Journal of Wound CareVol. 32, No. 3 CorrespondenceResponse to practice article, ‘Phantom pain as an adverse effect after maggot (Lucilia sericata) debridement therapy: a case study’Ronald Arlen ShermanRonald Arlen ShermanCorresponding author email: E-mail Address: [email protected]BioTherapeutics, Education and Research Foundation, USSearch for more papers by this authorRonald Arlen ShermanPublished Online:17 Mar 2023https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.3.193AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References 1 Lipiński P, Trzciński R, Dziki Ł, Mik M. Phantom pain as an adverse effect after maggot (Lucilia sericata) debridement therapy: a case study. J Wound Care 2020; 29(5):303–305. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2020.29.5.303 Link, Google Scholar2 Sherman RA. Maggot versus conservative debridement therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2002; 10(4):208–214. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10403.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Sherman RA, Wyle F, Vulpe M. Maggot therapy for treating pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury patients. J Spinal Cord Med 1995; 18(2):71–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.1995.11719382 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Sherman RA. Maggot therapy for treating diabetic foot ulcers unresponsive to conventional therapy. Diabetes Care 2003; 26(2):446–451. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2.446 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Sherman RA. Maggot therapy for foot and leg wounds. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2002; 1(2):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734602001002009 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Prete PE. Growth effects of Phaenicia sericata larval extracts on fibroblasts: mechanism for wound healing by maggot therapy. Life Sci 1997; 60(8):505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(96)00688-1 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Wollina U, Liebold K, Schmidt WD et al.. Biosurgery supports granulation and debridement in chronic wounds – clinical data and remittance spectroscopy measurement. Int J Dermatol 2002; 41(10):635–639. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01354.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Horobin AJ, Shakesheff KM, Woodrow S et al.. Maggots and wound healing: an investigation of the effects of secretions from Lucilia sericata larvae upon interactions between human dermal fibroblasts and extracellular matrix components. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148(5):923–933. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05314.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Horobin AJ, Shakesheff KM, Pritchard DI. Maggots and wound healing: an investigation of the effects of secretions from Lucilia sericata larvae upon the migration of human dermal fibroblasts over a fibronectin-coated surface. Wound Repair Regen 2005; 13(4):422–433 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130410.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Smith AG, Powis RA, Pritchard DI, Britland ST. Greenbottle (Lucilia sericata) larval secretions delivered from a prototype hydrogel wound dressing accelerate the closure of model wounds. Biotechnol Prog 2006;22(6):1690–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/bp0601600 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Pecivova J, Macickova T, Takac P et al.. Effect of the extract from salivary glands of Lucilia sericata on human neutrophils. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2008; 29(5):794–797 Medline, Google Scholar12 van der Plas MJ, Baldry M, van Dissel JT et al.. Maggot secretions suppress pro-inflammatory responses of human monocytes through elevation of cyclic AMP. Diabetologia 2009; 52(9):1962–1970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1432-6 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 van der Plas MJ, van Dissel JT, Nibbering PH. Maggot secretions skew monocyte-macrophage differentiation away from a pro-inflammatory to a pro-angiogenic type. PLoS One 2009; 4(11):e8071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008071 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Zhang Z, Wang S, Diao Y et al.. Fatty acid extracts from Lucilia sericata larvae promote murine cutaneous wound healing by angiogenic activity. Lipids Health Dis 2010; 9(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-24 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Zhang Z, Wang S, Tian X et al.. A new effective scaffold to facilitate peripheral nerve regeneration: Chitosan tube coated with maggot homogenate product. Med Hypotheses 2010; 74(1):12–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.053 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Bexfield A, Bond AE, Morgan C et al.. Amino acid derivatives from Lucilia sericata excretions/secretions may contribute to the beneficial effects of maggot therapy via increased angiogenesis. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162(3):554–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09530.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Cazander G, Schreurs MW, Renwarin L et al.. Maggot excretions affect the human complement system. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20(6):879–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00850.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 2 March 2023Volume 32Issue 3ISSN (print): 0969-0700ISSN (online): 2052-2916 Metrics History Published online 17 March 2023 Published in print 2 March 2023 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download