Lumbar Artery Perforator Research Articles

Does it Always have to be the Abdomen? Alternative Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

[English] Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle (ms-TRAM) flaps remain the gold standard for autologous reconstruction in post-mastectomy patients, although many women may not be candidates for abdominally based free tissue transfer. In this scenario, there are several other donor site options based from the thigh (transverse and diagonal upper gracilis flaps, profunda artery perforator flap, lateral thigh flap), trunk (lumbar artery perforator flap), and buttock (superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps). This article will provide insight into the history, relevant anatomy, surgical technique and novel applications (neurotization) for alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps: A Systematic Review of Free Tissue Transfers and Anatomical Characteristics.

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap has gained popularity as a versatile flap in reconstructive surgery; however, few studies have analyzed salient characteristics of this flap. We set out to provide a comprehensive appraisal of free tissue transfers of LAP flaps with specific attention to anatomic features and clinical outcomes. Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we identified clinical, radiographic, and cadaveric studies of LAP flaps and assessed outcomes, complications, and anatomic parameters, such as pedicle length, diameter, location, and course. A total of 254 articles were initially reviewed, of which 18 met the final inclusion criteria. Ten studies were primarily concerned with anatomic characteristics, and most clinical studies related to breast reconstruction. The operative durations varied between 4.8 and 9.2 hours. Partial and total flap losses were estimated at 2.6% and 7.6%, respectively. Acute revision rates ranged from 16% to 24% related to hematoma, arterial thrombus, and venous thrombus. Donor-site seromas were frequently encountered in breast reconstruction with an incidence of 17% to 78%. The LAP flap has demonstrated favorable outcomes in various reconstructive scenarios. The caudal perforators generally offer more pedicle length, greater pedicle diameter, and septocutaneous course and may be better suited for flap design. For breast reconstruction, the LAP flap is a useful alternative to abdominal-based flaps, and special attention should be given to optimizing pedicle length using interposition grafts and methods that minimize seroma formation at the donor site.

Harvesting Composite Arterial and Vein Grafts from Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery and Vein: A Safe Five-Step Method of Preparation.

As the use of stacked flaps and options for autologous breast reconstruction increase, the level of complexity in autologous breast reconstruction has risen. Frequently, these reconstruction types present technical challenges such as vessel mismatches and short pedicle length. In this study, the authors introduce their five steps of harvesting composite deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and deep inferior epigastric vein (DIEV) grafts to overcome such challenges. The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction using DIEA/DIEV grafts from 2012 to 2020. The grafts were harvested using the five steps, as follows: step 1, a transverse, paramedian skin incision was made at the level of suprapubic crease; step 2, an oblique fasciotomy was made on the lateral rectus border; step 3, DIEA/DIEV vessels were identified and exposed past the confluence of two venae comitantes; step 4, DIEA/DIEV grafts were harvested while sparing motor nerves; and step 5, fascial closure was performed. A total of 40 DIEA/DIEV grafts were used in 25 patients (lumbar artery perforator flaps, n = 25; lateral thigh flaps, n = 1; superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps, n = 12; and flap salvage, n = 2) for breast reconstruction. The average time of harvest was 28 minutes, and there were two flap losses. In the authors' experience, DIEA/DIEV grafts can be safely harvested and used in flaps with short pedicles and small vessel size. Although the authors' experience was limited to breast reconstruction, the DIEA/DIEV grafts can be used for other types of reconstruction, especially for head and neck reconstruction.

Donor Site Morbidity after Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The lumbar artery perforator flap is a second-choice flap in autologous breast reconstruction whenever a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is not possible. Ideal candidates are pear-shaped women who do not have enough bulk on the abdomen or thighs. Patient-reported "satisfaction with breasts" is excellent but we were curious about the donor site morbidity. We performed a retrospective study of all lumbar flap breast reconstructions performed between 2010 and 2019. Patients were invited by e-mail and telephone to take part in a BREAST-Q survey. One hundred fifty-four flaps were performed in 110 patients. Sixty-three patients filled out the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The most frequently observed donor site complications are seroma (35.1%), dehiscence (8.4%), and hematoma (3.2%). Correction of the donor site scar was performed in 31.8% of patients, lipofilling of the donor flank in 5.2%, and liposuction of the contralateral flank in 18.3% of patients. Body mass index (BMI) was the only significant risk factor for donor site complications. Patient-reported "satisfaction with donor site appearance" was good but significantly lower for primary reconstructions compared with secondary and tertiary procedures. Flap weight significantly influences patient-reported "physical wellbeing of the donor site." Ninety-seven percent of patients would recommend the surgery to someone in a similar position and would do it all over. The lumbar artery perforator flap is a good alternative for breast reconstruction in selected patients. The donor site issues consist mainly of seromas, prolonged discomfort, and a scar that might be noticeable to others, but patient-reported satisfaction is very high.

Breast Reconstruction with the Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap for Metachronous Breast Cancer that Developed After Contralateral Breast Reconstruction with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap

Breast Reconstruction with the Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap for Metachronous Breast Cancer that Developed After Contralateral Breast Reconstruction with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap

Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.

The gold standard for autologous reconstruction in the post-mastectomy patient remains the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, although many women may not be candidates for abdominally based free tissue transfer. In this scenario, there are several other donor site options based from the thigh (transverse and diagonal upper gracilis flaps, profunda artery perforator flap, lateral thigh flap) and trunk (lumbar artery perforator flap, superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps). This study will review the history, relevant anatomy, surgical technique and outcomes for alternative flaps in autologous reconstruction. Additionally, preoperative imaging (CTA, MRA) and novel applications (stacking flaps, neurotization) in breast reconstructive microsurgery will be discussed.

Latissimus Dorsi-lumbar Artery Perforator Chimeric Flap with Intra-flap Crossover Anastomosis for Breast Reconstruction.

Latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps are widely used in breast reconstruction for their ease of use and minimal sacrifice of the donor site. Various strategies to increase flap volume have been suggested, but tissue volume is often insufficient for patients with little subcutaneous fat. While lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flaps are advantageous for thin patients because they allow for the addition of a large amount of fat, the vascular pedicle is short and vascular grafts are often required. To address these shortcomings, we propose here a LD-LAP chimeric flap. Specifically, the LD flap and LAP flap are elevated as one piece, and the 6th or 7th intercostal artery perforators and lumbar artery perforators, which are harvested together with the flap, are connected via intra-flap crossover anastomosis. Anastomosis for both intercostal artery perforators and lumbar artery perforators was performed about 1 cm away from the flap. Indocyanine green angiography performed after anastomosis showed improved blood flow to the LAP flap portion of the chimeric flap. The chimeric flap was used in 4 patients, with a mean flap volume of 460 ml (range, 300-690 ml) and mean duration of 439 minutes (393-484 minutes) for reconstruction surgery. During the mean follow-up period of 29.5 months (range, 16-40 months), sufficient tissue volume was obtained and none of the patients developed flap necrosis. Although our method requires vascular anastomosis and may extend operative time, it substantially increases LD flap volume and thus is likely to be an effective auxiliary component to breast reconstruction using LD flaps.

Intraoperative Microvascular Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: The Effects of Resident Training on Microsurgical Outcomes.

Academic medical centers with large volumes of autologous breast reconstruction afford residents hand-on educational experience in microsurgical techniques. We present our experience with autologous reconstruction (deep inferior epigastric perforators, profunda artery perforator, lumbar artery perforator, bipedicled, and stacked) where a supervised trainee completed the microvascular anastomosis. Retrospective chart review was performed on 413 flaps (190 patients) with microvascular anastomoses performed by postgraduate year (PGY)-4, PGY-5, PGY-6, PGY-7 (microsurgery fellow), or attending physician (AP). Comorbidities, intra-operative complications, revisions, operative time, ischemia time, return to operating room (OR), and flap losses were compared between training levels. Age and all comorbidities were equivalent between groups. Total operative time was highest for the AP group. Flap ischemia time, return to OR, and intraoperative complication were equivalent between groups. Percentage of flaps requiring at least one revision of the original anastomosis was significantly higher in PGY-4 and AP than in microsurgical fellows: PGY-4 (16%), PGY-5 (12%), PGY-6 (7%), PGY-7 (2.1%), and AP (16%), p = 0.041. Rates of flap loss were equivalent between groups, with overall flap loss between all groups 2/413 (<1%). With regard to flap loss and microsurgical vessel compromise, lower PGYs did not significantly worsen surgical outcomes for patients. AP had the longest total operative time, likely due to flap selection bias. PGY-4 and AP groups had higher rates of revision of original anastomosis compared with PGY-7, though ultimately these differences did not impact overall operative time, complication rate, or flap losses. Hands-on supervised microsurgical education appears to be both safe for patients, and also an effective way of building technical proficiency in plastic surgery residents.

Characteristics and outcomes of primary interposition vascular grafts in free flap breast reconstruction

There is paucity of data on primary interposition vascular grafts (IVG) use in microsurgery. Our study examines the characteristics, indications and outcomes of IVG in free flap breast reconstruction. All cases of breast reconstruction with free flaps between January 2013 and June 2018 were examined and cases with primary IVG were included. Data were collected on patient, flap and graft characteristics, indications and outcomes. A total of 76 IVG, specifically 65 vein grafts and 11 arterial grafts, were used for 49 (of 1547) flaps in 48 (of 1346) cases. Of these, 52 grafts were primarily used to lengthen the pedicle and aid flap inset and 24 grafts to augment venous flow; 49 grafts were harvested from the flap harvest site, 7 from the anastomosis recipient site and 20 from a separate site. Of the total, 16.7% (8/49 flaps) required salvage procedures - seven cases for venous congestion and one for ischaemic compromise - in comparison to 4.3% in cases without IVG (65/1498) (p<0.0001). Out of 49 IVG flaps, three (6.1%) failed in comparison to 1.7% (26/1498), where IVG flaps were not used (p<0.05). Two were transverse upper gracilis flaps with vessel calibre mismatch, and one lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap with past infected implant and failed deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP). We present the largest number of primary vascular grafts for free flap breast reconstruction in the literature. Primary IVG were used for at-risk flaps and had a success rate of 93.9%. This shows that IVG are a viable option to prevent venous congestion and lengthen the pedicle to aid inset and shaping; they are associated with higher complication rates bearing in mind the high-risk profile of the flaps these are used for.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap: Initial Experience with Simultaneous Bilateral Flaps for Breast Reconstruction.

Background:The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap is a useful alternative for patients who are not a candidate for breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Due to the positioning and concerns for prolonged ischemia time, bilateral breast reconstruction using LAP flaps is frequently performed in separate stages. We present our early experience performing simultaneous LAP flaps for bilateral breast reconstruction.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction with LAP flaps from December 2018 to September 2019. Demographics, flap data, and complication data were collected. Surgical sequence is presented.Results:A total of 30 simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction were performed with LAP. We experienced 1 flap loss in an undiagnosed hypercoagulable patient. The average patient age was 52.7 years, and the average body mass index was 26.9. Most patients had a surgically absent abdominal donor site (66.7%). The average operative time was 510 minutes and ischemia time was 90.3 minutes. All flaps were performed using a composite deep inferior epigastric arterial/venous graft.Conclusions:The LAP flap is an innovative, yet technically challenging, choice for autologous breast reconstruction. In our experience, simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction using LAP flaps can be safely performed in a single surgical stage; however, we recommend caution and a coordinated team approach. With simultaneously performing bilateral LAP flaps, there is an inherent prolonged ischemia time and, thus, an increased possibility for vasospasm and intraoperative revisions. This experience represents the first series of bilateral LAP flaps performed simultaneously.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap: Video Surgical Sequence.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap: Video Surgical Sequence.

Anatomical Study of Lumbar Artery Perforators in Male Subjects.

Introduction:The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap takes an important place in lumbosacral reconstruction and in breast reconstruction. Although studies on the location of lumbar perforators in women are common, no anatomical study has focused solely on male subjects. Our objective is to facilitate the surgical approach to the LAP flap in male subjects by precisely ascertaining the characteristics of the perforators.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of computed tomographic angiography images of a cohort of 30 patients evaluating the perforator position from the 4 lumbar arteries. In addition, 4 characteristics were studied: the length, the diameter, the path of the lumbar pedicle, and the thickness of tissues available for transfer.Results:One hundred five lumbar perforating vessels were analyzed on 60 posterior hemi-bodies, of which 86% came from the third and fourth lumbar arteries. The average location was situated 7.4 cm from the midline and in a 6-cm vertical wide area. The position of the lumbar perforator was independent of body mass index, abdominal circumference, and subject size. Our results, compared to previous studies, show no difference in this position between men and women.Conclusions:The LAP flap is useful for regional reconstructions and as a free flap for both women and men. We provide male-specific tracking values for the dissection of lumbar perforating vessels. Dominant perforators were found to be situated in a wide region of 4 cm × 6 cm in the lumbosacral region at 7.4 cm from the midline.

Use of the Propeller Lumbar Perforator Flap: A Series of 32 Cases.

Introduction:Lumbosacral substance defect is a challenge in reconstructive surgery because few coverage solutions are available in this anatomical region. Lumbar artery perforator flaps (LAPs) have been progressively developed and make it possible to solve very complex situations. We report a multicenter study on LAP performed to treat medium and low lumbar defects of various etiologies, to highlight the versatility of this flap as well as its robustness and reproducibility.Methods:Between 2012 and 2019, 32 LAPs were performed in the Toulouse and Strasbourg University hospitals. Etiologies of the defects encountered were diverse: chronic wounds following neurosurgery, oncodermatology, burn sequelae, and ballistic injury. All LAPs were used in their pedicled form, turned as propeller, and combined or not with other flaps.Results:We treated 31 patients with 32 LAPs. Average flap size was 14.3 cm (range 8–26) × 6.5 cm (range 5–10), and average arc of rotation was 131.3 degrees (range 70–180 degrees). Only 4 patients (12.9%) presented partial necrosis, but required no other covering procedure because secondary healing was sufficient. No coverage failure was reported. Average follow-up duration was 9.7 months (range 1–18).Conclusions:In the case of lumbosacral defects of various etiologies, propeller LAP is a reliable and efficient surgical procedure, offering the advantage of low donor site morbidity. The reconstructive surgeon should propose this technique to patients as a first-line option where surgery is indicated.

The Stacked Hemiabdominal Extended Perforator Flap for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Options for bilateral autologous breast reconstruction in thin women are limited. The aim of this study was to introduce a novel approach to increase abdominal flap volume with the stacked hemiabdominal extended perforator (SHAEP) flap. The authors describe the surgical technique and analyze their results. A retrospective study was conducted of all SHAEP flap breast reconstructions performed since February of 2014. Patient demographics, operative details, complications, and flap reexplorations were recorded. The bipedicled hemiabdominal flap was designed as a combination of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and a second, more lateral pedicle: the deep or superficial circumflex iliac perforator vessels, the superficial inferior epigastric artery, or a lumbar artery or intercostal perforator. A total of 90 SHAEP flap breast reconstructions were performed in 49 consecutive patients. Median operative time was 500 minutes (range, 405 to 797 minutes). Median hemiabdominal flap weight that was used for reconstruction was 598 g (range, 160 to 1389 g). No total flap losses were recorded. Recipient-site complications included partial flap loss (2.2 percent), hematoma (3.3 percent), fat necrosis (2.2 percent), and wound problems (4.4 percent). Minor donor-site complications occurred in five patients (10.2 percent). Most flaps were harvested on a combination of the DIEP and deep circumflex iliac artery vessels. This study demonstrated that the SHAEP flap is an excellent option for bilateral autologous breast reconstruction in women who require significant breast volume but have insufficient abdominal tissue for a bilateral DIEP flap. The bipedicled SHAEP flap allows for enhanced flap perfusion, increased volume, and abdominal contour improvement using a single abdominal donor site. Therapeutic, IV.

Abstract: Tripedicled Extended Abdominal Perforator Flap: An Alternative for Low Body Weight Patients Requiring Large Autologous Bilateral Breast Reconstruction

PURPOSE: Autologous breast reconstruction is challenging in thin patients who present for bilateral breast reconstruction. The Stacked Hemi-abdominal Extended Perforator (SHAEP) flap has been shown to increase the volume of useable abdominal tissue by adding a secondary, more lateral pedicle to the DIEP. We present a novel approach to obtaining even more volume by adding another pedicle to the SHAEP. This is the first description of the Tripedicled Extended Abdominal Perforator (TEAP) flap that allows for use of the entire circumference of the lower trunk by adding two additional pedicles to the DIEP. METHODS: To perform the TEAP flap, circumferential body lift principles are followed in order to recruit more lower truncal tissue. The flap consists in an extended DIEP flap with three pedicles. Preoperative MRA is performed in order to localize vessels. The main pedicle is the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator. Two additional perforators are used, the most common being the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) and the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA). The lumbar artery perforator (LAP), the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) and the intercostal perforators (IP) can also be used. The DIEP pedicle is harvested with additional branches, and length on the superior continuation. The two additional pedicles are anastomosed on a back table to these branches using couplers for arteries and veins. The DIE artery and vein are then anastomosed to the internal mammary artery and vein. We analyzed our case series evaluating patient demographics, surgical techniques, operative time and complications. RESULTS: Six TEAP flaps were performed by two surgeons, on three patients undergoing bilateral breast reconstruction. A total of 6 anastomosis with 3 pedicles were performed for each breast reconstruction. Three flaps included one DIEP pedicle, one SCIA and one SIEA. One flap included one DIEP, one SIEA and one DCIA pedicle. Another flap included one DIEP pedicle, one SIEA and one Intercostal perforator and the last one included one DIEP pedicle, one DCIA and one LAP. The additional pedicles allowed for an average of 45% more volume than the DIEP alone. All flaps were successful with a mean follow up of 154 days (60–225 days). CONCLUSION: The TEAP flap is a novel procedure that avails the microsurgeon of the use of the entire abdominal circumference of the thin patient for use in breast reconstruction, providing total autologous breast reconstruction with increased volume, enhanced flap perfusion, and muscle preservation.

Unilateral Bipedicled Subcostal and Lumbar Arteries Perforator Flap for Reconstruction of Large Myelomeningocele Defects

Background: A plenty of options have been described forreconstruction of large myelomeningocele defects. We reportedour experience of using bipedicled subcostal and lumbararteries perforator flap.Material and Methods: During a period of 31 months 23neonates with large myelomeningocele defects were reconstructedwith unilateral bipedicled subcostal and lumbar arteryperforator flaps. We did not report any total flap loss.Results: Only one flap suffered distal necrosis that becomeswell after debridement and re-suturing. All donor siteswere closed primary.Conclusion: Our study confirmed reliability of bipedicledsubcostal and lumbar artery perforator flaps in reconstructionof large myelomeningocle defects.

The Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Initial Experience with 100 Cases.

The lumbar artery perforator flap is an alternative flap in breast reconstruction for those patients who are not eligible for a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap. Shaping of this flap is easier compared with other flaps because of the quality of the lumbar fat and the gluteal extension. Between October of 2010 and June of 2017, a total of 100 lumbar artery perforator free flap breast reconstructions were performed in 72 patients. Patient demographics, indications, flap specifics, and complications were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-eight bilateral and 44 unilateral breast reconstructions with a lumbar artery perforator flap were performed. Mean patient age was 48 years, and the average body mass index was 23.11 kg/m. The authors report 43 preventive mastectomies for elevated cancer risk with subsequent immediate reconstruction, 34 secondary reconstructions, and 14 tertiary reconstructions. Mean operative time was 7 hours 4 minutes, including the mastectomy in primary cases. Mean flap weight was 499 g (range, 77 to 1216 g) and mean follow-up time was 30 months. The revision rate was 22 percent and nine flaps were lost. The lumbar artery perforator flap is a valuable alternative to the DIEAP flap in breast reconstructive surgery. It is an excellent flap for BRCA-positive patients who are typically young and have limited excess tissue at the conventional donor sites. Despite higher revision rates compared with the DIEAP flap, the lumbar flap is superior in mimicking the shape and feel of native breast tissue. Scarring at the donor site remains a sore point but can be easily treated and used to an advantage to contour the flanks. Therapeutic, IV.

Myelomeningocele closure by unilateral lumbar artery perforator flap: Experience with thirty-eight patients.

Repair of large soft tissue defects in meningomyelocele is difficult and its morbidity is high. By applying unilateral lumbar artery perforator transposition flap for closing these defects, we aimed to investigate effects on the repair procedure, duration of surgery and recovery period, with the rates of bleeding and morbidity. Our report was conducted in 38 patients between the years 2013 and 2017. All soft tissue defects were repaired with unilateral lumbar artery perforator flap (LAPF) in meningomyelocele. Fourteen patients were female and 24 patients were male. The youngest patient was a 5.5 month premature female baby and weighing 570 g. The oldest was weighing 3,700 g and at 1.5 months old. Mean flap size was 32 ± 29.4 cm2 (ranged: 4 × 3-8 × 7 cm2 ). The mean rotation angle was 126.7° (ranged: 90°-170°). Flap positions were separated as 9 (23%) thoracodorsal and 29 (77%) lumbosacral. None of the patients had flap necrosis, infection, or hematoma. The operation took 23 ± 5.3 minutes on average and bleeding was minimal as 16 cc. All patients were discharged within around 9 ± 2 days. The follow-up period of the patient ranged from 4 to 21 months. Flap survival was at the rate of 100%. There was no flap or postoperative complications. Final outcome for all patients were assessed as complete healing. All patients recovered fast with minimal blood lose, and satisfied the outcomes. As a result, unilateral lumbar perforator flap can be performed successfully in every center. This report suggests using LAPF for reconstruction of meningomyelocele by surgeons as a safe and reliable option, allowing surgeons strong results.

Reconstruction mammaire autologue par lambeau perforant lombaire

Even though DIEP-SIEA flaps or latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap are the most frequently used, a wide variety of flaps have been described for autologous breast reconstruction. Concerning the choice of donor-site, the aim is to prevent and to limit the morbidity. That is why the donor-site should be carefully chosen, according to the morphology of the patient. Lumbar artery perforator flap (LAP) is an option for breast reconstruction, but it is not well known and its use is limited. This study summarizes the authors' early experience with free LAP flap for breast reconstruction. Three patients underwent immediate or delayed autologous breast reconstruction using a LAP flap. No vascular by pass was required to lengthen the pedicle. No partial or complete flap necrosis has been reported. There was no surgical donor-site complication. Mean operative time was 7hours. LAP flap can be considered as a good option for autologous breast reconstruction, especially in patients with unfavorable abdominal donor-site, and impossibility to use a DIEP flap.

Radiological anatomy of the perforators of the gluteal region: The "radiosome" based anatomy.

The superior (SGA) and the inferior gluteal artery (IGA) perforator flaps are widely used in pressure-sore repair and in breast reconstruction. The aim was to exhaustively depict the topographical anatomy of the whole system of perforators in the buttock. Eighty lower-extremity computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of patients (20 males/20 females, mean age 61-years old, range 38-81) were considered. The source artery, location, type, and caliber of gluteal perforators were analyzed. The location of perforators was reproduced using a standardized two-dimensional grid on the coronal plane, centered onto defined bone landmarks. We defined "radiosome" the cutaneous vascular territory of a source artery inferred through the representation of its whole perforator system at the exit point through the deep fascia. A mean number of 25.6 ± 5.7 perforators in the gluteal region was observed, distributed as follows: 11.6 ± 4.8(45.2%) from SGA; 7.9 ± 4.5(30.8%) from IGA; 1.5 ± 0.8(5.8%) from fifth lumbar artery; 1.2 ± 0.8(4.7%) from internal pudendal artery; 1.2 ± 1(4.8%) from lateral circumflex femoral artery; 0.3 ± 0.7(1.2%) from circumflex iliac superficial artery. At least one large (internal diameter > 1 mm) SGA septocutaneous perforator was present in 77.5% of patients. The gluteal region is vascularized by perforators of multiple source arteries. Septocutaneous perforators of SGA and IGA were planned along a curve drawn from the posterior-superior border of the iliac crest to the greater trochanter. The lumbar artery perforators are clustered over the apex of the iliac crest; the internal pudendal artery perforators are clustered medially to the ischiatic tuberosity. Contributions can also come from the sacral and superficial circumflex iliac arteries.