FIBULAR NAILS: IS THIS THE ANSWER TO ANKLE FRACTURE FIXATION?

Abstract

IntroductionPositive reports from implant designer centres on the use of fibular nails in the complex ankle fractures has resulted in a marked increase in their use nationally. Our aim in this study was to report on the outcomes of the use of all fibular nails in two major trauma centres.MethodsAll patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation using a fibular nail in two major trauma centres, were included for analysis. MTC 1 included patients from April 2013 to May 2015, and MTC 2 included patients February 2015 to March 2018. A minimum follow up of 1 year was achieved for all patients. Radiographic reduction was confirmed by Pettrones criteria at time of operation and at 6 weeks and 1 year post-operatively. Kellgren Lawrence radiographic criteria was used to classify osteoarthritis. All complications and further surgery were recorded.ResultsForty-four patients underwent fibular nail fixation in the two centres. The average age was 59 (range 21–91). Using Pettrones criteria, 86% were malreduced at time of operation. A further 34% deteriorated by at least 1 grade by 6 weeks and an additional 16% (n=7) deteriorated by at least 1 grade by 1 year. 57% had developed radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis by 1 year. Only 4.5% (2ankles) maintained complete reduction by 1 year. Other significant complications were reported in 43% of patients.ConclusionBoth major trauma centres report the same experience in the use of fibular nails for ankle fracture fixation. As previously reported in smaller number studies, initial reduction is challenging. Worryingly, the majority of well-reduced lose position with time. We suggest that the fibula nail is used with caution and as part of an appropriately approved audit.