Risk prediction of complicated course in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction

Abstract

IntroductionThe British Association of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) Quality and Outcomes in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (QOMS) reconstructive audit aims to provide surgical teams with risk adjusted comparative performance data. The goal is to enable surgeons to optimise surgical pathways. Risk adjustment requires that data on appropriate predictive variables is collected. This study looked at variables predicting major complications and flap failure in a single institution with the aim of determining whether the QOMS dataset adequately captures the appropriate data points. MethodsA prospective database of head and neck flap procedures and associated postoperative complications has been maintained in the maxillofacial surgery department since August 2009 up to August 2022 (n=1,327). A total of 25 putative risk variables were extracted from the health records for each patient. The outcomes of interest were total flap failure and major complications. ResultsIndependent predictors of flap failure were recipient site (Sinonasal/ anterior skull base), previous major surgery, previous major surgery and radiotherapy, and flap selection. For major complications ACE-27 comorbidity score, flap type, use of tracheostomy, elevated preoperative plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) and flap selection were independently predictive. Conclusions:Apart from preoperative activated innate immunity all relevant risk stratification variables identified in this study form part of the QOMS dataset. QOMS is therefore likely to adequately risk stratify patients based upon currently collected variables.