Major Trauma Centre Research Articles

FIBULAR NAILS: IS THIS THE ANSWER TO ANKLE FRACTURE FIXATION?

IntroductionPositive reports from implant designer centres on the use of fibular nails in the complex ankle fractures has resulted in a marked increase in their use nationally. Our aim in this study was to report on the outcomes of the use of all fibular nails in two major trauma centres.MethodsAll patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation using a fibular nail in two major trauma centres, were included for analysis. MTC 1 included patients from April 2013 to May 2015, and MTC 2 included patients February 2015 to March 2018. A minimum follow up of 1 year was achieved for all patients. Radiographic reduction was confirmed by Pettrones criteria at time of operation and at 6 weeks and 1 year post-operatively. Kellgren Lawrence radiographic criteria was used to classify osteoarthritis. All complications and further surgery were recorded.ResultsForty-four patients underwent fibular nail fixation in the two centres. The average age was 59 (range 21–91). Using Pettrones criteria, 86% were malreduced at time of operation. A further 34% deteriorated by at least 1 grade by 6 weeks and an additional 16% (n=7) deteriorated by at least 1 grade by 1 year. 57% had developed radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis by 1 year. Only 4.5% (2ankles) maintained complete reduction by 1 year. Other significant complications were reported in 43% of patients.ConclusionBoth major trauma centres report the same experience in the use of fibular nails for ankle fracture fixation. As previously reported in smaller number studies, initial reduction is challenging. Worryingly, the majority of well-reduced lose position with time. We suggest that the fibula nail is used with caution and as part of an appropriately approved audit.

Digital health interventions for remote follow-up after mild traumatic brain injury

Background After a mild traumatic brain injury (mild TBI,) a significant number of patients may experience persistent symptoms and disabilities for months to years. Early identification and timely management of persistent symptoms may help to reduce the long-term impacts of mild TBIs. There is currently no formalised method for identifying patients with persistent symptoms after mild TBI once they are discharged from emergency department. Objective Assess the feasibility of a remote monitoring tool for early identification of persistent symptoms after mild TBI in the outpatient setting using digital tools. Methods Electronic surveys were sent to patients with mild TBI who presented to the emergency department at a Major Trauma Centre in England. The surveys were completed at three different timepoints (within days of injury (S1), 1 month (S2), and 3 months (S3) after injury). The indicators used to assess feasibility were engagement, number of eligible patients for follow-up evidence of need for the intervention, and consistency with the literature. Feedback was sought from participants. Results Of the 200 people invited to participate, 134 (67.0%) completed S1, 115 (57.5%) completed S2, and 95 (47.5%) completed S3. The rates of persistent symptoms ranged from 17.9%–62.6% depending on the criteria used, and we found a significant proportion of the participants experienced morbidity 1 and 3 months after injury. The electronic follow-up tool was deemed an acceptable and user-friendly method for service delivery by participants. Conclusion Using digital tools to monitor and screen mild TBI patients for persistent symptoms is feasible. This could be a scalable, cost-effective, and convenient solution which could improve access to healthcare and reduce healthcare inequalities. This could enable early identification of patients with further medical needs and facilitate timely intervention to improve the clinical workflows, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes for people with persistent morbidities after mild TBIs.

The Use of the Taylor Spatial Frame in Treating Tibial Osteomyelitis Following Traumatic Tibial Fracture.

Tibial osteomyelitis can follow open fractures with bacteria colonising the wound and persisting through biofilm and sequestrum formation. The treatment is complex, requiring eradication through debridement before limb reconstruction, for which the Taylor spatial frame (TSF) is one option. This study evaluates patient outcomes after reconstruction and identifies factors associated with post-operative complications. Fifty-one cases of tibial osteomyelitis were treated by the Ilizarov technique from 2015 to 2021 at a major trauma centre. Bacterial samples and treatment factors were assessed. Patient outcomes were complication rates and time to bony union. Complications were expressed as odds-ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Linear regression was used to assess factors associated with time to union. The mean follow-up was 24.1 months with the mean time to radiological union being 11 months. Post-operative complications were noted in 76.5% of patients with pin-site infections most common (52.9%), followed by fracture malunion (29.4%). Smoking was associated with increased fracture malunion (OR = 4.148, 95% confidence Interval [1.13-15.18], p = 0.031). The time to union was positively associated with complications, age and time to full weight-bearing (FWB). All other measured factors were found not significant. Tibial osteomyelitis is treated reliably by debridement and reconstruction using the Ilizarov technique using a TSF application. The most common complication was pin-site infection. Optimising patients through cessation of smoking and encouraging post-operative weight-bearing can reduce the complication rate and improve time to union. The Ilizarov technique using a TSF can treat significant deformities that result from the management of tibial osteomyelitis. Geetala R, Zhang J, Maghsoudi D, et al. The Use of the Taylor Spatial Frame in Treating Tibial Osteomyelitis Following Traumatic Tibial Fracture. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):32-35.

IMPACT OF REGIONALIZATION OF MAJOR TRAUMA SERVICES ON HIP FRACTURE CARE IN ENGLAND: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Following the establishment of regional Major Trauma Networks in England in 2012, there were concerns that pressures regarding resource allocation in Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) may have a detrimental impact on the care of patients with hip fractures in these hospitals. This study aimed to compare outcomes in hip fracture care between MTCs and trauma units (TUs).National Hip Fracture Database data was extracted from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2022 for all hospitals in England. Outcome measures included perioperative medical and physiotherapy assessments, time to surgery, consultant supervision in theatre, Best Practice Tariff (BPT) compliance, discharge to original residence, and mortality. Data was pooled and weighted for MTCs and remaining hospitals (TUs).A total of 487,089 patients with hip fractures were included from 167 hospitals (23 MTCs and 144 TUs). MTCs achieved marginally higher rates of orthogeriatrician assessment within 72 hours of admission (91.1% vs 90.4%, p<0.001) and mobilisation out of bed by first postoperative day (81.9% vs 79.7%, p<0.001). A lower proportion of patients underwent surgery by the day after admission in MTCs (65.2% vs 69.7%, p<0.001). However, there was significantly higher consultant surgeon and anaesthetist supervision rates during surgery in MTCs (71.8% vs 61.6%, p<0.001). There was poorer compliance with BPT criteria in MTCs (57.3% vs 60.4%, p<0.001), and proportionately fewer MTC patients were discharged to their original residence (63.5% vs 60.4%, p<0.001). There was no difference between MTCs and TUs in 30-day mortality (6.8% vs 6.8%, p=0.825).This study demonstrates that MTCs have greater difficulty in providing prompt surgery to hip fracture patients. However, their marginally superior perioperative care outcomes appear to compensate for this, as their mortality rates are similar to TUs. These findings suggest that the regionalisation of major trauma in England has not significantly compromised the overall care of hip fracture patients.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Bicycle-Related Injuries Managed at a Level 1 Major Trauma Center in London, United Kingdom.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic changed peoples' travel behaviors; an uptake in cycling was observed in the United Kingdom. The aim of this study was to assess the cycling-related orthopedic injuries presented to a major trauma center (MTC) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method This retrospective observational single-center study analyzed referrals to the orthopedic department during a matched two-month period in 2019 and 2020. Data were collated on cycling-related injuries including demographic variables, mechanism of injury, anatomical area of injury, and the management of injury. The data were compared and statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson Chi-squared test to assess for significance. Results A total of 2409 patients were referred to the orthopedic department with injuries. A 35.6% decrease in total referrals was made during the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis of cycling-specific injuries demonstrated a statistically significant increase in referrals to the orthopedic department during the COVID-19 pandemic. A statistically significant difference in upper limb trauma was also observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patterns of management, namely operative vs. non-operative management, did not demonstrate a difference in the two time periods. Discussion This study highlights that during the COVID-19 pandemic, cycling behavior changed with more patients suffering orthopedic injuries as a result. Orthopedic departments may need to plan for this change in behaviors with more capacity being created to manage the demand. Conclusion Cycling-related injuries referred to the orthopedic department increased during the pandemic.

P19. Intimate Partner Violence among Plastic Surgery Patients: A Single Institution Experience at Two Major Trauma Centers

P19. Intimate Partner Violence among Plastic Surgery Patients: A Single Institution Experience at Two Major Trauma Centers

E-scooter-related dental injuries: a two-year retrospective review.

Introduction In June 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) published guidance on electric scooter (e-scooter) use to ease transport congestion and reduce pollution. This study aims to examine dental injuries sustained during the two years following initiation of the trial.Methods The research was conducted at a UK, Level 1, supra-regional major trauma centre. All eligible patient records were analysed to identify e-scooter-related dental injuries to the following regions: teeth, periodontium, alveolus, palate, tongue, floor of mouth, frenum, buccal mucosa and lips. To assess significant associations between recorded variables, a Pearson's chi-square test was utilised.Results Of the 32 patients who experienced a total of 71 dental injuries, 46.5% (n = 33) affected teeth, predominantly upper central incisors (n = 17). 'Lacerations' (n = 32) and 'lips' (n = 30) were the most common type and site of soft tissue injuries, respectively. Unprovoked falls by riders accounted for 53.1% (n = 17) of the injuries. There was an overall increase in e-scooter-related dental injuries throughout the two-year period.Conclusion E-scooters have introduced an additional source of dental trauma. It is imperative health care professionals can also identify signs of head and non-dental injuries when managing such patients. Further studies are warranted allowing for better informed and optimised dental public health interventions.

Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures.

Grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures are challenging to treat and controversy exists on whether to treat them with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a circular frame (CF). This study aims to compare outcomes for intramedullary nail and circular frame in the treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures. Retrospective study at a major trauma center of all patients admitted with a grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture between January 2016 and January 2022. The primary outcome measures were major complications: non-union, malunion, refracture, DBI and amputation. Secondary outcome measures were time to union and reoperation rates. Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 32 patients in CF group and 23 patients in IMN group. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics of patients in both groups. Major complications were recorded in 13 limbs (54%) in IMN group and in 18 limbs (56%) in CF group which were not statistically significant (p = 0.797). Deep bone infection rates were noted in 4 (12.5%) in the CF group, compared to 1 (4%) in IMN group; however, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.240). Amputation rates as a result of infected non-unions were seen in 1 limb (4%) in IMN group and 2 limbs (6%) in CF group (p = 0.99). Median time to union was significantly shorter in IMN group at 30weeks compared to 30weeks for CF group (p = 0.04). IMN should be the treatment of choice in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture, but CF should be considered for delayed treatment and in patients with bone loss.

DO ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA SOCIETY (OTS) SIMPLE FRACTURES RECEIVE A DIFFERENT STANDARD OF TREATMENT TO OTS COMPLEX FRACTURES?

IntroductionOpen fractures of the tibia are disabling injuries with a significant risk of deep infection. Treatment involves early antibiotic administration, early and aggressive surgical debridement, and may require complex soft tissue coverage techniques. The extent of disruption to the skin and soft-tissue envelope often varies, with ‘simple’ open fractures (defined by the Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS) open fracture severity classification) able to be closed primarily, whilst others may require shortening or soft-tissue reconstruction. This study aimed to determine whether OTS simple tibial open fractures received different rates of adequate debridement and plastic surgical presence at initial debridement, compared with OTS complex injuries, and whether rates of fracture-related infection, nonunion, or reoperation differed between the groups.Materials & MethodsA consecutive series of open tibia fractures managed at a tertiary UK Major Trauma Centre between January 2021 and November 2022 were included. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, timing of antibiotic delivery, timing and method of definitive fixation, and frequency of plastic surgical presence at initial debridement were retrospectively collected. The delivery of bone ends at initial debridement was used as a proxy for adequacy of surgical debridement. The primary outcome measure was rate of fracture-related infection, secondary outcomes included rates of reoperation, nonunion, and amputation. Chi2 Tests and independent samples T-tests were used to assess nominal and continuous outcomes respectively between simple and complex injuries. Ordinal data was assessed using nonparametric equivalent tests.Results79 patients with open fractures of the tibia were included. 70.8% of patients were male, with mean age 50.4 years (SD 19.2) and BMI 26.4 Kg/m2 (SD 6.0). Injuries were mostly sustained by low-energy falls (n = 28, 35.4%) and from road traffic accidents (n = 26, 32.9%). 27 (34.2%) were OTS simple open fractures. Simple open fractures were most commonly Gustillo-Anderson grade 1 (38.5%), or 2 (30.8%), whilst complex open fractures were mostly grade 3B (66.7%) (p < 0.001). Fracture-related infection rates in OTS simple and complex open fractures were 25.9% and 25.5% respectively (p = 0.967), and nonunion rates were 32% and 37.8% (p = 0.637). Primary amputation was less common in simple (0%) than in complex open fractures (20%, p = 0.012), there were no differences in delayed amputation rates (7.4% and 6% respectively, p = 0.811). Simple open fractures were less likely to have plastic surgeons present at initial debridement compared to complex open fractures (18.5% and 44%, p = 0.025), and less likely to have bone ends delivered through the skin at initial debridement (25.9% and 61.2%, p = 0.003). There were no differences in patient age, delays to antibiotic administration, or reoperation rates between OTS simple and OTS complex fractures (p > 0.05).ConclusionsDespite involving less significant soft tissue injury, OTS simple open tibia fractures had comparable deep infection and nonunion rates to complex fractures and received early plastic surgical input and adequate debridement less frequently. The severity of open fractures with less significant soft tissue injury may be underrecognized and therefore undertreated, although further prospective study is needed.

Hyperkalaemia in bleeding trauma patients: A potential marker of disease severity – A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundHyperkalaemia is a common electrolyte abnormality seen in critically ill patients. In haemorrhagic shock, it may contribute to cardiac arrest and has been identified as a potential marker for tissue hypoxia. However, the significance of its role in haemorrhagic shock and its contribution to mortality remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the potential underlying pathophysiology and evaluate the incidence and characteristics of patients with hyperkalaemia on hospital arrival in bleeding trauma patients before transfusions and its mortality. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients with traumatic bleeding admitted to a European Major Trauma Centre between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were classified according to their serum potassium levels on arrival, and relevant clinical parameters between non-hyperkalaemic and hyperkalaemic patients were compared. ResultsAmong the 83 patients in this study, 8 (9.6 %) presented with hyperkalaemia on arrival. The median shock index showed a higher tendency in the hyperkalaemic group. Hyperkalaemia was found to be more common among younger patients who sustained penetrating trauma. Mortality rates were higher in the hyperkalaemic group, but the difference was not statistically significant. ConclusionOur results suggest that hyperkalaemia occurs frequently in bleeding trauma patients on hospital arrival pre-transfusions, indicating a more severe illness. Our findings provide insights into the pathophysiology and characteristics of hyperkalaemia in bleeding trauma patients. Further studies are required to investigate the mechanisms by which hyperkalaemia contributes to mortality in haemorrhagic shock patients.

ARE NEUROVASCULAR CHARTS APPROPRIATE FOR DIAGNOSING COMPARTMENT SYNDROME?

IntroductionCompartment syndrome can be a life changing consequence of injury to a limb. If not diagnosed and treated early it can lead to permanent disability. Neurovascular observations done on the ward by nursing staff, are often our early warning system to those developing compartment syndrome. But are these adequate for detecting the early signs of compartment syndrome? Our aim was to compare the quality and variability of charts across the UK major trauma network.Materials & MethodsAll major trauma centres in England and Scotland were invited to supply a copy of the neurovascular chart routinely used. We assessed how such charts record relevant information. Specific primary data points included were pain scores, analgesia requirements, pain on passive stretch and decreased sensation in the first web space specifically. As secondary objectives, we assessed how late signs were recorded, whether clear instructions were included, quantitative scores and the use of regional blocks recorded.ResultsA response rate of 46% was achieved. Of the charts reviewed, 25% documented pain scores or pain on passive movement. Pain on movement and analgesia requirements were documented in 33% and 8% respectively. Specific sensation within the 1st webspace was recorded in 16%. No charts recorded use of regional block. All charts recorded global sensation, movement (unspecified), pulse and colour whilst 66% documented capillary refill and 83% temperature. Instructions were included in 41% of charts.ConclusionsIn 2016, the BOA supported publication of an observation chart for this purpose however, it is not widely used. In our study, late signs of compartment syndrome were generally well recorded. However, documentation of early signs and regional blocks was poor. This may lead to delays in diagnosis with significant clinical and medicolegal consequences. Standardisation of documentation by updating and promoting the use of the pre-existing chart would ensure highest quality care across the network.

PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES AFTER OPEN LOWER LIMB FRACTURE REPAIR

IntroductionOpen fractures are complex injuries associated with substantial morbidity. These injuries are associated with harm to both physical and emotional health as well as preclusion of work, social, and leisure activities. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health related quality of life are critical indicators of successful rehabilitation following open fracture treatment. This study aimed to measure the PROMs for patients with open lower limb fractures and investigate the relationship with injury severity.Materials & MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed at a single major trauma centre in the UK. All adult patients with an open lower limb fracture were eligible for inclusion. Patients were identified through a search of a local Open Fracture Database. Epidemiological, clinical, and fracture classification data were obtained by reviewing case notes. Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) and EQ5-D were used as PROMs and measured by a postal questionnaire, alongside return to employment data.ResultsA total of 73 patients responded to the questionnaire. Median LEFS was 42 (IQR 26.5 – 59.5), and median EQ5-D was 0.69 (IQR 0.48 – 0.89). There was no significant association between open fracture classification and PROMs. Over 40% of patients reported a change in employment due to their injury. Those who changed jobs had a statistically significant reduction in the EQ5-D of 0.12 (p = 0.021); no significant difference existed in LEFS.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the devastating functional impact of open fractures. This cohort of open injuries reported lower functional and quality-of-life measures compared to population norms. Injury classification was not a valuable predictor of PROMs. A substantial proportion of patients were forced to change employment due to their injury, and these patients reported a significantly lower quality of life. Further work is required to understand the factors contributing to open fracture PROMs.

Safety of tranexamic acid in surgically treated isolated spine trauma.

Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic antifibrinolytic drug, effectively reduces blood loss by inhibiting plasmin-induced fibrin breakdown. This is the first study in the United Kingdom to investigate the effectiveness of TXA in the surgical management of isolated spine trauma. To assess the safety of TXA in isolated spine trauma. The primary and secondary outcomes are to assess the rate of thromboembolic events and to evaluate blood loss and the incidence of blood transfusion, respectively. This prospective observational study included patients aged ≥ 17 years with isolated spine trauma requiring surgical intervention over a 6-month period at two major trauma centers in the United Kingdom. We identified 67 patients: 26 (39%) and 41 (61%) received and did not receive TXA, respectively. Both groups were matched in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and mechanism of injury. A higher proportion of patients who received TXA had a subaxial cervical spine injury classification or thoracolumbar injury classification score > 4 (74% vs 56%). All patients in the TXA group underwent an open approach with a mean of 5 spinal levels involved and an average operative time of 203 min, compared with 24 patients (58%) in the non-TXA group who underwent an open approach with an average of 3 spinal levels involved and a mean operative time of 159 min. Among patients who received TXA, blood loss was < 150 and 150-300 mL in 8 (31%) and 15 (58%) patients, respectively. There were no cases of thromboembolic events in any patient who received TXA. Our study demonstrated that TXA is safe for isolated spine trauma. It is challenging to determine whether TXA effectively reduces blood loss because most surgeons prefer TXA for open or multilevel cases. Further, larger studies are necessary to explore the rate, dosage, and mode of administration of TXA.

Traumatic Native Hip Dislocations: An Audit at a Major Trauma Centre and Assessment of Clinical Practice at Centres Across the United Kingdom.

Native hip dislocations are defined as traumatic dislocations of the hip, typically high-energy and associated with polytrauma. The majority of these injuries occur following motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). Due to the inherent stability of the hip joint, a significant force is required to cause dislocation. It is critical that such injuries are managed and reduced in a timely manner. We evaluated the current practice in a major trauma centre (MTC) in Cardiff and gathered information from emergency departments (EDs) in Wales and MTCs around the United Kingdom (UK). We did an evaluation of the current practice with a retrospective audit of all traumatic native hip dislocations presenting to the MTC at Cardiff from August 2018 to February 2021. Data was obtained from Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN), medical records, radiology and theatre management systems. An online survey was developed and disseminated to EDs in Wales and MTCs across the UK. There were 15 traumatic hip dislocation cases over the period evaluated. Sixty percentof cases were due to MVA. Eighty-six percent of patients had an associated fracture, with one Pipkin type IV fracture dislocation. The mean time to reduction from injury was 532 minutes (240-804 minutes), with 28.6% reduced within 6 hours and 71.4% reduced within 12 hours. Two patients had reduction performed in the ED (mean time to reduction, 275 minutes). There was one occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN) and one of chondrolysis at the follow-up. The response rate to the survey was 80% and 83% in Wales and MTCs nationally, respectively. The majority (82%) of departments did not have an established pathway in place for managing traumatic native hip dislocations with a preference for reduction in the operating theatre. Native hip dislocations are rare, high-energy injuries associated with significant morbidity. The available evidence suggests time to reduction is imperative in reducing the risk of future complications. The establishment of a pathway to guide management and having a mechanism to perform reductions in the ED may produce significant reductions in this time, impacting outcomes.

Understanding patients’ perspectives of clinical communication within a Major Trauma Centre

Clinical communication between major trauma patients (MTP) and healthcare professionals is extremely complex. Multiple demands are placed on specialist multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) and patients in all stages of treatment. Patient-staff clinical communication has an integral role in MTP healthcare experiences, supporting them with a range of physical and psychological difficulties post-injury. This study aimed to understand MTP perspectives of clinical communication within a MTC through qualitative semi-structured interviews. Twenty participants were purposively sampled from an outpatient follow-up clinic and interviews were analysed using a pluralistic qualitative approach. Three themes were conceptualised from the data; “Challenges to speaking up” “Conversations left me feeling” and “Strategies need to be clinical but tailored”. Patients often found it challenging to speak up due to feelings of vulnerability, confusion, and challenges navigating medical terminology. Patients spoke of not wanting to burden staff and family members playing a role in patient-staff communication, but these challenges require further exploration. Patients highlighted the positive (feel reassured, cared for, and human again) and negative (feeling like an object, angry, confused, and dependent) emotional impact of staff communication. Patients also described the benefits of being provided with written information, clear explanations of injuries and person-centred communication. MTP require multiple options to communicate and address psychological difficulties. Greater training on the emotional impact of conversations, skills to respond to psychological distress and communication guidance for staff, is needed to improve clinical communication with MTP.

National variation in guidance for the management of pregnant women presenting with major trauma.

The initial assessment of pregnant women presenting with significant injuries is more complicated than that of non-pregnant women because of physiological and anatomical changes, and the presence of the fetus. The aim of this study was to determine whether guidelines for the early management of severely injured pregnant women exist, which aspects of assessment/management they cover and to what extent there is national consistency. A freedom of information request was submitted to 125 acute National Health Service trusts in England and six in Wales. The trusts were asked to confirm whether they have a guideline for the management of major trauma in pregnant women presenting to the emergency department and what the guidelines were. In total, 96.2% of trusts responded, of which 19% have a specific guideline and 7.9% have a generic guideline for assessing pregnant women in the emergency department, irrespective of injury severity. Of the responding trusts, 19.8% have a protocol that specifies when an obstetric trauma call should be put out by the emergency department and when a pregnant woman should be transferred to a major trauma centre for definitive management. Our results found that 69.8% routinely call obstetrics or gynaecology to the trauma call compared with 36.5% calling paediatrics. The heterogeneity evident across trusts necessitates the establishment of national guidelines for the assessment of pregnant women with major trauma to standardise communication and delivery of care.

Development and validation of a trauma frailty scale in severely injured patients: the Nottingham Trauma Frailty Index.

Frailty greatly increases the risk of adverse outcome of trauma in older people. Frailty detection tools appear to be unsuitable for use in traumatically injured older patients. We therefore aimed to develop a method for detecting frailty in older people sustaining trauma using routinely collected clinical data. We analyzed prospectively collected registry data from 2,108 patients aged ≥ 65 years who were admitted to a single major trauma centre over five years (1 October 2015 to 31 July 2020). We divided the sample equally into two, creating derivation and validation samples. In the derivation sample, we performed univariate analyses followed by multivariate regression, starting with 27 clinical variables in the registry to predict Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS; range 1 to 9) scores. Bland-Altman analyses were performed in the validation cohort to evaluate any biases between the Nottingham Trauma Frailty Index (NTFI) and the CFS. In the derivation cohort, five of the 27 variables were strongly predictive of the CFS (regression coefficient B = 6.383 (95% confidence interval 5.03 to 7.74), p < 0.001): age, Abbreviated Mental Test score, admission haemoglobin concentration (g/l), pre-admission mobility (needs assistance or not), and mechanism of injury (falls from standing height). In the validation cohort, there was strong agreement between the NTFI and the CFS (mean difference 0.02) with no apparent systematic bias. We have developed a clinically applicable tool using easily and routinely measured physiological and functional parameters, which clinicians and researchers can use to guide patient care and to stratify the analysis of quality improvement and research projects.

The Epidemiology of Lower Limb Fractures: A Major United Kingdom (UK) Trauma Centre Study.

Understanding the epidemiology and incidence of fractures can help inform policymakers and clinicians about the needs of the population and highlight trends over time, allowing for tailoring of healthcare delivery to the population. This study reports on the lower limb fractures treated at a major trauma centre over a seven-year period. We collected data on fracture locations, age, gender, BMI, hospital admission length, and treatment options of all lower limb fractures treated at a level I trauma centre from January 2015 to December 2021. We included data on the femur, tibia, and fibula, which were each split up into distinct regions.Fractures were subdivided by location and graphed, separated by gender, over age group. Finally, each location area's frequency was graphed over the entire study period. A total of 8,511 patients sustained 8,613 fractures, given an overall incidence of 215.9 fractures per 100,000 patients per year. The mean age was 62.3 years, and 56.3% of patients were female. Fractures of the peri trochanteric region of the femur had the highest mean average age (79.9 years), which was closely followed by fractures of the head and neck of the femur (78.2 years). Fractures of the head and neck of the femur and the peri trochanteric region of the femur also had the highest proportion of females suffering from these fractures (67 and 66% female, respectively). Femur shaft fractures had the lowest average age (36.5 years) and the lowest proportion of female patients (29%). On graphing by location, separated by gender, over age group, overall fractures showed a bi-peak distribution of younger males and older, post-menopausal females having their respective peaks. Three further distinct distributions were observed in individual location fractures. Identifying the relative incidence and demographic associations with lower limb fractures helps highlight a changing population's needs. There is an absence of such study in literature in the United Kingdom (UK) since 2006. Our study's insights and results aid clinicians and policymakers in the creation of guidelines and the distribution of resources based on the most recent information and elucidate changing healthcare service needs for the population.

Factors Affecting Upper Limb Fracture Opioid Requirements.

Introduction Understanding the differentopioid pain relief requirements between patients withupper limb fractures can be useful in forming specific evidence-based guidelines and balancing patient-clinician prescribing discussions with opioid stewardship. We investigated the predictors for opioid requirements in upper limb fractures. Methods We retrospectively investigated all upper limb fractures from the shoulder to the wrist treated at a major trauma center from January 2015 to January 2022. The data collected consisted of fracture location, demographics, comorbidities, and management options. Post-injury opioid prescriptions in the first post-injury year were calculated every month up to six months and then grouped from the seventh to the 12th month and converted to morphine milligramequivalents (MMEs). We then calculated days requiring at least one medication (representing the "coverage")and relative "strength" in each time period. Results Six thousand four hundred thirteen patients sustaining a combined 9125 fractures were included in the study, with an MME mean of 436. Fracture locations of the scapula, proximal humerus, humeral shaft, distal humerus, and proximal ulnaall had significantly higher MME requirements (p<0.05) at the one-year level. The radius shaft and distal radius had significantly lower MME requirements (p<0.05). The patients with depression, diabetes, drug abuse history, obesity, pulmonary circulatory disorder, and rheumatological conditions required higher strength of opioids at the one-year level (p<0.05). The patients with chronic kidney disease, depression, pulmonary circulation disorder, and rheumatological conditions required higher coverage of opioids at the one-year level (p<0.05). Conclusion Our study presents a high-resolution breakdown of the post-injuryopioid requirements for patients with upper limb injuries. Fractures of the scapula, proximal humerus, and shaft of the humerus were associated with increases in both opioid strength and coverage.Depression, pulmonary disease, and rheumatological conditions were all associated with increased opioid strength and coverage.This provides a framework for which clinicians and patients can more accurately anticipate the course of the rehabilitation journeyand risk stratify appropriately at the outset of injury.

O65: Extremity Trauma in the UK (UK): Vascular Interventions and Surgery in Trauma Audit (VISTA)

Abstract Background Extremity injury is the commonest form of vascular trauma but currently there is no national surgical surveillance of operative management and amputation rates. Vascular injury impacts both the young and elderly, with time critical, trauma specific intervention key for limb salvage. Methods Subgroup analysis of a six-month multicentre, prospective audit of vascular injuries to examine procedures for extremity vascular trauma at 27 UK Major Trauma Centres conducted by the National Trauma Research &amp; Innovation Collaborative and Vascular &amp; Endovascular Research Network. Results There were 153 extremity vascular injuries (n=120 patients: 66 upper limb, 81 lower limb) with 92 primary interventions performed (n=86 open: primary repair, bypass or ligation vs. n=6 endovascular). The median age of operated patients was 36 (IQR: 22.5 - 52) years and 74% were male. 51% of injuries operated upon were secondary to blunt trauma with concomitant orthopaedic injury in 33%. Median time to intervention was 169 (IQR: 112 - 371) minutes with a consultant vascular surgeon present in 84% of cases. Overall, there were n=16 amputations: 7% primary and 11% secondary in operative cases. The median age for amputation was 41.5 (IQR: 36 - 52) years. Conclusion Extremity vascular interventions, regardless of aetiology, require national surveillance to assess outcomes and identify targets for improved limb salvage across all UK vascular and trauma networks.