2.19, P < 0.001). The patients were divided into four categories (accelerating rise, accelerating drop, decelerating rise, and decelerating drop) based on their SBP patterns after FDA fitting. The results of Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that at the 15- and 20-min time points, the incidence of AEs in the decelerating-drop group was significantly lower than that in the accelerating-rise group (OR 0.19, P = 0.031 and OR 0.23, P = 0.050). However, at the 25- and 30-min time points, the difference between these four groups was not significant (OR 0.26, P = 0.08 and OR 0.29, P = 0.10).ConclusionsThis study classified AD patients into four groups according to the SBP change patterns the first 30 min following admission, of which those with accelerating rises in SBP are at the highest risk of AEs, while those with decelerating drops have the best prognosis in the first 24 h after admission. Clinical practitioners may benefit from analyzing patterns of in-hospital SBP.

Ischemic stroke as a comorbidity in a patient with Stanford A aortic dissection: A case report

Background. Aortic dissection is one of the leading causes of death in cardiovascular disease. The clinical course of aortic dissection is often atypical and can mimic a variety of clinical manifestations. Stroke is one of the conditions that can make the management of aortic dissection becoming more complex. Case presentation. A 55-year-old female patient came with complaints of severe chest pain. The patient was diagnosed with Stanford aortic dissection, De Bakey type II, hypertension heart disease, mild mitral regurgitation, mild circumferential pericardial effusion. After the second day of treatment, the patient also complained of sudden slurred speech and weakness on right extremities. The administration of antiplatelet were postponed in consideration of the current patient with aortic dissection. On the 7th day of treatment, the patient experienced a worsening motor strength on the right extremities. We decided to continue antihypertensive therapy on acute phase of ischemic stroke with the consideration that aortic dissection can cause higher mortality. Conclusions. The management of ischemic stroke in a patient with aortic dissection is challenging. In ischemic stroke patient with aortic dissection, anti-hypertensives need to be given to reduce the stress on the aortic wall and prevent expansion of the dissection which has a higher mortality rate.

Partially Resorbable Mesh Inclusion between Dissected Layers during Surgical Repair of Aortic Dissection.

Surgical management of aortic dissection is technically challenging for different reasons. Reapproximation of dissected layers because of fragility of the dissected aortic wall layers is of major concern. Many techniques have been described to restore the integrity of aortic wall. Inclusion of a partially resorbable mesh fixed with glue, between the dissected layers, may be a simple and effective method for providing a secure and viable end-to-end anastomosis between aortic stump and a Dacron graft.