We appreciate Dr. Chaney's interest in our article (1) and the opportunity to provide more details about our article. We reported that methylprednisolone (MPS) prevented lung injury in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) induced by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP). In contrast, Chaney et al. (2) reported that MPS worsened pulmonary function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the immediate postoperative period. Although it is important to measure alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, dynamic pulmonary compliance, static lung compliance, shunt, and dead space, these variables were not measured in our study. Instead, we determined the lung injury score postoperatively, including the chest radiograph score, hypoxemia score (PaO2/PAO2), and positive end-expiratory pressure score, as recommended by Marks et al. (3). Using this score, our results confirmed that pretreatment with MPS prevented lung injury. The discrepancy between the two studies might be caused by the following reasons. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α were increased in patients with gastric cancer undergoing IPHP without pretreatment of MPS in our study. Denizot et al. (4) reported that no variation of tumor necrosis factor-α levels were found in patients undergoing CABG in pre- and postoperative periods. These findings strongly suggest that differences in the severity of SIRS might contribute to the difference in MPS response between IPHP and CABG. In fact, all our patients with gastrointestinal cancer, in whom IPHP was performed, showed severe lung injury caused by SIRS compared with those undergoing CABG studied by Chaney et al. (2). In their study, 58 of 60 (97%) patients were tracheally extubated within 24 h of arrival in the intensive care unit, compared with only 2 of 17 (12%) patients in our study within the same period. Gott et al. (5) indicated that “ventilatory support for more than 48 h” is associated with high pulmonary morbidity after cardiopulmonary bypass. The time of extubation is determined clinically, based on several factors, such as lung function, level of consciousness, and cardiac function. In our study, intubation was prolonged in our MPS-treated and untreated patients compared with the other study (2). Measurements of lung function were performed at different times in the two studies. We examined lung injury scores between 1 and 6 postoperative days, whereas Chaney et al. (2) measured alveolar-arterial gradient, dynamic pulmonary compliance, static lung compliance, shunt, and dead space at 10 min after intubation to 60 min after arrival in the intensive care unit. We did not analyze the lung injury score during operation or at the early postoperative period. The dose of MPS used in the two studies was somewhat different. We used a dose of 50 mg/kg MPS compared with 60 mg/kg in the other study (2). This difference, though small, might produce a different response. The correct dose of MPS to prevent lung injury could not be determined at the present stage. Further evidence for lung injury in our patients is demonstrated in preliminary studies showing recruitment of leukocytes into the lung. However, the discrepancy in the response to MPS between patients undergoing CABG (3) and those with IPHP (1) must not be ignored, and further work is needed. Megumi Sumida MD Miwako Kawamata MD
Read full abstract