Reviewed by: Cinema Civil Rights: Regulation, Repression, and Race in the Classical Hollywood Era by Ellen C. Scott Courtney Baker Ellen C. Scott.Cinema Civil Rights: Regulation, Repression, and Race in the Classical Hollywood Era. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2015. 268pp. $29.95. In her book Cinema Civil Rights: Regulation, Repression, and Race in the Classical Hollywood Era, media scholar Ellen C. Scott provides a well-researched critical history of black repression in the American film industry during the first half of the twentieth century. The study is a welcome addition to important recent publications in African American television and film studies such as Sarah Torres’s Black, White, and in Color: Television and Black Civil Rights (Princeton UP, 2003) and Allyson Nadia Field’s Uplift Cinema: The Emergence of African American Film and the Possibility of Black Modernity (Duke UP, 2015). All of the projects provide a careful and thoroughgoing account of the visual media industry and its representations of black life. Scott’s book significantly advances our understanding of the conditions of film production by investigating the impact of censorship in the constitution of narratives and the framing of black bodies on screen. Cinema Civil Rights undertakes media studies as a material cultural studies project, referring readers to the cinematic objects while contextualizing and critiquing the material and social conditions for those objects’ construction. Scott’s work stands out among these other books for its study of mainstream Hollywood film—a genre that would seem not to provide as rich a terrain for the discussion of black representational politics. However, Scott’s canny readings reveal that an anxiety about black representation in the context of civil rights discourse in popular film has been, for more than one hundred years, a central and abiding organizing principle for studios and directors in the most powerful and longstanding film industry in the world. Scott’s analysis of “the structure of limitation” in the film industry during its Golden Age is rooted in an understanding of civil rights as a project of “equal citizenship” that compelled and confounded African Americans throughout the [End Page 289] twentieth century (1). By examining texts that document both repression and resistance, Scott exposes how censorship boards and industry complacency “ultimately failed to avoid the civil rights questions they repressed” (3). The first two chapters trace how some films resisted industry and state policies and codes that forbade, if not outright censored, cinematic suggestions of miscegenation and racial injustice. Chapter one focuses on self-regulation and censorship that Scott divides into five eras, each attached to three regulating boards—the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America, the Studio Relations Committee, and the Production Code Administration—and their changing leadership. Over the course of this period, extending from 1926 to 1961, Hollywood films struggled to remain topical—taking on such subjects as chain gangs, lynching, and interracial sex—while attempting at the same time not to offend Southern racist sentiment nor to foreground race—and in particular black-white relations—as sources of conflict and titillation. Analyzing works such as I am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang (1932), Imitation of Life (1934), Pinky (1949), The Burning Cross (1947), and several others in the context of correspondence between the regulating boards and studios as well as revisions to scripts and shooting drafts reveals a pattern of careful compromises that did not ban, but rather “muted and dampened” reference to black-white racial conflict and miscegenation (66). State standards were in many ways more restrictive and no less influential, “vitally shaping America’s system of film vetting” (67) as well as industry censorship-board standards. Scott’s concern in this chapter is on the local impact of censorship on spectatorship that, “through censored shots and banned scenes, worked to bend the racial trajectory of the cinema on important local American screens and in specific communities” (69). The chapter looks at the treatment of not only mainstream films, but also “foreign, B, and independent films” (107) by the censors in particular states—specifically, Ohio, Kansas, Maryland, and Virginia—at the height of their influence (1915 to 1952). While the selection of films and states discussed in this section appears...