Major Surgery Research Articles

Undetected heart failure in tertiary care: prevalence, predictors and outcomes

Abstract Background Undetected heart failure (HF) seems to be unexpectedly common in primary care. We hypothesized that undetected HF may also be common in tertiary care, even in care pathways including cardiologists. Methods We assessed prevalence, predictors, and outcome of undetected HF in a large prospective cohort study enrolling patients referred for myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography (MPI-SPECT) with central adjudication of HF according to guidelines. Findings were validated in two independent prospective cohorts (outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program, major noncardiac surgery). Prevalence of undetected HF, ratio of undetected HF to known HF and number needed to screen (NNS) were the primary endpoints. Results Among 3623 patients, median age 68 years, 31% women. 100 patients (3%) had known HF and 928 patients (25.6%) were adjudicated to have undetected HF, resulting in a ratio of undetected to known HF of 9.3-to-1 and a NNS of 2.8. Older age, atrial fibrillation, and previous pacemaker implantation were strong independent predictors of undetected HF. Patients with undetected HF were at significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.47 [95%CI, 1.17-1.85] versus no HF). These findings were confirmed in both validation cohorts: among 970 and 1563 patients the prevalence of undetected HF was 21.5% and 19%, ratio of undetected HF to known HF 0.7-to-1 and 2.8-to-1, NNS 2.2 and 3.7, respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of undetected HF is high also in tertiary care, even higher with older age, atrial fibrillation, and previous pacemaker implantation, and associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization.Prevalence of undetected HFKaplan-Meier cumulative incidence curves

Unraveling anesthetic challenges of a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy posted for lower limb amputation surgery -A case report

This case report details the anesthetic management of a 64-year-old male with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and a significantly reduced ejection fraction, undergoing lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease. Managing anesthesia in such patients poses considerable challenges due to the complexities associated with congestive heart failure. The successful administration of general anesthesia in this case can be attributed to a rigorous preoperative assessment and a meticulously devised anesthetic plan. The systematic approach included careful monitoring, fluid management, and the use of specific anesthetic agents that minimize cardiovascular stress, thereby ensuring an uneventful anesthetic course. This report emphasizes the importance of strategic planning and expert execution in the anesthesia management of patients with severe cardiomyopathy undergoing major surgical procedures.

Effect of Propofol and Isoflurane on Hemodynamic changes during Spinal Surgery Under General Anesthesia

Background: Hemodynamic stability are vital requirements of up-to-date anesthesia. Both propofol and isoflurane meet these criteria though the clinical effects like postoperative nausea vomiting after administering propofol and isoflurane have been studied in various surgeries but have not been much evaluated or studied in patients undergoing major surgical procedures like spine surgeries, There’ is definite advantage of one technique over the other. Isoflurane has a low blood gas partition coefficient, which contributes to rapid induction and emergence from anaesthesia than with other volatile anesthetics in current clinical use. Propofol has been established as the intravenous agent that provides faster and smoother recovery & peri operative hemodynamic stability. Objective: To compare the effects of isoflurane and propofol regarding hemodynamic status in spinal surgery under general anaesthesia. Methods: After getting ethical approval, a randomized controlled trial study design was performed where patients were selected in the pre-anesthetic checkup room based on inclusion and exclusion criteria for those who were scheduled for spine surgeries under general anesthesia is admitted in the Department of Neurosurgery in East West Medical College from January 2023 – December 2024. A total number of 40 patients were selected. 20 patients were enrolled each in group A and group B by lottery method in a sealed envelope. They were divided into two groups by randomization; Group A and Group B. A written informed consent was taken from all selected patients. Patients were advised to fast for at least 8 hours before intervention. In Group A, anesthesia is maintained with propofol infusion, nitrous oxide (66%), and oxygen (33%) while in Group B, anesthesia is maintained with Isoflurane, nitrous oxide (66%), and oxygen (33%). All patients were given N2O in oxygen and 1.25% inspired concentration of Isoflurane (MAC -1.15). In Group A propofol infusion at rate of 80 μg/kg/min (fixed from the beginning). All data was collected at –Just after starting, 15 minutes, 30-minute, 1 hour, and >1 hour interval per operatively. Data was compiled, edited and plotted in tabular and figure form. P value was determined as significant when it was <0.05. Results: 40 patients yielded the following results. The mean age of Group A and B were 32.56±12.55 years and 34.6±12.5 years. Mean difference of heart rate was lower in Group A than that of Group B. Other parameters in both groups were confined to good and acceptable categories. But interestingly, there was a statistically significant difference found between Group A and Group B in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) & Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP). The scoring was far better in Group A than Group B. Mean SBP was higher in Group B than Group A (p= >0.05). Similarly, mean DBP was also higher in Group B than Group A (p = >0.05). Conclusion: Propofol is better for maintaining hemodynamic status than Isoflurane for Spine surgery under General anaesthesia. EWMCJ Vol. 12, No. 1&2, January-July 2024: 21-26

Ultrasound-Guided Intranodal Lipiodol Lymphangiography for the Assessment and Treatment of Chylous Leaks: A Retrospective Case Series from a Single Center in Switzerland and a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Background: Lymphatic leaks are well-known complications of major thoracic or abdominal surgeries, which significantly heighten morbidity and mortality rates. While the existing literature provides insights into managing these post-operative leaks, with a step-up approach from conservative measures (CMs) to surgical intervention, there are no standardized treatment guidelines. The purpose of this paper is to offer a management algorithm of post-operative lymphatic leaks based on a systematic literature review (SLR) of the therapeutic effect of Lipiodol lymphangiography (LL), completed by a case series of five patients who underwent LL in our department. Methods: In this IRB-approved study, we conducted an SLR following the PRISMA guidelines, using a PICOS. A quality assessment was performed for each study. The case series consisted of consecutive patients who underwent LL for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes at our institution between September 2018 and December 2020. Results: A total of 39 observational studies were included in the SLR comprising 11 retrospective case reviews (Group 1), and 3 case series as well as 25 case reports (Group 2). In total, these studies report cases of 557 patients (51.52% presenting oncological diagnoses; 43.98% having benefited from lymphadenectomy). Lymphatic or chylous fistulas were the most encountered complication, followed by chylothorax. The median volume of Lipiodol injected during lymphography was 11.7 mL (range: 9.8-75 mL). Overall, LL was technically successful in 77.7% (366/471) of patients. The clinical success of all technically successful LLs was 80.6% (295/366). Time-to-leak resolution after lymphography varied between 1 and 31 days. The factors associated with treatment failure were a high leak output (>500 mL/day) and Lipiodol extravasation on post-LL imaging. Our case series consisted of five patients (mean age: 62 ± 9.24 years; 20% female; 100% oncological diagnoses; 60% having beneficiated from lymphadenectomy). Technical and clinical successes were 80% (4/5) and 75% (3/4), respectively. Time-to-leak resolution varied between 1 and 4 days. The volume and technique of LL was not different from that identified in the SLR. Conclusions: LL is a safe procedure with high technical and clinical success rates that could be proposed as both a diagnostic and therapeutic solution for patients with post-operative central lymphatic lesions.

Driving pressure during general anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery (GENERATOR)—study protocol of a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundIntraoperative driving pressure (ΔP) has an independent association with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving ventilation during general anesthesia for major surgery. Ventilation with high intraoperative positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers (RMs) that result in a low ΔP has the potential to prevent PPCs. This trial tests the hypothesis that compared to standard low PEEP without RMs, an individualized high PEEP strategy, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs prevents PPCs in patients receiving intraoperative protective ventilation during anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery.Methods“DrivinG prEssure duriNg gEneRal AnesThesia fOr minimally invasive abdominal suRgery (GENERATOR)” is an international, multicenter, two–group, patient and outcome–assessor blinded randomized clinical trial. In total, 1806 adult patients scheduled for minimally invasive abdominal surgery and with an increased risk of PPCs based on (i) the ARISCAT risk score for PPCs (≥ 26 points) and/or (ii) a combination of age > 40 years and scheduled surgery lasting > 2 h and planned to receive an intra–arterial catheter for blood pressure monitoring during the surgery will be included. Patients are assigned to either an intraoperative ventilation strategy with individualized high PEEP, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs or one with a standard low PEEP of 5 cm H2O without RMs. The primary outcome is a collapsed composite endpoint of PPCs until postoperative day 5.DiscussionGENERATOR will be the first adequately powered randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of individualized high PEEP with RMs versus standard low PEEP without RMs on the occurrence of PPCs after minimally invasive abdominal surgery. The results of the GENERATOR trial will support anesthesiologists in their decisions regarding PEEP settings during minimally invasive abdominal surgery.Trial registrationGENERATOR is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study identifier: NCT06101511) on 26 October 2023.

Risk Factors for Increased Opioid Use During Postoperative Intensive Care.

In the ICU, opioids treat pain and improve ventilator tolerance as part of an analgosedation approach. Identifying predictors of opioid consumption during the ICU course might highlight actionable items to reduce opioid consumption. To identify risk factors for opioid use during a postoperative ICU course. Patients enrolled in the Michigan Genomics Initiative single-center prospective observational cohort study completed baseline preoperative sociodemographic and mental/physical health questionnaires and provided blood samples for genetic analysis. Included patients were 18 years old and older, admitted to ICU postoperatively, and received opioids postoperatively. The primary outcome was ICU mean daily oral morphine equivalent (OME) use. The association between OME and phenotypic risk factors and genetic variants previously associated with pain were analyzed through univariable and multivariable linear regression models. The cohort consisted of 1865 mixed-surgical patients with mean age of 56 years (sd, 15 yr). Preoperative opioid users were more likely to continue to receive opioids throughout their ICU stay than opioid-naive patients. OME (log10 scale) was most strongly associated with ICU mechanical ventilation (β = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15-0.38; p < 0.0001; effect size 1.85 for receiving > 24 hours of mechanical ventilation), preoperative opioid use (β = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.16-0.29; p < 0.0001; effect size 1.67 for receiving preoperative opioids), major surgery (β = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.30; p < 0.0001; effect size 1.62 compared with minor surgery), and current/former illicit drug use (β = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.23; p = 0.04; effect size 1.30 for drug use). Younger age, centralized pain, and longer anesthetic duration were also significantly associated with OME but with smaller effect sizes. Selected genetic variants (FKBP5, COMT, and OPRM1) were not associated with OME use. Mechanical ventilation and preoperative opioids were the strongest risk factors for postoperative ICU opioid consumption, whereas psychologic factors and genetic variants were not associated.

Comparison of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) in patients with degenerative scoliosis and patients with normal alignment

Objectives Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a well-described method of treating foraminal stenosis. However, there is little literature examining the usage of TELF to treat foraminal stenosis in patients with degenerative scoliosis. TELF is an attractive option for such patients as it results in lesser blood loss, shorter recovery time, and lower infection rates as compared to fusion surgery. However, TELF neither corrects the deformity nor alters the natural history of the disease. Therefore, the outcomes of TELF in patients with degenerative scoliosis may be worse than those without deformities. This study aims to compare the outcomes of TELF in these two groups of patients. Material and Methods This is a retrospective study of 19 patients who underwent TELF from July 2012 to April 2015. Eight patients had degenerative scoliosis, and 11 were without scoliosis. Visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were collected at 3 months postsurgery. Patient outcomes were graded as excellent, good, fair, and poor using a modified MacNab’s criteria. Results Both groups had significant improvements in back pain, leg pain, and ODI scores postoperatively. There were no differences between the two groups when comparing the preoperative and postoperative back pain, leg pain, and ODI scores. The majority of patients rated their outcomes as excellent or good. Conclusion The short-term outcomes of TELF in patients with degenerative scoliosis are comparable to those without scoliosis. Improvements in back and leg pain after surgery are expected. We recommend it as a palliative treatment for patients who are unable to undergo major surgery.

The effect of prebiotic fibre on the gut microbiome and surgical outcomes in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PENGUIN) - study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ACTRN12623001273673)

BackgroundProsthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is the most devastating complication of arthroplasty surgery and affects 1–5% of patients. Despite strict adherence to aseptic protocols and preventive measures, infection is the most common reason for revision arthroplasty, and the incidence is increasing. Treatment of PJI is challenging and often requires repeated major surgeries with sequentially poor results. The continued occurrence of PJI, and persistence after treatment, brings into question the current treatment paradigm. Preclinical evidence suggests a link between altered gut health and the risk of PJI in arthroplasty patients. Resistant starches helps to restore gut physiology by enhancing the beneficial microbiome and producing short-chain fatty acids, which have several health-conferring properties. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a commercially available prebiotic fibre formulation on the gut microbiome in PJI patients planned for a two-stage revision surgery.MethodsA double-blind placebo-controlled trial will assess the effect of 8-week supplementation of a commercially available prebiotic supplement in patients presenting with first-time PJI undergoing two-stage revision surgery. The supplementation phase will start after the first stage revision, and 80 patients will be randomised to receive either a test product (34 g of resistant starch) or a placebo (custard powder) daily for eight weeks. Stool and blood specimens will be collected at baseline, four weeks and eight weeks after the first-stage surgery and once at second-stage surgery. Gut microbiome profile, inflammatory cytokines and gut permeability biomarkers will be measured. Tissue specimens will be collected intra-operatively during first and second-stage surgeries. Baseline dietary patterns and gut symptoms will be recorded using validated questionnaires. Treatment outcomes will be reported for both cohorts using the Delphi criterion at one and two years after second-stage surgery.DiscussionThis will be the first study to investigate the relationship between gut health optimisation and preventing PJI recurrence in arthroplasty patients. If supplementation with resistant starch improves gut health and reduces systemic inflammation, optimising the gut microbiome will be a recommended preoperative management strategy for arthroplasty patients.Trial registration noACTRN12623001273673.

Analgesic Contribution of External Oblique Intercostal Block in Major Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Analgesic Contribution of External Oblique Intercostal Block in Major Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Patients´ experiences of an exercise intervention in primary care following robot-assisted radical cystectomy due to bladder cancer: a qualitative study

BackgroundPhysical activity is thought to be a key component in reducing postoperative complications following major abdominal surgery. The available literature on exercise interventions following radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer is scarce but suggests that physical activity and exercise might improve physical function and health-related quality of life, thus calling for further investigation. The CanMoRe-trial is a single-blinded randomised controlled trial (Clinicals Trials NCT03998579 25/06/2019), aimed at evaluating the impact of an exercise intervention in primary care following robot-assisted radical cystectomy. This study seeks to explore patients’ experiences of the exercise intervention in the CanMoRe-trial to gain a better understanding of facilitating aspects and potential barriers.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted involving 20 patients from the intervention group of the CanMoRe-trial who were interviewed individually between October 2020 and March 2023 using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.ResultsFour main themes were identified: Having to adapt to new circumstances, describing the challenges regarding physical activity patients face after discharge. Optimising conditions for rehabilitation, describing how practical conditions affect patients’ ability to exercise. Motivated to get back to normal, describing patients´ desire to get back to normal life and factors influencing motivation. Importance of a supportive environment, describing the impact of social support, support from physiotherapists, and how the environment where exercise takes place impacts patients’ ability to exercise.ConclusionThis study found that patients participating in the CanMoRe-trial are positive towards physical exercise in PC following radical RARC. They are motivated to get back to normal life but face major challenges when arriving home following surgery, which affect their ability to perform physical activity and engage in exercise. Conditions need to be optimised to support patients’ ability to engage in exercise by providing an accessible PC location to perform exercise in. A supportive environment is also needed, including guidance from healthcare professionals regarding which type of exercise, intensity and amount of exercise that should be performed, enabling patients gradually to develop self-efficacy regarding exercise and focusing on goals related to patients’ normal lives before surgery.

Is pancreaticoduodenectomy justified for metastatic melanoma to the ampulla of Vater?

Metastatic melanoma of the ampulla of Vater is rare. The purpose of this study was to summarize the characteristics and outcomes of metastatic melanoma in the ampulla of Vater and highlight the impact of surgery on the prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma. Pooled data from a case encountered at our institution and from all sporadic cases published on PubMed and MEDLINE between 1996 and 2023 were analyzed. Fourteen patients with metastatic melanoma in the ampulla of Vater were enrolled. Seventy-three percent of primary melanomas were cutaneous and 27% were mucosal. Jaundice was the most common symptom (86%). The size of metastatic melanoma to the ampulla ranged from 1.5 cm to 8 cm, with a median of 2.75 cm. Concomitant metastasis to other organs occurred in 82% of the patients at the time of diagnosis, most commonly in the brain, lungs, and liver (36% each). Among the reported cases, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in five patients. The overall 1-year survival rate was 27.3%, with a median survival of four months. Wide excision of the primary lesion and chemotherapy significantly improved survival rates (p= 0.048). There is a trend toward improved survival in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by chemotherapy. Given the availability of effective systemic therapies, metastatic melanoma of the ampulla of Vater does not necessarily preclude major surgeries.

The Predictive Value of Perioperative Inflammatory Indexes in Major Arterial Surgical Revascularization from Leriche Syndrome.

Objectives: The role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis is extensive. Our study aims to assess the predictive role of inflammatory indexes regarding in-hospital mortality in major vascular surgery of Leriche syndrome as a convenient, low-cost, and noninvasive prognostic marker to optimize the patient's perioperative course. Methods: Our retrospective single-center study enrolled consecutive patients diagnosed with aortoiliac occlusive disease, Leriche syndrome, who underwent elective major vascular surgery between 2017 and 2023 in a tertiary cardiovascular center. Preoperative, postoperative, and day-one after-surgery data, including systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, were studied to the endpoint, in-hospital death. We also tested the delta values of the indexes to the endpoint. The indexes were compared to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and Vascular Surgery Group Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) for outcome prediction. Results: The tested inflammatory indexes significantly increased from the preoperative to postoperative and, further, to the day-one settings. Preoperative AISI (p = 0.040) emerged as the only independent risk factor regarding in-hospital death occurrence in Leriche patients who underwent major revascularization surgery. While RCRI did not significantly predict the endpoint (AUC = 0.698, p = 0.057), VSG-CRI (AUC = 0.864, p = 0.001) presented the best result in ROC analysis. Postoperative NLR (AUC = 0.758, p = 0.006) was next, followed by NLR postoperative-preoperative (_Preop-_Postop) delta value (AUC = 0.725, p = 0.004), postoperative SIRI (AUC = 0.716, p = 0.016), SIRI_Preop-_Postop delta value (AUC = 0.712, p = 0.016), postoperative SII (AUC = 0.692, p = 0.032), and SII_Preop-_Postop delta value (AUC = 0.631, p = 0.030). Conclusions: Inflammatory indexes are valuable tools for assessing perioperative risk in major vascular surgery, enhancing the value of the already validated risk scores.

Long-Term Trajectories of Postoperative Recovery in Younger and Older Veterans

Major surgery sometimes involves long recovery or even permanent institutionalization. Little is known about long-term trajectories of postoperative recovery, as surgical registries are limited to 30-day outcomes and care can occur across various institutions. To characterize long-term postoperative recovery trajectories. This retrospective cohort study used Veterans Affairs (VA) Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2016 through 2019) linked to the Residential History File, combining data from the VA, Medicare/Medicaid, and other sources to capture most health care utilization by days. Patients were divided into younger (younger than 65 years) or older (65 years or older) subgroups, as Medicare eligibility is age dependent. Latent-class, group-based trajectory models were developed for each group. These data were analyzed from February 2023 through August 2024. Surgical care in VA hospitals. Days elsewhere than home (DEH) were counted in 30-day periods for 275 days presurgery and 365 days postsurgery. A 5-trajectory solution was optimal and visually similar for both age groups (cases: 179 879 younger [mean age (SD) 51.2 (10.8) years; most were male [154 542 (83.0%)] and 198 803 older [mean (SD) age, 72.2 (6.0) years; 187 996 were male (97.6%)]). Most cases were in trajectories 1 and 2 (T1 and T2). T1 cases returned home within 30 days (younger, 74.0%; older, 54.2%), while T2 described delayed recovery within 30 to 60 days (younger, 21.6%; older, 35.5%). Trajectory 3 (T3) and trajectory 4 (T4) were similar for the first 30 days postsurgery, but subsequently separated with T3 representing protracted recovery of 6 months or longer (younger, 2.7%; older, 3.8%) and T4 indicating long-term loss of independence (younger, 1.3%; older, 5.2%). Few (trajectory 5) were chronically dependent, with 20 to 30 DEH per month before and after surgery (younger, 0.4%; older, 1.3%). In this study, trajectory models demonstrated clinically meaningful differences in postoperative recovery that should inform surgical decision-making. Registries should include longer-term outcomes to enable future research to distinguish patients prone to long-term loss of independence vs protracted, but meaningful recovery.

77 Antenatal MgS04 in very preterm babies is not related to improved 36 month neurodevelopmental outcomes once accounting for neonatal interventions

Abstract Background Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4) has become a standard practice for fetal neuroprotection prior to delivery of very-preterm babies due to an association with MgSO4 and reduction of cerebral palsy at 2 years of age in randomized clinical trials. Objectives In a prospective cohort of very preterm babies, we aimed to define the association between antenatal MgSO4 administration and neurodevelopmental outcome. Design/Methods We included a prospective cohort of 265 infants born ≤ 32 weeks’ gestation recruited at three tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Infants underwent two brain MRIs, one in the initial weeks after birth and one at term-equivalent age. Neurodevelopmental follow-up assessments were completed using the Bayley-3 at 3 years. Univariate analysis was undertaken to determine whether MgSO4 was associated with outcome. Multiple maternal and neonatal factors were analyzed according to their relationship with outcome. Gestational age was accounted for in all models. Maternal factors associated with MgSO4 administration were hypertension, multiple births and antenatal corticosteroid administration. Neonatal factors were sex, neonatal resuscitation, major surgery, and moderate-severe white matter injury (volume &amp;gt;40mm3). Multivariable linear regression models of maternal and neonatal risk factors were used to account for potential confounders based on those factors that were significantly (p&amp;lt;0.05) associated in univariate analysis. Results On univariate analysis, MgSO4 administration was inversely associated with 36-month motor scores (p&amp;lt;0.05). On the multivariable analysis, no maternal confounders had an impact on the relationship between MgSO4 and outcome (Table 2). MgS04 was no longer statistically related to any Bayley outcomes after adjusting for confounders at 36 months (Table 2). Neonatal surgery was related to poorer 36-month motor and cognitive outcomes. Conclusion Antenatal MgSO4 exposure was not associated with improved measures on the Bayley scales at 3 years after adjusting for potential confounders. However, neonatal interventions remained significant risk factors for poorer neurodevelopmental outcome.

Lower Levels of Vitamin D Are Associated with Higher Vasoactive–Inotropic Scores in Major Cardiac Surgery

Background: The vasoactive–inotropic score (VIS) predicts unfavorable outcomes after cardiac surgery in both children and adults. In our adult population, we investigated whether preoperative levels of vitamin D can predict the VIS and whether both vitamin D and the VIS can predict adverse outcomes following major heart surgery. Methods: Between 1 October 2021 and 28 February 2022, 300 patients underwent major cardiac surgery at our institution. Eighty-three of them had their 25-OH vitamin D levels measured before surgery. For this cohort, we calculated the VIS based on doses of vasoactive and inotropic medications administered post-surgery. Utilizing receiver operating curves, the predictive accuracy of vitamin D levels and the VIS in predicting acute kidney injury was assessed. Results: The median age of the cohort was 66 (IQR 61–71) years, with 59% being male and a median BMI of 28.4 (IQR 25.2–31.6). The most common procedures were aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve and ascending aorta repair, and ASD correction. There was a significant difference in the postoperative VIS between patients with vitamin D deficiency, i.e., &lt;20 ng/mL, and patients with vitamin D values &gt; 20 ng/mL (3.5 vs. 1.3 p &lt; 0.04). We also found a significant correlation between the VIS and the days of hospitalization (r = 0.335; p = 0.002), the days of stay in the intensive care unit (r = 0.547; p &lt; 0.00001), and the mechanical ventilation time (r = 0.327; p = 0.025). Both vitamin D levels and the VIS predicted postoperative acute kidney injury (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is correlated with the VIS in adults undergoing major cardiac surgery. Both vitamin D levels and the VIS can predict unfavorable postoperative outcomes.

Strategies for Perioperative Anticoagulant Reversal in Orthopedic Surgery: A Review.

The administration of anticoagulation therapy during major orthopedic surgeries is a clinical challenge due to the risk of thrombotic events and bleeding complications. This review aims to evaluate the current strategies and emerging developments in perioperative anticoagulation reversal. We conducted a literature review on the management of perioperative anticoagulant therapy, which included the current status of anticoagulant reversal agents, as well as personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, artificial intelligence (AI), and novel drug delivery systems. The review indicates that reversal agents such as idarucizumab and andexanet alfa are crucial in managing bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Personalized medicine, guided by pharmacogenomics, allows for tailored anticoagulation regimens. AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms can enhance the predictive capabilities for bleeding and thrombotic risks. Additionally, nanotechnology and biomarkers offer innovative approaches to drug delivery and personalized treatment. Integrating evidence-based guidelines with innovative reversal agents, personalized medicine, AI and nanotechnology opens a new era in perioperative anticoagulation management. These advancements can ensure patient safety, minimize bleeding risks, and improve surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on the clinical validation of these strategies to ensure their effectiveness across diverse patient populations.

Tranexamic Acid for reduction of intra- and postoperative TRansfusion requirements in elective Abdominal surgery (TATRA): study protocol for an investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized superiority trial with two parallel groups

BackgroundIntra- and postoperative hemorrhage is a relevant problem in major abdominal surgery, leading to acute anemia and necessitating transfusion of packed red blood cells. It is estimated that in 30% of abdominal surgeries, intra- or postoperative transfusion is required. Transfusion potentially has detrimental health effects and poses a considerable socioeconomic burden. Tranexamic acid, a lysine analog inhibiting plasminogen activation and providing clot stability, has been used to reduce hemorrhage. While there is ample evidence in other surgical disciplines, it is almost completely lacking in abdominal surgery.MethodsThis multicenter double-blind parallel group randomized superiority trial will compare tranexamic acid (loading dose 1000 mg over 10 min prior to skin incision, maintenance dose 125 mg/h continuously until skin closure or until 1000 mg have been administered) to placebo in patients ≥ 18 years undergoing elective esophagectomy, gastrectomy, colectomy, rectal resection, pancreatic resection, or hepatectomy. The primary efficacy endpoint is the intra- or postoperative transfusion of at least one unit of packed red blood cells. Key secondary endpoints are the number of transfused units per patient, estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications/mortality, length of hospital stay, operation/anesthesia time, D-dimer levels, and quality of life. Sample size calculation is based on the assumption that in the control group, 30% of patients require transfusion while the intervention achieves a risk reduction of 33%, reducing the probability to 20%. With a type one error of 5% and a power of 90%, using a two-sided χ2 test, this results in 412 patients per group. Accounting for non-compliance, 425 patients are to be randomized per group. The total trial duration will be 30 months with a recruitment period of 18 months.DiscussionIf the proposed trial yielded positive results, the routine use of tranexamic acid in major abdominal surgery would be supported. This would avoid acute anemia with detrimental effects such as tissue hypoxia and organ injury, as well as the negative immediate and delayed effects of transfusions.Trial registrationEU CT Nr: 2023–509970-43–01, NCT06414031. Registered on 10 May 2024.

Underweight as a Risk Factor for Major Intra-abdominal Malignancy Surgeries

Underweight as a Risk Factor for Major Intra-abdominal Malignancy Surgeries

Postoperative quality of recovery comparison between ciprofol and propofol in total intravenous anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

Study objectivesWe conducted a non-inferiority study to assess the postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) in elderly patients receiving ciprofol or propofol total intravenous anesthersia(TIVA)after elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery, with QoR-15 scores as the main measure. DesignA prospective, double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in the theater, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and the ward. Participants144 elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) were randomly assigned to either the ciprofol group or the propofol group. InterventionsThe ciprofol group received continuous infusion of ciprofol with remifentanil, and the propofol group received infusion of propofol with remifentanil. Outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the QoR-15 on the first postoperative day (POD1), assessed in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with the mean difference between groups compared to a non-inferiority threshold of −8. Additional assessments included QoR-15 scores on POD2, 3, and 5 for both analysis sets. Other evaluated perioperative value factors included hemodynamic parameters and injection discomfort in the intention-to-treat analysis. A linear mixed model was utilized to examine the impact of group-time interactions on hemodynamic data and QoR-15. Main resultsThe QoR-15 scores on POD1 in the ciprofol group were non-inferior to those in the propofol group both in intention-to-treat set (mean [95 %CI], 95.9[93.7–98.2] vs. 95.6 [93.3–97.8]; mean difference [95 % CI], 0.4 [−2.8–3.5]; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and per-protocol set (mean [95 %CI], 96.7 [94.4–99.0] vs. 95.7 [93.4–98.0]; mean difference [95 % CI], 1.0 [−2.2–4.3]; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Comparable outcomes were noted on postoperative days 2, 3, and 5 following the procedure in both analysis sets. Additionally: compared with propofol group, the occurrence of injection pain was lower (2.8 % vs. 27.8 %, P < 0.001); the hypotension was less frequent (33.3 % vs. 54.2 %, P = 0.012); the bradycardia was more common (38.9 % vs. 23.6 %, P = 0.048). ConclusionsCiprofol is not inferior to propofol in QoR. Ciprofol can be suitably administered to elderly patients undergoing elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery.

Effect of small dose esketamine on perioperative neurocognitive disorder and postoperative depressive symptoms in elderly patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery for malignant tumors: A randomized clinical trial.

Perioperative neurocognitive disorder and postoperative depressive symptoms are significant complications after surgery. Studies have indicated that esketamine possesses neuroprotective and antidepressant qualities. This trial included 209 patients aged 60 to 86 years undergoing tumor resection who received esketamine (Group E) or not (Group C) during and after surgery. In group E, patients were given an intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of esketamine 10 minutes after induction of general anaesthesia. In addition, esketamine (2 mg/kg) in combination with sufentanil was used for PCIA during 48 hours postoperatively. On the other hand, saline was used as a substitute for esketamine in group C. Cognitive function was evaluated using neuropsychological tests and telephone interview for cognitive status-modified, and symptoms of depression were assessed using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17. Compared to Group C, patients in Group E exhibited lower rates of depressive symptoms at 3, 7, and 90 days post-surgery (53.9% vs 67.7%, 26.3% vs 47.9%, and 13.3% vs 28.4%). Group E also showed decreased time for Trail Making Test on days 7 and 90. However, there were no significant differences in the incidence of delirium 1 to 5 days post-surgery or cognitive impairment 90 days post-surgery between the 2 groups (12.1% vs 10.9% and 8.4% vs 9.7%). Intraoperative low-dose esketamine and postoperative low-dose esketamine combined with sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia has been shown to improve postoperative analgesia, alleviate postoperative depressive symptoms, and aid in the recovery of social executive ability. However, this approach did not reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium or postoperative cognitive dysfunction.