Lung Volume Reduction Research Articles

Assessment of hyperinflation: comparison of Global Lung Function Initiative and European Community for Steel and Coal lung volume reference equations.

Assessment of static hyperinflation severity is crucial to identify COPD patients eligible for lung volume reduction. The current recommendation of residual volume ≥175% predicted may need to be reconsidered owing to potential differences between the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) and the European Community for Steel and Coal (ECSC) reference equations for residual volume and concerns about using percentage of predicted. We compared the residual volume reference values derived from the GLI and ECSC equations using mathematically simulated data and used a receiver operating characteristic curve to establish a new GLI-derived z-score cut-off for residual volume using body plethysmography data from patients with severe COPD. The GLI reference equation for residual volume consistently yields a lower predicted residual volume for individuals with an average or below-average height (females ≤163 cm and males ≤177 cm). Our clinical cohort consisted of 1011 patients with COPD (graded using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria as 38% GOLD 3 and 59% GOLD 4). In this cohort, a GLI-derived residual volume z-score of ≥2.9 could accurately replace the ECSC-derived 175% predicted cut-off and a z-score of ≥3.5 was established for the 200% predicted cut-off. There are substantial differences in predicted residual volume values between the GLI and ECSC equations, with the GLI generally yielding a lower predicted residual volume in the majority of individuals. A GLI-derived residual volume z-score of ≥2.9 could be used to replace the currently used cut-off of ≥175% predicted to identify potential lung volume reduction candidates.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction by instillation of fibrinogen and thrombin in COPD patients with homogenous emphysema

BackgroundThe new endobronchial therapy called biological lung volume reduction (BioLVR) involves using a rapid polymerizing sealant to block off the most emphysematous portions of the lungs. The primary mechanism of action is resorption atelectasis, which is then followed by inflammation and remodeling of the airspace. The remodeling process will result in the formation of scars, leading to the contraction of the lung tissue. As a result, a decrease in functional lung volume is anticipated for a period of 6–8 weeks.ObjectiveAssessing the safety and effectiveness of bronchoscopic installation of (fibrinogen and thrombin) in COPD patients with homogeneous emphysema in terms of radiological, physiological, and quality of life outcomes.MethodsBetween December 2017 and December 2019, 40 COPD patients with homogeneous emphysema were studied using a fiber optic bronchoscope while they were awake but sedated. Tanta University Hospitals’ chest medicine department collaborated with the diagnostic radiology department of the Faculty of Medicine.ResultsAll the following parameters were reduced from their initial values: HRCT volumetry, RV/TLC, mMRC dyspnea scale, CAT score, 6MWT, FEV1, and the FEV1/FVC ratio at the first, third, and sixth months from the beginning (p = 0.001). One individual (0.025%) had pneumonia, whereas three individuals had COPD (0.075%). Using fibrin glue produced locally, biological lung volume reduction (Bio LVR) may be an effective treatment for advanced homogenous emphysema.ConclusionBy using locally prepared fibrin glue the biologic lung volume reduction (Bio LVR) may be a convenient method to treat advanced homogenous emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery is safe and leads to functional improvement in patients who fail or cannot undergo bronchoscopic lung volume reduction

BackgroundBronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) has supplanted surgery in the treatment of patients with advanced emphysema, but not all patients qualify for it. Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) among patients who either failed BLVR or were not candidates for it. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LVRS for upper lobe–predominant emphysema at a single tertiary center between March 2018 and December 2022. The main outcomes measures were preoperative and postoperative respiratory parameters, perioperative morbidity, and mortality. ResultsA total of 67 LVRS recipients were evaluated, including 10 who had failed prior valve placement. The median patient age was 69 years, and 35 (52%) were male. All procedures were performed thoracoscopically, with 36 patients (53.7%) undergoing bilateral LVRS. The median hospital length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-11 days). Prolonged air leak (>7 days) occurred in 20 patients. There was one 90-day mortality from a nosocomial pneumonia (non–COVID-related) and no further deaths at 12 months. There were mean improvements of 10.07% in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and 4.74% in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, along with a mean decrease 49.2% in residual volume (P < .001 for all). The modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale was improved by 1.84 points (P < .001). ConclusionsLVRS can be performed safely in patients who are not candidates for BLVR and those who fail BLVR and leads to significant functional improvement. Long-term follow-up is necessary to ensure the sustainability of LVRS benefits in this patient population.

Estimating lung function from computed tomography at the patient and lobe level using machine learning.

Automated estimation of Pulmonary function test (PFT) results from Computed Tomography (CT) could advance the use of CT in screening, diagnosis, and staging of restrictive pulmonary diseases. Estimating lung function per lobe, which cannot be done with PFTs, would be helpful for risk assessment for pulmonary resection surgery and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction. To automatically estimate PFT results from CT and furthermore disentangle the individual contribution of pulmonary lobes to a patient's lung function. We propose I3Dr, a deep learning architecture for estimating global measures from an image that can also estimate the contributions of individual parts of the image to this global measure. We apply it to estimate the separate contributions of each pulmonary lobe to a patient's total lung function from CT, while requiring only CT scans and patient level lung function measurements for training. I3Dr consists of a lobe-level and a patient-level model. The lobe-level model extracts all anatomical pulmonary lobes from a CT scan and processes them in parallel to produce lobe level lung function estimates that sum up to a patient level estimate. The patient-level model directly estimates patient level lung function from a CT scan and is used to re-scale the output of the lobe-level model to increase performance. After demonstrating the viability of the proposed approach, the I3Dr model is trained and evaluated for PFT result estimation using a large data set of 8433 CT volumes for training, 1775 CT volumes for validation, and 1873 CT volumes fortesting. First, we demonstrate the viability of our approach by showing that a model trained with a collection of digit images to estimate their sum implicitly learns to assign correct values to individual digits. Next, we show that our models can estimate lobe-level quantities, such as COVID-19 severity scores, pulmonary volume (PV), and functional pulmonary volume (FPV) from CT while only provided with patient-level quantities during training. Lastly, we train and evaluate models for producing spirometry and diffusion capacity of carbon mono-oxide (DLCO) estimates at the patient and lobe level. For producing Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), and DLCO estimates, I3Dr obtains mean absolute errors (MAE) of 0.377L, 0.297L, and 2.800mL/min/mm Hg respectively. We release the resulting algorithms for lung function estimation to the research community at https://grand-challenge.org/algorithms/lobe-wise-lung-function-estimation/ CONCLUSIONS: I3Dr can estimate global measures from an image, as well as the contributions of individual parts of the image to this global measure. It offers a promising approach for estimating PFT results from CT scans and disentangling the individual contribution of pulmonary lobes to a patient's lung function. The findings presented in this work may advance the use of CT in screening, diagnosis, and staging of restrictive pulmonary diseases as well as in risk assessment for pulmonary resection surgery and bronchoscopic lung volumereduction.

Survival following lung volume reduction procedures: results from the UK Lung Volume Reduction (UKLVR) registry

IntroductionLung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) placement can produce substantial benefits in appropriately selected people with emphysema. The UK Lung Volume Reduction (UKLVR) registry is a national...

Lung Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer following Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction for Heterogenous Emphysema

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a minimally invasive treatment for emphysema. Lung cancer may be associated with emphysema due to common risk factors. Thus, a growing number of patients undergoing BLVR may develop lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the effects of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer in patients undergoing BLVR. The clinical data of patients undergoing BLVR followed by lung resection for NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, surgical and oncological outcomes were recorded to define the effects of this strategy. Eight patients were included in our series. In all cases but one, emphysema was localized within upper lobes; the tumor was detected during routine follow-up following BLVR and it did not involve the treated lobe. The comparison of pre- and post-BLVR data showed a significant improvement in FEV1 (29.7 ± 4.9 vs. 33.7 ± 6.7, p = 0.01); in FVC (28.5 ± 6.6 vs. 32.4 ± 6.1, p = 0.01); in DLCO (31.5 ± 4.9 vs. 38.7 ± 5.7, p = 0.02); in 6MWT (237 ± 14 m vs. 271 ± 15 m, p = 0.01); and a reduction in RV (198 ± 11 vs. 143 ± 9.8, p = 0.01). Surgical resection of lung cancer included wedge resection (n = 6); lobectomy (n = 1); and segmentectomy (n = 1). No major complications were observed and the comparison of pre- and post-operative data showed no significant reduction in FEV1% (33.7 ± 6.7 vs. 31.5 ± 5.3; p = 0.15) and in DLCO (38.7 ± 5.7 vs. 36.1 ± 5.4; p = 0.15). Median survival was 35 months and no cancer relapses were observed. The improved lung function obtained with BLVR allowed nonsurgical candidates to undergo lung resection for lung cancer.

The Unveiled Triad: Clinical, Radiological and Pathological Insights into Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DLPD) characterized by complex interstitial lung damage with polymorphic and protean inflammatory aspects affecting lung tissue targets including small airways, the interstitium, alveolar compartments and vascular structures. HP shares clinical and often radiological features with other lung diseases in acute or chronic forms. In its natural temporal evolution, if specific therapy is not initiated promptly, HP leads to progressive fibrotic damage with reduced lung volumes and impaired gas exchange. The prevalence of HP varies considerably worldwide, influenced by factors like imprecise disease classification, diagnostic method limitations for obtaining a confident diagnosis, diagnostic limitations in the correct processing of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) radiological parameters, unreliable medical history, diverse geographical conditions, heterogeneous agricultural and industrial practices and occasionally ineffective individual protections regarding occupational exposures and host risk factors. The aim of this review is to present an accurate and detailed 360-degree analysis of HP considering HRCT patterns and the role of the broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL), without neglecting biopsy and anatomopathological aspects and future technological developments that could make the diagnosis of this disease less challenging.

A 6-year experience of Zephyr endobronchial valves for severe emphysema in an Australian single-centre cohort.

Endobronchial valve (EBV) insertion for lung volume reduction is a management option for patients with severe emphysema. One-way valves cause lobar deflation and improve lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. To retrospectively analyse and compare the outcomes of the first 57 patients treated with EBVs between 2015 and 2021 at the Royal Adelaide Hospital to international standards. Clinical outcomes of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), treated lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at 3, 6 and 12 months after valve insertion were reviewed against established minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). Complications and subjective breathlessness measured by Borg scores were also reviewed. Fifty-seven patients were included. At 12 months, 77.2% achieved TLVR. FEV1 improved by 170 mL (95% confidence interval (CI): 100-250, P < 0.001), 80 mL (95% CI: 10-150, P = 0.019) and 40 mL (95% CI: -60 to 130, P 0.66) at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. RV improved by -610 mL (95% CI: -330 to -900, P < 0.0001) at 3 months, -640 mL (95% CI: -360 to -920, P < 0.0001) at 6 months and -360 mL (95% CI: -60 to -680, P = 0.017) at 12 months. 6MWD improved by 57.34 m (95% CI: 36.23-78.45, P < 0.0001) and 44.93 m (95% CI: 7.19-82.67, P = 0.02) at 3 and 6 months. Borg score improved by -0.53 (95% CI: 0.11 to -1.2, P = 0.11) and -0.49 (95% CI: 0.17 to -1.15, P = 0.16) at 3 and 6 months. Complication rates aligned with international standards with mucous/infection (26.3%) and pneumothorax (17.5%) as the most common. Subgroup analysis signalled improved outcomes in patients with heterogeneous emphysema. Our study represents the first publicly funded Australian analysis of EBVs. The results align with international prospective trials demonstrating improved lung function and exercise capacity. Australians with severe emphysema and gas trapping should be referred to a multidisciplinary centre for consideration of EBVs.

Dynamic changes in lung water density and volume following supine body positioning.

Measure the changes in relative lung water density (rLWD), lung volume, and total lung water content as a function of time after supine body positioning. An efficient ultrashort-TE pulse sequence with a yarnball k-space trajectory was used to measure water density-weighted lung images for 25 min following supine body positioning (free breathing, 74-s acquisitions, 3D images at functional residual capacity, 18 time points) in 9 healthy volunteers. Global and regional (10 chest-to-back positions) rLWD, lung volume, and total lung water volume were measured in all subjects at all time points. Volume changes were validated with a nitrogen washout study in 3 participants. Global rLWD increased significantly (p = 0.001) from 31.8 ± 5.5% to 34.8 ± 6.8%, while lung volumes decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 2390 ± 620 mL to 2130 ± 630 mL over the same 25-min interval. Total lung water volume decreased slightly from 730 ± 125 mL to 706 ± 126 mL (p = 0.028). There was a significant chest-to-back gradient in rLWD (20.7 ± 4.6% to 39.9 ± 6.1%) at all time points with absolute increases of 1.8 ± 1.2% at the chest and 5.4 ± 1.9% at the back. Nitrogen washout studies yielded a similar reduction in lung volume (12.5 ± 0.9%) and time course following supine positioning. Lung volumes during tidal breathing decrease significantly over tens of minutes following supine body positioning, with corresponding increases in lung water density (9.2 ± 4.4% relative increase). The total volume of lung water is slightly reduced over this interval (3.3 ± 4.0% relative change). Evaluation of rLWD should take time after supine positioning, and more generally, all sources of lung volume changes should be taken into consideration to avoid significant bias.

A Relationship Between Preoperative Inspiratory Lung Resistance And Emphysema-Reduction Surgery Outcome

Background Surgery to reduce lung volume has recently been reintroduced to alleviate dyspnea and improve exercise tolerance in selected patients with emphysema. A reliable means of identifying patients who are likely to benefit from this surgery is needed. Methods We measured lung resistance during inspiration, static recoil pressure at total lung capacity, static lung compliance, expiratory flow rates, and lung volumes in 29 patients with chronic obstructive lung disease before lung-volume–reduction surgery. The changes in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) six months after surgery were related to the preoperatively determined physiologic measures. A response to surgery was defined as an increase in the FEV1 of at least 0.2 liters and of at least 12 percent above baseline values. Results Of the 29 patients, 23 had some improvement in FEV1 including 15 who met the criteria for a response to surgery. Among the variables considered, only preoperative lung resistance during inspiration predicted changes in expiratory flow rates after surgery. Inspiratory lung resistance correlated significantly and inversely with improvement in FEV1 after surgery (r=—0.63, P&lt;0.001). A preoperative criterion of an inspiratory resistance of 10 cm of water per liter per second had a sensitivity of 88 percent (14 of 16 patients) and a specificity of 92 percent (12 of 13 patients) in identifying patients who were likely to have a response to surgery. Conclusions Preoperative lung resistance during inspiration appears to be a useful measure for selecting patients with emphysema for lung–volume– reduction surgery

Unveiling the complexities of lung transplantation in situs inversus

BackgroundLung transplantation for situs inverse is considered technically challenging because of the reverse positioning of the organs. By providing a detailed description of the surgical procedure, perioperative care, and post-transplant follow-up, we aim to contribute valuable information to the existing knowledge base. We presented two cases of successful bilateral sequential lung transplantation in situs inverse patients.Case presentationOur first patient was a 28-year-old, non-smoking woman with Kartagener syndrome and advanced bronchiectasis that developed into pneumonia and required repeated hospital admissions. She underwent double lung transplantation. During the lung transplant procedure, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support was provided. The recipient’s morphologically right (anatomically left) lung was explanted. The right main bronchus was anastomosed, followed by the pulmonary artery and left atrial anastomoses. Afterward, we proceeded with the left side. Similar to the right side, left pneumonectomy and implantation were performed using the same methods. The duration of VA ECMO support was 147 min with a 328-min ischemic time. Because of the significant size mismatch, nonanatomic lung volume reduction over the right middle and left upper lobes was necessary. The patient had no complications postoperatively and was discharged on post-operative day (POD) 12. Our second patient was a 51-year- old man with scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease with situs inversus. Bilateral sequential lung transplantation was performed. Similar to case 1, a clamshell incision was made at the fourth intercostal space entry. The patient then received VA ECMO support identical to that in case 1. The total VA ECMO support time was 155 min with 295 min of ischemic time. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on POD 13.ConclusionsLung transplantation for situs inverse can be a viable treatment option without modifying established transplantation procedures.

Endobronchial Valves for the Management of Severe Emphysema

What Is the Issue?&#x0D; &#x0D; People with severe emphysema who do not experience relief with non-invasive therapies such as medication, physical activity, and smoking cessation may need advanced treatments.&#x0D; Endobronchial valves are an alternative therapy that may improve exercise capacity and quality of life, and are less invasive compared to lung reduction surgery or transplants.&#x0D; &#x0D; What Did We Do?&#x0D; &#x0D; A 2019 CADTH report summarized clinical effectiveness evidence for valves compared to standard care. CADTH sought to update this evidence with new clinical research and include information on cost-effectiveness, which was not part of the previous report.&#x0D; A research information specialist conducted a literature search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature with a search strategy focused on emphysema and endobronchial valves. The search was limited to English-language documents published since 2018. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings.&#x0D; &#x0D; What Did We Find?&#x0D; &#x0D; We did not find systematic reviews or health technology assessments published since 2018 that contained clinical evidence not already captured in the 2019 CADTH report. Two RCTs provide updated clinical evidence for endobronchial valves compared to standard care, and 1 RCT contains evidence on valves compared to lung surgery.&#x0D; The evidence suggests that valves may improve lung function, breathing ability, and physical activity in middle-aged and older adults with emphysema compared to standard care; the effect on quality of life and safety is unclear. The previous CADTH report showed lung function, breathing ability, physical activity, and quality of life were favourable for valve treatment compared to standard care.&#x0D; The previous CADTH report showed that valves resulted in harmful outcomes compared to standard care; however, in the current review, safety was difficult to assess due to poor reporting.&#x0D; When comparing valves to lung surgery, lung surgery may improve quality of life compared to valves; other outcomes did not favour one therapy over another.&#x0D; For cost-effectiveness, valves may be favourable compared to standard medical care, while their cost-effectiveness compared to lung volume reduction surgery is unclear.&#x0D; One study was conducted in Canada, and no studies were conducted in children and younger adults.&#x0D; &#x0D; What Does it Mean?&#x0D; &#x0D; Endobronchial valves are a potential therapy for people with severe emphysema with some favourable clinical and cost outcomes, but the evidence for their safety is unclear.&#x0D; Decision-makers may wish to consider the balance of favourable and harmful effects in existing evidence before more high-quality evidence in Canada, especially for safety, is available.&#x0D;

A preclinical animal study to evaluate the operability and safety of domestic one-way endobronchial valves.

To evaluate the operability and safety of bronchoscopic domestic one-way endobronchial valves (EBV) on animals. Nine pigs were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive domestic one-way EBV (the experimental group, n = 6) and Zephyr® EBV (the control group, n = 3). Routine blood tests, arterial blood gases, and CT scans of the lungs were performed 1 day pre-procedure in addition to 1 week and 1 month post-procedure to assess changes in blood markers and lung volumes. At 1 month post-procedure, the animals were sacrificed, followed by removal of all valves via bronchoscopy. Pathological examinations of critical organs were subsequently performed. A total of 15 valves were placed in the experimental group and 6 valves were placed in the control group, without serious complications. Routine blood tests and arterial blood gas examinations at 1 day pre-procedure, 1 week post-procedure, and 1 month post-procedure did not differ significantly in both groups. No EBV displacement was noted under bronchoscopy, and the valve was smoothly removable by bronchoscope at 1 month post-procedure. At 1 week post-procedure, varying degrees of target lung lobe volume reduction were observed on lung CT in both groups. Lung volume reduction was achieved at 1 month post-procedure in both groups, without significant statistical difference. Although 3 cases in the experimental group and 1 case in the control group developed varying degrees of pneumonia, the inflammatory response did not increase over time during the experimental period. Pathological examination revealed no significant abnormal changes in the critical organs for both groups. Our results demonstrate that domestic EBV is safe and reliable for endobronchial application in general-grade laboratory white pigs. The safety of domestic EBV is similar to that of Zephyr® EBV, with good ease of use and operability. This kind of domestic EBV can meet the safety evaluation requirements for animal testing.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Extremely Rare Complication

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Extremely Rare Complication

A Quantitative Computed Tomography Analysis of Fissure Integrity and Emphysema Destruction in Japanese Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Objective Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using a one-way endobronchial valve (EBV) can provide clinically meaningful benefits to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Although the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency approved EBVs in November 2022, information regarding the number of Japanese patients with severe COPD eligible for BLVR treatment is still lacking. We therefore screened computed tomography (CT) images of patients with severe COPD using a quantitative CT (QCT) analysis to estimate the proportion of candidates eligible for BLVR treatment with an EBV. Methods CT scans of COPD patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages 3 and 4 were retrospectively analyzed using QCT to evaluate fissure integrity and tissue destruction. The difference in volume-weighted percentage was measured using the density scores of the target lobe and ipsilateral non-target lobe at -910 Hounsfield units. The target lobe was defined as the most affected lobe, with an emphysema destruction score of >50% for each patient. Results High-resolution CT scans of 32 patients (GOLD 3=19, GOLD 4=13) were analyzed. The target lobe could not be identified in 1 patient, whereas the target lobes for 8 patients were not surrounded by fissures with ≥80% completeness. Conversely, in 13 patients, the target lobes were surrounded by fissures with >95% completeness. The remaining 10 patients had fissure completeness between 80% and 95% at the target lobes and were considered candidates for collateral ventilation assessment. Conclusion A QCT analysis showed that 23 of 32 patients with severe COPD could be considered for a thorough examination of BLVR treatment with EBV.

Improving Referral Patterns for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with severe emphysema and hyperinflation refractory to optimal medical care. This therapy is effective in improving functional status and quality of life, underscoring the importance of identifying potential procedure candidates. To our knowledge, scalable strategies to improve the referral of advanced lung disease patients are lacking. This quality improvement project aimed to increase identification and referral for BLVR in a large Veterans Affairs academic medical center. We show implementing case identification within a pulmonary function testing report, in conjunction with provider education, increased referral rates for BLVR. Because of the ubiquity of lung function testing, other advanced lung disease programs may consider adopting this strategy to improve patients' access to timely clinical evaluation and therapy.

Body Composition after Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Endobronchial Valves: A Prospective Study.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema experience malnutrition and pulmonary cachexia. Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with endobronchial valves has not only improved lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life but also influenced body weight. Only a few data are available on body composition changes after ELVR. This single-center prospective study of patients with advanced COPD investigates body composition before and after endoscopic valve treatment using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The following parameters were evaluated in addition to clinical data and routine tests: body weight, body mass index (BMI), basal metabolic rate, total body water, body fat, cell percentage, phase angle, intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), extracellular mass (ECM), body cell mass (BCM), lean body mass (ECM + BCM), and fat-free mass index. A total of 23 patients (mean emphysema index 37.2 ± 7.5%, BMI 23.4 ± 4.3 kg/m2) experienced improvements in lung function and exercise capacity with ELVR. Complete lobar atelectasis was achieved in 39.1% of participants. A non-statistically significant increase in body weight and BMI was observed after ELVR (p = 0.111 and p = 0.102). BIA measurement revealed a worsening of phase angle, cell percentage and ECM/BCM and thus of body composition, but without statistical significance. This is mainly due to a statistically significant increase in ECM, ECW, and ICW (all p &lt; 0.001). ELVR demonstrated no beneficial changes in body composition, although patients tend to gain weight. A larger cohort is warranted to confirm these findings.

Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema.

COPD is a highly prevalent, chronic and irreversible obstructive airway disease without curative treatment. Standard therapeutic strategies, both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, have only limited effects on lung function parameters of patients with severe disease. Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, many patients with severe COPD still have a high burden of dyspnoea and a poor quality of life. If these patients have severe lung emphysema, with hyperinflation as the driver of symptoms and exercise intolerance, lung volume reduction may be an effective treatment with a significant impact on lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. Currently, different lung volume reduction approaches, both surgical and bronchoscopic, have shown encouraging results and have been implemented in COPD treatment recommendations. Nevertheless, choosing the optimal lung volume reduction strategy for an individual patient remains challenging. Moreover, there is still room for improving durability of effect and safety in all available procedures. Ongoing and innovative research is essential to push this field forwards. This review provides an overview of results and limitations of the current lung volume reduction options for patients with severe lung emphysema and hyperinflation.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction as Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients with Emphysema

BLVR is a combination of non-surgical techniques for lung volume reduction performed via bronchoscopy as an alternative to LVRS in emphysema patients. The techniques most often used in BLVR are bronchial valves (EBV/IBV), coils (lung coil), and thermal vapor (BTVA), while the BioLVR and ABS techniques have begun to be abandoned. BLVR is generally beneficial in improving lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with emphysema. There is a need to monitor post-procedure side effects and long-term follow-up to assess the effectiveness of the procedure and reduce complications.

Complications following bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR)

Complications following bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR)