The Shoulders We Stand On and the View From Here: Historiography and Directions for Research NINA E. LERMAN, ARWEN PALMER MOHUN, AND RUTH OLDENZIEL Our approaches to “gender and technology” are unabashedly in terdisciplinary. Scholars studying technology and scholars explicat ing gender systems have provided us with a versatile set of tools for thinking about interactions of gender and technology in historical context. The articles collected in this special issue of Technology and Culture draw not only on the work of scholars within the community of thisjournal, but also on that of gender theorists, gender histori ans, and feminist sociologists ofscience and technology. In this essay we lay out a brief historiography, a map of the work we rely on.1 We gather it as an invitation to others to join and extend a complex conversation. Interdisciplinary exchange is a scholarly strategy more often pre scribed than practiced. Its benefits are easy to recognize: fresh direc tions for research and new techniques for understanding familiar topics. Achieving them can be more difficult, however, requiring struggles with different standards for evidence and different uses Our views of the material presented here have been shaped in myriad discussions with a substantial thought collective, many ofwhom appear in the notes that follow. This essay has benefited from readings and comments by Paul Edwards, Gabrielle Hecht, Christian Gelzer, Carolyn Goldstein, Helen Longino, Steven Lubar, Robert Post, Erik Rau, and John Staudenmaier. We dedicate this essay in thanks to the many foreparents cited here, in gratitude for their support, their example, and their scholarship. ‘Most importantly, we recognize the modern Western bias of this discussion, a bias that reflects both the North American focus of the articles that follow and the Western focus of the scholarship treating gender and technology explicitly. Al though they do not explicitly address questions of gender, we are indebted to Mi chael Adas and Bryan Pfaffenberger for clear arguments about the meanings attached to technology and the ways those meanings construct power relationships. See Michael Adas, Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies ofWestern Dominance (Ithaca, N.Y., 1989); Bryan Pfaffenberger, “Technological Dra mas,” Science, Technology and Human Values 17 (1992): 282-312.© 1997 by the Society for the History of Technology. All rights reserved. 0040-165X/97/3801-0002J01.00 9 10 Nina E. Lerman, Amen Palmer Mohun, and Ruth Oldenziel of language. We caution that moving from prescription to practice requires tolerance: this discussion stands at the confluence ofseveral streams of scholarship, each ofwhich has strengths and weaknesses. For example, feminist sociologists of technology have been very pro ductive in analyzing the relationship between gender and technol ogy in recent years. These studies, most of them ethnographies of contemporary innovations like computers and genetic engineering, tend to pay careful attention to rapid and recent patterns of techno logical change, but to be far less sophisticated in understanding slower-paced transformations in gender ideologies over time. Con versely, researchers studying gender in historical context tend to leave technological issues unexamined, neatly relegated to the “black box” scholars of technology have been at pains to open. His torians of technology, meanwhile, have been sluggish in their atten tion to masculinity as a crucial cultural dimension of the material they have traditionally studied, and reluctant to challenge familiar taxonomies (see the introduction to this volume). In addition to making this conversation possible, a tolerant attitude will reduce the amount of energy spent reinventing wheels: the existing scholarship is rich if diverse, and fragmented more now by academic divisions than by neglect of subject matter. Because of this diversity, the histo riographic discussion below is followed by a topical treatment of more recent work. The Shoulders We Stand On: Early Work on Women, Gender, and Technology To discuss early work in women, gender, and technology is to dis cuss work in the history of technology, in women’s history, and in the philosophy of science. The interdisciplinarity of this conversa tion has a long history, or rather several long histories, which con verge at important points. One of the great strengths of the Society for the History of Tech nology, and of this journal, has been a willingness to...
Read full abstract